Opinion - Al Udeid Air Base: A strategic asset for US power in the Gulf
Yet, despite its strategic value, some critics have suggested relocating CENTCOM's forward headquarters. No clear alternative has been proposed, and such a move would carry enormous financial and operational costs at a time when regional stability is increasingly fragile.
Al Udeid is the largest U.S. military base in the region, hosting nearly 11,000 American troops and more than 100 aircraft, including strategic bombers, tankers and surveillance assets. Its long, well-maintained runways enable rapid deployment, making it a critical component of U.S. force projection. The base has played a pivotal role in counterterrorism operations, air campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, and humanitarian missions, including the 2021 evacuation of Kabul.
Qatar's investment in Al Udeid has kept the base at the forefront of military readiness while saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars. Over the years, Qatar has spent more than $8 billion upgrading infrastructure, including $1.4 billion on troop housing and airfield improvements. Beyond hosting the base, Qatar remains a key regional partner, collaborating with the U.S. on counterterrorism efforts, intelligence sharing and weapons procurement. Qatar's purchase of F-15s from Boeing alone has generated tens of thousands of American jobs.
In addition to hosting Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar has significantly enhanced its military capabilities through substantial investments in U.S. defense systems. A notable example is the U.S. State Department's approval for Qatar to purchase eight MQ-9B Predator drones, a deal valued at nearly $2 billion. This acquisition includes advanced munitions and equipment, bolstering Qatar's surveillance and strike capabilities.
These procurements not only strengthen Qatar's defense infrastructure but also deepen the strategic partnership between the U.S. and Qatar. By integrating advanced U.S. military technology, Qatar enhances its role as a stabilizing force in the Gulf region.
Furthermore, these defense deals contribute to the U.S. economy by supporting American jobs and fostering industrial collaboration. The ongoing military cooperation exemplified by these acquisitions underscores the mutual commitment to regional security and opens avenues for further collaboration in defense and beyond.
More broadly, Qatar's role in the Gulf Cooperation Council is an asset to U.S. interests. As the region faces growing security challenges — including tensions in the Red Sea, ongoing conflicts in Yemen and concerns over Iranian influence — the stability of key partners like Qatar is essential. The country's diplomatic efforts, including mediation in hostage negotiations and ceasefire talks, further bolster its importance as a security partner.
Finding a viable alternative to Al Udeid would not only be prohibitively expensive but would also risk weakening U.S. regional influence at a time when competitors are expanding their presence in the Gulf. The base is more than just a military facility; it is a cornerstone of U.S. strategy in the Middle East and a vital link to regional security efforts.
The U.S. must remain committed to maintaining strong partnerships in the Gulf Cooperation Council, and Al Udeid represents a tangible, cost-effective and strategically invaluable component of that approach. Disrupting it would undermine America's ability to respond to future crises in one of the world's most volatile regions.
