
Time To Abolish High-Deductible Health Plans
A draft copy of the form proposed for use to apply for low-cost insurance from Medicaid Tuesday Mar. ... More 12, 2013. (AP Photo/J. David Ake)
Over the past decade and a half, the American healthcare system has undergone a silent revolution. I'm not referring to the Affordable Care Act, but instead to a separate paradigm shift in how Americans pay for their healthcare—they increasingly find themselves in insurance plans that carry high out-of-pocket expenses, meaning their coverage doesn't leave them well covered. Almost half of Americans younger than 65 are currently enrolled in high deductible health plans, required to pay for the first $1,000, $2,000, or even $5,000 of their health care expenses before their insurance kicks in. Euphemistically referred to as Consumer-Directed Health Plans, these high out-of-pocket programs are in theory supposed to incentivize people to scrutinize the cost and quality of their medical care, thus bringing pressure on providers to lower the price and/or raise the quality of their services.
This theory isn't borne out in practice. As a matter of practice and policy, we need to stop burdening people with the expense of necessary care.
As recently as a decade ago, less than 15% of Americans were enrolled in high-deductible health plans. Since then, American employers have turned to such plans to hold down the costs of the benefits they offer their employees. High-deductible health plans hold down employer expenses by shifting costs to employees. First, employers save money because the first $5,000 of each employee's healthcare expenses come out of those employees' pockets. Second, high-deductible health plans dissuade employees from receiving medical care. That saves employers money by lowering overall healthcare expenditures.
Both of these ways of saving money harm Americans. The shift of expenses from employer to employee is a huge financial burden on low- and middle-income Americans, for whom an unexpected $5,000 expense creates financial distress. High-deductible health plans put many people one illness away from missing their next mortgage payment.
High-deductible health plans frequently force people to decide whether to seek medical care. When facing high out-of-pocket expenses, people often avoid necessary medical care. They stop taking important medications or wait out troubling symptoms that require urgent intervention.
Consider what happens when people with diabetes get forced into high-deductible health plans by their employers. When they begin experiencing complications from their diabetes—perhaps early vision problems or symptoms suggesting the onset of heart disease—they hold off on receiving tests to evaluate those symptoms. People with high-deductible plans receive less testing than those with more generous coverage. That might save money in the short run. But what about later, when they experience retinal bleeding or clogged coronary arteries?
The turn towards high-deductible health plans has harmed Americans financially and medically. The federal government should disincentivize employers from pushing people into such plans by scaling back tax breaks for employers that provide only high-deductible plans to their employees.
Americans deserve insurance plans that cover them for what counts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
38 minutes ago
- New York Times
‘Little Lobbyists' Urge Senators to Oppose Trump's Bill Cutting Medicaid
Landry Bell, a 1-year-old boy who was born with Down syndrome, wriggled and smiled in his big sister's lap on the floor outside Republican Senator Mike Lee's office this week as he took a break from going office to office with his mother while she explained how cuts to Medicaid would devastate their family. Wearing a bright blue T-shirt emblazoned with the words 'Little Lobbyists,' Landry was among a group of children with serious medical needs who crisscrossed the Capitol with their parents urging senators to vote 'no' on the sprawling Republican bill carrying President Trump's agenda. The legislation would cut deeply into Medicaid to help pay for large tax cuts that would benefit businesses and the richest Americans. The Senate version of the legislation would make even more aggressive cuts to Medicaid than the version of the legislation that passed the House last month. Those proposed reductions, and the elimination of some clean-energy tax credits, are among the most contentious provisions driving debate on the bill among Republicans, as party leaders push to complete it and send it to Mr. Trump's desk within weeks. The Little Lobbyists formed in 2017 during Mr. Trump's first term to push back against Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, taking to Capitol Hill to demand that lawmakers oppose the move. Their successful campaign to save the law was part of a broader backlash against the proposal, which was driven in large part by major health care lobbies, like hospitals and insurance companies, as well as patient groups worried about losing insurance coverage. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Unsung and (Often Exhausted) Heroes: Moms
The young mother was visibly exhausted. She had been up for two nights as her six-month-old ran a fever and cried nonstop. She had thought about going to the ER but worried about the long wait, especially without childcare for her two-year-old as her husband was out of town. Now she was in the pediatrics office with an air of despair. 'Please help me. I don't know what's wrong with my child". Parenting Can Be Stressful Being a parent is a journey, even in the best of times. Whether it's a sick infant, a clumsy toddler with a broken arm, a 9-year old starting the soccer season with a concussion, or a teen struggling with anxiety at school, the potential challenges can be endless. Unfortunately, the weight of parenting and supporting kids through this myriad of issues often falls disproportionately on moms. Almost 25% of women leave their jobs in the first year after having kids. After five years, only about 30 percent of these moms have returned to work. Over three-quarters of moms report they are the ones responsible for managing their children's healthcare. It is not surprising to see that JAMA recently published a study about the stress and decline in mental health that moms are experiencing. This seems to be relevant to many professions. In a Healio survey of physicians, 64 percent of women reported that they had caregiving responsibilities, and greater than 50% reported that this had a significant impact on their stress levels. Mental Health is Often Impacted Maternal stress and mental health can have rippling effects and impact kids' own mental health, affect their social skills, educational success, and even their weight. These consequences may begin even before birth – infants of mothers dealing with depression, anxiety, or stress while they were pregnant have been shown to struggle more with social and emotional development. Parental mental illness is one of the adverse childhood experiences that the American Academy of Pediatrics flags as high risk for leading to poor health as adults. Community is Key Stress and mental illness do not exist in a vacuum - a multitude of external factors exert stress on a parent's day-to-day life, from financial instability and food insecurity, to lack of childcare and mental health