SingPost halves sacked CEO Vincent Phang's pay to $616,400
SINGAPORE - Former Singapore Post (SingPost) group chief executive Vincent Phang, who was dismissed over the mishandling of a whistleblower complaint, received $616,400 in remuneration for the financial year ended March 31, the company's latest annual report disclosed.
It did not indicate if Mr Phang, who was fired by SingPost on Dec 21, had his salary pro-rated. He had received about $1.2 million in the previous financial year.
According to the annual report released on June 24, the payout comprised $570,600 in fixed salary, $10,500 in provident fund contributions, and $35,200 in benefits. The company's benefits generally include medical and flexible allowances, as well as other perks such as car allowance and long service awards, where applicable.
Fired along with Mr Phang was former group chief financial officer Mr Vincent Yik, and former chief executive of SingPost's international business unit, Mr Li Yu, after the top executives were found to be negligent in the handling of the internal investigations over a whistleblower's report.
The exact remuneration for Mr Li was not disclosed in the report. Instead, he was broadly categorised under the $250,000 to below $500,000 salary band, with the stated amount covering his remuneration from April 1 to Dec 21 in 2024.
As for Mr Yik, his pay was not reported individually.
Instead, the annual report stated that an aggregate of about $950,000 was paid to him and Mr Shahrin Abdol Salam, SingPost's former Singapore CEO, who resigned in February – less than a year after taking up the role on May 1, 2024.
The annual report also disclosed that total compensation paid to SingPost's non-executive directors exceeded $1.3 million.
Of this, $288,600 went to outgoing chairman Mr Simon Israel, while nine others received between $10,100 and $176,000 each.
The report also noted that outgoing chairman Simon Israel, 72, declined an ex-gratia payment of $250,000 proposed by board 'in recognition of the extra time and effort' he expended during SingPost's leadership transition.
Mr Israel, who has chaired the board for nine years, will be succeeded by Mr Teo Swee Lian, 65, following SingPost's annual general meeting (AGM) on July 23.
Five directors, including Ms Teo, are also seeking re-election at the AGM.
Both Ms Teo and Mr Phang, who stepped down as a non-executive, non-independent director with effect from Jan 12, were not listed among the directors who received board compensation.
Mr Phang's replacement has yet to be announced by the postal service provider.
What's next
While acknowledging the challenges of the past year, Mr Israel signalled a forward-looking shift for SingPost as it prepares for a new phase of transformation under fresh leadership.
Despite booking a net profit of $245.1 million, boosted by the one-off divestment of its Australia business, the group saw its underlying net profit fall 40.3 per cent to $24.8 million, with a net loss of some $500,000 in the second half.
Mr Israel described these figures as evidence of the 'persistent pressures facing the group' and the need for decisive restructuring.
Looking ahead, he warned that the operating environment is likely to remain volatile.
But he stressed that SingPost has taken steps to reset its cost base and streamline operations, including the reintegration of its international cross-border business into the Singapore unit to unlock synergies.
To support future growth, the group is betting on automation and eCommerce logistics.
A $30 million investment has been committed to scaling up its Regional eCommerce Logistics Hub, which will eventually handle up to 400,000 parcels daily – a three-fold increase in capacity.
But the domestic postal business remains under strain, with discussions ongoing between SingPost and the government on how to ensure the long-term financial viability of postal services, including its Post Office Network.
Nevertheless, Mr Israel said that SingPost is undertaking a 'strategic reset' which will be finalised after a new group CEO is appointed. 'Upon conclusion, the board will set out the new strategy for all stakeholders,' he added.
