The uncomfortable truth about Democrats' problem reaching male voters
Over the weekend, The New York Times reported that Democratic donors are considering a $20 million 'strategic plan' called 'Speaking with American Men' that includes 'study(ing) the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality' in male 'spaces.' The initiative is yet another example of Democrats trying to make sense of the 2024 election and, in particular, how they can win back male voters.
But polling data from the last four presidential elections suggests the root of their male voter problem — and the potential solution — might be rather straightforward: Support for Democrats among male voters dropped most dramatically when the party's presidential candidate was a woman — and rebounded when the party nominated a man.
At the outset, it's important to note that there are significant caveats to this data. Four elections offer useful data, but it's still a relatively small sample size. In addition, it's impossible to say with certainty that the presence of a woman on the Democratic ticket sapped the party's support in presidential elections. Some of the reasoning here is based on circumstantial evidence. Nonetheless, the numbers tell a sobering tale.
For example, last week, Catalist, a progressive organization that analyzes voter data, released its report entitled 'What Happened in 2024,' and it's clear that, across the board, Democrats lost ground with men. While women supported Kamala Harris at nearly the same levels that they supported Joe Biden in 2020, the share of men backing the Democratic ticket dropped from 48% in 2020 to 42% in 2024. In all, there was an 11-point shift from Democrats to Republicans. These declines were evident across every major demographic group.
For example, white and black women supported Biden and Harris at levels virtually unchanged from 2020, but there was a four-point drop among white men and a seven-point drop among Black men. Support for Democrats among Latino women fell by seven points, but among Latino men, the decline was 12 points.
Even more striking is the drop-off with younger voters. According to Catalist, 'the gender gap among 18 to 29 year olds widened to 17 points as women dropped slightly from 66% Democratic support in 2020 to 63% in 2024 while men dropped much further from 55% Democratic support in 2020 to 46% in 2024.'
Again, these shifts took place across multiple demographic groups. Democrats lost one point of support with young Black women, but 10 points among young Black men. The party's share of support among young Hispanic women fell by 8 points from 2020 to 2024, but 16 points among young Hispanic men.
The shift also held across college-educated voters — a group that in recent years has increasingly moved toward the Democratic Party. In 2020, Democrats won 54% of white college-age voters, but in 2024 that number slipped to 51%. However, nearly all of the decline was due to a six-point drop in support among college-educated men (versus just one point among college-educated women). A similar dynamic was evident among white non-college-educated voters. Harris matched Biden's numbers with women in this group, but lost three points with men.
To be sure, there's long been a gender gap in American politics, with women more inclined to vote Democratic than men. In 2024, Trump's presidential campaign made it a priority to target men, particularly occasional male voters. And it's worth noting that Democrats lost significant support with white college-educated men in the 2022 midterms (though they gained ground with white non-college-educated men). So perhaps the decline evident in the 2024 numbers is part of a larger electoral trend? Perhaps men were more aggrieved by the state of the economy in 2024? Perhaps they were more turned off by Democratic positions on cultural issues like abortion, trans rights, etc?
All this is possible, but there is one complicating factor: The decline in male support for the Democratic Party in 2024 looks a lot like what happened with male voters in 2016, when Hillary Clinton was the party nominee.
In 2012, when Barack Obama faced off against Mitt Romney, there was an 8-point gender gap, according to Catalist. In 2016, the gender gap increased to 12 points. In 2020, Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee, it closed back to nine percentage points. And in 2024, it had increased to 13 points. By and large, female support for the Democratic ticket was constant throughout these four elections; only male support for Democrats fluctuated.
Again, this seesawing support is evident across virtually all demographic groups. Democratic support among white non-college-educated voters is perhaps the most striking example. The party's support with white non-college-educated women has been nearly constant in every election since 2012. But among white non-college-educated men, there was a six-point drop from 2012 to 2016, a two-point increase in 2020, and then a three-point drop in 2024. A similar gender gap was also evident among college-educated men.