services. Policies that protect and expand social services for families would help to alleviate many stressors that parents may face, including protections for SNAP, Medicaid, and legislation to support affordable childcare. Guaranteed robust and paid maternity leave policies would allow new moms to heal, rest, and adapt to this next chapter. In Europe, for example, many countries offer up to a year of parental leave, with much of it paid. Online community support can be helpful and some resources do exist. The National Maternal Mental Health Hotline is available at 1-833-TLC-MAMA (1-833-852-6262) via text or call as a 24/7 service for pregnant people or moms to talk to counselors who can provide support and refer them to local resources. Self Compassion Can Buffer Stress But an essential change to help our moms, often the 'Chief Health Officers' of the family, is a culture shift. Moms and caregivers should be encouraged to get off the treadmill, pause, take care of themselves and support systems should be in place to allow this to happen. This concept of 'self compassion' has been studied extensively and has made a difference in teachers, healthcare professionals and parents. The 'reset' includes breathing techniques, visualization, guided meditation and mindset shifts. To allow for these pauses, our essential caregivers must also have an inner team of family and friends that they can hand off to, or lean on, so they can take time to reset and breathe. Imagine this - the young mother calls her neighbor, who watches her toddler while she takes her baby to urgent care. The doctor diagnoses the child with an ear infection, prescribes antibiotics and shows her how to suction her baby's nose so he (and she) can sleep soundly. Everyone wakes up the next day rested and calm. Self compassion, connection and a village are essential parts of helping our most significant caregivers- moms. When we uplift our moms and other caregivers, there is a rippling effect to the health of the children now and longterm. Written with Alice Gao, MD.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
A New Study Targets Genetic Risk For Mental Illness
For centuries, the genetic lottery has shaped our health and our futures. In Destiny's Child No Longer: Rewriting Genetic Fate, the story is told of how science is beginning to tip the scales, offering hope to individuals once bound by the DNA they inherited. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the effort to address rare genetic conditions that dramatically raise the risk of serious mental health challenges, including schizophrenia. Some children are born missing a vital stretch of their DNA. This genetic change is known as a microdeletion. Although small, this missing segment can have far-reaching effects on development, influencing everything from the heart and immune system to facial shape and the ability to speak clearly. The range of physical symptoms is broad: some children may be born with heart defects, others with weakened immune defenses that make them more susceptible to infections, and still others with differences in facial features or palate formation that can affect feeding and speech. As these children grow and develop, they often face significant challenges in their brains. Many experience difficulties with learning, memory, and attention. Social interactions can be especially challenging, as some individuals struggle to recognize and interpret emotions and maintain healthy relationships. Emotional regulation may also be affected, leading to increased anxiety and mood swings. These issues can persist into adulthood, impacting overall quality of life. Perhaps most concerning is the sharply increased risk of severe psychiatric disorders. Among these, schizophrenia, a complex mental health condition marked by hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking, stands out. While schizophrenia is influenced by a combination of many genes and environmental factors, research consistently shows that genetic factors account for up to 80% of the risk. In the general population, the lifetime risk of developing schizophrenia is about 1%. However, for those with rare genetic deletions, the risk can be higher. It's believed that the loss of specific genes in these tiny DNA segments disrupts brain development and connectivity, making the brain more vulnerable to the onset of psychiatric illness later in life. Importantly, not everyone with such a deletion will develop schizophrenia or other psychiatric conditions. Knowing this highlights the interplay between genetic vulnerability and environmental influences that together shape mental health outcomes. Still, the presence of a genetic deletion dramatically tips the odds, making early identification and intervention critical for affected families. Until recently, there were no treatments that addressed the root cause of these cognitive and psychiatric symptoms. Care focused on managing day-to-day challenges, but the underlying biology remained untouched. That is why a new study published in eLife is noteworthy. It focused on the molecular consequences of this DNA deletion, specifically examining how it disrupts the brain's normal development and function. The study found that the deletion disrupts the brain's natural gene regulators. This results in the overproduction of a protein, which, when present in excess, disrupts the growth and communication of brain cells. This overproduction contributes to the symptoms observed in individuals affected by the condition. The breakthrough occurred via a gene-targeting therapy that used short pieces of synthetic genetic material designed to silence specific genes. By delivering these molecules to the brains of adult mice with the genetic deletion, they were able to reduce protein levels. The result: memory and learning improved, and the benefits lasted for more than two months after a single treatment. This research marks a significant step forward for several reasons. First, it demonstrates that the effects of a genetic brain disorder are not necessarily permanent. Intervening at the molecular level can restore function, at least in animal models. Second, the technology used here is already being used to treat other neurological diseases. This raises hopes that similar approaches could be adapted for people. Finally, the study sheds light on the broader mechanisms that link rare genetic changes to common mental illnesses like schizophrenia, offering new clues for future therapies. For families living with the daily realities of this genetic condition, the promise of a therapy that targets the underlying cause rather than just the symptoms could be life-changing. Imagine a young adult who has struggled for years with memory lapses and social difficulties is now able to participate more fully in school, work, and relationships. While much work remains to be done before such treatments become widely available, the path is more straightforward than ever before. As we stand at the threshold of a new era in genetic medicine, stories like this remind us that destiny, once written in our genes, is now open to revision. With each advance, the possibility grows that inherited risk does not have to mean inherited fate. The challenge ahead is to ensure that these breakthroughs are translated into real-world therapies, so that the promise of rewriting genetic destiny becomes a reality for all who need it.