logo
UP GOP lawmaker: Cash aid program is not 'just a flat out government handout'

UP GOP lawmaker: Cash aid program is not 'just a flat out government handout'

Yahoo17-02-2025

A cash-assistance program for expectant moms and babies, which first began in Flint more than a year ago, is growing its reach to hundreds more families across Michigan.
Rx Kids, led by Flint pediatrician Dr. Mona Hanna, began taking applications in Kalamazoo last week and will kick off in the eastern Upper Peninsula next month. So far, the Flint program has distributed more than $6 million to families — no strings attached. The program is among dozens across the country experimenting with providing direct cash payments to people with the greatest need. Bipartisan lawmakers from regions where the Rx Kids is slated to expand see promise in the program but say they remain alert, watching for how families benefit from getting cash in hand, to use as they see fit.
The premise is simple but the goal is ambitious: give expectant moms cash during a financially rocky time to eliminate infant poverty and boost economic stability. The program gives families $1,500 mid-pregnancy and then $500 a month up to a year of the infant's life. Program participants in Flint reported spending the money on basics like baby supplies and food, and feeling more financially secure.
"We are improving the family's ability to keep a roof over their head, food on their table and care for their children. And Rx Kids is helping our families succeed at, really, the hardest job in the world, and that is being a parent," Hanna said during a Friday press conference announcing the expansion of the program to the eastern Upper Peninsula.
Rx Kids has so far raised about $100 million from public and private funders. Programs don't launch in communities without at least two years of funding. Last year, Rx Kids received $20 million from the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program to expand beyond Flint, from the southwest side of the state to its northernmost regions.
That's important, said Republican state Sen. John Damoose, who represents part of the UP and the northern Lower Peninsula: "A lot of times people forget the rural poor."
"There's a lot of need, certainly, in our big cities but there's also a lot of support systems that often don't exist in areas like ours and I can tell you, our people up here are suffering because of inflation, because of lack of services. They need some help," Damoose, whose district includes parts of Mackinac and Chippewa counties, said last month.
In Chippewa County — home to Michigan's oldest city, Sault Ste. Marie, and the Soo Locks — roughly 29% of children under 5 years old live below poverty. It's one of the counties in the eastern Upper Peninsula where Rx Kids is slated to expand. The other counties are Luce, Mackinac, Alger and Schoolcraft. High housing costs, a seasonal economy, a dearth of health care and miles between neighbors and services can make life in the Upper Peninsula challenging and unaffordable, Damoose said.
The UP program is estimated to cover about 600 babies a year. Pregnant moms and babies born after March 1 will be eligible for $1,500 mid-pregnancy and $500 a month for the first six months of the child's life. There are no income requirements. It's a shorter time period compared with Flint because of how much funding the program was able to raise, Hanna said.
More: Moms are getting cash each month to ease financial troubles. Does it work?
"I've had people who came up to me and said, 'Wait a second, you're a Republican and you're supporting a cash giveaway to parents.' Well, of course I am. This is a great idea," Damoose said during Friday's announcement.
Damoose has told the Free Press that he sees it as an innovative way to get help to people without bureaucratic hurdles. He's supportive of the program but will be watching for what the results bear out and how it runs.
"If we can look back and realize ... in the city of Sault Ste. Marie, we've helped out this number of mothers and children and young families, and it seems to be appropriate, then let's grow it a little bit," he said last month. "If we find that we're just pouring money down a black hole, let's pull it back or revise the program a little bit."
State Sen. Ed McBroom, R-Vulcan, said he likes the program because it supports families but thinks it should have income restrictions to "keep the costs in check" and ensure it runs for a long time. He also said support like this can encourage people to have more children and grow the state's population. Michigan's Upper Peninsula has seen population loss back-to-back in the past two decades, according to research from the Michigan Technological University.
"If a couple is considering whether or not to have children and the financial hardship is part of that calculation, this program can offset those concerns and give people hope that they can indeed afford to have more children and raise a family," McBroom said.
In Kalamazoo, where nearly a third of kids under 5 years old live below poverty, applications for Rx Kids opened Feb. 12 for expectant moms and babies born on or after Feb. 1. Just like in Flint, Kalamazoo's version of the program will offer $1,500 mid-pregnancy and then $500 the first 12 months of the infant's life. As as Friday, the Kalamazoo program had received more than 200 applications.
"There's just so many people living on the margins and Kalamazoo is resource rich, but sometimes people don't understand how to navigate all the different assistance programs," said Democratic state Rep. Julie Rogers, whose district includes the city of Kalamazoo.
More: Program providing $7,500 for Flint moms and babies expected to expand across Michigan
Rogers pointed to a significant ALICE population in Kalamazoo. The United Way's ALICE measure — which stands for asset limited, income constrained, employed — considers households earning above the federal poverty level but still struggling to afford the basics. In Kalamazoo County, 39% of households fell below the ALICE threshold.
"We are trusting mothers, we are trusting families to decide what is best for them and their family and situation," Rogers said. "So, instead of the government being prescriptive and telling people how to spend the money, we're giving them the cash assistance with pretty much a blank slate of, they can choose and decide."
To measure success, bipartisan lawmakers are watching for a range of outcomes, from increased birth rates and school enrollment to improvements in child development and health.
Rogers said she's "cautiously optimistic" about the Rx Kids program as a pilot, and wants to see the data from participating communities. Damoose, Rogers and state Sen. John Cherry, D-Flint, said they would consider more public dollars to go toward the program in the future.
Damoose said Rx Kids doesn't necessarily fit into a "Republican orthodoxy," since it involves government giving cash to people in need, but he supports the effort because he is "very pro-family."
"I can have a real role in helping to convince Republican lawmakers to at least understand the benefits and how it fits within our sort of preconceived notions, if you will. Because I've got to dispel the idea that this is just a flat out government handout," Damoose said.
McBroom said there's support from his Republican colleagues to strengthen families, but questions remain on the long term sustainability.
"Where we put our money shows some of our values as a society. It shows what things we need to incentivize. Sometimes we're incentivizing particular behaviors and actions. In this case, I see us believing that we need as a society to increase children. We need to increase population. And so, I think it's valuable for us to put our money towards that endeavor," he said.
Back in Flint where Rx Kids first began, more than 1,400 families have so far enrolled in the program. Cherry said starting in the city which he represents, Flint, was a good call because of its high concentration of poverty, but it shouldn't stop there.
"The goal is not for it to end at Flint," he said. "The goal is: we want to make sure that we're helping all these mothers and babies."
Hanna said programs in Wayne County and Oakland County communities will likely go live later this year.
City of Kalamazoo: Applications opened Feb. 12 for expectant moms and babies born on or after Feb. 1. People can sign up while pregnant or until a baby is six months old. The Kalamazoo program will offer $1,500 mid-pregnancy and then $500 the first year of the infant's life.
Eastern Upper Peninsula (Chippewa, Alger, Schoolcraft, Luce and Mackinac Counties): Expectant moms or babies born on or after March 1 are eligible. Applications will open March 3. Expectant moms can get $1,500 mid-pregnancy and $500 for the first 6 months of the infant's life.
Expectant mothers must live in the areas where the program is running. To learn more, go to rxkids.org/.
This story was produced as part of a series for the USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism's 2024 Data Fellowship.
Contact Nushrat Rahman: nrahman@freepress.com. Follow her on X: @NushratR.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Michigan lawmakers see promise in aid program. Where it's expanding.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House energy chair: Musk ‘never mentioned' megabill on day of vote
House energy chair: Musk ‘never mentioned' megabill on day of vote

