logo
Revealed: the council that spends more on pensions than it collects in tax

Revealed: the council that spends more on pensions than it collects in tax

Telegraph31-05-2025
Cash-strapped local authorities are spending more than half of their council tax revenue on staff pensions, a Telegraph investigation has found.
The Shetland Islands council puts the equivalent of 111pc of its council tax haul into staff pensions, while councils in Hackney, South Oxfordshire, Newcastle-under-Lyme and the Orkney Islands all shell out more than half.
Another 19 fork out the equivalent of at least a third of what they take in.
Together, the 24 councils have stuffed almost £3bn into staff pensions over the past five years – but still hiked their tax rates by an average of over 7pc for 2025-26.
As rates soar to record levels and second home owners are hit with double premiums, Telegraph Money can reveal:
12 Scottish, nine English and three Welsh local authorities now shell out more than a third of their council tax on staff pension contributions – with the total bill exceeding £730m a year.
60 councils spend at least 20pc of what they collect.
The Local Government Pension Scheme already pays 2.3 million retirees and another five million current and former workers are building up generous, inflation-linked pensions.
It comes after nine in 10 areas across England endured the maximum 4.99pc council tax rise last month, with parts of Scotland and Wales slapped with even higher increases.
Local authority funding comes from multiple sources, including government grants, but tax receipts represented more than half of English councils' core spending power last year, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
The Local Government Pension Scheme for England and Wales is one of the world's largest funded schemes, with 6.7 million members and £390bn in assets. Scotland's scheme has another 639,000 and assets of £60bn.
Together, they pay retirees £15bn a year in inflation-linked, guaranteed pensions for life. Employers pay an average contribution of 19.8pc of salaries for staff pension in England and Wales and 17.5pc in Scotland.
Now, following a series of Freedom of Information requests, The Telegraph can reveal the true cost of the generous schemes – and how much of your council tax is used to fund them.
Nigel Farage, Reform leader, said: 'For all the talk of debt, for all the talk of interest rates, for all the talk of local, county and national budgets, the real elephant in the room is public sector pensions.
'What is happening is a microcosm of an even bigger national problem. These will present big challenges for Reform in the councils we're in control of.'
The Shetland Islands council reported the highest percentage of contributions paid compared to council tax collected with 111pc. Its pension costs of £74.9m over the past five years dwarfed the £67.7m it collected from ratepayers.
In March, council officials said the council's major spending commitments and millions in borrowing repayments would lead to cuts to everyday services.
Orkney Islands council was also near the top of the list after spending the equivalent of 58pc of council tax.
The highest in England was Hackney council, which collected £415.2m in council tax between 2020 and 2024 and paid £243.3m, or 59pc, into staff pensions. It has yet to release its 2024-25 figures, but confirmed in November it would need to make savings of £67m by 2028.
South Oxfordshire district council received £43.8m over the past five years, but spent £25.2m, or 58pc.
Blaenau Gwent county borough council, at 39pc, was the highest in Wales after taking in £176.9m and spending £68.5m.
A total of 60 local authorities have spent more than a fifth of the council tax they collected on pension contributions since 2020-21.
Among the 24 that spent over a third, the average council tax increase for 2025-26 was 7.5pc. It ranged from 1.99pc in Newcastle-under-Lyme to 15pc on the Orkney Islands.
Birmingham council, which effectively filed for bankruptcy and announced £300m in cuts over two years, spent more than £100m a year, equivalent to 29pc of its council tax.
The figures come as homeowners and renters battle soaring council tax rates across the country.
Almost half of properties in England now face bills of at least £2,000, while the number of households on the hook for a £5,000 bill has quadrupled.
Six councils were also granted permission for exceptional increases by Angela Rayner, with Labour-run councils in Bradford and Newham hiking rates by 9.99pc and 8.99pc respectively. Increases in Scotland and Wales were even higher.
Second home owners have also been hit after more than 200 local authorities brought in a 100pc council tax premium from April 1, enabled by rules introduced under the Conservatives.
Telegraph analysis found that 2,000 second home owners in popular holiday hotspots could face bills of £10,000 or more across both their residences. The average second home owner will now see their tax bill rise 77pc to £3,672 in 2025-26.
John O'Connell, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Local taxpayers are fed up with seeing more and more of their cash being used to prop up gold-plated pensions that most could only dream of.
'Households across the country are still reeling from the latest round of council tax rises and authorities are cutting back key services. All the while, those working in local councils are sitting pretty on defined benefit nest eggs that are all but non-existent in the private sector.'
Despite the amounts paid in by councils, the Local Government Pension Scheme remained almost £6bn in deficit at its last valuation. Of 87 individual schemes, 26 still didn't have enough money to pay their retirees.
There were hopes that councils would be able to cut their contributions following the next round of valuations, due later this year. However, experts fear this is now less likely after Donald Trump's announcement of global tariffs hit investment markets.
Andy King, of wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said the 'huge divide' between public and private sector pensions raised questions over affordability and fairness for taxpayers.
He said: 'A lot of council tax payers will be surprised at just how much of their continually rising bills go towards funding pensions, rather than into local services. The scheme is hugely more generous than private sector pensions, and local government staff may not know how good it actually is.'
A Local Government Association spokesman said: 'The Local Government Pension Scheme [LGPS] can help encourage people to develop a career in local government. With pay often lower in local government than comparable private sector roles, the LGPS can mitigate that while occupational pensions, like the LGPS, can help public sector workers avoid needing welfare benefits in retirement.
'The LGPS is the most robust public sector pension scheme. Compared with other major public sector pension schemes, the employer contribution rates in the LGPS are also generally much lower.'
A Hackney council spokesman said: 'Council tax income is just one of many funding sources that form our £1.9bn budget this year and help us deliver over 800 services that our residents rely on.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Campaigners criticise UK plans to reveal suspects' ethnicity and migration status
Campaigners criticise UK plans to reveal suspects' ethnicity and migration status

