
Jane Austen's novels are both a mirror and a map for Gen Z and millennials
Growing up as the youngest of four girls, writer Anuja Chauhan always found the fictional world of Jane Austen relatable. But you'd be mistaken to assume that Pride and Prejudice is her favourite among Austen's novels.
'I love her humour, her honest, pragmatic, realistic take on romance. There is nothing breathless about it," Chauhan says. 'But I find the sister dynamics in Pride and Prejudice problematic."
It's a sentiment Chauhan has aired before, when her novel Those Pricey Thakur Girls came out in 2013. Perhaps the most autobiographical among her books, it tells the story of four sisters growing up in a bustling Delhi family. Understandably, readers drew parallels with Pride and Prejudice, which revolves around the lives of the five Bennet sisters. But Chauhan was quick to correct them.
Also read: Mary Bennet: Just no main character energy
'Even if I am an Austen fan, I'm not such a Pride and Prejudice fan because frankly, I think Lydia (the youngest Bennet sister) got such a raw deal. Everyone was so mean about her. I really think of Elizabeth and Jane as self-righteous, goody two shoes who think, 'Arrey, we are so classy, and our sisters are like...'," she said in an interview. 'They don't like their own mother, they don't like their own sister, they are just sitting around thinking, 'We are so cool and rich people want to marry us'."
Chauhan's may be the unpopular opinion, considering the massive fandom that TV, movie and book adaptations Pride and Prejudice has spawned over the years, but it captures a fundamental truth about Austen's reputation 250 years after she was born. It's impossible to pigeonhole Jane Austen as one kind of writer, namely of romances. Rather, as Katherine Joy Fowler wrote in her best-selling novel The Jane Austen Book Club (2004), 'Each of us has a private Austen."
A WRITER FOR THE TIMES
For a writer born in 1775, who wrote only six full-length novels (two of which were published posthumously) before she died at the age of 41, Austen left behind an outsized legacy. In India, her novels are widely loved, taught as part of higher education curricula, and have inspired multiple films. Austen is still admired for the universal truths her novels offer, transcending social, cultural and geographical barriers.
Sowmya Guntooru, 40, who started the Jane Austen Society of India (JASI) in 2017, a Facebook community with over 2,500 followers, says Austen's novels are examples of 'practical feminism". 'She always gives the woman the right to choose. All her stories are told from a woman's perspective, not from a male gaze." The purpose of JASI, which maintains close links with similar groups from across the world, is to not only read Austen's novels, but also highlight the values she lived by.
During the covid-19 pandemic, Guntooru hosted a talk show called Happy Hour on JASI's channel, where she engaged with a range of writers, who have created heroines with strong personalities, or look at Austen's books from a fresh angle. Her guests included Nancy Springer, author of the Enola Holmes books (which present a counterpoint to Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes) and Damianne Scott, the mind behind 'Black Girl Loves Jane", a Facebook page that tracks Austen's influence on BIPOC (Black, indigenous and people of colour) readers. The latter theme has gained currency in the popular imagination as more adaptations choose blind casting, be it the 2022 Netflix version of Persuasion or the 2020 Regency-era drama series, Bridgerton.
Although Guntooru points out that JASI's members are a mix of men and women, the gender ratio is heavily skewed towards women . The trend checks out, anecdotally, from the responses I received on social media when I put out a call out for fans of Austen to share their views with me: 100% of the respondents were women. Does that mean Austen's novels don't have much to offer to men? On the contrary, as Chauhan says, 'Women aspire to have a teachable guy like Darcy in their lives, a man who is receptive to feedback."
Also read: How Suniti Namjoshi wields the spear and the shield of satire and fables
Searching for such qualities in men, adds Soumanetra Basu, 39, an Austen fan living in Hong Kong, 'may seem misplaced in the present times of rushed Tinder romances and situationships." But the ideals never really disappeared. 'Even today, the desire to search for a perfect mate—a Mr Darcy or a Mr Knightley—is all too familiar," she adds. Men in 2025 have much to learn from Austen, in terms of etiquette of dating and marriage. It's one of the reasons why social media is teeming with varieties of Austen content 250 years after her time.
