Hall of Famer D. Wayne Lukas has been hospitalized and will not return to training, family says
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Hall of Fame horse racing trainer D. Wayne Lukas has been hospitalized and will not return to training, Churchill Downs announced Sunday after speaking with members of his family.
Lukas' family said the 89-year-old has battled a severe infection that has worsened and that he has declined an aggressive treatment plan to instead return home. His horses have been transferred to assistant trainer Sebastian 'Bas' Nicholl.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Married Couple Diagnosed with Stage 4 Cancer in the Same Week: 'Not Done Seeing' Their 4 Children 'Grow,' Wife Says
Husband and wife Kevin and Wendy Wilson were both diagnosed with stage 4 cancer in the same week The Millbrook, Ala., couple is "not done seeing" their four children "grow," Wendy said The Wilsons will be sharing their 'journey' together on the TikTok account @ourcancerbattleKevin and Wendy Wilson have 'always carried the weight of life together,' a GoFundMe fundraiser for the couple reads. The Millbrook, Ala., couple has been together for 21 years, married for 18 and share four children. But for a long time, Wendy was the only half of the pair undergoing treatment for cancer — until now. The Alabama mom — who received her first cancer diagnosis in 2004 and underwent a double mastectomy in 2017, per GoFundMe — just learned that her breast cancer has recurred. "I've had ovarian, cervical and breast cancer, and then, this time, with breast cancer,' Wendy told NBC affiliate WSFA. Her husband's recent diagnosis, meanwhile, is his first. 'He was told that he has stage 4 prostate cancer, and then, within a week later, I was told that my breast cancer had come back for a second time,' Wendy told WSFA. Like Kevin, her cancer is also stage 4 this time around, 'because it had spread to other areas of my body,' Wendy added. The couple are 'the kind of people who give without asking, who love without limits, and who never stop fighting for their family,' the GoFundMe says. And family is exactly what gives them strength, according to Wendy. 'To be honest, it's my kids,' she told WSFA. 'I'm not done seeing them grow.' 'I'm not done seeing them graduate high school, or continue the legacy of us,' she continued. 'So, that's my strength: showing them that no matter what you're faced with, you have to meet it head on and do the best you can, and if you can't you're going to go down fighting.' The Wilsons' youngest child, daughter Savannah, told WSFA that her parents 'need everything that they can get right now,' and urged people not to take time with the people they love for granted. "Anything can turn bad quickly,' Savannah said, adding that 'no matter what you have going on, always check on your family and your loved ones.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. As they receive treatment, Wendy and Kevin 'are both still working,' according to the GoFundMe. They are 'still showing up' and 'still trying to keep their lives steady while the ground beneath them keeps shifting," the fundraiser states. They will also be sharing their 'journey' together on the TikTok account @ourcancerbattle. 'We are doing a little video diary type thing for our family and anybody to bring awareness and let everybody know how we're doing along the way,' Wendy said in the first TikTok. 'Cancer sucks,' she concluded. 'If you ever come to Millbrook, Alabama, don't drink the Kool-Aid, 'cause there's gotta be something in the water.' Read the original article on People
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
How Social Security's overpayment mistakes can become your responsibility
This is an updated version of a story first published on Nov. 5, 2023. The original video can be viewed here. Each month, about 74 million Americans - retirees, disabled workers, and others – receive payments from Social Security. But each year many people get something else in the mail – a bill. They're told they owe the government money, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars, because the Social Security Administration miscalculated their benefits and paid them too much. When we first reported this story in 2023, the agency said about a million people a year are affected by this problem, but it now acknowledges that when you consider all the agency's programs, it's two million people per year. It can happen to anyone. And it can take years, even decades, for these unexpected debts to suddenly come to light. It often doesn't matter if it's not the recipient's fault – they still have to pay. Few people realize it, but Social Security's mistakes are your responsibility. In 2022, at Steven and Becky Sword's home in Chicago, a letter arrived from the Social Security Administration. When Becky Sword read it, she was stunned to discover that she and her husband owed Social Security "$51,887," and were expected to repay it "within 30 days." Anderson Cooper: That letter changed your life. Becky Sword: Oh, yeah. Anderson Cooper: Are you scared? Becky Sword: He's thinking we're gonna lose our house. You know, what are we gonna do? I mean, we were very scared. When we spoke with Steven and Becky Sword in 2023, Steven was making $16 an hour as a security guard on the overnight shift at a condominium complex. Becky was working days as an occupational therapy assistant in a nursing home. They were 62-years-old and had worked full-time most of their lives. But for several years, Steven had been dealing with the effects of a pancreatic disease that nearly killed him in 2016. Anderson Cooper: How long were you in the hospital for? Steven Sword: About 105 days. It was hard 'cause when I left the hospital, it