Trump, Putin announce ‘understanding' on Ukraine after Alaska summit
The two leaders met for about 2 1/2 hours behind closed doors on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage.
The summit began with a warm handshake on the tarmac beneath a sign reading "Alaska 2025" and concluded with brief statements from both leaders.
They described the talks as productive and constructive, but declined to elaborate on what had been agreed.
'We have a very good chance of getting there,' Trump said during a joint press conference, referring to ending the war. 'We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance.'
Putin said the two sides 'reached an understanding' and emphasized the need to 'restore a fair balance' in global security.
He added that Moscow was 'ready to work' on Ukrainian security but did not explain how that would be achieved.
He also thanked Trump for the 'friendly' tone of the talks and proposed holding the next meeting in Moscow.
Neither leader took questions after their remarks. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the statements were 'comprehensive,' which is why they chose not to engage with the press.
Putin's envoy for investment, Kirill Dmitriev, said the summit was 'definitely productive,' citing potential economic cooperation, though no details were disclosed.
Trump, in a post-summit interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, avoided directly answering whether he had sized up Putin's intent within the first two minutes of the meeting — something he previously promised he could do.
Instead, Trump praised their longstanding relationship and repeated claims that the U.S. investigation into Russian election interference in 2016 had obstructed closer cooperation.
Both leaders departed separately after the summit. Putin later visited Fort Richardson National Cemetery to lay flowers on the graves of Soviet WWII pilots and referenced the historic Alaska-Siberia air route, used to deliver U.S. aircraft to the USSR during the war.
Putin reiterated Moscow's position that peace can only come when all 'root causes' of the conflict are addressed — including halting Western arms deliveries and addressing Russia's security concerns.
Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other NATO leaders to update them on the meeting's outcome, though Zelenskyy was not invited to the summit.
While Trump said there are only 'a very few' issues still unresolved, he acknowledged that 'one is probably the most significant.'
Putin, echoing Trump's campaign rhetoric, said there would have been no war in Ukraine had Trump remained president. 'I can confirm that,' he said.
No joint communique or formal agreement was issued at the end of the summit. The leaders left open the possibility of another meeting, with Trump responding to Putin's invitation by saying, 'I could see it possibly happening.' — Agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
European, NATO leaders to join Ukraine's Zelensky for meeting with Trump
KYIV, Ukraine: European and NATO leaders announced Sunday they will join President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington to present a united front in talks with President Donald Trump on ending Russia's war in Ukraine and firming up US security guarantees now on the negotiating table. Leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland are rallying around the Ukrainian president after his exclusion from Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their pledge to be at Zelensky's side at the White House on Monday is an apparent effort to ensure the meeting goes better than the last one in February, when Trump berated Zelensky in a heated Oval Office encounter. 'The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt,' said retired French Gen. Dominique Trinquand, a former head of France's military mission at the United Nations. 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he said. Putin agreed at his summit in Alaska with Trump that the US and its European allies could offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war, special US envoy Steve Witkoff said in an interview Sunday on CNN's 'State of the Union.' It 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that,' said Witkoff, who called it 'game-changing.' Later, French President Emmanuel Macron said the European delegation will ask Trump to back plans they drafted to beef-up Ukraine's armed forces — already Europe's largest outside of Russia — with more training and equipment to secure any peace. 'We need a credible format for the Ukrainian army, that's the first point, and say — we Europeans and Americans — how we'll train them, equip them, and finance this effort in the long-term,' the French leader said. The European-drafted plans also envision an allied force in Ukraine away from the front lines to reassure Kyiv that peace will hold and to dissuade another Russian invasion, Macron said. He spoke after a nearly two-hour video call Sunday with nations in Europe and further afield — including Canada, Australia and Japan — that are involved in the so-called 'coalition of the willing.' The 'several thousand men on the ground in Ukraine in the zone of peace' would signal that 'our fates are linked,' Macron said. 'This is what we must discuss with the Americans: Who is ready to do what?' Macron said. 'Otherwise, I think the Ukrainians simply cannot accept commitments that are theoretical.' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said earlier at a news conference in Brussels with Zelensky that 'we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. And the 'coalition of the willing' — including the European Union — is ready to do its share.' Macron said the substance of security guarantees will be more important than whether they are given an Article 5-type label. 'A theoretical article isn't enough, the question is one of substance,' he said. 