Freedom Debt Relief Review: What to Know About Consolidating Your Debt
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
As consumer debt climbs across the U.S., many people are desperately searching for ways to regain control. Finding a manageable path forward is essential, whether it involves managing credit card bills, medical debt, or personal loans. Freedom Debt Relief (FDR) offers an alternative to traditional debt consolidation loans for those overwhelmed by unsecured debt.
What Is Freedom Debt Relief?
Founded in 2002, Freedom Debt Relief has helped over 850,000 clients resolve over $15 billion in debt. The company offers debt settlement, not consolidation loans. Instead of bundling your debts into a new loan, FDR works with your creditors to reduce what you owe through negotiation.
The approach targets consumers who can't qualify for a loan or want to reduce their total debt, not just their interest rates.
Can Freedom Debt Relief Help With Debt Consolidation?
While FDR doesn't offer loans, its settlement program can serve a similar purpose. Clients make a single monthly deposit into a dedicated account, which is then used to pay negotiated settlements.
Over time, this can simplify repayment and reduce overall debt. The program benefits those who don't qualify for loan-based consolidation due to poor credit or high debt loads.
How the Freedom Debt Relief Program Works
FDR's process begins with a free consultation. If you enroll, you'll start making deposits into a dedicated account. As your balance grows, FDR negotiates with your creditors to settle accounts for less than the full amount.
Once the settlement is reached, the agreed amount is paid from your account. This process repeats until all enrolled debts are resolved. The program typically takes 24 to 48 months to complete.
Benefits of Using Freedom Debt Relief
Clients receive reduced total debt through negotiated settlements.
There is one monthly deposit instead of multiple payments.
There are no upfront fees—you only pay after a successful settlement.
FDR is a trusted provider with two decades of experience.
Downsides to Consider
There is a short-term credit impact from settling rather than paying in full.
Fees range from 15% to 25% of enrolled debt upon settlement.
It is not a loan: FDR isn't a fit for those seeking traditional consolidation loans.
The program only applies to unsecured debts—secured loans, such as mortgages and auto loans, do not qualify.
Freedom Debt Relief vs. Traditional Debt Consolidation
Debt consolidation typically involves taking out a new loan to combine multiple balances. This can help lower your interest rate, but it often requires good credit. FDR, by contrast, allows consumers to reduce what they owe through negotiation, not new borrowing.
For example, a borrower with $25,000 in credit card debt who has missed payments may not qualify for a low-interest loan but may find relief through FDR's program.
Customer Experiences
FDR holds strong ratings on Trustpilot and the Better Business Bureau. Many users highlight the company's clear communication and personalized service. Common praise includes:
"I saved thousands and finally got some peace of mind."
"They were kind, non-judgmental, and handled everything for me."
"It took time, but it worked. I'm debt-free in under two years."
Some reviews note the process isn't instant, but the result is often worth the wait.
Is Freedom Debt Relief Right for You?
Freedom Debt Relief is a strong option for individuals with significant unsecured debt who do not qualify for consolidation loans. It's ideal for individuals seeking to reduce their debt and simplify their repayment process. The program benefits individuals facing hardship, such as job loss, medical bills, or other life events that have made debt unmanageable. While it isn't a one-size-fits-all solution, it can offer relief to people committed to sticking with the plan.
If that sounds like you, starting with a free consultation could be the first step toward financial freedom.
Investing and Crypto
Investing involves risk, and your investment may lose value. Past performance gives no indication of future results. These statements do not constitute and cannot replace investment or financial advice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prosecutors link LA contract to Smartmatic 'slush fund' as voting tech firm battles Fox in court
MIAMI (AP) — Smartmatic, the elections-technology company suing Fox News for defamation, is now contending with a growing list of criminal allegations against some of its executives — including a new claim by federal prosecutors that a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials was financed partly with proceeds from the sale of voting machines in Los Angeles. The new details about the criminal case surfaced this month in court filings in Miami, where the company's co-founder, Roger Pinate, and two Venezuelan colleagues were charged last year with bribing officials in the Philippines in exchange for a contract to help run that country's 2016 presidential elections. Pinate, who no longer works for Smartmatic, has pleaded not guilty. To buttress the case, federal prosecutors are seeking to introduce evidence they argue shows that some of the nearly $300 million the company was paid by Los Angeles County to help modernize its voting systems was diverted to a fund controlled by Pinate through the use of overseas shell companies, fake invoices and other means. Smartmatic itself hasn't been charged with breaking any laws, nor have U.S. prosecutors accused Smartmatic or its executives of tampering with election results. Similarly, they haven't accused Los Angeles County officials of wrongdoing, or said whether they were even aware of the alleged bribery scheme. County officials say they weren't. But the case against Pinate is unfolding as Smartmatic is pursuing a $2.7 billion lawsuit accusing Fox of defamation for airing false claims that the company helped rig the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox says it was legitimately reporting newsworthy allegations. Smartmatic said the Justice Department's new filing was filled with 'misrepresentations' and is 'untethered from reality.' 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do,' the company said in a statement. 