took me about two months to learn to eat and walk again. Steven started receiving Social Security disability checks in 2017 as he recovered and returned to work. The agency's rules are complicated, but Becky faxed Steven's pay stubs to Social Security so the agency could monitor his earnings and eligibility. She kept the fax receipts… Anderson Cooper and Becky Sword 60 Minutes Becky Sword: So I knew they were getting it, you know. In return, Social Security sent the Swords letters like this one, saying it had increased Steven's benefits "to give him credit for his 2019 earnings." Anderson Cooper: Is the impression you got from that, that they're examining the pay stubs-- Becky Sword: Uh-huh. Definitely. Anderson Cooper: And they're pay attention-- Steven Sword: Uh-huh Becky Sword: Yeah. Anderson Cooper: And adjusting accordingly? Becky Sword: Because they're increasing it. Becky Sword and Steven Sword: Yeah. But the letter the Swords got in 2022 from Social Security said Steven shouldn't have gotten any money at the time the agency gave him that increase. Steven and Becky owed more than $50,000, the agency said, "because we did not stop his checks" about three years sooner. Anderson Cooper: Has anyone at Social Security ever, sort of, apologized? Steven Sword: No. Steven Sword: They-- they take no blame at all. Becky Sword: They say it's our fault Anderson Cooper: They're saying you should have known that-- Steven Sword: That I'm making too much money. Anderson Cooper: That-- that Social Security-- Steven Sword: But-- Anderson Cooper: Was giving you too much money? Steven Sword: Yeah. Anderson Cooper: Even though Social Security didn't know that they were giving you too much money? Steven Sword: Yeah. Which is strange because you're sending in all your pay stubs. Someone has to file that. And to me– Becky Sword: And when we asked 'em, they said, "Well, they're not looking at that every month." And then she even said, "Well, they're not even looking at it every year." I would think yearly, at least, they would review it. I could see makin' a mistake after a few months, but not three years of a mistake. And then they blamed it on COVID. They blamed it on being understaffed. And so to me, right there it's saying it's their fault. The Social Security Administration told us its privacy rules prevent it from commenting on individual cases like the Swords, and no one from the agency would give us an on camera interview. Terry Savage: Nobody knows this is happening to so many people. Anderson Cooper: This is not a story Social Security wants to publicize. Terry Savage: Ohhh no— Laurence Kotlikoff: No. Terry Savage and Laurence Kotlikoff 60 Minutes Terry Savage writes a nationally syndicated column on personal finance. Laurence Kotlikoff, an economics professor at Boston University, created software to help people maximize their Social Security benefits. Together, they've been trying to draw attention to what they call, "Social Security horror stories," caused largely, they say, by the Social Security Administration's own mistakes. Laurence Kotlikoff: Their mantra, their rule, is "Our mistake is your mistake." And you can appeal it or ask for a waiver. The only reason they will waive this-- clawback is if you are indigent: really, really poor. Terry Savage: The worst part of it is they have all the power. Because they say, "If you don't pay us back, we're just gonna cut your benefit check." Imagine: People live on those checks. And all of a sudden you get no check? Or a small amount? Anderson Cooper: If someone's been paid too much in Social Security benefits, why shouldn't they have to pay it back? Laurence Kotlikoff: Because you relied on it. So you may have decided to-- retire early, or to spend the money on your child's tuition. Overpayments have existed for decades and caused people a lot of financial pain. But fixing the problem has never been a high priority on Capitol Hill. In 2015, Congress did approve a measure to reduce overpayments by giving Social Security more timely access to payroll data. But eight years later, the agency still hasn't put the new system in place. Aging technology and staff shortages have taken a toll on Social Security. In 2022, the agency's workforce hit a 25-year low as the number of people claiming benefits kept going up. When we took a close look at Social Security's annual reports to congress, we discovered something else has been going up as well: the amount of money the agency has been clawing back from the checks of people with overpayments. Jean Rodriguez, then 73-years-old, told us her retirement checks had been withheld for the past two years. A former school cafeteria worker, she started receiving benefits in 2014. But four years later, she and her husband Glenn were asked to come to the local Social Security office in Virginia Beach, Virginia to speak with a representative. Glenn and Jean Rodriguez 60 Minutes Jean Rodriguez: And he says, "We have a small problem." Anderson Cooper: How much did he say they had overpaid you? Jean Rodriguez: $72,000. Anderson Cooper: That doesn't sound like a small problem. Jean Rodriguez: No. It wasn't. We were both devastated. Anderson Cooper: What did they tell you happened? Jean Rodriguez: Somewhere along the line they made a combination of four other people in addition to my numbers. Anderson Cooper: So they were giving you benefits based not just on your salary, but on four other people's salary-- Anderson Cooper: All combined? Jean Rodriguez: Right. Anderson Cooper: How does that happen? Jean Rodriguez: Good question. (laugh) Don't know how they did it. Anderson Cooper: Did Social Security admit to you that this was their fault? Jean Rodriguez: Yes, they did. But the agency said the Rodriguezes had to pay the