
Latest transit proposal would hike tolls, tax ride shares to avoid $771 million fiscal cliff
SPRINGFIELD — After months of negotiations amid warnings of potentially drastic service cuts, Illinois lawmakers on Thursday introduced a bill they said addresses the expected $771 million financial shortfall for Chicago-area public transit with proposals that include a 50-cent hike on Illinois toll roads and an additional tax on ride sharing services.
'The funding mechanism we put forward, with estimates, gets us above the fiscal cliff amount,' Democratic Sen. Ram Villivalam of Chicago, chair of the committee covering transportation, said. 'The goal is to ensure that we're funding a system not for tomorrow, not for next year but for decades to come.'
Key labor organizations were quick to question thep proposal introduced Thursday in the Senate, citing concerns over the long-term viability of the funding streams. Also voicing opposition were suburban officials who said the bills put the interests of mass transit users, most of them in Chicago, above those of their constituents.
Transit agencies have said services would be slashed if legislators don't come up with funding to plug the budget shortfall expected when COVID-19 relief funding runs out at the end of this year. With the spring legislative session set to end this weekend, agencies have said they will need to start planning for those cuts soon, though lawmakers could take up the issue to later in the year.
The bill introduced in the Senate on Thursday has similarities with a House proposal a day earlier that include replacing the Regional Transportation Authority with an entity called the Northern Illinois Transit Authority that would be given with broad planning responsibilities. Only the Senate version, however, offered funding proposals.
The House version of the bill passed out of the chamber's executive committee by an 8-4 vote on Thursday and was scheduled to go before the full chamber for a vote despite questions about the lack of financing. Concerns also were raised about how the legislation could jeopardize the bonding authority for the Chicago Transit Authority to see through its planned extension of the Red Line.
The Senate revenue proposals, which include transit agency staff cuts in addition to an increase on toll roads, would not fully cover the $1.5 billion that some transit advocates say is needed to transform Chicago-area public transportation, Villivalam told reporters, though he later added a final estimate on how much the proposals would raise is not yet known. The legislation did not come to a vote in the Senate committee.
The bill would require the revamped transit governing board, NITA, to make cuts that could include layoffs. It mandates $10 million in transit service-related savings and $20.1 million in savings on labor, which the bill suggests would come from changes in employee headcounts and position types. Those changes have previously been suggested by the RTA.
A key provision allows the transit board to impose a surcharge of 50 cents on roads operated by the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority. The tax would be capped at $1 per vehicle per day, according to the legislation. The bill also includes a 10% tax on rideshare trips in Chicago, suburban Cook County, or the collar counties.
The Senate proposal also asks for $16.8 million in savings from property and real estate. The savings would need to be realized in NITA's budget for the fiscal year beginning in October 2026.
The bill also includes a real estate transfer tax in the collar counties and suburban Cook County. In Cook County, half of the revenues from that tax would go toward CTA pension payments, with leftover funds going to transit operations. The other half would go toward a fund designed to encourage transit-oriented development that is designed to boost ridership and create walkable communities and commercial corridors. Taxes levied in the collar counties would go entirely toward that development fund.
Interest earned on money in the state's road fund would also need to go toward public transit construction projects, according to the bill.
Labor leaders argued the funding proposals wouldn't provide long-term security for the transit systems.
'We strongly oppose any transit governance reform legislation that lacks a dedicated and sustainable revenue source,' said Marc Poulos, executive director of the labor-management group for the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150.
Tim Drea, president of the Illinois AFL-CIO, said in a statement that the two legislative proposals '[kick] the can down the road and [set] our state up for a future fiscal crisis.' The Amalgamated Transit Union Local 241, which represents CTA bus operators, opposes the Senate bill.
Representatives from the collar counties pushed back against several of the revenue ideas Thursday.
'The Senate plan steals $72 million dollars in DuPage tax revenue, imposes a local real estate transfer tax with no oversight from the County, and taxes suburban commuters,' DuPage County Board Chair Deborah Conroy said in a letter opposing the bill Thursday. 'If passed as written, DuPage County will be forced into massive layoffs, crippling our ability to provide safe streets and neighborhoods for our nearly 1 million residents.'
Republican Sen. Donald DeWitte of suburban St. Charles said the Senate bill subsidizes mass transit in Chicago at the expense of the suburbs, citing the tollway tax proposal and other measures.
'The suburbs get taxed, Chicago gets control, and that's outrageous,' he said.
Like the House bill introduced Wednesday, the Senate version would remake the board of the RTA, renamed as the NITA, with five appointments from the governor in addition to existing appointments from the mayor of Chicago, the Cook County Board President and the collar counties.
The bill also calls for a unified fare system between all Chicago area transit agencies by 2030.
In a statement Thursday, RTA spokesperson Tina Fassett Smith said the agency was reviewing the Senate legislation but again stressed the need to get something done soon. 'The region's transit system serves more than 1.2 million rides each day,' Fassett Smith said. 'Having funding certainty by May 31 is essential to ensure CTA, Metra, and Pace can continue to provide safe, reliable, affordable transportation for all.'