Shares of SingPost rose 2.5 per cent, or 1.5 cents, to 62 cents as at 3.53pm on June 26. THE BUSINESS TIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
4 days ago
- Business Times
SingPost board should speed up resetting directions
[SINGAPORE] Shareholders of postal service provider Singapore Post (SingPost) could understandably be frustrated and disappointed that the annual general meeting (AGM) held last week did not deliver the answers they wanted. SingPost posted an underlying net loss of S$461,000 for the second half-year ended Mar 31, from a net profit of S$28.1 million in the year-ago period, and attributed the dismal performance to intensifying challenges and uncertain conditions in the global logistics sector. This came after the group divested its key financial contributor Freight Management Holdings at the end of March – without a replacement source of revenue . Selling the cash cow without a Plan B meant the group could only depend on its property business and the unremarkable postal and logistics businesses until whatever future endeavours bear fruit. When investors gathered at the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) in mid-March for the divestment of the key earnings pillar, then-chairman Simon Israel was already bombarded with questions from shareholders . Israel said then that the board did have some ideas, but would need to evaluate them, and work with the chief executive to be appointed on the reset strategy. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up He added: 'Maybe by the AGM, which is not that far away, things will be a lot clearer.' Following the EGM, shareholders were distraught at the lack of specific direction on where SingPost – saddled with the declining postal and competitive e-commerce logistics businesses – was headed. Yet, when they sought answers at the AGM last week, they were urged to be patient. Israel, who stepped down at the AGM on Jul 23 after nine years on the board, asked shareholders to allow the reconstituted board and incoming chairman Teo Swee Lian time to work through the 'many options'. His counterpart Teo said these were 'not easy issues'. There are also other stakeholders – customers, the regulators and SingPost staff – to think about in deciding on the future path for the group, she added. To be fair, shareholders are not being impatient, and they are right to press the board about the future of SingPost. Bear in mind that it would take time to put into action whatever plans it has and for the plans to work out – or not. Acquisitions could be risky, given that studies have shown the majority of such corporate actions failed. In fact, SingPost has had an unsuccessful experience in acquisitions in the US, which prompted it to take a prudent, phased approach to buying Freight Management Holdings . A shareholder sought assurance at the AGM that it is worthy to continue holding its shares, while another earlier at the EGM describing the group as a 'sinking boat' was concerned that the remaining sales proceeds from recent divestments would be ploughed into riskier or more volatile business. A third shareholder suggested that SingPost divest all its assets and return the capital to shareholders as he could easily make equivalent investment returns in the current stock market rally rather than wait five years for SingPost's future venture to bear fruit. Although four of its seven members were appointed to the board only between February and May this year and would need time to familiarise themselves with SingPost, time is of the essence in a highly competitive and volatile environment – particularly more so for SingPost operating declining or competitive businesses. Granted, the challenges that SingPost is facing are not easy to overcome and one would argue that the board should not be rushed into decisions. However, it is exactly that the pursuit of viable plans to turn SingPost around has significant implications that there is urgency. What is at stake is not only the shareholders' investments, but also its 3,000 workers' livelihoods and morale. The board should commit to a timeline and not wait till the next AGM to present the path forward for SingPost shareholders and other stakeholders. It may also want to take this suggestion into consideration for its future acquisitions. Granted that the purchase of Freight Management Holdings had saddled SingPost's balance sheet with debt, but it would have and should have made all the calculations before making the offer. In spite of the purchase being seemingly unappreciated by shareholders – it was said that the stock price did not rise in tandem with the contributions from Freight Management Holdings – if the business continues to be a promising one for the group, it should not be sold. It was because one of the objectives of buying Freight Management Holdings was to offset the declining postal business for SingPost. Should another core asset or business in the future fetch an attractive price, especially from an unsolicited offer, SingPost shareholders may want to think about what the offeror could have seen in it that they could have missed.
