Rubio To Meet With Russia's Lavrov, ASEAN Allies In Malaysia
Rubio's first visit to Asia as secretary of state comes after US President Donald Trump ramped up his trade war this week and Russia pummelled Ukraine with its largest missile and drone attack in three years of war.
The top US diplomat is to meet Sergei Lavrov Thursday on the sidelines of a meeting of foreign ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Kuala Lumpur.
Trump on Tuesday accused his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin of talking "bullshit" about Ukraine, saying that the United States would send Kyiv more weapons to defend itself.
Trump's expletive reflected his growing frustration with the Kremlin leader over the grinding war that Moscow launched in early 2022.
US officials said ahead of Rubio's trip that Washington was "prioritising" its commitment to East Asia and Southeast Asia.
But Trump has also threatened more than 20 countries, many in Asia, with punitive duties ranging from 20 to 50 percent, and announced a 50 percent toll on copper imports and a possible 200 percent tariff on pharmaceuticals.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim warned Asia's top diplomats on Wednesday of a new era when tariffs are among the "sharpened instruments of geopolitical rivalry."
"This is no passing storm, it is a new weather of our time," Ibrahim said as the meeting of the 10-nation bloc got underway.
Trump said Monday that duties he had suspended in April would snap back -- even more steeply -- on August 1.
Among those targeted were top trade partners Japan and South Korea, which each face 25 percent tariffs.
Indonesia, Laos, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei and Myanmar -- all members of ASEAN -- face duties ranging from 20 percent to 40 percent if they do not strike deals with Washington by Trump's new deadline.
The levels were not too far from those originally threatened in April, although some rates were notably lower this time.
Vietnam, which is also an ASEAN member, is one of only two countries to have reached a tentative agreement with Trump.
Rubio will attend a post-ministerial conference and a meeting by East Asian foreign ministers -- which will also see Japan, South Korea and China participating.
He will also meet with Ibrahim and hold trilateral talks with the Philippines and Japan.
A senior US official said the issue of tariffs was expected to be raised at the talks in Kuala Lumpur, and that Rubio would likely tell ASEAN that the United States wants to "rebalance" its trade relationships.
Rubio's Chinese counterpart Wang Yi is also visiting Malaysia.
Chinese actions in the Asia-Pacific region and its disputed waterways are in focus at the gathering.
Beijing claims almost the entire South China Sea, ignoring rival claims of the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei, and an international ruling that its assertion has no legal basis.
China and the Philippines -- which has a defence treaty with the United States -- have engaged in years of confrontations in the waters.
Chinese and Japanese patrol vessels in the East China Sea also routinely face off around disputed islands.
The tensions have driven the Philippines and Japan to deepen ties with the United States.
In January, Rubio said the United States under Trump remained committed to the Philippines' defence.
Last month, the Philippines, United States and Japan held joint coast guard exercises for the second time as a show of unity against Chinese activity in hotly contested waters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
30 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Pushes MAGA Theory on Epstein Files But It Backfires: 'Then What's Stopping You From Releasing Everything?'