Representatives for CTA, Metra and Pace did not immediately provide comment Thursday.
Funding for the proposed CTA Red Line extension south of 95th Street was one point of discussion in a hearing on the House version of the bill Thursday.
The multibillion-dollar project would extend the train line south to 130th Street and add four stations. The project, discussed for more than 50 years, has the potential to be a major investment in the city's Far South Side, even as it has meant acquiring dozens of residents' homes.
After Thursday's House hearing, state Rep. Marty Moylan, a Des Plaines Democrat who heads the House Transportation Committee, said the removal of the CTA's bonding authority from the bill was an oversight and should be addressed with another amendment.
'This is a major program that's going to redo the whole face of transit and you've got to look at the greater good, which is we're going to have an operating transit system, which is going to have reforms and operating more efficiently and safe so that people can actually ride the system,' Moylan said of the transit reforms as a whole.
Among the issues discussed on the House bill was the proposed system-wide law enforcement task force. Led by the Cook County sheriff's office, the system would also include Metra and Chicago police officers, as well as Illinois State Police personnel.
Rep. John Cabello, a Republican from Machesney Park who has also worked as a police detective, said at the hearing he'd prefer to have the task force run by law enforcement throughout the newly-proposal transit system.
'I'd rather have Metra police…take care of the whole thing because their police department goes through the whole of those counties,' Cabello said after the hearing.
Rep. Eva-Dina Delgado, a Chicago Democrat and the main House sponsor of the bill, indicated she's open to discussions about that but also noted how the Cook County sheriff's office has relationships outside the county.
'They currently have a relationship with Metra on dispatch and so they have some relationships outside of Cook County and they're centralized in that way,' Delgado said. 'So, that's where the thought process came from.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
19 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Says Musk Will Face ‘Very Serious Consequences' If He Backs Democrats
President Donald Trump on June 7 warned that Elon Musk could face 'serious consequences' if he decides to back Democratic political candidates in upcoming elections. While Musk campaigned for Trump's 2024 presidential run and was a key member in the Trump administration's fight against fraud and waste, the two were involved in a public spat this week, apparently fueled by their disagreements over Trump's budget priorities in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.


Los Angeles Times
32 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘A huge moment': Martin Jarmond discusses UCLA's plans after House settlement
Like a quarterback who completed offseason workouts, spring practices and fall training camp, Martin Jarmond had been preparing for this moment for nearly a year. On Saturday came the big unveiling. The UCLA athletic director discussed with the Times the plans for his department's operations in the new college sports world created by the House settlement agreement with the NCAA that will allow schools to pay athletes directly for the first time starting July 1. The big takeaways: UCLA will distribute $20.5 million in revenue sharing — the maximum allowed under the settlement — while keeping its Olympic sports programs and athletic department staff intact. The school will also preserve scholarship limits at their current levels for at least one year in order to distribute more revenue sharing money to each player. 'This is a pivotal moment in collegiate athletics and we have to continue to invest in our athletics program to compete at the highest level,' Jarmond said. 'That's why student-athletes come to UCLA, to get the best education and compete at the highest level, and we must invest in our student-athletes to provide that championship-level experience.' While Jarmond would not divulge the specifics of his revenue-sharing arrangement, it's expected that UCLA will follow other Power Four conference schools in using U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken's back-payment formula as a model for current athletes. Under this formula, which will distribute $2.8 billion to athletes who competed from 2016 to 2024 to compensate them for lost name, image and likeness opportunities, roughly 75% of the money will be shared with football players, 15% with men's basketball players, 5% with women's basketball players and 5% with all remaining athletes. 'We've worked really hard to look at the House settlement, along with other factors,' Jarmond said, 'to determine how we were going to split up the revenue share.' Jarmond told The Times last year that he anticipated a bigger share of revenue going to football and men's basketball players because they were 'responsible for more of the revenue based on the House settlement and the back pay for NIL and all those things.' Payments will rise each year as part of the 10-year settlement agreement. Even though roster limits could eventually rise to 105 for football and 15 for men's basketball as part of the settlement, keeping scholarship limits at their current levels — 85 for football, 13 for men's basketball — will allow UCLA to provide each player on scholarship a bigger share of revenue. As part of the settlement agreement, any money used for scholarships (which have an estimated value of $65,000 per athlete at UCLA) comes out of the revenue sharing pot. Jarmond said his department would re-evaluate this arrangement in a year to ensure it was best serving the school's athletes. UCLA is also committed to preserving its Olympic sports that have provided the lion's share of NCAA championships in an athletic department widely regarded as one of the best in the nation. Jarmond said there would be no staffing cuts, but some personnel might be reassigned to better serve the athletic department. 