Christopher C. Miller, a former acting U.S. secretary of Defense, is an adviser to Highlander Partners, a private equity firm.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
30 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
America's Next Economic Chapter Is Being Built on Land, Not Paper: Inside EX CIA strategist presentation
Washington, D.C., Aug. 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ex-CIA strategist and economic advisor Jim Rickards is calling for 'the return of American industry' — a silent revolution happening not in Washington, Wall Street, or Silicon Valley, but in the ground beneath America's heartland. 'We used to build everything here. Then we shipped it all away. But that era is ending.' The Reindustrialization of the United States Has Quietly Begun According to Rickards, America is entering a new era—one not defined by software or finance, but by real production, physical goods, and critical materials. He points to a coming wave of reshoring, driven by both national security concerns and growing distrust of foreign supply chains. 'Trump is applying immense pressure on U.S. companies to re-shore the production of everything from auto parts to AI chips. It's all coming back.' Why 'Made in America' Is No Longer Just a Slogan Rickards says recent global disruptions, from pandemic lockdowns to geopolitical tensions, exposed just how fragile the supply chains supporting America's economy really are. In response, there's now a growing push to build strategic manufacturing hubs closer to home —powered by local minerals, local energy, and American labor. 'To increase oil production… to rebuild our military… even to power AI—everything comes back to domestic production and resources.' From Gridlock to Ground Game: New Projects Are Already Moving The presentation highlights how previously dormant infrastructure, manufacturing corridors, and extraction zones are now seeing renewed attention and capital. Projects once halted by environmental red tape are being reconsidered for fast-track development. 'We don't have enough refining capacity. And the more oil we produce, the more profits could flow to one specific company.' The Forgotten Engine of American Growth: Materials + Machines Rickards argues that America's wealth was never built on speculation—it was built on steel, oil, copper, and construction. And as the country faces increasing pressure to rebuild everything from its roads and bridges to its energy grid and weapons systems, demand for raw input will become more urgent than ever. 'We've hollowed out our economy. But now we know exactly where these materials are—and how to go get them.' About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, the Department of Defense, and the White House. He's helped guide U.S. strategy during pivotal global events and now serves as the lead analyst for Strategic Intelligence , a monthly research brief focused on America's future through the lens of national security, economic policy, and industrial power. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
New York Post
41 minutes ago
- New York Post
Gasparino: Inside the enormous Biden effort to 'debank' Trump after Jan. 6
The scale of the effort to 'debank' Donald Trump because of pressure from Biden administration regulators went far beyond JPMorgan and Bank of America, The Post has learned. At least 10 other financial institutions closed their windows to the billionaire real estate tycoon over his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill melee. The moves came in the months after Trump left the White House in 2021, sources inside the Trump Organization told me. The stunning scale of the blacklisting is being revealed here for the first time. 3 President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 8, 2025. REUTERS It should be reported as much as possible for the simple reason that if any big bank can cancel a former president over politics as opposed to illegality, then every American citizen is in danger of facing the same mistreatment. For expressing an opinion, or starting a business out of step with the progressive culture norms that have infected so much of society, you too can see your economic livelihood go up in smoke and 'debanked.' Debanking is such an odd word for one of the most insidious parts of cancel culture, and its sponsors like it that way. It sanitizes, via clumsy, obtuse lingo, what is essentially something of dangerous Orwellian magnitude: negating an American citizen's ability to save, and conduct business through a big bank. That's why Trump and Republicans like South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott are taking steps to end the politicization of banking. Keep in mind, there are already laws preventing the likes of JPMorgan, BofA and Capital One — the banks Trump has publicly stated canceled him — from being conduits for drug kingpins and Mafiosi. (Trump has sued Capital One, which denied Trump's allegations.) Debanking takes it further. It forces banks to remove customers who might pose nothing more than 'reputational risk,' a flighty rule enforced by bank regulators in recent years to keep financial institutions from doing business with people like Jeffrey Epstein. The now-deceased convicted child sex predator was a JPMorgan customer for years, and in theory making it impossible for Epstein to finance his illegality sounds like what should be happening. That is until you dig deeper. Under pressure from the Biden administration, just after Trump lost the 2020 election and started to act out (which the last time I checked was his constitutional right), the enforcement of reputational risk took a decidedly political turn, bank officials tell me. If you believe people at the two largest banks, Jamie Dimon's JPMorgan and Brian Moynihan's BofA, the Biden administration unleashed its bank regulatory cops at the Office of Comptroller of Currency, the FDIC and the semi-independent Federal Reserve to go beyond nixing perverted financiers from their platform. 