'We must start out by saying that the first of the security guarantees for Ukraine is a strong Ukrainian army.' Along with Von der Leyen and Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb also said they'll will take part in Monday's talks, as will secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte. The European leaders' support could help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal. Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute, said European leaders are trying to 'shape this fast-evolving agenda.' After the Alaska summit, the idea of a ceasefire appears all-but-abandoned, with the narrative shifting toward Putin's agenda of ensuring Ukraine does not join NATO or even the EU. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that a possible ceasefire is 'not off the table' but that the best way to end the war would be through a 'full peace deal.' Putin has implied that he sees Europe as a hindrance to negotiations. He has also resisted meeting Zelensky in person, saying that such a meeting can only take place once the groundwork for a peace deal has been laid. Speaking to the press after his meeting with Trump, the Russian leader raised the idea that Kyiv and other European capitals could 'create obstacles' to derail potential progress with 'behind-the-scenes intrigue.' For now, Zelensky offers the Europeans the 'only way' to get into the discussions about the future of Ukraine and European security, says RUSI's Melvin. However, the sheer number of European leaders potentially in attendance means the group will have to be 'mindful' not to give 'contradictory' messages, Melvin said. 'The risk is they look heavy-handed and are ganging up on Trump,' he added. 'Trump won't want to be put in a corner.' Although details remain hazy on what Article 5-like security guarantees from the US and Europe would entail for Ukraine, it could mirror NATO membership terms, in which an attack on one member of the alliance is seen as an attack on all. Zelensky continues to stress the importance of both US and European involvement in any negotiations. 'A security guarantee is a strong army. Only Ukraine can provide that. Only Europe can finance this army, and weapons for this army can be provided by our domestic production and European production. But there are certain things that are in short supply and are only available in the United States,' he said at the press conference Sunday alongside Von der Leyen. Zelensky also pushed back against Trump's assertion — which aligned with Putin's preference — that the two sides should negotiate a complete end to the war, rather than first securing a ceasefire. Zelensky said a ceasefire would provide breathing room to review Putin's demands. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons,' he said. 'Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.'
Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
Erosion of the nuclear taboo a key global challenge
Eight decades on, relatively few people recall the historical significance of Aug. 15, 1945. Yet, the surrender of Japan on that day, ending the Second World War, was a pivotal moment in 20th-century history. Each year, Victory over Japan Day, known as VJ Day, commemorates that surrender. While Victory in Europe Day — May 8, 1945 — marked the end of the war in Europe, many thousands of armed forces personnel had continued to fight in Asia in what is sometimes seen as a forgotten conflict. Eighty years later, the momentous events of 1945 might appear to be consigned to the history books, yet they have much relevance to the world of today. This core point was highlighted by Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on this month's 80th anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, one of the key developments that led to the surrender of Japan. Ishiba vowed to uphold the commitment that his country would never possess, produce or permit the introduction of nuclear weapons. Moreover, he pledged to help bring about 'a world without nuclear war and a world without nuclear weapons.' These are widely seen as noble goals. But today the world faces at least two major threats in this realm, as the post-1945 so-called nuclear taboo preventing the further use of atomic weapons has begun to erode. Firstly, there are still more than 12,000 such weapons stockpiled around the globe, each of which is more powerful than the two devices used eight decades ago by the US in Japan combined. This is a chilling fact, given that the bomb dropped on Nagasaki on Aug. 9, 1945, is estimated to have killed more than 70,000 people, while the one used three days earlier on Hiroshima is estimated to have killed more than 140,000. The events of 1945 might appear to be consigned to history, yet they have much relevance to the world of today. Andrew Hammond Today, there are growing tensions between the US and Russia, each of which possesses more than 5,000 nuclear weapons, together representing about 90 percent of the global total. Just this month, US President Donald Trump engaged in a war of words with former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev over atomic weapons. Medvedev referred to 'Dead Hand,' the Russian nuclear retaliation system, in an apparent threat to the US. In response, Trump claimed he had ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia. The reasons this behavior is so alarming are at least twofold. Firstly, there is the risk of miscalculation in the context of growing global investment in new nuclear weapons technology. The US government, for instance, is building a new generation of nuclear weapons and plans to resume nuclear testing. China, too, is rapidly increasing its nuclear arsenal, which is estimated to have approximately trebled in size to about 600 weapons. While still relatively small compared to the US and Russia, the direction of travel is clear. These actions are slowing