'We are looking at reallocating staff,' Jarmond said, 'to positions that better meet our needs in a changing landscape.' The ability to pay players directly could help UCLA in ways that go beyond compensating its athletes. Revenue sharing arrangements could help narrow the resource gap between the Bruins and other Big Ten Conference schools that had more deep-pocketed NIL collectives engaging in pay-for-play practices. Now, all new NIL deals exceeding $600 must be approved by NIL Go, a clearinghouse created by the College Sports Commission to analyze deals to ensure they serve a valid business purpose and provide fair market value. It's expected that all existing college NIL collectives — including UCLA's Men of Westwood (which serves men's basketball), Bruins for Life (football) and Champion of Westwood (women's basketball, Olympic sports) — will essentially become marketing agencies that try to find endorsement deals for athletes. Jarmond said UCLA was seeking a third-party partner to help secure so-called true NIL opportunities. Being based in Los Angeles should provide Bruins athletes with a clear advantage in securing marketing deals, Jarmond said. Other challenges remain. Having traveled to Washington, D.C., to lobby for federal NIL legislation, Jarmond said he believed it was necessary to eliminate the imbalance that exists with more than 30 states having their own NIL laws. While distributing $20.5 million in revenue will be another financial blow to an athletic department that has run $219.5 million in the red over the last six fiscal years — though the entire debt has been covered by the university, bringing the balance to zero — Jarmond said he has long championed athletes being paid and believes the move is long overdue. As part of the settlement involving back pay to athletes, UCLA's share of NCAA revenue will be reduced by more than $1 million annually for the next 10 years. UCLA's finances could soon improve under a College Football Playoff revenue sharing agreement that is expected to provide Big Ten schools an additional $8 million to $12 million annually beginning in 2026. That's on top of media rights deals tilted heavily in favor of Big Ten and Southeastern Conference schools, giving the Bruins another infusion of much-needed cash. The athletic department has a new ally in chancellor Julio Frenk, who signaled his intention to be closely involved with the school's sports programs during a recent interview with The Times. 'Chancellor Frenk has been extremely supportive of athletics and the impact that it has on our community,' Jarmond said. 'He has been supportive of our efforts every step of the way. He hit the ground running during a pivotal time not just for athletics but the university, and he has demonstrated support at a high level and I'm grateful for his leadership at such a pivotal time for athletics.' While acknowledging that UCLA athletics needed to be more creative with revenue generation as part of what he called 'a huge moment' that would forever change the trajectory of college sports, Jarmond said the school's commitment to sports was unwavering. 'We have to be bold and innovative in this new world,' Jarmond said. 'UCLA has always been on the forefront and been a leader and that's not going to change. We will embrace this new era and we will continue to support our student-athletes at a championship level.'


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Sunday shows preview: Trump-Musk spat leaves admin reeling; ‘Big, beautiful bill' hits speed bump
President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's feud spilled out in public on Thursday, with the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader trading barbs that engulfed news cycles in Washington and abroad. Musk, a Trump ally, was vocal about his disappointment with Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' currently sitting in the Senate. Musk, who spent millions during the 2024 presidential campaign to help elect Trump, called the massive piece of legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump then weighed in on Thursday at the White House during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's visit, saying, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' The spat intensified, with Musk floating the prospects of creating a third party, claiming that without his political contributions, Trump would not be victorious against ex-Vice President Harris in November and accusing the president of having ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump threatened to cut off federal contracts awarded to Musk's companies. Later on Thursday, Musk signaled he might be open to brokering a truce with the commander-in-chief. After speaking with several news outlets Friday morning, Trump suggested he is ready to move on and indicated that he will not be speaking with Musk for a while. Trump told CNN Friday morning that he is 'not even thinking about Elon' and added that the SpaceX and Tesla CEO has 'got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' In the Senate, Trump's agenda bill, which passed the House chamber last month, has sparked concerns and criticism from GOP senators. The first group of GOP Sens., which consists of Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), are arguing they could vote against the bill if it slashes Medicaid benefits. Others, including Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) have previously said they would not back the legislation if it retains the current debt and spending levels. The GOP can have three defections total if all Democrats vote against the legislation. Sen. Johnson will be on CNN's 'State of the Union where he will likely discuss if any of his concerns regarding the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' have been addressed. As part of a push to root out waste, fraud and abuse within Medicare, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said this week that a bill sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), that would crack down on Medicare Advantage overpayments known as 'upcoding,' could be inserted into Trump's massive legislation. Cassidy will be on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' where he will likely discuss the latest on the reconciliation package along with his recent visit to the White House. NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.); Rep. Sarah Elfreth (D-Ma); U.S. Chamber of Commerce chief policy officer Neil Bradley. ABC's 'This Week': Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). NBC's 'Meet the Press': Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.), and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). CNN's 'State of the Union': 'Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), and Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.); Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.). CBS' 'Face the Nation': National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett; Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.); Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas); Save the Children U.S. President and CEO Janti Soeripto. 'Fox News Sunday': Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought; Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.); Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures': Secretary Of Interior Doug Burgum, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.); House Ways And Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.); Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).