Trump-Harvard fight shifts focus to trade schools
The representative from Oklahoma has co-sponsored legislation to broaden the use of tax-advantaged 529 savings accounts for technical and vocational programs. Hern says he himself benefited from vocational training during high school, which paved the way for his engineering degree.
As for throwing taxpayer money at trade schools, he advises caution.
Trump has 'Harvard Derangement Syndrome,' professor says
'We've got to make sure that these outcomes are people that are getting great jobs and not just people who are standing up businesses to get funding,' Hern told 'The Hill' Thursday.
Trade schools offer training in high-demand fields such as HVAC, construction, electrical engineering and plumbing and are seen as an alternative for students who may not have the means or interest to pursue a four-year degree.
Hern indicated he doesn't have a problem with higher education but said many students don't know what their professional path will be.
'Very few kids — and I say kids — that come out of high school know what they're going to do in four years. And that's why we see runaway student debt, only second to mortgages in America,' he said.
His advice: 'Learn a skill, go to Harvard; learn a skill, go to the Naval Academy. Learn a skill and go somewhere. But learn how to make sure you can take care of yourself.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Economists Flip To Trump's Side After Jobs Data–And Jerome Powell Is Now In Trouble
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Just two days after Fed Chair Jerome Powell refused to pre-commit to a September rate cut, the U.S. labor market did it for him. SPY ETF breaks past support. See real-time price here. A weak July jobs report and the biggest downward 2-month revisions since 2020 have economists—and markets—racing to President Donald Trump's side on calling for lower interest rates. Labor Data Breaks Down And Manufacturing Is Not Helping Either The U.S. economy added just 73,000 jobs in July, far below the 110,000 expected. But the real shock came from the Bureau of Labor Statistics revising May and June non-farm payrolls down by a combined 258,000—erasing what were thought to be solid job gains. This is the largest two-month revision since the COVID-19 shock in 2020. Trending: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— Private-sector job growth was narrowly concentrated, driven largely by healthcare, while government payrolls fell by 10,000. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.2%, reversing June's drop. Wages, however, remained hot. Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% month-over-month and 3.9% year-over-year, both beating forecasts. Still, signs of underlying weakness in the labor force—especially due to declining immigration—are mounting. Meanwhile, U.S. manufacturing continues to struggle, signaling ongoing headwinds from tariff-driven uncertainty. The ISM Manufacturing PMI decreased to 48 in July 2025, down from 49 in June and below the expected level of 49.5. It marked the fifth straight month of contraction and the lowest reading since October 2024. Wall Street Moves To The Dovish Side Markets are now fully pricing in two rate cuts by December, with the chance of a September 25-basis-point cut surging to 76% Friday, more than double Thursday's odds. Oxford Economics' Nancy Vanden Houten said the weak July report and historic revisions "raise the odds of a Fed rate cut in September." She warned that slower labor force growth, especially among foreign-born workers, may mask deeper structural issues."The foreign-born labor force has shrunk by 1.2 million in just six months," she said, linking the decline to the Trump administration's immigration policies. "Powell's take on September not being a live meeting might be under revision as we speak," said BOK Financial's analyst Steve Wyett, citing the sharp downward revisions. David Russell, analyst at TradeStation, indicated that "huge negative revisions undermine beliefs about the strength of the labor market," but warned that "there are still signs of stagflation, with hourly earnings up more than expected." Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group, weighed in. "Powell is going to regret holding rates steady this week. September is a lock for a rate cut—and it might even be 50 basis points." Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank, struck a more cautious tone. He said the weak July jobs report adds pressure on the Fed to cut rates later this year, but warned the decision "isn't a slam dunk." Adams said the Fed will closely watch the August jobs report and inflation data before making its next move. Yields on two-year Treasury bonds, which are highly sensitive to interest-rate expectations, tumbled 22 basis points to 3.75%, eyeing the largest intraday drop since August 2024. The U.S. dollar index – as closely tracked by the Invesco DB USD Index Bullish Fund ETF (NYSE:UUP) – fell 1.2% by 10:30 a.m. in New York, trimming weekly gains. Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. Arrived Home's Private Credit Fund's has historically paid an annualized dividend yield of 8.1%*, which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. Photo: Shutterstock This article Economists Flip To Trump's Side After Jobs Data–And Jerome Powell Is Now In Trouble originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
4 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Cincinnati officials discuss city crime and widespread response to video of violent fight