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

House energy chair: Musk ‘never mentioned' megabill on day of vote

Elon Musk now says he considers the GOP mega budget reconciliation bill an 'abomination.' But he never brought up those objections during a breakfast just hours after the House passed the measure, House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) said Tuesday. 'I went directly from that vote straight to a breakfast with Elon, and he never mentioned the bill that morning,' Guthrie said during POLITICO's annual Energy Summit in Washington. Instead, he said, Musk's big obsessions included competition with China to dominate artificial intelligence. Guthrie's comments landed just a week after Musk began attacking President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' calling it 'a disgusting abomination' for increasing the deficit. Musk — who has exited the federal government after leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency — traded back-and-forth attacks with Trump last week. But Guthrie, who played a key role in crafting the health care, technology and energy portions of the legislation, said Tuesday that he met with Musk the day the bill passed alongside his fellow committee Republicans. 'He talked about AI, he talked about all this stuff that [was] energy,' Guthrie said. 'Never mentioned the bill. And the bill had just been voted.' Guthrie also addressed Musk's suggestions that the mega-billionaire, who spent more than $200 million backing Trump's White House run last year, could fund campaigns to primary Republicans who backed the legislation. 'I assume that if he chooses somebody to primary, President Trump would probably take the opposite side, and in my district ... if I had that problem, I think President Trump would be a good person to come campaign in my district,' the Kentucky Republican said. Still, Guthrie emphasized Musk's 'good insights' on energy and AI and noted that lawmakers will need input from Silicon Valley and other technology companies on the topics. 'We're going to have federal guardrails, and it's good to have the input from those people, and we want that input, but we as members of Congress representing our districts have to take their input — what allows them to grow their companies, allows us to compete, allows us to win — [and] at the same time, protects the American people and their use of data and privacy,' he said.

