Janaki vs State of Kerala: Kerala High Court set to review film as makers says ‘cannot change name at this stage'
In June, CBFC objected to the use of Janaki in the film's title and said that the movie's lead, a rape survivor, cannot be named after Goddess Sita.
Justice N Nagaresh, who will watch the film alongside representatives from both the petitioner and the CBFC, told The Hindu, 'Considering the allegations in the petitions, I believe it is appropriate to watch the movie before arriving at a decision.'
In their petition, the makers of the film said, 'We accept that Janaki is also another name for goddess Sita, but it's such a common name used in many parts of the country. Through our movie, we never tried to defame Goddess Sita or any other belief system reluctant in our country.'
The makers further shared that they are in the final stage of production and to rename the character at this stage is difficult for us. The petitioner's counsel also highlighted that the same CBFC has issued a certificate to a film titled Janaki Jaane.
ALSO READ | Ramayana Teaser Out: Ranbir Kapoor's first look as Ram, Yash as Ravan in mythological epic; credits are a reminder of Game of Thrones
The CBFC is also facing opposition from the film body Association of Malayalam Movie Artists. Joy Mathew, member of the ad hoc committee, AMMA said, 'What a joke! Most of the people, films in our country and even the government give name from our itihas and traditions. Then why should CBFC say this? They always want to change most of the dialogues mentioning Janaki. It looks like matter of ego, otherwise there is no reason for them to do it because most of the films carry names like Sita, Ram, Mohammad, George and so on.'
Directed by Pravin Narayanan, Janaki vs State of Kerala stars Suresh Gopi and Anupama Parameswaran in the lead roles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
Madras High Court Judge to view 'Manushi' amid row over 37 cuts by censor board
Chennai: In an unusual step, the Madras High Court will directly review the Tamil film 'Manushi' following a bitter standoff between its makers and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, hearing a petition filed by the film's producer C. Vetri Maaran, on Tuesday ordered a private screening of the film on August 24 in Chennai to determine whether the censor board was justified in demanding 37 cuts. The film, produced by Vetri Maaran's Grassroot Film Company and directed by Gopi Nainar, known for his earlier work 'Aramm', stars Andrea Jeremiah in the lead role. It depicts the custodial torture of a woman suspected of being a terrorist, a subject that has already drawn attention since the release of its trailer by actor Vijay Sethupathi in April 2024. Trouble began in September 2024 when both the examining and reviewing committees of the CBFC refused to grant a censor certificate. They objected to the film because it portrayed the State in a "negative light" and claimed it blurred the lines between "leftist communism" and "mainstream communism". The rejection was challenged by Vetri Maaran in June this year, when he filed a writ petition alleging that the CBFC had acted without transparency by neither providing him an opportunity to defend the film nor spelling out specific objections. He further requested the constitution of an expert panel, including human rights activists, to re-examine the film. The High Court, while hearing that earlier petition, recorded the CBFC's submission that it had reviewed the film again and listed objectionable sequences. The petition was disposed of in June, with the court granting the producer liberty to pursue the matter further in law. However, Vetri Maaran returned to court with a fresh petition, arguing that the board's objections were excessive and arbitrary. He pointed out that even simple dialogues, such as the colloquial insult "saniyan", had been flagged for removal, which he argued violated the CBFC's guidelines. Responding to these claims, Justice Venkatesh remarked that the only way forward was to personally watch the film along with the censor board members to verify the validity of the objections. He directed that the screening be held at a private theatre on Dr. D.G.S. Dhinakaran Salai (formerly Greenways Road) and asked senior central government panel counsel A. Kumaraguru to ensure the attendance of CBFC officials. The High Court's decision to step into the censor dispute sets the stage for an extraordinary judicial review of 'Manushi'. The outcome of this screening will not only decide the film's release but could also influence wider debates on censorship and creative freedom in Indian cinema.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
AI-generated film Chiranjeevi Hanuman announced, Vikramaditya Motwane not pleased about it: ‘So it begins'
A film created entirely with AI, Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal, has been announced for a theatrical release, making Vikramaditya Motwane's long-expressed concerns about artificial intelligence taking over creativity in cinema seem like a reality. The filmmaker has come forward to call it out. On Tuesday, Abundantia Entertainment and Collective Media Network's Historyverse announced its AI-generated, 'Made-In-AI' and 'Made in India', motion picture. Chiranjeevi Hanuman – The Eternal announced On Tuesday, Abundantia Entertainment and Collective Media Network's Historyverse announced its AI-generated, 'Made-In-AI' and 'Made in India', motion picture for theatrical release on the life of Lord Hanuman. The film is set for release on Hanuman Jayanti 2026. According to the makers, the film will draw inspiration from the Ramayana and ancient Puranic texts, using AI to breathe