ONOE: Ex-CJIs say bill ‘may not' violate basic structure of Constitution, but question powers to EC
Members of the JPC examining the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024, widely known as the One Nation, One Election (ONOE) Bill, told ThePrint that Khehar appeared more doubtful about the legality and constitutionality of the concept than Chandrachud.
New Delhi: Former Chief Justices of India D.Y.Chandrachud and J.S.Khehar told a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) Friday that while simultaneous elections to Lok Sabha and the state assemblies 'may not' violate the basic structure of the Constitution, authorising the Election Commission (EC) to decide the poll schedule without checks would fall short of legality.
The MP said that Justice Khehar said that the text in the Bill needed to be revised and made more precise as several clauses are 'vaguely worded'. Justice Chandrachud is also learnt to have said that giving more powers to the EC could disturb constitutional balance.
Previously, in his written submission to the JPC, Chandrachud had raised concern over the 'sweeping powers' granted to the EC in the proposed constitutional amendment law 'without laying down any guidelines for the exercise of the discretion'.
However, he added that staggered elections were not an immutable feature of the Constitution, a view he shared during the meeting of the committee Friday as well.
'The argument that staggered elections are a part of the Constitution's basic structure (or form part of the principles of federalism or democracy) does not hold. Staggered timing of elections cannot be considered as a feature of the original Constitution, let alone an immutable feature,' the former CJI stated in his written submission.
The Bill proposes an amendment in Article 172 of the Constitution (which lays down the duration and dissolution of state legislative assemblies) to allow the curtailment or extension of state assemblies for alignment of state polls with the general elections. Both the former CJIs are learnt to have recommended the need to have parliamentary oversight to prevent misuse of the provision by the EC.
'In fact, Justice Khehar said these questions and doubts assume more significance in light of the ongoing conversation about the supposed biased nature of the EC,' another MP said.
Previously, two more CJIs—Justices U.U.Lalit and Ranjan Gogoi—have appeared before the committee. Appearing before the 39-member committee, former CJI Gogoi had also raised questions on the Constitutional validity of certain provisions in the Bill.
Similarly, former CJI Lalit had also cautioned, in his submission before the panel, that curtailing the terms of the state assemblies to make the ONOE possible may not stand legal scrutiny.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: 'Worst attack' on Constitution, says Oppn after meeting EC over voter verification drive in Bihar
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Let Election Commission itself submit an affidavit, says Ashok Gehlot
Questioning the neutrality of the Election Commission, veteran Congress leader Ashok Gehlot on Friday (August 8, 2025) asked the poll body to itself submit an affidavit stating that there were no irregularities in the elections. The Election Commission had demanded an affidavit under oath from Congress MP Rahul Gandhi about his allegation of electoral fraud. Mr. Gehlot said at a press conference in Jaipur that the Election Commission had made an 'absurd demand' despite knowing the fact that Mr. Gandhi was working under an oath to uphold the Constitution which inherently included strengthening the constitutional institutions. 'Instead of making such a ridiculous demand, the EC should have initiated a fair investigation,' he said. The former Rajasthan Chief Minister accused the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party of damaging all democratic institutions, while affirming that the Election Commission, once respected globally for its credibility, was being looked at with suspicion. 'Democracy cannot survive in the country when the EC colludes with the ruling party,' Mr. Gehlot said. Mr. Gehlot said the statements of the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha about electoral fraud in Maharashtra and Karnataka were 'absolutely correct' and in the interest of the nation. Mr. Gandhi's presentation had proved that a dangerous game was being played in the country, he said, adding that threats were being issued to the Congress leader instead of addressing the issue. While the Election Commission was depicting a 'clear bias' against the Opposition leaders after changes in its appointment procedure, the BJP's manipulation of election results through 'rigging and money power' and its acts to undermine institutions for political advantage had posed a major threat to the nation's democracy, Mr. Gehlot said.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
EC appointment process change fuels doubts about fairness: Gehlot
1 2 Jaipur: Former chief minister Ashok Gehlot Friday raised questions about the impartiality of the Election Commission during a press briefing in Jaipur. Supporting Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi 's allegations of 'vote theft', Gehlot said that the EC was working under the BJP 's pressure. Gehlot mentioned that doubts arose after changes in the EC's appointment process. If the appointments were made using the old method, these controversies might not have occurred. "Doubts arose as soon as the law was passed by Modiji (Prime Minister Narendra Modi) on how the Election Commissioner should be selected. When the Supreme Court suggested a committee comprising the PM, Leader of Opposition, and the CJI to select the election commissioner, this process would have prevented doubts. Rahul Gandhi wouldn't have had to raise these issues. However, the way the law was changed in a few days, replacing the CJI with union home minister Amit Shah, naturally raised suspicions. Following this, the behaviour of the EC has changed. Its bias is clearly visible. For the first time, the EC is discriminating against meeting opposition leaders. Its conduct towards the opposition is objectionable," said Gehlot. He said the situation has reached a point where democracy is under threat in the country. "All institutions, be it the executive, judiciary, or legislature, are under pressure," he added. "If elections are rigged institutionally with the collusion of the EC and the ruling party (BJP), where will democracy stand? There was a time when our experts conducted elections and trained officials from other countries. Now, the credibility is diminishing. Shouldn't this concern the citizens?" he asked. Accusing the BJP of systematically damaging democratic institutions through undemocratic practices, Gehlot said it was doing such things for its political advantage. He further alleged that the BJP's manipulation of poll results through 'selective rigging' and the 'use of money power' was a major threat to democracy. He noted that the closure of EC websites in states like Rajasthan, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra after Gandhi's press conference on Thursday raises suspicion. However, the Rajasthan CEO website, which couldn't be opened in the afternoon, was working later. He said the EC should publicly clarify its stance. Gehlot suggested that instead of asking Gandhi for a declaration under oath, the EC should issue one to affirm its impartiality and resolve the controversy. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Fee regulation Bill ignores audits, backs schools: Atishi
NEW DELHI The fee regulation Bill is in the interest of schools and not parents because it makes no mention of financial audits, Leader of the Opposition in the Delhi Assembly Atishi claimed on Friday. Approved in April, the Delhi School Education Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees Bill, 2025 was passed by the Assembly on Friday. It stipulates three levels of checks through committees formed at the school, district, and State levels. 'The only way you can tell if a school's fee hike is legitimate or not is if you audit all the accounts: check all the money that is coming in and all the money that is going out. In this entire Bill, the word audit is not even mentioned once. What if they have crores of surplus [money] lying [unused]?' Ms. Atishi told The Hindu. Recalling the previous AAP government's efforts to regulate fee hikes, she said her party in 2015 had sent the fee hike Bill to the Central government, but it was not approved. 'When we could not pass it, we started audits of schools. First, we did a base-level audit and then found out that one school had ₹90 crore in surplus, another school bought a farmhouse for their management, one got luxury cars, and they were all asking for fee hikes. Until you do an audit, you will never know where the money is going,' she said. 'Managements favoured' Ms. Atishi alleged that the Bill's provisions favour private school managements. 'How and when they [provisions] were introduced — all go to show that it is in the interest of schools and not parents... You have made a committee that is headed by the school management. There are only 5% members and selected by a draw of lots. Everyone in this city knows that you can manage the draw of lots,' she said. Ms. Atishi said during AAP rule, many schools had to refund excess fees.