How the big, complicated bill could create headaches next tax season
How the big, complicated bill could create headaches next tax season

Boston Globe

time3 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

How the big, complicated bill could create headaches next tax season

All of that has helped swell the Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Experts said the addition of numerous temporary tax breaks provides new ways for people to try to game the system while making it more difficult for everyday Americans to file their returns. Advertisement 'It most certainly doesn't simplify anything,' said Adam N. Michel, director of tax policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute think tank. 'It definitely makes the tax code significantly more complex, which doesn't just make it challenging for taxpayers to comply with the tax law, but also opens up new avenues for tax avoidance.' Advertisement For decades, Republicans have pushed to simplify the increasingly complicated tax code by eliminating or restricting targeted deductions and credits. They have argued that the savings could then be used to help lower the overall rates while making tax-filing less time-consuming. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 took that approach, in part by eliminating the deductibility of interest on auto and other personal loans. And the 2017 tax law did something similar, restricting the state and local tax deduction and allowing millions of Americans to avoid complicated itemizing by nearly doubling the standard deduction, to $12,000 for single filers and $24,000 for married couples, and tying it to inflation. The new Republican tax bill, whose main focus is to extend the expiring tax cuts to avoid across-the-board tax increases next year, makes the higher standard deduction permanent and temporarily boosts it by $1,000 for single filers and $2,000 for married couples through 2028. That alone helps further simplify the tax code, said Representative Jason Smith, a Missouri Republican who chairs the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'The increase in the standard deduction means less people itemizing,' Smith, a key player on the tax bill, told the Globe. 'So we're making it easier for more people to just do the standard deduction.' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said critics were missing the bigger picture. 'Leave it to these so-called experts that are politically opposed to anything the president does to overexaggerate and hyperfocus on so-called complications to the tax structure instead of focusing on the real story which is the massive tax cuts brought forward in this bill,' he said. 'Further deductions are music to the American taxpayers' ears, and this bill will result in more money in American families' pockets.' Advertisement But the new tax bill, which is being considered in the Senate after Exempting taxes on tips, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits through 2028 will require complex new rules. For example, the Internal Revenue Service will have to determine what occupations are eligible to prevent abuse of the new break. The bill also restores, with several restrictions, the deduction for auto loan interest through 2028, another 2024 Trump campaign promise, that was axed in the name of simplification in the 1986 law. And the legislation raises the cap on the state and local tax deduction to $40,000 from the $10,000 limit put in place in the 2017 law. Representative Don Beyer, a Virginia Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, said the 2017 tax simplification efforts were spearheaded by the panel's Republican chair at the time, Kevin Brady of Texas, who has since retired. 'I've not heard that phrase used this year,' Beyer said. He argued that making the tax code more complicated will drive more business to professional tax preparers and aligns with Republican opposition to the Direct File has proven popular, with Advertisement 'Simplification does not help out billionaires, and this bill is designed to help billionaires,' said Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat. 'Billionaires have very complex financial arrangements, and they can slip through carefully lawyered loopholes.' 'Each one entails fiscal costs, adds complexity, opens new avenues for tax avoidance, and delivers little in the way of long-term growth,' he wrote in a May 14 Cato blog post titled, He's not the only critic of the bill's added complexity. 'It gets an F for tax simplification, base-broadening, and personal rate schedule. It also adds dozens of narrow, special-interest provisions, which is the opposite of what tax reform should do,' Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow at George Mason University's Mercatus Center, wrote in William McBride, chief economist at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan, center-right think tank, said simplification 'just wasn't a priority this time around,' particularly because House Republicans have a much smaller majority than they did in 2017. The bill eliminates some clean energy tax credits put in place during the Biden administration, but those were axed for political reasons, not to increase simplicity, he said. 'You might say 2017 was really the aberration and we're returning to a more normal situation in which you've just got political horse trading and all the the oddball policies that creep in in the middle of the night to satisfy this or that member,' he said. The increase in the state and local tax deduction, for example, was inserted to win the crucial votes of several moderate Republicans from competitive districts in high-tax New York and New Jersey. Advertisement Representative Tom McClintock, a conservative California Republican, acknowledged the need to limit Republican defections with unified Democratic opposition and fulfill Trump's campaign promises made the tax bill more complicated than he would have preferred. 'I think the ideal approach is a broad-based flat tax,' McClintock said. 'But as [Winston] Churchill once said, 'Democracy is the occasional necessity of deferring to the opinions of others.'' Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at