Ananya Mahnot, who, at 18, is poised to enter Ashoka University with the aim to major in English, gives credence to Basu's view. 'Austen's presence in pop culture feels surprisingly strong for an author writing in the early 19th century," she says. 'Whether through modern film adaptations, social media trends, or viral memes comparing Mr Darcy to today's emotionally unavailable love interests, her legacy is very much alive among my peers."
Beyond this quest for a romantic idyll, Austen's novels also teach us how to forge bonds of friendship. 'She shows us how easy it is to misjudge people," says Mumbai-based writer Anjalli Kripalani, 38. 'So many of her characters get together, or become friends, after an initial misunderstanding."
A WORLD WITHOUT JUDGEMENT
A couple of months ago, Rakhi Chakraborty, 34, a former communications professional, and her friend Rupanjali Samaddar, 26, a psychotherapist, started a Jane Austen Book Club in Kolkata, inspired by the movie, The Jane Austen Book Club. 'As of now, seven people have signed up, all women, and we want to cap the membership at eight," Chakraborty says. 'The ages range from 26-41."
To join the book club, people have to fill out a form explaining the reason behind their interest. As Chakraborty began screening the responses, she was deeply moved to discover how Austen's novels have influenced the lives of women living in another time and part of the world.
'I've inherited as much Austen as I have my great-grandmother's cheekbones! As a young adult, her stories helped me figure out who I wanted to be—or more importantly, the kind of woman I refused to become," wrote a 41-year-old learning designer. 'I filled up too many slam books dreaming of Darcy. But I also learned to question why we romanticise him. That's the thing about Austen—you can love her and still push back. Austen has always been both a mirror and a map."
The mirror and map analogy rings true for favourite writers who have given us a way to be in the world. Either their vision of life resonates with our core values, or maybe the plights of their characters make us feel 'seen". As a late-bloomer in the world of real-life romance, I looked up to Anne Elliot in Persuasion (1817)—single, stoic and dignified at 27—when I read the novel for the first time as part of my MA syllabus.
In contrast, for Chennai-based writer Nirica Srinivasan, 27, who is one of the curators of Bengaluru- and Goa-based Champaca Bookstore, it was Emma that made her fall in love with Austen. Like many of her Gen Z peers, she got to Austen via the retellings, through movies and other contemporary novels. What Srinivasan liked most about Austen is that there is no judgement in her portrayal of a young woman who gets into a pickle every so often. 'I always find it hard to define myself in any one way and all of her characters—so real, vivid and flawed— remind me that I don't need to," she adds. 'I can see something of myself in her heroines."
It wouldn't be wrong to surmise that Austen put a bit of herself in all the heroines she created—from the emotionally volatile Marianne Dashwood in Sense and Sensibility (1811) to the impressionable Catherine Morland in Northanger Abbey (1818). If her one major theme is the portrayal of a steady and dependable love that stands the test of time, she was no less keen to grapple with ways of being a self-respecting woman in the world—especially in her time, when she, like many other women, lived in the shadow of their male relations, brothers in her case. Sadly, this is still far too commonly the case in India and many parts of the world.
So, it is hardly surprising that generations of women are still finding solace in her books. While the millennials, based on my interviews, seem to be drawn towards the Austenian ideal of love, cautiously cultivated by overcoming multiple disappointments, the Gen Zs are more inclined to discover through Austen ways of being outspoken, opinionated, and not always likeable young women in the world they live in.
'When I first read Northanger Abbey, I was about 12 years old, and I read the novel again two years ago (when I was 22). As a 12-year-old, it was Austen's flamboyant freedom that stood out to me," says poet and writer Alolika Dutta, 24. 'Austen wrote, it seemed to me at 12, so much where so much less would do," she adds. 'But why must one make do with only as much as is called for? How much is 'called for'? What makes a thing more socially acceptable than another?"
Also read: Geet Chaturvedi reflects on reading, writing and translations in his new book
For Gen Zs and Alphas reading Austen, or getting acquainted with her legacy through pop-culture adaptations, the author's opinionated style itself can be a pull, a permission to say what's on their mind.
'Personally, Lady Susan stands out to me as a sharp, underrated gem in Austen's body of work. It is tonally distinct from her more well-known novels—darker, more biting, and driven by a central character who is unapologetically manipulative and self-serving," Mahnot says. 'There's something thrilling about watching a female character operate so boldly within and against the social conventions of her time."