The Guardian

time12 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Campaigners criticise UK plans to reveal suspects' ethnicity and migration status

Anti-racism campaigners have criticised proposals to allow police to reveal the ethnicity and migration status of suspects, after a row triggered by claims police 'covered up' the backgrounds of two men charged in connection to the alleged rape of a child. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, this week told the BBC she hoped the Law Commission would 'accelerate' a review of contempt of court and that 'guidance needs to change' about information released when a trial is pending. But the anti-racism group the Runnymede Trust – which this month claimed 'hostile language' from politicians and the media towards immigration was fuelling 'reactionary politics' – says the proposals risk framing violence against women and girls as an issue of ethnicity instead of misogyny. The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) said the proposals would 'undermine' justice. The debate was reignited after George Finch, the Reform UK leader of Warwickshire county council, accused police of a 'cover-up' over the migration status of two suspects charged after the alleged rape of the child, claiming they were asylum seekers. The force strongly denies a cover-up, saying it merely acted in line with national guidance. The details of suspects before trials are routinely limited to ensure the fairness and legal safety of proceedings. But Downing Street has called for 'transparency' to rebuild public trust after false rumours spread after 2024's Southport murders. However, campaigners warn that politicians and media are emboldening the far right by linking migration to crime. This month, the Runnymede Trust released a report that – after analysing more than 63m words from 52,990 news articles and 317 House of Commons debates on immigration between 2019 and July 2024 – found the word most strongly associated with migrants was 'illegal'. After Cooper's remarks that 'more information should be provided … including on some of those asylum issues', Dr Shabna Begum, the chief executive of the Runnymede Trust, said: 'These proposals do nothing to address the urgent issues of male sexual violence, divert attention away from women and girls and fixate on nationality and asylum status – as part of an increasingly aggressive far-right agenda. 'Instead of recycling age-old tropes about men of colour as inherently threatening to white British women, we should be centring victims and survivors of all backgrounds. 'We all deserve better than this pantomime politics that offers us easy villains but deals with none of the wider conditions where misogyny has increased.' Runnymede's recent report said there were 'many' examples of media 'stories about distressing crimes that emphasise the immigration status of the perpetrator', claiming they were used to frame asylum seekers as a potential threat to women and 'the British way of life'. The report also cited comments made by the former home secretary Suella Braverman, in the context of 2023's illegal migration bill, which linked people arriving on boats to 'heightened levels of criminality' and Robert Jenrick's X post this year that spoke of 'importing hundreds of thousands of people from alien cultures, who possess medieval attitudes towards women'. Runnymede's report said the 'long-term effects' of such claims would be to 'normalise' violence against women and girls by making it seem as if it is 'determined by ethnicity rather than the perpetuation of misogynist practices in society'. Cooper described the release of information about suspects as 'an operational decision for the police and Crown Prosecution Service on an individual case' to the BBC, stressing ministers had to take care to avoid legal prejudice. But Griff Ferris, the interim director of communications at JCWI, said prior release of ethnicity and migration status would 'undermine what's left of justice in this country' and make all communities 'less safe'. He added: 'This deeply irresponsible and dangerous proposal is guaranteed to fuel racist narratives and further embolden the far right. 'Policies like this send a chilling message: that some people are inherently more 'suspect'.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The home secretary has made clear that there is a strong public interest in maximum transparency wherever that is possible. 'That is why the Home Office and College of Policing are working together to strengthen and clarify the guidance around how and when information is released.' Ahmad Mulakhil has been charged with rape and Mohammad Kabir has been charged with kidnap and strangulation after an alleged attack on a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton in July.