So over the last four elections, we see a similar pattern — Democrats lose support with men when there's a woman on the ticket, and gain it back when they nominate a man.
Trump is undoubtedly a factor here as well. He's long preached a traditional form of masculinity that undoubtedly appeals to a certain segment of American men. Conversely, Democrats have long been branded as the more feminine party, for their views on issues like trans rights, abortion and even social insurance programs. But then why did Trump's support among male voters shift so dramatically in 2020? If it was the result of, say, his handling of the pandemic, why would such anger materialize so acutely among men?
It's certainly possible that the Democrats' problems with male voters will fade away when Trump is not on the ballot in 2028. And it bears noting that female representation in Congress has steadily increased since Trump first arrived on the national stage. In 2017, there were 105 female members of Congress. Today, that number stands at 151 (and that includes a substantial increase in female Republicans in Congress). However, the presidency is a vastly different office with significantly different responsibilities than a member of Congress. The U.S. stands out as one of the handful of Western democracies that has never elected a female head of state.
As uncomfortable as it might be to acknowledge, the Democrats' problem with male voters might be solved with the simplest, albeit most reactionary of solutions. Nominate a man for president in 2028.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
Musk suggests creating a new political party as feud with Trump continues to rage
Elon Musk floated the idea of a new political party as his rapidly escalating feud with President Trump reached a tipping point — with more than 80% of the millions who voted wanting change. The world's richest man posted a poll on X asking followers whether they supported the idea of a party to take on the Republicans and Democrats. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' the poll asked. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as Elon Musk looks on in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025. AP Well over 4.7 million votes had been cast as of early Friday — with more than 80% agreeing a new party was needed. The poll was posted soon after Musk and Trump's once-close relationship imploded late Thursday when the men started hurling blistering attacks at each other. Musk also encouraged Republicans torn over who to back to side with him. 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,' he wrote in one tweet. The verbal punches erupted after Trump criticized Musk in the Oval Office on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in the Tesla founder for denouncing his sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. Elon Musk shared the poll to his X followers on June 5, 2025. @elonmusk/X Trump quickly posted on Truth Social that Musk had been 'wearing thin,' that he had 'asked him to leave' his administration and that the tech titan had 'gone CRAZY.' Trump then threatened that he could save taxpayer money by canceling government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. Musk, for his part, fired back by expressing support for impeaching Trump and even accused the administration of withholding documents related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein because the president would be mentioned. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk post on X.


Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Georgia is an immigration enforcement hot spot
Efforts to arrest and remove unauthorized immigrants appear most aggressive in Georgia and other southern states with Democratic-leaning cities, while deeply red, rural states are seeing less activity, according to an Axios analysis. Why it matters: Our review of removal orders, pending deportation cases and agreements between immigration officials and local law enforcement agencies sheds light on where the Trump administration is dispatching resources to support its mass deportation plan. The analysis shows local law enforcement agencies here and in Texas, Florida, North Carolina and Virginia have been most cooperative with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in rounding up immigrants through deals known as 287 (g) agreements. There are 629 such agreements now in place across the country. About 43% of them are in Florida, followed by 14% in Texas and 5% in Georgia. Zoom in: The death of Laken Riley, a nursing student who was killed in Athens by an undocumented immigrant, spurred Gov. Brian Kemp and Republican state lawmakers to push local governments to partner with federal immigration efforts. In March, Kemp directed Georgia Department of Public Safety Commissioner Billy Hitchens to ask ICE to train the force's 1,100 sworn officers under the 287 (g) program. The Georgia Senate earlier this year passed legislation to waive sovereign immunity for "sanctuary cities" that do not enforce immigration laws. The bill awaits a vote in the state House. Reality check: Sanctuary cities — local governments that do not assist with federal immigration enforcement — have been prohibited in Georgia since 2009. Zoom out: Federal agents also have been especially active in