Days after a brawl that injured six people in Cincinnati, the mayor and other city leaders said Friday they would beef up law enforcement patrols but criticized how the much-shared video of the fight had portrayed the city in what they see as an unfair and cynical light. 'Let me be clear, there is no place for violent crime in Cincinnati, whether it's a fight or gun violence,' Mayor Aftab Pureval said. 'We will pursue those responsible and we will hold them accountable no matter who they are.' Video of the fight quickly went viral, and conservatives leaders and influencers seized on the brawl to point out what they see as lawless urban areas in America. Those voices included Vice President JD Vance, Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and the vice president's half brother, Cory Bowman, who is running to be mayor of Cincinnati. A video of the fight shows a crowd milling about before several people start throwing punches. One man falls to the ground and is repeatedly punched and kicked by bystanders. Another woman is punched in the face and falls to the ground, lying motionless before another woman helps her. She can be seeing bleeding from the mouth. The mayor acknowledged on Friday the perception remained that the city was dangerous, but he pointed out that data showed the violent crime was declining in the city. Pureval also said 'there's a concerning increase in burglaries and breaking and entering, and shootings in some specific areas' without providing the data. 'Currently too many Cincinnatians don't feel safe,' he said. 'All of us, especially me, are clear-eyed and working urgently to fix that.' Pureval said he was working with Republican Gov. Mike DeWine to deploy state highway patrol to work highways into the city, which should free up more police officers. He also said police units like SWAT and the Civil Disturbance Response Team will expand their reach in the city. Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge said five men and one woman 'were subjected to unimaginable physical violence' in the brawl. She didn't identify them. She also said six people have been charged with assault and rioting for playing a role in the brawl, three of whom are in custody. 'This remains an open investigation, and I want to assure you, we will not stop until justice is finally served,' she told reporters, adding that they plan to release footage of the brawl, including body camera footage next week. But several speakers, including a pastor and a council member, talked about how the fight had been racialized and several blamed conservative Republicans for fueling that narrative. 'We would not be here and this will not be national news if this was a group of Black people that jumped on other Black people,' Pastor Damon Lynch, III told reporters. 'Obviously it's national news because it's been racialized.' Lynch said critics were focused on the Black participants but haven't mentioned a white man who, he says, could be seen in a video of the brawl slapping a Black man during the fight. 'Nobody's asking why didn't he just walk away?" Lynch said. Council Member Scotty Johnson also criticized the media for playing the brawl on a loop all week. 'What role do you play in quoting misdirected national leaders talking about a city that is on the right track, but they are doing everything they can to try take us off that track,' Johnson said. Toward the end of the press conference, a reporter asked Pureval how he would deal with the racial tensions in the city that have been exacerbated by this brawl. 'It's overt racial tensions that have been claimed by irresponsible leaders, who have unfortunately cynically tried to take advantage of this awful fight and try and divide us,' he said, noting that Cincinnati 'has a long history of being, on the on the very front foot of racial justice' including as a stop on the Underground Railroad.
New York Times
5 minutes ago
- New York Times
Appeals Court Allows Trump Order That Ends Union Protections for Federal Workers
A federal appeals court on Friday allowed President Trump to move forward with an order instructing a broad swath of government agencies to end collective bargaining with federal unions. The ruling authorizes a component of Mr. Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal work force to move forward, for now, while the case plays out in court. It is unclear what immediate effect the ruling will have: The appeals court noted that the affected agencies had been directed to refrain from ending any collective bargaining agreement until 'litigation has concluded,' but also noted that Mr. Trump was now free to follow through with the order at his discretion. Mr. Trump had framed his order stripping workers of labor protections as critical to protect national security. But the plaintiffs — a group of affected unions representing over a million federal workers — argued in a lawsuit that the order was a form of retaliation against those unions that have participated in a barrage of lawsuits opposing Mr. Trump's policies. The unions pointed to statements from the White House justifying the order that said 'certain federal unions have declared war on President Trump's agenda' and that the president 'will not tolerate mass obstruction that jeopardizes his ability to manage agencies with vital national security missions.' But a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a famously liberal jurisdiction, ruled in Mr. Trump's favor, writing that 'the government has shown that the president would have taken the same action even in the absence' of the union lawsuits. Even if some of the White House's statements 'reflect a degree of retaliatory animus,' they wrote, those statements, taken as a whole, also demonstrate 'the president's focus on national security.' The unions had also argued that the order broadly targeted agencies across the government, some of which had no obvious national security portfolio — including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Environmental Protection Agency — using national security as a pretext to strip the unions of their power. The panel sidestepped that claim, writing in the 15-page ruling that 'we question whether we can take up such arguments, which invite us to assess whether the president's stated reasons for exercising national security authority — clearly conferred to him by statute — were pretextual.' The order, they continued, 'conveys the president's determination that the excluded agencies have primary functions implicating national security.'