money back anyway, because they could afford to do so. Jean and Glenn own their home and Glenn gets a pension from the Navy. Jean Rodriguez: If it was something I knew I did totally wrong they have the right to come after me. But I didn't know how they calculated it. And then they waited four years to figure it out. In a statement, the Social Security Administration told us "our payment accuracy rates are high," yet "even small error rates add up to substantial improper payment amounts." The agency said it's "required by law" to recover this money…and added that overpayments are not necessarily the agency's fault. They can happen "when a beneficiary does not timely report work" or other financial information. There's no statute of limitations on how long Social Security can wait to collect an overpayment. Nearly four years ago, Roy Farmer of Livonia, Michigan got a letter from Social Security asking whether he'd forgotten to pay a debt he didn't know he had. Roy Farmer 60 Minutes Anderson Cooper: This is an alleged overpayment from 20 years ago. Roy Farmer: Yes, sir. Anderson Cooper: When you were 11 or 12 years old. Roy Farmer: Correct. Roy Farmer grew up in rural Cadillac, Michigan, in a family of six that struggled to make ends meet. Roy Farmer: We ended up near homelessness a couple of times-- at one point, even living, you know, six of us in-- in a camper trailer. He was born with cerebral palsy. Roy Farmer: I had leg braces. I had to walk with a child-sized version of, like, an old-person walker. Anderson Cooper: And you had surgeries. You had doctor's visits. You had it treated. Roy Farmer: Yeah. And so thankfully they were able to get me to a point where I can live a more or less normal life-- with some limitations. He's 34-years-old now and works full-time. But when he was a child, his mother received benefits on his behalf. Social Security told him that when he was 11-years-old, the agency determined he was no longer medically eligible for benefits and his mother received $4,902 too much. His mother died a few years ago, and the agency is insisting he pay back the money because it believes he can afford to do so. Anderson Cooper: Could you afford $4,902? Roy Farmer: No, sir. That much is about a sixth of my annual take-home pay. Like most of the people we spoke to, Roy Farmer couldn't find a lawyer to help him. There's little financial incentive for attorneys to take on these cases. It took Farmer nine months to get the documents in his Social Security file. He was looking for the agency's evidence that he was no longer medically eligible for benefits when he was 11-years-old. But, he says, there was none. Roy Farmer: And they told me "We probably had it at some point. But we don't have it now." Anderson Cooper: And they admit there's no evidence you're at fault, but they're still coming after you for it. Roy Farmer: Yes, sir. Anderson Cooper: People at Social Security have told us-- "Look this is a law. This has to be changed through Congress. Our ti-- our hands are tied." Laurence Kotlikoff: It's not, Anderson because the law says that-- "If equity and good conscience demands" that-- the clawback be waived, it should be waived. Laurence Kotlikoff, the economist who's written about overpayments, is talking about a specific part of the Social Security Act that says the agency should not recover an overpayment if doing so would be "against equity and good conscience." The problem, he says, is that Social Security interprets that phrase in a very narrow way. Anderson Cooper: So the agency itself-- Social Security Administration, has a lot of discretion. Laurence Kotlikoff: Absolutely, yes. Terry Savage: Oh, sure they do. But… Laurence Kotlikoff: But financially the long-term picture's not good. And they've trained the staff, "Look, your job is to collect every penny you can, no matter what." The Social Security trust fund for retirement and disability benefits is expected to be depleted around 2035 because the benefits being paid out are greater than the payroll taxes coming in. But Kotlikoff and Savage argue that clawing back money from the elderly and disabled isn't going to make much of a dent in that problem. They say there are some simple things Congress and the Social Security Administration could do to alleviate the stress and financial difficulty caused by overpayments. For example: Terry Savage: Shouldn't there be a statute of limitations so that, after 18 months, it's their mistake, and they have to deal with it? And not the person who mistakenly received and lived on that benefit check? Anderson Cooper: If it's more than a year or two Laurence Kotlikoff: Just waive it. Say, "Our mistake. You're fine." Roy Farmer in Michigan had been waiting four months to appeal his case before an administrative law judge who works for social security. Jean and Glenn Rodriguez told us they'd been waiting four years. As for the Swords in Chicago, Steven and Becky told us they were tired of fighting the government and had decided not to appeal the matter any further. Becky and Steven Sword 60 Minutes Becky Sword: I just figure we were gonna have to give up our retirement funds. Anderson Cooper: That's the only way you can-- Steven Sword: Yeah. Becky Sword: That's the only way. Becky Sword and Steven Sword: Yeah. Becky Sword: Because they said we'd have to pay it back in three years' time and we-- we'd have to come up with $1,400 a month to pay back and we don't have that. We don't have that, you know, kind of money. When Steven Sword was not working the night shift, and Becky Sword was not working the day shift, they were preparing to hand over most of the $60,000 they'd saved for their retirement to the government agency charged with supporting Americans in their old age. After we asked the Social Security Administration about their cases back in 2023, all of the people in our story received phone calls from the agency, saying they would not have to pay the money back after all. Last year, Social Security announced it would claw back no more than 10% of a person's monthly check to recover an overpayment. But that policy changed this year under the Trump administration. Social Security now withholds 50% of monthly checks for most new overpayments it finds. Produced by Andy Court. Associate producer, Annabelle Hanflig. Broadcast associate, Grace Conley. Edited by Stephanie Palewski Brumbach.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