disarmament and nonproliferation initiatives, such as the efforts to advance the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the first international accord designed to comprehensively ban nuclear arms. The treaty came into force in 2021 but has so far been ignored by nuclear-armed states and other key parties, including Japan. The origins of the international nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation campaign dates back decades, to at least 1963, when the US, the former Soviet Union and the UK signed the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Other landmarks have included the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which came into force in 1970. With global momentum shifting toward rearmament rather than abolition, a growing list of nations, including South Korea, Ukraine and Turkiye, have expressed an interest in acquiring atomic weapons. Iran, too, is likely to further develop its nuclear capabilities, fueled by the recent attacks by Israel and the US on its development facilities. While many fear the use of nuclear weapons as a conscious choice, as happened in 1945, a growing number are also alarmed about the possibility of deployment in error. This includes the possibility of cyberattacks, especially on systems in which artificial intelligence is utilized. Beyond the state use of nuclear weapons, there also remains the threat of atomic terrorism. Andrew Hammond Beyond the state use of nuclear weapons, there also remains the threat of atomic terrorism. While some assert that the probability of a major nuclear terrorism event remains very low, Robert Gates, a former US defense secretary, noted while in office that 'every senior leader, when you're asked what keeps you awake at night, it's the thought of a terrorist ending up with a weapon of mass destruction, especially nuclear.' This nuclear terrorism agenda first appeared prominently on the international radar in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, amid concerns about safeguarding the former communist empire's extensive nuclear arsenal. More than two dozen states have had at least 1 kg of highly enriched uranium in civilian stocks. Since the 1990s, more than 4,000 confirmed incidents of illicit trafficking, unauthorized possession or loss of nuclear and radioactive material have been reported to the International Atomic Energy Agency. It is the US, which dropped the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, that has been at the forefront of international post-Cold War efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and materials. However, this agenda is no longer a top priority for Washington. While the international ability to tackle nuclear terrorism might be eroding significantly, the threat could be growing. Yet, given the hurdles that exist to terror networks obtaining weapons-grade material, perhaps the more likely danger is the use of a small nuclear weapon or a radiological dispersal device (a so-called dirty bomb), which could still cause immense damage, especially in a major urban area. The world is therefore facing a growing risk related to the possible use of nuclear weapons. The danger lies not only in the growing threat of the state use of such weapons, but also in nuclear terrorism — a major global effort is now needed to counteract these grim challenges.
Leaders
8 hours ago
- Leaders
Trump Delivers Melania's 'Peace Letter' to Putin at Alaska Summit
US President Donald Trump presented a heartfelt letter from First Lady Melania Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin during their recent summit in Alaska. This letter, which urged Putin to prioritize peace for the sake of children, came a day after the two leaders failed to reach a significant agreement. The First Lady's office on Saturday shared a Fox News article on X, showcasing the poignant letter. However, according to Fox News, Putin read the letter immediately after receiving it from Trump, while both delegations observed the moment. 'In today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them,' the letter stated. Although it did not mention Ukraine directly, it conveyed a powerful message. 'Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter,' it continued. 'In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone—you serve humanity itself.' Additionally, the letter emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating, 'Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are able to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time.' Trump's Evolving Perspective on Putin In July, Trump revealed that Melania, who hails from Slovenia, influenced his views on Putin. 'I go home, I tell the First Lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today, we had a wonderful conversation,'' Trump recounted. Melania responded with concern, saying, 'Oh really? Another city was just hit.' After beginning his second term, Trump sought to improve relations with Putin, promising to end the Ukraine war within 24 hours. Initially, he directed his frustration at Ukraine for not reaching a deal. However, he gradually expressed disappointment over Putin's ongoing military actions in Ukraine. Warnings and Shifts in Strategy Before the Alaska summit, Trump warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia did not agree to a ceasefire. Yet, following his meeting with Putin, he shifted his stance, stating that the best way to end the conflict 'is to go directly to a peace agreement.' Putin has consistently advocated for negotiations toward a final peace deal. However, Ukraine and its European allies criticize this approach, viewing it as a tactic to buy time while Russia continues its military advances. In conclusion, Trump's delivery of Melania's letter highlights the complex dynamics of international diplomacy and the ongoing quest for peace in a turbulent region. Short link : Post Views: 25