President Donald Trump tried pushing a popular MAGA theory as to why the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been released yet, only for it to backfire online. President Donald Trump tried spinning a popular MAGA theory to help defend why the files on Jeffrey Epstein have not been released yet, only for it to backfire online. Trump took to Truth Social Thursday morning to rally his supporters against Democrats, seemingly suggesting that if there was anything on him in the Epstein files then they would have released the files already. "If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!" the president declared. Popular conspiracy theories surrounding the Epstein case have caused some people to believe that the files in Epstein's case have not been released to the public because they implicate powerful people and public figures. However, following Trump's message, users were quick to point out that if he was not named in the files then they believed the president should have no problem with releasing them to the public. Well then, WHAT'S STOPPING YOU FROM RELEASING EVERYTHING, THEN??? — Steve Rosenberg (@stevemrosenbrg) July 18, 2025 "WHAT'S STOPPING YOU FROM RELEASING EVERYTHING, THEN???" one user angrily wrote on X. Another added, "If there's nothing then release the files." "If he were being honest he wouldn't constantly be freaking out about it. He has something to hide whether it just makes him look bad or makes him bad," another user wrote. The president's assertion was also met with disapproval from MAGA supporters, with one user writing, "Then show us. Keep in mind we don't follow you, we follow MAGA." Then show us. Keep in mind we don't follow you, we follow MAGA. — Brenda (@Brendakenzie) July 18, 2025 Others speculated that if the files did not name Trump himself, then there might be other people who do not want the files made public. "If they had nothing on you, why don't you release all the files? Maybe because there's something there that will show the true colors of both Republicans and Democrats?" one person suggested. If they had nothing on you, why don't you release all the files? Maybe because there's something there that will show the true colours of both Republicans and Democrats? — Backy (@pG6Z5GbT_U2rvL) July 18, 2025 Meanwhile, others took issue with the president's behavior towards the situation as a whole. During Trump's 2024 campaign he suggested that he would be open to investigations into the Epstein files. But since backlash to the Department of Justice and FBI's memo declaring that Epstein had no client list, Trump has since called the relentless pursuit of the files a "hoax" by Democrats. Can he try to make it make sense. First they were real and ready for reveal, next they were nonexistent, then they were real but fabricated by democrats, and now they're not real again? If he wants MAGA to calm down, he should've just said they were democrats made — Soap_Eater (@Soap_Eater71) July 18, 2025 "Can he try to make it make sense... If he wants MAGA to calm down, he should've just said they were Democrats made," one user replied. Trump's Thursday morning post came a day after the Wall Street Journal published a report alleging that Trump sent Epstein a note for his 50th birthday, which included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature near her private region. The president repeatedly denied the report's claims, and Vice President JD Vance has also come to Trump's defense, calling the report "complete and utter bulls***." Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans have continued to push for the release of the files, with New York Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Daniel Goldman calling for more photos and videos to be shared with the public. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Democratic Lawmaker Demands 'the Evidence About Trump' Following Pam Bondi's Plans to Release of Epstein Case Transcripts
A Democratic lawmaker is demanding more evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's case be released, which he believes could have something to do with President Donald Trump. Latin Times A Democratic lawmaker is demanding more evidence in the case of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein be released, which he believes could include President Donald Trump, following the Trump administration's intent to release grand jury testimony. New York Rep. Daniel Goldman urged Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to release physical evidence such as photos and videos, insisting that the testimony will not be enough. "Nice try @AGPamBondi. What about videos, photographs and other recordings? What about FBI 302's (witness interviews)? What about texts and emails?" Goldman wrote . "That's where the evidence about Trump and others will be. Grand jury testimony will only relate to Epstein and Maxwell." Nice try @ about videos, photographs and other recordings?What about FBI 302's (witness interviews)?What about texts and emails?That's where the evidence about Trump and others will be. Grand jury testimony will only relate to Epstein and Maxwell. — Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) July 18, 2025 Goldman's statement comes after President Donald Trump called for Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent grand jury testimony, subject to court approval" in a Truth Social post Thursday night. In turn, Bondi responded to the president's post on X , saying the DOJ is "ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts." Trump and Bondi's statements came after the Wall Street Journal published a report alleging that Trump wrote a note for Epstein's 50th birthday that included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature where the woman's pubic hair would have been. Trump has repeatedly denied the report's claims, calling it "fake" in another post to Truth Social. When the publication asked for comment on the report, Trump reportedly threatened to sue them "just like I sued everyone else." Grand jury testimonies are typically kept from public view out of protection for victims and accusers as the transcripts may include their statements, CNN reported. It will be up to a judge to determine how much — if any — of the testimonies can be released. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