Salmond allies dismiss misconduct leak claims in Sturgeon memoir
Salmond allies dismiss misconduct leak claims in Sturgeon memoir

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Salmond allies dismiss misconduct leak claims in Sturgeon memoir

Allies of Alex Salmond have dismissed Nicola Sturgeon's suggestion that the former first minister leaked details about an investigation into sexual misconduct claims made against was cleared of 13 sexual offence charges in 2020, including attempted rape, but during the trial his lawyer admitted his client could "have been a better man."In her upcoming memoir, Frankly, Sturgeon denied releasing details about the investigation, or any having any knowledge of who did. But she added it would have been "classic Alex" to have been behind the party leader Kenny MacAskill called her a "hypocrite" while the party's former general secretary, Chris McEleny, described the ex-SNP leader's claim as a "fabrication". Sturgeon succeeded Salmond as first minister in 2014 until she resigned in March 2019, a judicial review concluded that the Scottish government's investigation into Salmond's alleged misconduct was unlawful, unfair and tainted by apparent who died of a heart attack last October, was later awarded more than £500,000 in legal left the SNP in 2018 and formed the pro-independence Alba party in 2021. MacAskill recently called for a public inquiry into the handling of sexual misconduct complaints against Salmond, who he succeeded as Alba former SNP minister posted on social media: "It's one thing to be supposedly candid in your autobiography. "Quite another to block openness and transparency when in office and by those you continue to support."This hypocrisy is yet another reason for an inquiry into the Scottish government's actions relating to Alex Salmond."Meanwhile, Chris McEleny claimed the investigation was a "stitch up" and that several public bodies had "conspired to jail Salmond".He added: "Alex Salmond delivered an SNP government, an SNP majority and an independence referendum whereas Nicola Sturgeon delivered nothing whatsoever for the national cause."Nicola might think she can fabricate her own version of the truth now that Alex is no longer here but the reality is her book will end up in a bargain basket whilst Alex Salmond will reside is in the pages of the Scottish history books." Journalist David Clegg broke the story about the Salmond investigation when he was political editor of the Daily told BBC Scotland's The Sunday Show that he did not believe there was any truth in Sturgeon's leak now editor of The Courier, said: "I find that a conspiracy theory too far. "But I think it shows the level of suspicion and the deep rift that had formed between Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon prior to his death."He said the "factual account" of what happened when the story emerged was laid out in his book, Break-Up, which he co-wrote with journalist Kieran recalled: "A document turned up in the post at the Record offices."It had these claims summarised and over the course of that evening we had to authenticate them and work out whether they were legitimate. "There is obviously some mystery and speculation about what went on seven years ago and how that happened."But if it was Alex Salmond who had leaked it, when I phoned him up that night to put the claims to him, he did an incredible acting job of seeming surprised and shocked. "I have heard this from people close to Nicola Sturgeon before and it's always struck me as not credible and I would be very surprised if it was the case." When asked if he knew the source of the leak, Clegg said: "I have had many nights thinking about who may have sent that in and I've had some suspicions over the years and guesses - but the truth is I'm not even sure who it was."In her book extract, published in The Sunday Times, Nicola Sturgeon also dismissed suggestions of a "conspiracy" between the Scottish government, civil service, the complainants and the Crown Office against Salmond."I think that's fanciful as well," said Mr Clegg."In general, I'm always of the view that the simplest explanation is probably the most likely one."And that would be that somebody thought this information was in the public interest and was concerned that it was going to be covered up so tried to get it out."Sturgeon previously spoke about Salmond in a Financial Times interview in January, where she said he "would be really rough on people."Salmond's widow, Moira, later said comments about her husband had caused the family "great distress".At the time, she added: "Attacks by the living on the dead will seem to many as deeply unfair."My wish, and sincere hope, is that these attacks will now stop." The extract is the second to be published from Sturgeon's the first, published in The Times on Saturday, the former first minister described her arrest by police investigating the SNP's finances as the worst day of her describes being questioned by detectives as part of Operation also writes about her "utter disbelief" about police raiding the home she shared with her husband Peter Murrell in April former first minister was later exonerated and has since separated from Mr Murrell who has been charged with in the extracts, the former SNP leader describes the pain of suffering a miscarriage and sets out her views on sexuality, which she says she does not consider "to be binary".Frankly will be published on Thursday 14 August. Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon once formed a formidable partnership which dominated the SNP and then Scottish politics brought Scotland within touching distance of independence in was something which even some supporters of independence would not have believed to have been possible so quickly a few years latest extracts from Nicola Sturgeon's memoirs serve as a reminder of the spectacular implosion of their also reignites the question of Alex Salmond's friends and political allies have wanted his public reputation restored since his acquittal in - but not all - of those who were closest to him are no longer prominent within the SNP but are still powerful voices within the independence movement or the Alba party, which Salmond Minister John Swinney - who was also a key figure in Salmond's administration as finance secretary - wants to move the SNP forward and chart the road nine months from the Scottish election, some will wonder what such an explosive account of the end of the relationship at the heart of the SNP will do to the party's prospects of securing re-election.

