Trump's fans forgive him everything. Why not the Epstein files?
So it has been fascinating to watch a vocal part of Trump's movement revolt over his administration's handling of files from the case of Jeffrey Epstein, the sex-trafficking financier who died in jail in 2019 in what was ruled a suicide. Running for president, Trump promised to release the Epstein files, which some thought would contain evidence of murder. 'Yet another good reason to vote for Trump,' Republican Senator Mike Lee, from Utah, wrote on social media. 'Americans deserve to know why Epstein didn't kill himself.'
Some of the influencers who now staff Trump's administration built their followings by spinning wild stories about the case, promising revelations that would lay their enemies low. Epstein's client list 'is going to rock the political world,' Dan Bongino, now deputy director of the FBI, said in September. Appearing on Fox News in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked whether her department would release 'a list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients'. She responded, 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review.'
Now she says there was no such client list. Last week, the Justice Department and the FBI released a memo saying that Epstein killed himself and no more information would be forthcoming: 'It is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted. Trump has implored his followers to forget about Epstein, writing, in a petulant Truth Social post, that the files were 'written by Obama, Crooked Hillary' and various other deep-state foes. Let's 'not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about,' he wrote.
But he was wrong: Lots of people care. Trump's followers responded to his attempt to wave Epstein away with uncharacteristic fury and disappointment. Bongino has reportedly threatened to resign over Bondi's handling of the case. Epstein was a major subject at Turning Point USA's Student Action Summit, a conservative conference that began on Friday. Speaking from the stage in Tampa, Florida, comedian Dave Smith accused Trump of actively covering up 'a giant child rapist ring.' The audience cheered and applauded.
Having nurtured conspiracy theories for his entire political career, Trump suddenly seems in danger of being consumed by one. In many ways, it's delicious to watch, but there's also reason for anxiety, because for some in Trump's movement, this setback is simply proof that they're up against a conspiracy more powerful than they had ever imagined. 'What we just learned is that dealing with the Epstein Operation is above the President's pay grade,' posted Bret Weinstein, an evolutionary biologist and podcaster. An important question, now, is who they decide is pulling the strings.
Epstein obsessives are right to be suspicious about the weird turns the case has taken. So much about it feels inexplicable, including the sweetheart plea deal Epstein got in 2008, and the fact that he was apparently able to kill himself despite being one of the most monitored inmates in the country. Even if it turns out that a review of the case doesn't implicate anyone who hasn't already been charged, it should be a scandal that Bondi misled the public about the existence of a client list.
But the administration lies all the time — that alone doesn't explain why this issue has so tested the MAGA coalition. To understand why it's such a crisis, you need to understand the crucial role that Epstein plays in the mythologies buttressing MAGA. The case is of equal interest to QAnon types, who see in Epstein's crimes proof of their conviction that networks of elite paedophiles have hijacked America, and of right-wing critics of Israel, who are convinced that Epstein worked for Mossad, the country's spy service.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Russia threatens 'preemptive strikes' on West days after US President Donald Trump demands Ukraine ceasefire
Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has claimed the Kremlin could launch "preemptive strikes" on Western nations if they escalate the war in Ukraine just days after United States President Donald Trump demanded a ceasefire. On Tuesday, President Trump threatened to impose "very severe" tariffs on Russia unless the Kremlin negotiated an end to its invasion. The US leader also declared he was "very unhappy" with Russian President Vladimir Putin's reticence to engage in peace talks, in a notable shift away from previous comments praising Russia's leader. The Kremlin subsequently dismissed the threat, with Mr Medvedev, who now acts as the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia, describing it as a "theatrical ultimatum". On Thursday, the senior Russian official went further still, telling state media the Kremlin was ready to "respond in full" to any perceived escalation of the war by Western nations. "The statements of Western politicians on this topic are complete nonsense," he said, adding many were attempting to deliberately rachet up tensions. "We need to act accordingly. To respond in full and, if necessary, launch preemptive strikes." Mr Medvedev did not name President Trump in his remarks, but was likely responding both the the US leader and comments from Ukraine's European and NATO allies following the announcement of further military support. Under a fresh agreement, the US is set to provide NATO with weapons, including advanced Patriot missile systems, which will then be distributed to Ukraine to aid its defence against Russian invaders. Russia has long argued the provision of Western weapons to Ukraine represents direct European and US involvement in the war, a claim Mr Medvedev reiterated on Thursday. "What is happening today is a proxy war, but in essence it is a full-scale war, sanctions packages, loud statements about the militarisation of Europe," he told Russian outlet TASS. "It's another attempt to destroy the 'historical anomaly' hated by the West - Russia, our country." Given Mr Medvedev's remarks, it appears highly unlikely the Kremlin will bow to President Trump's demand for a ceasefire. Russian forces have continued to make gains in Ukraine, with President Putin understood to be keen on continuing to push forward until the West is prepared to meet his terms for peace. Those demands include several stipulations Ukraine deems unacceptable, including the almost complete disbandment of its armed forces and the surrender of huge amounts of land to Russia. The majority of European leaders have backed Ukraine's stance, maintaining any peace agreement should not be negotiated on Russian terms, although it US officials have made no such demands. When asked about the terms of any peace agreement, President Trump has been light on detail, simply insisting the fighting needed to end. The US leader has suggested Ukraine may need to concede territory to Russia in order to secure peace and has also refused to provide guarantees over the nation's future security. With Reuters

Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Conflict in the Indo-Pacific as early as 2027': Military expert warns of aggressive China
Former Army director general Retired Brigadier Ian Langford speculates on future conflict in the Indo-Pacific. This comes amid Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's week-long visit to China for the Australia-China Annual Leaders' Meeting. 'The Chinese don't stage any of these influence actions without it being choreographed in the broader context,' Mr Langford told Sky News host Peta Credlin. 'We've got an interesting contrast between diplomacy at the very highest levels of government and, in fact, that the Americans are conducting … what some are calling a rehearsal for future conflict in the Indo-Pacific from as early as 2027.'

Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Epstein saga reveals ‘rare' moment of Trump attacking the MAGA base
Sky News contributor Kosha Gada discusses the MAGA furore around the Epstein files how Democrats are 'making hay' of the situation. 'There are many questions about this that remain unanswered that people care about,' Ms Gada said. 'It has a lot of people very angry, and it's a rare time where I see Trump out of step with his base and attacking his own base, which is unlike him.'