One can only imagine what a sensation Jane Austen would have been on social media had she lived in our compulsively online times.
With inputs from Shrabonti Bagchi.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
A stroll down Jane street: Poonam Saxena on Austen as the ultimate comfort read
Everyone has a few comfort films or comfort books that bring them special joy. I have a set of comfort books or, perhaps more accurately, a comfort author. She wrote only six major novels in her lifetime but, no matter what I am reading, one of these is almost always open on my Kindle alongside. Since this year marks the 250th birth anniversary of this globally celebrated writer, I'm happy to dedicate this week's column to the peerless Jane Austen. Most English-speakers are familiar with Austen, but I suspect many know her more through the countless TV and movie adaptations of her works than through her books themselves. And that is a pity. The six novels (Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Mansfield Park, Emma, Persuasion and Northanger Abbey, all published between 1811 and 1817) illuminate a small, cloistered world of village landlords and clergymen, army men and navy officers, matrons, dowagers and spinsters, young girls waiting to make suitable marriages, and a genteel rural life of country dances, card games and tea. But what makes Austen special is that she populated this frankly-fairly-dull world with the most delightful and diverting characters. There were her heroines and heroes, of course, but also a supporting cast so entertaining, they can eclipse the main actors themselves. Her sharp observations on society, class and the predicaments of women were spot on and strike a chord even today. The final stroke of genius: her ironic humour, which lands even at the nth reading. These gifts that she brought to the page are why her stories are still being retold centuries on, as Hindi and Tamil films, as manga works in Japan, even as the Bridget Jones film franchise. (In fact, it wouldn't be a stretch to see Austen as the original template-creator of the modern romcom.) Pride and Prejudice is the tale retold most often, and the one that invariably tops the list of Austen's best-loved work. I yield to none in my love for this wonderful novel. But the book I keep gravitating to is one of her least-popular novels, Northanger Abbey. Published in 1817, soon after her death, this is the frothiest and funniest of her works. Its heroine is 17-year-old Catherine Morland, daughter of a clergyman, who is invited by her kindly neighbours, Mr and Mrs Allen, to accompany them to Bath. Catherine is an unexceptional, sweet-natured girl, slightly naïve as a result of her youth and sheltered upbringing. I find her the most appealing of Austen's heroines (followed by Elizabeth Bennet of Pride and Prejudice). While in Bath, Catherine falls in love with the charming, witty clergyman Henry Tilney, and strikes up a close friendship with the effusive Isabella Thorpe (only to discover later that she is a vain and selfish coquette). The characters are sketched with Austen's signature drollness. She writes, for instance, that Mrs Allen was 'one of that numerous class of females whose society can raise no other emotion than surprise at there being any man in the world who could like them well enough to marry them.' Her descriptions of Isabella's dull brother John and his obsessions with the latest carriages, their new features, how many miles they can cover in an hour etc are hilarious (and remind me of all those boring men one meets who are obsessed with the latest cars). Catherine is youth itself: light of heart, prone to flights of fancy. She has an all-consuming passion for Gothic romances. So taken up is she with thoughts of sinister castles, ancient housekeepers, gloomy passages and 'secret' doors that she becomes convinced at some point that Tilney's father, a formidable retired general, has either murdered his wife or is keeping her locked in a secret room on the family estate. (Northanger Abbey is often seen as a satire on the Gothic novel.) But Catherine also has one of the most memorable lines of dialogue in any Austen novel. Asked for her thoughts on the subject of history, she says, 'The quarrels of popes and kings, with wars or pestilences, in every page; the men all so good for nothing, and hardly any women at all – it is very tiresome: and yet I often think it odd that it should be so dull, for a great deal of it must be invention.' Comfort reads that combine sharp insight, wit and humour with engaging storytelling and happy endings are rare. Rarer still is the ability to do this while creating characters one wants to meet over and over again, as if they were old, beloved friends. Austen delivers on all of the above. Every single time. (To reach Poonam Saxena with feedback, email poonamsaxena3555@


Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Tourist shatters fragile crystal-covered ‘Van Gogh' chair while posing for photo: 'Terrible and shameful'