'We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' Fox questions Smartmatic's dealings in LA Still, Fox has gone to court to try to get more information about L.A. County's dealings with Smartmatic. The network has long tried to leverage the bribery allegations to undermine Smartmatic's narrative about its business prospects – a key component in calculating any potential damages — and portray it as a scandal-plagued company brought low by its own legal problems, not Fox's broadcasts. South Florida-based Smartmatic was founded more than two decades ago by a group of Venezuelans who found early success working for the government of the late Hugo Chavez, a devotee of electronic voting. The company later expanded globally, providing voting machines and other technology to help carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia. It was awarded its contract to help with Los Angeles County elections in 2018. The contract, which Smartmatic continues to service, gave the company an important foothold in what was then a fast-expanding U.S. voting-technology market. But Smartmatic has said its business tanked after Fox News gave President Donald Trump's lawyers a platform to paint the company as part of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. Fox itself eventually aired a piece refuting the allegations after Smartmatic's lawyers complained, but it has aggressively defended itself against the defamation lawsuit in New York. 'Facing imminent financial collapse and indictment, Smartmatic saw a litigation lottery ticket in Fox News's coverage of the 2020 election,' the network's lawyers said in a court filing. Smartmatic has disputed Fox's characterization in court filings as 'lies' and 'another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation." LA clerk deposed about trip, gifted meal As part of its effort to investigate Smartmatic's work in Los Angeles, Fox has sued to force LA County Clerk Dean Logan to hand over public records about his dealings with Smartmatic's U.S. affiliate. Fox's lawyers also questioned Logan in a deposition about a dinner a Smartmatic executive bought for him at the members-only Magic Castle club and restaurant in Los Angeles and a Smartmatic-paid trip that Logan made to Taiwan in 2019 to oversee the manufacturing of equipment by a Smartmatic vendor. U.S. prosecutors claim that vendor was deeply involved in the alleged kickback scheme in the Philippines. The five-day trip included business class airfare, hotel and numerous meals as well as time for sightseeing, Fox said. 'The trip's itinerary demonstrates that the trip was not a financial inspection or audit. It was a boondoggle,' Fox said in court filings. Logan, who did not report the gifts in his financial disclosures, said in his 2023 deposition that the meal at the Magic Castle was a 'social occasion' unrelated to business and that he was not required to report the trip to Taiwan because his visit was covered by the contract. Mike Sanchez, a spokesman for Logan's office, said in a statement that the bribery allegations are unrelated to the company's work for L.A. County and that the county had no knowledge of how the proceeds from its contract would be used. All of Smartmatic's work has been evaluated for compliance with the contract's terms, Sanchez added, and as soon as Pinate was indicted he and the other defendants were banned from conducting business with the county. As for the trip to Taiwan, Sanchez said another county official joined Logan for the trip and the two conducted several on-site visits and conducted detailed reviews of electoral technology products that were required prior the start of their manufacturing. Logan's spouse accompanied him on the trip, but at the couple's own expense, the spokesman added. 'Unfortunately, this is an attempt to use the County as a pawn in two serious legal actions to which the County is not a party,' Sanchez said. Smartmatic has settled two other defamation lawsuits it brought against conservative news outlets Newsmax and One America News Network over their 2020 U.S. election coverage. Settlement terms weren't disclosed. Prosecutors claim bribe paid in Venezuela U.S. prosecutors in Miami have also accused Pinate of secretly bribing Venezuela's longtime election chief by giving her a luxury home with a pool in Caracas. Prosecutors say the home was transferred to the election chief in an attempt to repair relations following Smartmatic's abrupt exit from Venezuela in 2017 when it accused President Nicolas Maduro 's government of manipulating tallied results in elections for a rubber-stamping constituent assembly. Smartmatic has denied the bribery allegations, saying it ceased all operations in Venezuela in 2017 after blowing the whistle on the government and has never sought to secure business there again. "There are no slush funds, no gifted house," the company said. Instead, it accused Fox of engaging in 'victim-blaming' and attempts to use 'frivolous' court filings 'to smear us further, twisting unproven Justice Department allegations.' ___ Peltz reported from New York. Joshua Goodman And Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
14 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Prosecutors link LA contract to Smartmatic 'slush fund' as voting tech firm battles Fox in court
MIAMI — Smartmatic, the elections-technology company suing Fox News for defamation , is now contending with a growing list of criminal allegations against some of its executives — including a new claim by federal prosecutors that a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials was financed partly with proceeds from the sale of voting machines in Los Angeles. The new details about the criminal case surfaced this month in court filings in Miami, where the company's co-founder, Roger Pinate, and two Venezuelan colleagues were charged last year with bribing officials in the Philippines in exchange for a contract to help run that country's 2016 presidential elections. Pinate, who no longer works for Smartmatic, has pleaded not guilty. To buttress the case, federal prosecutors are seeking to introduce evidence they argue shows that some of the nearly $300 million the company was paid by Los Angeles County to help modernize its voting systems was diverted to a fund controlled by Pinate through the use of overseas shell companies, fake invoices and other means. Smartmatic itself hasn't been charged with breaking any laws, nor have U.S. prosecutors accused Smartmatic or its executives of tampering with election results. Similarly, they haven't accused Los Angeles County officials of wrongdoing, or said whether they were even aware of the alleged bribery scheme. County officials say they weren't. But the case against Pinate is unfolding as Smartmatic is pursuing a $2.7 billion lawsuit accusing Fox of defamation for airing false claims that the company helped rig the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox says it was legitimately reporting newsworthy allegations. Smartmatic said the Justice Department's new filing was filled with 'misrepresentations' and is 'untethered from reality.' 