Oil prices gain as US inventory withdrawals point to strong demand
Brent crude futures were up 13 cents, or 0.19%, to $66.97 a barrel at 0055 GMT, after gaining 1.6% in the previous session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures rose 15 cents, or 0.24%, to $62.86, after climbing 1.4% on Wednesday.
U.S. crude inventories fell by 6 million barrels last week to 420.7 million barrels, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday, versus analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.8 million-barrel draw.
Gasoline stocks dropped by 2.7 million barrels, versus expectations for a 915,000-barrel draw, the EIA said, indicating steady driving demand during the summer travel season. That was also seen in a jump in the four-week average for jet fuel consumption to its highest since 2019.
"Crude oil prices rebounded as signs of strong demand in the U.S. boosted sentiment," Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ, said in a note on Thursday.
Still, Hynes cautioned that some "bearish sentiment remains evident as traders continue to monitor negotiations to end Russia's war against Ukraine."
Russia said on Wednesday attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without Moscow's participation were a "road to nowhere," as U.S. and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine.
The drawn-out efforts to secure peace in Ukraine mean that Western sanctions on Russian oil supply continue to remain in place. The possibility of further U.S. sanctions and tariffs on Russian oil buyers also hang over the market.
Russia, however, remains adamant it will keep providing crude to willing buyers, with Russian diplomats in India saying on Wednesday the country expects to continue supplying oil to India despite warnings from the U.S.
U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an additional tariff of 25% on Indian goods from August 27 because of their Russian crude purchases. The European Union has also sanctioned Indian private refiner Nayara Energy, which is backed by Russian oil company Rosneft.
Indian refiners initially backed off their Russian buying but company officials at state-run Indian Oil and Bharat Petroleum have bought Russian oil for September and October delivery, resuming purchases after discounts widened. (Reporting by Katya Golubkova in Tokyo; Editing by Christian Schmollinger)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Trump ally Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as US attorney, judge says
, US President Donald Trump 's choice to be the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey, was blocked from handling cases by a district court judge who said her appointment was invalid. The ruling on Thursday rejected Mr Trump's decision to keep Ms Habba as acting US attorney when her interim term expired, even though the state's federal judges chose her deputy to succeed her. Mr Trump instead fired the deputy, Desiree Grace, and used an unusual set of legal manoeuvres to keep Ms Habba, Bloomberg reported. US District Judge Matthew Brann ruled that the Trump administration circumvented existing laws to appoint Ms Habba, without confirmation from the Senate in accordance with federal law. The judge embraced some arguments by criminal defendants who claimed she does not deserve the powerful post. They sought to block the charges against them, arguing that Ms Habba did not have the authority to prosecute the case after her 120-day term as interim US attorney expired in July. 'Faced with the question of whether Ms Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not,' Mr Brann said. The decision disqualifies Ms Habba from supervising or engaging in prosecution of criminal defendants who challenged the appointment. The ruling also applies to any prosecutor working under her direction. Mr Brann said he would stay the effect of his decision pending the resolution of any appeal. Ms Habba made headlines when Mr Trump named her US attorney for New Jersey in March. She said the state could 'turn red', a rare, overt political expression from a prosecutor, and said she planned to investigate the state's Democratic Governor and Attorney General, AP reported. She then brought a trespassing charge, which was eventually dropped, against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka after he visited a federal immigration detention centre. Ms Habba later charged Democratic Representative LaMonica McIver with assault after the same incident, in a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress other than for corruption. She denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. Problems over Ms Habba's tenure emerged in late July when the four-month temporary appointment was coming to a close and it became clear that she would not get support from state senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats, effectively ending her chances of Senate approval. Ms Habba is of Iraqi descent. She was part of Habba Madaio & Associates. She represented Mr Trump in a series of legal challenges, including in a defamation lawsuit from a former Apprentice contestant who accused him of sexual assault.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Trump to increase scrutiny of 55 million visa holders in search for breaches
The administration of President Donald Trump is increasing its efforts to scrutinise and possibly deport US visa holders who it considers to be in violation of immigration rules. What the Trump White House determines to be a breach, however, is likely to cause a lot of concern and probably legal action. The US State Department says it will review the records of about 55 million foreigners holding US visas, a report from AP said. It will look closely for any signs of ineligibility, such as overstaying, criminal activity, threats to public safety, engaging in any form of terrorist activity, or providing support to a terrorist organisation. Since taking office for his second term in January, Mr Trump has pushed to arrest and deport those holding student visas who have taken part in demonstrations supporting the rights of Palestinians amid the Israel-Gaza war. Many of those moves have come under legal scrutiny, ending in several losses for the Trump administration. Last week, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended a decision to suspend visitor visas for Gazans – even those seeking medical treatment after being injured in Israel's war on the enclave – which was made after inquiries from members of Congress. Mr Rubio told CBS on Sunday that the State Department was warned by politicians that some of the non-government organisations assisting Gazans with the visas had connections to Hamas. The recent move from the State Department is a significant escalation from the stance at Mr Trump's 2024 campaign rallies. There have also been reports that the State Department will be using AI to potentially revoke visas, adding to concern that such a vast undertaking could overlook nuance and context that many legal experts consider to be necessary.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
New York appeals court throws out $464m civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump
A US court on Thursday threw out a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum "excessive" but upholding the judgment against him. Five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court said the fine "violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution", which prohibits excessive or cruel punishments and penalties. The panel was sharply divided, issuing 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Mr Trump in February last year at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions that the Republican slammed as "lawfare". Mr Trump celebrated the Thursday decision, calling the case a "political witch hunt". "A great win for America," he wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. In a subsequent post, he wrote: "This was a Case of Election Interference by the City and State trying to show, illegally, that I did things that were wrong when, in fact, everything I did was absolutely correct and, even, perfect." When Mr Engoron originally ruled against Mr Trump, he ordered the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Mr Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favourable bank loans or insurance terms. Mr Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Mr Trump's appeal, and the President was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. Alongside the financial hit to Mr Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the President repeatedly referred to as a "corporate death penalty". State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, can now appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' ... but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business," one of the judges, appointed by a Republican governor to the bench, wrote. "The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Mr Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On January 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush-money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Mr Trump sexually abused writer E Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Mr Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. The President is also appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Ms Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.