A tourist's reckless stunt at the Palazzo Maffei museum in Verona, Italy, has drawn widespread criticism after he damaged a fragile art installation by sitting on it for a photo. Security footage from the museum shows the man ignoring the delicate nature of the exhibit and sitting directly on the chair, a work of art adorned with thousands of Swarovski crystals, despite clear indications not to touch the piece. The chair collapsed under his weight as he lost balance, attempting to steady himself by grabbing onto a nearby wall. Instead of mimicking his female companion, who had only pretended to sit for her photo, the man went ahead and sat on the artwork. The woman quickly came to his aid, and the pair fled the scene before security returned. The museum publicly condemned the incident, describing the tourists' actions as 'superficial' and 'disrespectful'. In a social media post, the museum added, 'They ignored every rule of respect for art and cultural heritage,' also pointing out that the couple had waited for the room to be empty before attempting the stunt. Also read: Did US pizza joints really predict Israel's strike on Iran? X account dedicated to 'Pizza Index' theory claims The damaged installation, known as the 'Van Gogh' chair, is a delicate creation by Italian artist Nicola Bolla. Inspired by a famous Van Gogh painting, the chair is completely encrusted with Swarovski crystals and was considered a centrepiece of the exhibit. Though initially uncertain about whether the chair could be salvaged, museum staff were able to restore it within a few days. 'For days we didn't know if it would be possible to restore it. But we did it,' a museum representative said in a Facebook post. 'A heartfelt thanks goes to the police, our security department and the restorers, whose precious work allowed the work to be recovered.' The museum did not disclose the cost of the restoration or confirm whether the couple would be held financially accountable. A post shared by Palazzo Maffei Casa Museo (@palazzomaffeiverona) Outraged social media users slammed the tourists' behaviour. 'Idiots! I hope they are reported!' commented Davide Baraldi. Another user wrote, 'The embodiment of mediocrity, rudeness and ignorance.' 'So much ignorance, this is unacceptable!,' wrote a user while another added, 'Terrible and shameful' One user added, 'Well let's hope the culprits have been identified and held accountable.' Also read: Dog trapped in Tel Aviv building after Iran's missile strike miraculously rescued A user noted, 'Unfortunately too many people enter museums just for a shot to post on social media and not because they have a real interest in art, which explains the ignorance and total lack of respect for places and works.'


India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
The 11A mystery: Two plane crashes, two lives spared, one seat
A Thai actor-singer who survived a deadly plane crash 27 years ago noticed an eerie coincidence when he got to know about the Air India disaster: the lone survivor was seated in the exact same seat as he was, December 11, 1998, 20-year-old Ruangsak Loychusak cheated death when Thai Airways Flight TG261 stalled and plunged into a swamp while attempting to land in southern Thailand, killing 101 of the 146 people on now 47, said he had goosebumps after learning that Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British national who had a miraculous escape in the Air India Flight AI171 crash, was seated in 11A when the plane went down. In a Facebook post written in Thai, Ruangsak said, "Survivor of a plane crash in India. He sat in the same seat as me. 11A."The Boeing Dreamliner crashed shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad airport on Thursday afternoon. Of the 242 people onboard, Ramesh was the only one to noted he no longer had his boarding pass from 1998, but said newspaper articles had documented his seat number and defying death, the actor has, on several occasions, openly addressed the trauma and survivor's guilt he carried for years. According to reports, he did not fly again for a described his life since the crash as a "second life", and offered his condolences to the families affected by the Air India miracle on seat 11A has stunned the public and sparked global fascination. Seated by the emergency exit, Ramesh was thrown from the aircraft on impact and, despite multiple injuries, managed to walk away from the wreckage and into a waiting from the hospital, Ramesh said he doesn't know how he survived when everyone else on the doomed plane perished."For some time, I thought I was also going to die. But when I opened my eyes, I realised I was alive and I tried to unbuckle myself from the seat and escape from where I could," he told DD fascination with Ramesh's narrow escape has led to a spike in interest for emergency exit seats on commercial flights, and seat 11A in particular. Social media is buzzing with posts by people looking to book these seats for their next Reel