3 A Chase bank sign in Richmond, Virginia, Wednesday, June 2, 2021. AP They used the amorphous nature of what is reputational risk to enforce a political regime, the bank officials said. The Bidenistas hated crypto, thought it was an affront to their power to control the economy, and pressured banks from doing business with this somewhat heterodox emerging industry, according to the bank sources. So was anything related to guns and certain conservative religious organizations, they added. And most of all, anything MAGA, including the multibillion-dollar real estate and resort empire of Mr. MAGA himself, Donald J. Trump. Such an effort isn't easy to prove because there's no direct smoking gun, no memo (at least not yet) telling banks to cancel Trump from their system. 3 A general view of a Bank of America sign as seen in Wyckoff, New Jersey, on April 13, 2020. Christopher Sadowski The banks say the pressure was more subtle but still real: Failure to remove Trump or crypto types and others would result in heightened enforcement, harassment and possibly fines. The banks decided to drop customers, even rich ones like Trump, because it wasn't worth the hassle. I have covered finance for three decades now and thought I saw it all: Bernie Madoff, Epstein, the 2008 financial crisis, Wall Street scandals, penny stock scams and hedge fund implosions. But what happened to Trump in 2021 was truly surprising given the breadth of big banks dropping him as a client and scary given their rationale. As bad as the events of Jan. 6 were, Trump did tell the crowd that crazy afternoon to protest peacefully. Trump didn't break the law holding a rally. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters You may disagree with his rhetoric that day. He had just lost a closely fought election against Joe Biden. Trump said he really won it. Millions of people seemed to agree. He wouldn't be the first politician to pull that lever. Democrat Stacey Abrams never really fully conceded when she lost in her first attempt to become governor of Georgia against Republican Brian Kemp. How many times did Hillary Clinton say Trump was an 'illegitimate president' after she lost the 2016 contest to him? During the violent social justice protests of 2020, Gwen Walz, the wife of Minnesota Gov. and 2024 Democrat VP candidate Tim Walz, said she 'kept the windows' open to smell the burning debris. 'I felt like that was such a touchstone of what was happening,' she said. Or how about what Kamala Harris proudly said around the same time. The then-Biden VP candidate, who went on to get trounced by Trump in 2024, supported the defunding of the police movement that led to much more mayhem than what occurred on Jan. 6. Her rationale for the 'largely peaceful protests' that burned cities to the ground, delivered to fellow-traveler lefty late-night host Stephen Colbert, is at least as cringey as anything Trump said on Jan. 6. 'They're not going to stop,' she said during an appearance on the show. 'They're not. This is a movement. I'm telling you. They're not going to stop, and everyone, beware . . . That they're not going to let up. And they should not, and we should not.' Did Jamie Dimon tell Harris that her money isn't good at JPM?
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Dean Cain a ‘loser' for joining ICE: John Leguizamo
Actor Dean Cain, best known for his role as Superman in the 1990s TV series 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman,' made rare headlines this week after the outspoken conservative announced he would join Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The move came as the Trump administration continues its national crackdown on illegal immigration, including ICE raids and mass deportations. Cain, 59, is scheduled to be sworn in as an 'honorary ICE officer' in the next month, per the Department of Homeland Security. But while the announcement was met with acclaim from supporters of the administration, elsewhere, it's garnered Cain a multitude of criticism. One such critic is Colombian-American actor John Leguizamo (Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey'), who has been vocal about his condemnation of ICE raids and the U.S.' detention centers, took aim at Cain, dubbing the actor a 'loser.' In an Instagram post on Friday, Leguizamo spoke directly to Cain saying, 'What kind of loser volunteers to be an ICE officer? What a moron. Your pronouns are has/been.' The comments of Leguizamo's post were equally venomous towards Cain, with fellow actor Frank Grillo (James Gunn's 'Superman') replying: 'never was '. hahahahha. 😂' On Saturday, Leguizamo slammed Cain again, this time in an Instagram story featuring a fake DVD case bearing Cain's likeness with the faux film title 'Aged Ice'. The repost was from a meme account who captioned the post with 'More like 'Dean needs a cane' amiright?' Elsewhere on the internet, Cain hasn't escaped the ire of everyday people, either. A popular social media joke circulating right now is some form of the following: 'I'm really trying to boycott Dean Cain but there's just… nothing to boycott.'
