Astronomers Capture First-Ever Image of Star That Exploded Twice
That just changed. Astronomers using the Very Large Telescope in Chile have taken the first-ever image of a star that died in a stellar "double-detonation," leaving behind a spectacular supernova remnant.
Their findings, published as a new study in the journal Nature Astronomy, deepen our understanding of the stellar evolution of burned-out stars called white dwarfs.
"The explosions of white dwarfs play a crucial role in astronomy," lead author Priyam Das, a researcher at the University of New South Wales Canberra, Australia, said in a statement about the work. "Yet, despite their importance, the long-standing puzzle of the exact mechanism triggering their explosion remains unsolved."
Once an exceptionally massive star — one at least several times heavier than the Sun — burns through all its fuel, it collapses under its own gravity in a powerful explosion known as a supernova.
That's just one way supernovas can happen, though, and not all of them end the same. Some result in the star being completely obliterated, but others, if the star is heavy enough, can produce a super dense core called a neutron star, or even a black hole.
The scene imaged by the VLT is the work of what's called a Type Ia supernova, produced by a low-mass star that exhausted all its fuel and left behind a remnant called a white dwarf. These objects are more compact and far denser than their original stars, endowing them with a wicked gravitational pull.
In binary systems, this powerful gravity can lead to the white dwarf stripping matter off its stellar companion if their orbits are close enough. When enough of this stolen material accumulates on the surface of the white dwarf, reaching a point known as critical mass, it kickstarts a single but incredibly destructive thermonuclear explosion that wipes out both stars.
That's the typical understanding. More recent research, though, has found evidence that some white dwarfs are battered by two explosions, not one, prior to winking out. In this scenario, astronomers believe that a white dwarf is swimming in a cloud of siphoned helium. This unstable helium cloud is the first to explode, precipitating a second blast in the core of the star. And bam: you have a two-fer supernova.
Critically, this type of supernova occurs before the white dwarf reaches critical mass. Astronomers predicted that this double-detonation would produce a unique, visual signature in the form of two separate shells of calcium — and the new image bears this out. If you look closely, you can see that the calcium, depicted in blue, is indeed in a two-shell arrangement.
This is a "clear indication that white dwarfs can explode well before they reach the famous Chandrasekhar mass limit, and that the 'double-detonation' mechanism does indeed occur in nature," said coauthor Ivo Seitenzahl, who conducted the observations while at the Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies in Germany, in the statement.
The work is invaluable for another reason. Type Ia explosions are considered "standard candles" that astronomers use as a measuring stick in the cosmos, because they shine at a consistent luminosity. Now we understand a little more about why that's the case.
"Revealing the inner workings of such a spectacular cosmic explosion is incredibly rewarding," Das said.
More on stars: Scientists Working to Decode Signal From Earliest Years of Universe
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Astronomers discovered a whole new class of black holes
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Scientists have observed a new type of black hole that is too heavy to have been born from a star but still too slim to act as an anchor for an entire galaxy. These black holes are being being referred to as 'lite' intermediate-mass black holes (IMBH), and they're extremely hard to identify because of how low-frequency their signals tend to be. The quest to find these IMBHs has come about due to the fact that we've discovered ultramassive black holes that can measure up to millions of times the mass of our sun, while others can sit at just 50 solar masses or below. Astronomers wanted to understand where any mid-sized black holes might fit in, so they began looking harder. Today's Top Deals XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals What they discovered is that lite intermediate-mass black holes do indeed exist. However, finding them is difficult. To make it easier, the researchers used Virgo and LIGO, two gravitational wave detectors. Using the detectors, astronomers were able to find multiple black holes ranging in size from 100 to 300 times the mass of the sun. While still massive, these black holes are not anywhere near powerful enough to have been born from dying stars or to hold galaxies together. So, where do they fit into the universe? Well, researchers believe they could have been born from mergers that happen out in the cosmos. While completing a run from 2019 to 2020, the LIGO and Virgo network logged 11 mergers that could fit the bill for these cosmic objects. A study on the findings is published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. In it, the researchers detail how they classified the new class of black holes, breaking down the exact way they discovered them and why they are so important. The hope is that some of these smaller black holes could offer us a glimpse into the time when the first stars lived and died. As we detect more and more of these lite intermediate-mass black holes, researchers believe we find even more reason to be excited about them. Understanding them could not only unlock the secrets of the early universe, but it could also help us refine the models that we use to view the universe as a whole. More Top Deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 See the
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