'This is a disaster of epic proportion': How the Trump–Musk feud sparked a $150 billion meltdown
'This is a disaster of epic proportion': How the Trump–Musk feud sparked a $150 billion meltdown

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'This is a disaster of epic proportion': How the Trump–Musk feud sparked a $150 billion meltdown

A high-profile feud between President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk continued to simmer on Friday after a Thursday crescendo saw more than $150 billion in value wiped from Tesla (TSLA) stock, prompting at least one investor to call Musk's government foray a "disaster" and leaving the future of Musk's government entanglements in question. "This is a disaster of epic proportion for Tesla and SpaceX," Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth & Investment Management CEO, told Yahoo Finance. "And whether Elon wants to accept it or not, he did help Trump get elected. It is his fault that Trump is president of the United States." Thursday's sell-off came after Musk slammed Trump's GOP-backed spending bill, prompting fiery responses from the president and raising concerns over the political risk now tied to one of the world's most valuable companies. Tesla stock rose as much as 6% Friday as Musk and Trump moved to cool tensions. The stock finished the trading session up a more modest 3.7%. Read more about Tesla's stock moves and today's market action. Musk endorsed the then-Republican candidate soon after the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pa. Afterward, Musk frequently appeared at rallies, voicing his support for the Republican Party at large and pledging millions to America PAC, a Trump-aligned super-PAC. A flood of support for Trump from the tech community followed as Musk became one of Trump's biggest public boosters in the final days of the campaign. After Trump was elected, the president appointed Musk as head of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, otherwise known as DOGE. The purpose of the agency was to eliminate government waste. Musk officially exited the role late last month, claiming the agency had cut billions of dollars in costs. Days later, Musk began openly criticizing Trump's controversial tax legislation, which is estimated to add trillions to the national debt over the next decade. The bill would also eliminate EV tax credits, a crucial government incentive for Tesla and a potential "death blow" to the company's sales, according to Gerber. Having cleared the House, the bill now heads to the Senate, with Trump vowing to sign it into law by July 4. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted Tuesday on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." The post opened the floodgates for a days-long escalation between the once-close confidants turned rivals. Trump wrote he was "very disappointed" in his former ally, while Musk fired back, saying the president wouldn't have won the election if it weren't for him. Investors reacted swiftly to the back-and-forth, sending Tesla shares down roughly 14% by Thursday's close — the largest single-day drop for the stock in almost five years. Gerber, whose firm holds about 235,000 Tesla shares, called the plunge "100% justified," pointing out that much of Tesla's stock value is driven more by perception than by the company's fundamentals. "I think we're just getting started for the declines because a lot of the stock price's value isn't based off the underlying business," Gerber said. "It's based off the perception that Elon being a part of Tesla is somehow wonderful." Prior to Thursday's sell-off, Tesla shares had rallied about 40% from their April lows, largely fueled by Musk's close relationship with the president and his pledge to return his focus to Tesla after leaving his role with the Trump administration. "As a shareholder, [this] couldn't be worse for Elon and his properties and his investments and the future that he has because Trump's got another three and a half years," Gerber added. "Elon, in his ego and sort of weird haze of reality, actually thinks he's more powerful than Trump. This is now a showdown." Still, other investors remain optimistic, particularly when it comes to Tesla's upcoming robotaxi rollout and long-term plans for autonomous robots. "I think people are going to be impressed," said Craig Irwin, a senior research analyst at Roth MKM and Tesla shareholder. "The political noise and the other volatility is more short term in nature, at least as far as I see it." Irwin added, "The closeness between these two men is something that needed to change a little bit. These guys have so much in common: tremendous egos, tremendous power, and very strong opinions. ... Their interests are still incredibly well aligned [and] I think cooler heads prevail." On Friday, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas reiterated his Overweight rating on Tesla and maintained a $410 price target, implying about 40% upside from current levels. Jonas said his bullish stance reflects confidence in Tesla's broader technological strengths spanning autonomous vehicles, robotics, and even space and communications infrastructure, which he believes present far greater long-term growth and margin potential than the company's traditional EV business, currently under pressure. "We believe the challenges facing Tesla's current business are widely reported and well known, while the opportunities in the future business are potentially greatly underestimated," Jonas said. Alexandra Canal is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X @allie_canal, LinkedIn, and email her at Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store