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do,' the company said in a statement. 'We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' Still, Fox has gone to court to try to get more information about L.A. County's dealings with Smartmatic. The network has long tried to leverage the bribery allegations to undermine Smartmatic's narrative about its business prospects – a key component in calculating any potential damages — and portray it as a scandal-plagued company brought low by its own legal problems, not Fox's broadcasts. South Florida-based Smartmatic was founded more than two decades ago by a group of Venezuelans who found early success working for the government of the late Hugo Chavez , a devotee of electronic voting. The company later expanded globally, providing voting machines and other technology to help carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia. It was awarded its contract to help with Los Angeles County elections in 2018. The contract, which Smartmatic continues to service, gave the company an important foothold in what was then a fast-expanding U.S. voting-technology market. But Smartmatic has said its business tanked after Fox News gave President Donald Trump's lawyers a platform to paint the company as part of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. Fox itself eventually aired a piece refuting the allegations after Smartmatic's lawyers complained , but it has aggressively defended itself against the defamation lawsuit in New York. 'Facing imminent financial collapse and indictment, Smartmatic saw a litigation lottery ticket in Fox News's coverage of the 2020 election,' the network's lawyers said in a court filing. Smartmatic has disputed Fox's characterization in court filings as 'lies' and 'another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation.' As part of its effort to investigate Smartmatic's work in Los Angeles, Fox has sued to force LA County Clerk Dean Logan to hand over public records about his dealings with Smartmatic's U.S. affiliate. Fox's lawyers also questioned Logan in a deposition about a dinner a Smartmatic executive bought for him at the members-only Magic Castle club and restaurant in Los Angeles and a Smartmatic-paid trip that Logan made to Taiwan in 2019 to oversee the manufacturing of equipment by a Smartmatic vendor. U.S. prosecutors claim that vendor was deeply involved in the alleged kickback scheme in the Philippines. The five-day trip included business class airfare, hotel and numerous meals as well as time for sightseeing, Fox said. 'The trip's itinerary demonstrates that the trip was not a financial inspection or audit. It was a boondoggle,' Fox said in court filings. Logan, who did not report the gifts in his financial disclosures, said in his 2023 deposition that the meal at the Magic Castle was a 'social occasion' unrelated to business and that he was not required to report the trip to Taiwan because his visit was covered by the contract. Mike Sanchez, a spokesman for Logan's office, said in a statement that the bribery allegations are unrelated to the company's work for L.A. County and that the county had no knowledge of how the proceeds from its contract would be used. All of Smartmatic's work has been evaluated for compliance with the contract's terms, Sanchez added, and as soon as Pinate was indicted he and the other defendants were banned from conducting business with the county. As for the trip to Taiwan, Sanchez said another county official joined Logan for the trip and the two conducted several on-site visits and conducted detailed reviews of electoral technology products that were required prior the start of their manufacturing. Logan's spouse accompanied him on the trip, but at the couple's own expense, the spokesman added. 'Unfortunately, this is an attempt to use the County as a pawn in two serious legal actions to which the County is not a party,' Sanchez said. Smartmatic has settled two other defamation lawsuits it brought against conservative news outlets Newsmax and One America News Network over their 2020 U.S. election coverage. Settlement terms weren't disclosed. U.S. prosecutors in Miami have also accused Pinate of secretly bribing Venezuela's longtime election chief by giving her a luxury home with a pool in Caracas. Prosecutors say the home was transferred to the election chief in an attempt to repair relations following Smartmatic's abrupt exit from Venezuela in 2017 when it accused President Nicolas Maduro 's government of manipulating tallied results in elections for a rubber-stamping constituent assembly. Smartmatic has denied the bribery allegations, saying it ceased all operations in Venezuela in 2017 after blowing the whistle on the government and has never sought to secure business there again. 'There are no slush funds, no gifted house,' the company said. Instead, it accused Fox of engaging in 'victim-blaming' and attempts to use 'frivolous' court filings 'to smear us further, twisting unproven Justice Department allegations.' ___ Peltz reported from New York.
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Meeting the World's Growing Demand for Energy
James Walker, CEO of NANO Nuclear Energy, discusses the timeline for his company to roll out its first small modular reactor, and also responds to a stock downgrade from Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. James speaks with Tim Stenovec and Emily Graffeo on Bloomberg Businessweek Daily. (Source: Bloomberg)
