Russia to face new US sanctions unless ends Ukraine war in 10 days: Trump - War in Ukraine
"Ten days from today," Trump told reporters when asked what the exact deadline would be.
Trump, flying back from Britain to Washington, had already said on Monday that he was reducing a previous ultimatum of 50 days to between 10 and 12 days, but his latest comments indicated an apparently firm date at the end of next week.
Trump said that he had not heard from Putin on his threat. "I haven't had any response. It's a shame," he said.
And the Republican appeared to play down the effect of his planned actions.
"We're going to put on tariffs and stuff," he said, but "I don't know if it's going to effect Russia because obviously he wants to keep the war going."
Follow us on:
Short link:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Turkey to begin supplying Azeri gas to Syria from Saturday - Energy
Turkey will start exporting natural gas from Azerbaijan to Syria from Saturday, the energy minister said on Wednesday. Syria's Islamist authorities, who toppled Bashar al-Assad in December, are seeking to rebuild the country's infrastructure and economy after almost 14 years of civil war. The conflict badly damaged Syria's power infrastructure, leading to cuts that can last for more than 20 hours a day. "We will start exporting natural gas from Azerbaijan to Aleppo via Kilis", a province in southernmost Turkey near the Syrian border, Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar said. In May, Syrian Energy Minister Mohammad al-Bashir said Damascus and Ankara had reached a deal for Turkey to supply natural gas to the war-torn country via a pipeline in the north. Gas-rich Azerbaijan is a historic ally of Turkey which maintains close ties with the Syrian transitional government. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
5 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
The US is sitting out the most consequential climate summit in a decade. It may offer a victory to China
The Trump administration fired the last of the US climate negotiators earlier this month, helping cement America's withdrawal from international climate diplomacy. It may also have handed a huge victory to China. The elimination of the State Department's Office of Global Change — which represents the United States in climate change negotiations between countries — leaves the world's largest historical polluter with no official presence at one of the most consequential climate summits in a decade: COP30, the annual UN climate talks in Belém, Brazil, in November. Without State's climate staff in place, even Capitol Hill lawmakers who usually attend the summits have been unable to get accredited, a source familiar with the process said. COP30 is intended to be a landmark summit, setting the global climate agenda for the next 10 years — an absolutely crucial decade as the world hurtles toward ever more catastrophic levels of warming. The US is 'abandoning its responsibilities in the midst of a planetary emergency,' said Harjeet Singh, a longtime climate advocate, COP negotiations veteran and founding director of Satat Sampada Climate Foundation, a climate justice organization. The US role in climate negotiations has always been marked by contradiction, he told CNN. 'It has championed ambition in rhetoric while expanding domestic fossil fuel extraction.' But its absence creates a 'dangerous vacuum,' he said. One of President Donald Trump's first acts in office was to pull the US out of the Paris climate agreement, which he also did in his first term. The elimination of the State climate office is yet another sign of the administration's hard line rejection of climate action. A State Department spokesperson said 'any relevant related work will be managed in other offices in the Department as appropriate.' They did not directly respond to CNN's question on whether it would send representatives to COP30. Experts fear the US absence may derail climate ambition. Wealthy countries, including those in Europe, may use it as a 'license to backtrack,' said Chiara Martinelli, director of Climate Action Network Europe, a coalition of climate non-profits. Poorer countries may lose faith in the process, she told CNN. But most significantly, it could hand a geopolitical advantage to China, allowing America's most formidable global competitor to position itself as a more reliable and stable global partner, experts told CNN. The State Department spokesperson did not comment on what the US withdrawing from Paris would mean for China. China is building out clean energy at a blistering pace, as the US takes a chainsaw to its wind and solar sectors and makes a hard turn back toward fossil fuels. 'It is likely that China's voice will be heard more loudly (at COP30), as they have identified growth in green technologies as a key pillar of their economic strategy,' said Joeri Rogelj, a climate scientist at Imperial College London. In a statement to CNN, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs called climate change a 'common challenge faced by mankind.' 'No country can stay out of it, and no country can be immune to it,' the Chinese statement said. The question is whether China will make good on the strong language, and lead by example without its world-power counterpart. All countries have until September to submit new goals to limit climate pollution over the next decade, and China has a history of setting weak targets for itself. Meanwhile, it continues to power plants that run on coal — the most polluting fossil fuel. These goals will provide a road map for climate action between now and 2035, and China, being the world's most-polluting country, will help determine the planet's climate trajectory. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not answer specific questions about its forthcoming goals, but said the country 'will work with all parties concerned' to 'actively respond to the challenges of climate change, and jointly promote the global green and low-carbon transformation process.' The US has traditionally pushed China to make more ambitious pledges, with varying degrees of success. Climate was the one bright spot in an otherwise strained US-China relationship under the Biden administration. The two nations struck a significant deal nearly two years ago, pledging to ramp up renewables and curb planet-warming gases. 'We were the country that put pressure on them more than any other,' said the source familiar with the process. But it's a very different world now. As COP30 looms, China will not be facing that same pressure. The Biden administration proffered an ambitious US target before leaving office, a cut of 61-66% below 2005 levels by 2035. This would have been tough even under a Democratic administration that favors clean energy. It's vanishingly unlikely under the Trump administration with its 'drill, baby, drill' mantra. That leaves all eyes on China. Its target is by far the most consequential for the climate, experts told CNN. The country has a well-established pattern of under-promising and over-delivering. Its most recent target gave the country until 'around' 2030 to peak its climate pollution. Independent analysis shows it is likely this has already happened, five years ahead of schedule, and pollution is now starting to decline. Then-US Special Envoy for Climate Change Todd Stern (standing on the left) and China National Development and Reform Commission Vice Chairman Xie Zhenhua (standing on the right) during an eco-partnership event at the US state department in Washington, DC, in 2013. Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images Biden administration officials had encouraged China to put forward a sharp pollution cut of 30% by 2035. But some experts anticipate a much more tepid target giving China plenty of wiggle room. 'Beijing has been sending signals that those demands are just too high, rather unrealistic and unfair in their view,' said Li Shuo, director of the China climate hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'It is very safe to say there will be a gap. And potentially that gap will be rather significant.' Shuo and colleagues at the Asia Society believe China will put forward a high single-digit or a low double-digit figure for pollution cuts. The number matters, said former US climate envoy Todd Stern. A strong, ambitious goal from China 'would affect numbers all over the world and it would affect the perception of whether COP is making decent progress or not,' he added. Even if its climate pledges lack ambition, China is still leagues ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to clean energy. It is currently building 510 gigawatts of utility-scale solar and wind capacity, according to Global Energy Monitor. This will add to the eye-popping 1,400 gigawatts already online — five times what is operating in the US. The big sticking point is coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel, to which China remains wedded. 'They're building every five years as much coal as remains in the US,' Duke said. That's the paradox of the US withdrawal, Singh said. 'It could advance China's global climate leadership while simultaneously easing the pressure on Beijing to accelerate its difficult transition away from fossil fuels.'