New York, California and Illinois — blue states where some local and state laws prohibit authorities from assisting in immigration arrests. By the numbers: Of the 42,000 removals of immigrants ordered in March, nearly 50% involved people in Texas, California, New York, Virginia and Florida, according to an analysis of data from the nonpartisan Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). The big picture: The data analyzed by Axios and the locations of the agreements between federal and local authorities reflect a few simple truths about immigration enforcement across the U.S. There aren't nearly enough federal agents to meet President Trump's unprecedented deportation goal of deporting a million immigrants a year. In some places where the Trump administration faces a gap in resources, local law enforcement agencies are unable or unwilling to meet the feds' demands or expand beyond their usual enforcement duties. With the nation's borders essentially locked down, the administration has shifted much of its deportation operations to the nation's interior. National Sheriffs' Association executive director and CEO Jonathan Thompson said some sheriffs are concerned that their departments could undermine their communities' trust by working with ICE. "What I've heard them say is, if you're going to take somebody out of the community, do it in a way that demonstrates due process," he said. There is a cost to these arrests, Thompson said. "It costs the community because [an arrested immigrant] may be a contributing member ... to the fabric of the community." Catch up quick: Metro Atlanta sheriffs, including Cobb County's Craig D. Owens Sr. and Gwinnett's Keybo Taylor, won their elections pledging to end 287 (g) partnerships after taking office. The result, they told Axios in 2022, made communities safer; Taylor said he redirected some of the $3 million spent on 287 (g) toward combating human trafficking and gang violence. What they're saying: Trump border czar Tom Homan, a former ICE director, told Axios he rejects the notion that working with immigration officials can undermine community trust in local authorities.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lori Falce: The bromance is over
Jun. 6—In December, as the Biden administration was winding down and the air was thick with plans for the second Donald Trump term in the White House, I asked a question. I looked at the events surrounding the continuing resolution bill making its way through both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support — until Trump's biggest donor, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, called it a "steal" of public tax dollars. Then Trump backed away, and Republican lawmakers were left at a loss, caught between what had seemed like a good idea and what the richest man in the world wanted. Before the new administration even got to rearrange the furniture in the West Wing, there was confusion about who was deciding where the couch went. What will happen if Trump and Musk start to butt heads, I wondered. It's June. Now we know. The bromance between the billionaire president and the man who literally wrote million dollar checks to voters has collapsed. After six months of Musk's Department of Government Efficiency running roughshod over agencies, firing employees and delving into data, but never finding the trillions in waste he predicted, he departed last week. In an Oval Office press conference, Trump and Musk said lovely things about each other and their time working together. Once out the White House doors, however, Musk began to slam Trump's hyped "One Big Beautiful Bill" as a "disgusting abomination." On Thursday morning, Trump countered, saying he was "very disappointed" in Musk. And then they started throwing social media mud, with Trump saying Elon was "wearing thin." Musk in turn said Trump hasn't released files about accused sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein because the president's name is included in them. This is the kind of catfight both men are famous for starting online. Seeing the relationship turn sour was as predictable as the sunrise. The question now is: What's next? While Trump bristled at suggestions Musk's money was instrumental in his campaign, money is what makes the political world go 'round. A bitter breakup between the two, especially when it involves all the Republicans in Congress, can have widespread repercussions for the 2026 midterms. Musk threw out a post about starting a third party "that actually represents the 80% in the middle." Is that something the GOP and Democrats alike should be watching? On the other hand, Musk's involvement in Wisconsin's judicial race this year was a dismal failure as a follow-up to Trump's win. Maybe — just maybe — it would be a good idea for Musk to stick to Musk things, like Cybertrucks and SpaceX. Trump could concentrate on the presidency — and maybe read a few of his daily intelligence briefings. And lawmakers could stop worrying about what rich men want and do the jobs they were elected to do for the American people. Lori Falce is the Tribune-Review community engagement editor and an opinion columnist. For more than 30 years, she has covered Pennsylvania politics, Penn State, crime and communities. She joined the Trib in 2018. She can be reached at lfalce@