What are dwarf planets — and how many are there?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. In 2006, Pluto was famously demoted from a planet to a dwarf planet. It remains the most famous dwarf planet today, but there are others in our solar system, including potentially hundreds that haven't been discovered yet. But what, exactly, is a dwarf planet? And how many dwarf planets are there? A dwarf planet is a celestial body that is smaller than a planet but bigger than an asteroid or other small rock in the solar system. They're not planets because they only meet two of the three criteria for something in space to be considered a true planet. A planet is defined by three qualities: It orbits the sun, it's mostly round, and it's massive enough for its gravity to have mostly kicked large objects from its orbit. Pluto and some other known dwarf planets meet the first two criteria but not the third because they orbit in the Kuiper Belt, a region beyond Neptune filled with small icy debris. When Pluto was first discovered in 1930, it (and other similar objects in the Kuiper Belt) were so far away and faint that they were really hard to spot, even with the most powerful telescopes at the time. Indeed, the very qualities that make something a dwarf planet make those objects particularly hard to detect. Related: James Webb telescope discovers 'a new kind of climate' on Pluto, unlike anything else in our solar system "There are a few things that work against us spotting them," Mathew Yu, an astronomer at UCLA, told Live Science in an email. "They are far away from the sun. The reflected light from them is faint as a result. Some have low reflectivity, making light reflecting off them fainter." Plus, "they move slowly across the sky due to their large distance from the sun," he added. "They go around the sun once every hundreds of Earth years. So their relative motions to the background stars are small. For astronomers with a limited observing time, these objects become hard to detect." Astronomers got a lot better at finding objects in the Kuiper Belt in the 1990s and 2000s as telescope technology improved. And once they could see a bit better, they noticed there were a lot more rocks out there with orbits similar to Pluto's. Between 2002 and 2005, astronomers found seven more particularly large rocks: Haumea, Makemake, Quaoar, Sedna, Orcus, Eris and Salacia. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) — the group of astronomers that decides on official names and terms for things in space — decided in 2006 that a new category was needed to describe these objects that were pretty big but not big enough to clear their orbits as a true planet does. Thus, the name "dwarf planet" was born. With eight named large rocks in the Kuiper Belt, you might think that means there are eight dwarf planets. However, not all astronomers agree on the number. "Accepted numbers range between around 10 to a few hundred in the Kuiper Belt alone," Yu said. "Some estimate that there may be up to tens of thousands of them beyond the Kuiper Belt." The IAU has officially recognized only five dwarf planets: Pluto, Haumea, Makemake and Eris in the Kuiper Belt, plus Ceres in the asteroid belt. We've sent space probes to only two of these: Pluto (visited by NASA's New Horizons) and Ceres (visited by NASA's Dawn), both of which flew by those bodies in 2015. Astronomers who observe dwarf planets, however, tend to recognize nine: the previous five, plus Quaoar, Sedna, Orcus and Gonggong. Gonggong was discovered in 2007 after the dwarf planet name change, but it wasn't confirmed until some new observations from NASA telescopes in 2016. The IAU is still considering proposals on these dwarfish bodies. RELATED STORIES —Watch newly discovered 'interstellar visitor' 3I/ATLAS shoot toward us in first livestream today (July 3) —'A completely new phenomenon': Astronomers spot a planet causing its star to constantly explode —James Webb telescope discovers tentacled 'jellyfish' galaxy swimming through deep space There are at least a handful more objects that have been proposed but need more observations to confirm their size and, therefore, dwarf planet status. And in June 2025, scientists proposed a new possible dwarf planet: 2017 OF201. Astronomers found this particularly faint object by searching through an old pile of data with new advanced algorithms. If you count all of the currently proposed dwarf planets plus the newcomer, that makes eighteen or more dwarf planets in the solar system — and that's just the ones we've seen. There are likely more out there, perhaps even hundreds or thousands, someday to be revealed as our telescopes keep getting better.

Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rubin observatory will be a new step in accessing far reaches of space
An exciting new step in access to the far reaches of space and time increasingly will become available when the new Vera C. Rubin Observatory comes into full operation ('Providing a detailed look at the cosmos,' June 25). Funded by the National Science Foundation and the US Department of Energy's Office of Science, and located on an Andean mountain in Chile, its unprecedented telescopic and camera capacity will secure data and imagery essential to further knowledge of the dark energy and dark matter composing most of the universe. In my opinion, telescopic exploring of the cosmos, along with extraterrestrial probes and telescopes, deserve top priority over anything like a plan to colonize Mars. Cannot far-flung telescopes, robotic craft and AI be combined to obviate the need for human presence requiring a transported environment? Would that not be a better investment of resources? Putting humans on Mars would be a new place for old problems. Thomas Hughson SJ, emeritus Marquette University, Milwaukee Letters: Wisconsin GOP's real problem is lousy campaigns, not party chairman Schimming Opinion: Statistics don't support UW-Milwaukee shuttering materials engineering program Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state: Please include your name, street address and daytime phone. Generally, we limit letters to 200 words. Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter. Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing. Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person. We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions. We don't publish poetry, anonymous or open letters. Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months. All letters are subject to editing. Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@ or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Telescopes, robots, AI could end need for human transport | Letters