On Dobbs anniversary, Senate Democrats aim to restart abortion conversation
Just weeks after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Nancy Davis learned that her fetus had a fatal cranial condition. She sought an abortion in her home state of Louisiana, but a 'trigger law' took effect shortly after the June 2022 decision. The law banned nearly all abortions in the state, and doctors were unsure if Davis's case fell within its few exceptions, forcing her to travel to New York to have an abortion. Now, three years post-Roe, Davis worries for patients who may still face the kind of excruciating decisions about their pregnancies that she did. On Tuesday, she will help Senate Democrats as they try to bring abortion and reproductive health care back to the forefront on the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. 'I know these women who are currently going through it need someone to say 'I see you,'' Davis told The Washington Post. ''I believe you.'' In a forum designed to resemble a congressional hearing at the Capitol, Davis will share her story with an audience of Senate Democrats and members of the press alongside other witnesses, including two abortion providers. They will speak about their experiences in the three years since the high court eliminated the nearly 50-year constitutional right to an abortion — part of an ongoing effort from some Democrats to keep steadfast attention on the issue. The event, known as a shadow hearing, allows for a public forum to be held without conducting an official Senate hearing, which would've required approval from Republican leaders who chair committees. The move comes at a time when abortion appears to have drifted away from where it once stood as a key political issue. Though President Donald Trump has repeatedly taken credit for appointing the justices who solidified the landmark Dobbs decision, he said on the campaign trail last year that he would veto a federal abortion ban and leave abortion law up to the states. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Sunday. When Roe fell in 2022, conservatives claimed it as a massive victory. For liberals, it served as a sign of the ground the GOP gained while the Democratic Party struggled to muster enough votes to pass national abortion legislation over the past decade. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington), one of the four Democratic lawmakers leading the Dobbs anniversary messaging, said that since Trump took office, his administration has steadily launched smaller scale antiabortion efforts, which she said amount to a 'national abortion ban behind the scenes.' 'Because there's so much going on, and because it's little by little and piece by piece, women don't collectively see what is coming at them,' Murray told The Post. Among the efforts Murray referenced is the GOP's budget bill, which includes a provision that would halt Medicaid payments to abortion providers who received more than $1 million in federal reimbursements in 2024 — a measure that would mean funding cuts to Planned Parenthood, one of the biggest reproductive health care providers in the United States. Senate Republicans are racing to meet Trump's July 4 deadline to pass their version of the bill. Leading the Democratic messaging on this year's Dobbs anniversary alongside Murray are Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts), Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) and Tina Smith (Minnesota), all of whom have been vocal about the need to protect abortion access and other reproductive health advocacy. Murray said they will highlight a medley of actions from the Trump administration related to reproductive health over the past six months — some of them undoing Biden-era efforts to protect abortion access. Within days of assuming the presidency, Trump pardoned 23 people who were convicted of blocking access to reproductive health clinics, many of them during the Biden administration for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or Face Act. This month, Republicans prepared a bill that if passed would repeal the Face Act altogether. Also in January, Trump overturned two executive orders signed by President Joe Biden that aimed to expand access to reproductive care. And in early June, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services rescinded Biden-era guidance that required hospitals to provide emergency abortions when needed to stabilize patients, regardless of the state where they were receiving treatment. For Davis, who still lives in Louisiana and has become a reproductive health advocate, the ongoing changes have made her afraid that more patients will be unable to receive the care they choose in a timely manner. It's a fear that's been on her mind constantly, she said, especially as a mother to three girls, one of whom was born in the time since her 2022 nonviable pregnancy. Sharing her story again this week, Davis said, 'gives us a chance to stand up before any more harm is done.' 'For me, it's about protecting the next woman, the next family, the next mother,' she said.