new life into centuries-old stories. They will be using AI to weave together a visual spectacle 'designed to be enjoyed as a shared experience in theatres'. The production is anchored by a team of over 50 engineers who are working closely with cultural scholars and literary experts to script the narrative. The soundtrack will be created by Trilok, the AI-powered band, known for blending spiritual sounds with contemporary rhythms. Vikramaditya reacts As soon as the news was announced, Vikramaditya took to Instagram Stories to call it out. He reiterated his fears about AI potentially displacing creative professionals in the entertainment industry. Vikramaditya's Story. "And so it begins… Who TF needs writers and directors when its 'Made in AI',' he wrote while re-posting the announcement on his handle. Some time back in an interview with Hindustan Times, Vikramaditya confessed that he looks at AI as a threat. He said, 'I see AI as a threat. The threat is not from the creators using it. The threat is from the people with money wanting to use it to save more money for themselves. The threat comes from there. It's about the people in power using it to be able to say, 'I can use AI and then I will not hire X number of people for my job', or 'I can use AI and I can get rid of X number of people'.' More about the film Explaining the thought behind putting AI into use for the film, Vijay Subramaniam, Founder & Group CEO, Collective Artists Network, shared, 'With this film, we have the extraordinary opportunity to reimagine cultural storytelling for an audience that cherishes both tradition and innovation.' 'Our approach is rooted in authenticity and cultural stewardship, ensuring complete transparency about the role of AI in the creative process,' he shared. To this, Vikram Malhotra, founder & CEO at Abundantia Entertainment, added that they used 'cutting-edge tech & tools to tell one of India's most iconic stories – the story of Lord Hanuman – in a never-before manner.' 'Hanuman Ji is not just a God and a beacon of our culture but he is also a symbol of eternal faith, devotion and strength for hundreds of millions of his worshippers around the world. We take the responsibility of telling this story with immense gratitude and humility,' he added.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court judge to watch Vetri Maaran's movie ‘Manushi' to decide on CBFC's suggestion for 37 cuts
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the Madras High Court, on Tuesday (August 19, 2025), decided to watch the Andrea Jeremiah-starrer Tamil movie 'Manushi' during a private screening in Chennai on Sunday (August 24) to ascertain if the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is justified in suggesting as many as 37 cuts. The judge took the decision pursuant to a writ petition filed by the film's producer C. Vetri Maaran, also an acclaimed director, questioning the 37 cuts made mandatory before the CBFC could certify the movie to be fit enough for public screening in cinema theatres. The film had been produced under the writ petitioner's production banner Grassroot Film Company and directed by Tamil movie 'Aramm' fame Gopi Nainar. The movie's trailer, released by actor Vijay Sethupathi in April 2024, showed it to be a story revolving around custodial torture of a woman suspected to be a terrorist. In September 2024, the CBFC's examining committee as well as screening committee watched the full length movie and refused to issue a censor certificate for the movie on the ground that it had portrayed the State in bad light and it had confused 'leftist communism' with 'mainstream communism'. Earlier petition Mr. Maaran approached the High Court with his first writ petition in June 2025 challenging the blanket rejection of censor certificate. He said he was neither given an opportunity to be heard before the denial of the censor certificate nor informed of the individual views of the censor committee members. The producer stated he had submitted a representation to the CBFC on March 29, 2025 requesting the constitution of an expert committee comprising of human rights activists to re-examine the movie and sought a direction to the CBFC to consider his representation and issue a speaking order after re-examination. Then, Justice Venkatesh wondered how could there be a blanket rejection of censor certificate for the entire movie without listing out the objectionable scenes, sequences, visuals, dialogues, audio clips and other aspects which required to be edited out before issuance of the certificate. On June 17, the judge disposed of the first writ petition after recording the submission of CBFC that it had reviewed the movie as directed by the court and listed out the objectionable portions that required editing. Then, the judge also permitted the petitioner to proceed in accordance with law. Second petition Mr. Maaran had come to the High Court with the present writ petition claiming the CBFC had failed to consider the movie in the light of well established guidelines and that it had insisted on editing out even simple dialogues such as 'saniyan' (a Tamil term used to scold people). When the second writ petition was listed before Justice Venkatesh on Tuesday, he said, now, he would have no choice but to watch the movie himself, along with the committee members, to ascertain whether they were justified in suggesting the 37 cuts. He directed the parties before him to make arrangements for playing the movie in a private theatre at Dr. D.G.S. Dhinakaran Salai (previously known as Greenways Road) in Chennai on Sunday afternoon and asked central government senior panel counsel A. Kumaraguru to ensure the presence of CBFC committee members.