Egypt Independent
5 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump says Epstein poached young women from Mar-a-Lago. That raises new questions about what he knew.
President Donald Trump wants to move on from his administration's fiasco over the Jeffrey Epstein files, but he keeps hampering that effort by opening his mouth. The most recent instance has to do with precisely why the two men had a falling out about two decades ago. Trump acknowledged on Tuesday that the employees who he said Monday that Epstein poached from him, triggering their breakup, were young women who worked in the spa at his Mar-a-Lago club. 'The answer is yes, they were,' he told reporters on Air Force One while traveling back from Scotland. The answer doesn't just call into question Trump's honesty about his relationship with Epstein, but also his potential knowledge of the accused sex trafficker's misconduct. (Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.) A day earlier, the president said they'd fallen out because Epstein 'stole people that worked for me' – including after he had warned Epstein not to do it again. But Trump had made no mention of the employees being young women. And the White House last week had said Trump barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club 'for being a creep.' (Trump on Tuesday said the two reasons were 'sort of a little bit of the same thing.') But back in 2019, reporting traced their fallout to another factor entirely: the two powerful real estate men competing for the same Palm Beach property. It's clear that this is something of a sensitive subject. After Epstein's arrest in 2019, Trump declined to go into detail about their falling out, telling reporters, 'The reason doesn't make any difference, frankly.' But it surely does now. So where does the truth lie? Trump was the most forthcoming so far on Tuesday. Epstein hired away Mar-a-Lago spa employees more than once, Trump said, even after being warned against it, prompting him to cut ties with Epstein and throw him out of the club. 'I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa,'' Trump told reporters. 'And then not too long after that he did it again and I said, 'outta here.'' He also acknowledged that one of those employees may have been Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, who died by suicide earlier this year. 'I think she worked at the spa,' Trump said. 'I think that was one of the people, yeah. He stole her.' With these answers, there's clear overlap between Trump's account Monday and what the White House said last week. 'I wouldn't talk [to him] because he did something that was inappropriate. He hired help,' Trump said of Epstein on Monday, adding: 'He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place, persona non-grata. I threw him out, and that was it.' And last week, the White House communications director said: 'The fact is that the president kicked [Epstein] out of his club for being a creep.' Both of those accounts differ from the falling out that's portrayed in a 2019 Washington Post report about the two men competing for a bankrupted oceanfront property called Maison de l'Amitié – a process that included plenty of hardnosed tactics. (The first Trump White House at the time did not comment on or deny that story.) When asked by CNN on Tuesday to reconcile these accounts, the White House said, 'Nothing more to add to POTUS' comments.' There are still plenty of unanswered questions. Trump casting Epstein as merely having stolen employees – even young women from the spa – would be a pretty shocking way to characterize recruiting someone into a sex-trafficking ring. The whole thing certainly adds to questions about what Trump knew and when about Epstein's activities. Those questions had already been relevant for a host of reasons. There's the infamous 2002 Trump comment about how Epstein 'likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' There's the Florida businessman who has said he expressed discomfort to Trump about putting on a 'calendar girl' event with Epstein. 'I said, 'Look, Donald, I know Jeff really well, I can't have him going after younger girls,' he recalled telling Trump, according to The New York Times. And then there's longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone's 2016 book, in which he quoted Trump citing how Epstein's 'swimming pool was full of beautiful young girls.' 'How nice, I thought,' Trump said, according to Stone, 'he let the neighborhood kids use his pool.' And then there's another reported scene at Mar-a-Lago. A 2020 book by reporters for the Miami Herald and Wall Street Journal reported that Trump actually severed ties with Epstein after he hit on a Mar-a-Lago member's teenage daughter. 'The way this person described it, such an act could irreparably harm the Trump brand, leaving Donald no choice but to remove Epstein,' one of the book's authors said. What's particularly striking here is the timeline. In former Trump aide Sam Nunberg's telling to the Washington Post in 2019, Trump's excommunication of Epstein from his club for recruiting a young woman for massages came years before Epstein's sex-trafficking investigation became public knowledge. That would mean years before 2005. But that — and Trump's own comments Tuesday – suggest the president might have known something unsavory was going on before a lot of other people did. Giuffre, after all, was a teenaged employee during the relevant period. The president doesn't seem to want to talk about that. But as with so many of his other answers on Epstein, that only leads to more questions.