Welsh Labour spends £4m planting trees in Uganda
Welsh Labour spends £4m planting trees in Uganda

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Welsh Labour spends £4m planting trees in Uganda

The Labour-run Welsh Government has spent more than £4m on planting trees in Uganda. The Mbale Tree Planting Project, which aims to mitigate climate change and promote gender equality for female workers in the landlocked country, has been backed by the Welsh Government since 2013. Yet it is the latest in a series of taxpayer costs signed off by Welsh Labour politicians to come under scrutiny, as NHS patients in the country continue to face some of the longest waits for treatment in the UK. The Size of Wales programme, which sends the taxpayer cash to Uganda, has overseen the planting of trees for beekeeping in Africa as part of the Advancing Gender Equality for Climate Change Resilience and Adaptation project. As a result, a network of tree nurseries has been established which are capable of growing at least 3.2 million trees each year. Providing training and support to women-led nurseries had also 'empowered women to take on leadership roles and generate income,' an evaluation of the project reported. Celebrating the planting project's 25 millionth sapling earlier this year, Welsh Labour minister Jane Hutt said: 'The distribution of 25 million trees in eastern Uganda is not only helping to combat climate change, it's transforming lives, particularly for women and young people across Uganda.' Meanwhile, the indigenous Wampis people in the northern Peruvian Amazon have enjoyed solar-powered boats and charging points, also funded by the Welsh Government. Yet more than 5,800 miles away in Wales, the ambulance service has also faced severe pressure and the social care sector is struggling to cope with increased demand. Council tax bills have also soared by 7.2 per cent on average across the country. Welsh Tory leader Darren Millar said: 'People in Wales will be amazed that there is money to plant trees in Uganda, yet public toilets, libraries and other services are closing in their communities. Every pound spent on planting trees in Africa is a pound that is not being spent on public services here. ' The Welsh government isn't even responsible for international relations so Labour ministers should stop the overreach and focus on the things that they are responsible for such as our poorly performing schools and hospitals and getting to grips with the unacceptable waiting times in the Welsh NHS.' It is not the first Welsh Labour policy has faced criticism in recent months. Earlier this year the Government came under attack for spending almost £250,000 on a project to count moths. Tory colleague Janet Finch-Saunders added: 'It is time the Welsh Labour Government stopped this virtue-signalling and instead concentrated their spending priorities on the things that matter most to our tax-paying residents.' A Welsh Government spokesman said: 'Climate change affects all of us, and we are stepping up to play our part in the world. These trees protect communities from floods and droughts, while connecting Welsh and Ugandan schoolchildren culturally and through practical environmental education opportunities. 'Earlier this year, we passed a £26bn budget, investing an extra £1.6bn in public services, strengthening our NHS, supporting schools and helping communities across Wales thrive.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store