New EU sanctions on Russia 'unprecedented' – DW – 07/18/2025
The EU will impose a moving price cap on Russian oil, among other measures, in a bid to shrink Russia's economy. The bloc hopes the latest sanctions package will urge Russia toward a ceasefire with Ukraine. The European Union has adopted a new set of sanctions against Russia in the hopes of restricting its ability to wage war in Ukraine. The EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the bloc was "striking at the heart of Russia's war machine," and will keep up the pressure on Russia until a ceasefire is agreed. The EU sanctioned Russia's energy, banking and military sectors in a slew of measures that France's top diplomat hailed as "unprecedented." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The EU has set a dynamic price cap on Russian oil — at 15% below the average market value — from $60 [€51.49] to $47.6 [€40.85]. The bloc has banned all future transactions via both Nord Stream pipelines and introduced an import ban on refined petroleum products made from Russian crude oil and processed in a third country. It has banned 22 more Russian banks and more than a hundred non-EU shipping vessels that comprise a part of Russia's so-called shadow fleet, tankers that operate outside of standard international maritime regulations. More than two dozen entities have been subjected to tighter export restrictions over supplying Russia with dual-use technologies that serve civilian but also military purposes. At least seven of these are Chinese, three are from Hong Kong and four based in Turkey. The sanctions have effectively "killed" the Nord Stream pipelines, said Ben McWilliams, an affiliate fellow in the field of energy and climate policy with the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank. Nord Stream pipelines run from Russia to Germany via the Baltic Sea. McWilliams said that a series of underwater explosions had damaged the pipelines back in September 2022 and yet there were discussions around the possibility of reviving them in Germany. These sanctions make that much harder, he added. "This is a very important clause. Anybody could have imported [oil] from Nord Stream, there was nothing to stop them," he told DW. "But now there is a ban, which means in any future scenario, whatever the politics of the day looks like, a decision to lift the ban would have to be taken at the Union level," with all member states in agreement. "The ban on imports of petroleum products from third countries if refined from Russian oil was also quite significant," he added. In alignment with this measure, the EU has sanctioned one of India's main refineries of Russian oil. "For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India," the EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas posted. Jakob Kirkegaard, Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute For International Economics [PIIE], said he suspected Russia was selling more than half of its oil exports via the shadow fleet. As Russia faces a lower price cap for its oil, he said, it may now be encouraged to sell more via the shadow fleet which allows it to escape the price cap and is harder to chase on the high seas. "Unless Baltic sea countries say we won't accept any such ship crossing through our waters, and just confiscate them," Kirkegaard said, enforcement of sanctions remains weak. But seizing ships has its own issues and could be seen as a "violation of freedom of navigation in international waters and could set a precedent," that could be misused by other countries. "Then of course there is the fear that Russia might retaliate militarily." Moreover, experts argued that banning one Indian oil refinery exporting refined petroleum products was insufficient. "The way India has been buying Russian fuel at cheaper prices I would assume many Indian refineries are refining Russian oil and exporting it to the EU," added Kirkegaard. They said once these refined petroleum products, such as diesel, arrive from India to Europe, it was impossible to trace their origin. In the wake of ongoing talks on an EU-India free Trade Agreement [FTA], Kirkegaard added, the EU would have taken New Delhi into confidence before imposing the sanction. "I don't think it is going to be such a big deal, frankly. It will probably annoy the Indians. But will it lead to some big crisis between India and the EU? I would be skeptical." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video All eyes in the EU are now on Washington. They are hoping President Trump delivers on his threat of imposing a 100% tariff on any country that is trading with Russia if there is no peace deal in 50 days, Trump's new timeline. "The EU paved the way. Now it's time for perfect storm — the US Senate to vote on that Russia sanctions bill imposing crushing burdens on Russian economy and those fueling Russia's war of aggression," Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys posted on X. No one believes thatEuropean sanctionsare enough to change Russian President Putin's war calculus and end Russian aggression in Ukraine. But they can limit Russia's ability to inflict war on others over time. "What these sanctions essentially amount to, is weakening Russia economically over the longer run," he added. "Russia is the main military threat to the EU, and that's what the EU needs, a weaker Russia."