Business Times
5 days ago
- Business Times
Optus' performance in spotlight at Singtel AGM
[SINGAPORE] Eight hundred Singtel shareholders packed into a function room in the Sands Expo and Convention Centre on Tuesday (Jul 29), with questions for the management of the telco – specifically about Optus, its Australian subsidiary. Citing figures from Singtel's annual report released on Jun 30, these investors had questions not only about the A$100 million (S$83.8 million) penalty that Optus had to pay for alleged sales misconduct; they also asked about its lagging profitability relative to its rivals, despite clocking a 55 per cent jump in earnings before interest and taxes (Ebit). The intense scrutiny of Optus during Singtel's 2½ hour long annual general meeting (AGM) highlighted the operational challenges faced by Optus, which also included the 2023 nationwide outage in Australia , and the series of reports by whistleblowers and those with grievances. Financial performance Optus, the second-largest telco in Australia, posted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) of S$1.94 billion for FY2025 ended Mar 31, 5.7 per cent higher than FY2024's figure of S$1.86 billion, accounting for constant currency. In a question submitted before the AGM, one investor noted that, compared to the pre-pandemic period, the company's revenue and Ebit were now lower. Singtel said in a written response that Optus' Ebit has been hit by a combination of structural and market-specific factors that have reshaped the Australian telco landscape over the past few years. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'That said, Optus is now on a recovery path,' it added, noting its 55 per cent rise in Ebit for FY2025. Singtel expects Optus to be a key driver of the group's Ebit. This will be supported by ongoing cost-reduction efforts, rational pricing in mobile and broadband sectors, and further streamlining of the product portfolio, it said. However, some shareholders were still unconvinced, with one raising his concern about Optus being left behind by its competitors. Singtel's group chief executive officer Yuen Kuan Moon noted that Optus' Ebitda margin was around 27 per cent – lower than the industry's average of 30 to 33 per cent. He added that Singtel's management is looking at the capital expenditure needs for Optus to lift its performance, and that this would include exploring network and IT investments. 'We want to ensure that Optus is able to grow progressively and sustainably over time,' he added. Controversy While Optus' financial performance has improved, shareholders wanted to know what steps Singtel would take to restore customer trust following the outage in Australia. Singtel replied that doing so is an ongoing priority for management, and that 'some improvements' in Optus' reputation metrics have already been noted. Shareholders also homed in on the Jun 18, 2025, penalty of A$100 million incurred over Optus' alleged sales misconduct, specifically the selling of mobile phones and plans to vulnerable customers. Asked about the fallout from the incident, Yuen said Optus is making ongoing efforts to reach out and support affected customers. One shareholder, referring to the latest group-wide sustainability report, asked the board to clarify the 'disproportionately high volume' of grievances reports involving Optus. The report indicated that Optus accounted for more than half of all reported staff grievances and whistleblower reports. In a written response, Singtel said that since Optus contributes to approximately half the group's revenues, the proportion is reflected in related metrics, including whistleblower cases. Looking ahead Singtel's group chief financial officer Arthur Lang, responding to the questions raised, said: 'We are not happy about where Optus is today.' Whether it is revenue, Ebitda, Ebit, returns on capital, or cash flow. Singtel is working on improving these areas, he added. 'We are confident, and we are very focused on making sure that Optus will continue to perform.' Ten resolutions tabled on Singtel matters for the AGM were passed, with each garnering at least 93.1 per cent support. Among them, one concerned raising its directors' remuneration to a maximum of S$4.9 million for FY2026, up from S$460,000 for FY2025; three others related to the re-election of three directors. Shares of Singtel closed down 1 per cent, or S$0.04, at S$4.03 on Tuesday.
Business Times
5 days ago
- Business Times
Questions over Optus' performance cloud Singtel's AGM
[SINGAPORE] Eight hundred Singtel shareholders packed into a function room in the Sands Expo and Convention Centre on Tuesday (Jul 29), with questions for the management of the telco – specifically about Optus, its Australian subsidiary. Citing figures from Singtel's annual report released on Jun 30, these investors not only had questions about the A$100 million (S$83.8 million) penalty that the Australian subsidiary had to pay for alleged sales misconduct; they also asked about Optus' lagging profitability relative to its rivals, despite clocking a 55 per cent jump in Ebit (earnings before interest and taxes). The intense scrutiny of Optus during Singtel's two-and-a-half hour long annual general meeting (AGM) highlighted the operational challenges faced by Optus, which also included the 2023 nationwide outage in Australia , and the series of reports by whistleblowers and those with grievances. Financial performance Optus, the second-largest telco in Australia, achieved an Ebitda (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) of S$1.94 billion in FY 2025, 5.7 per cent higher than FY 2024's figure of S$1.86 billion, accounting for constant currency. In a question submitted before the AGM, one investor noted that, compared to the pre-pandemic period, the company's revenue and Ebit were now lower. In a written response, Singtel said that Optus' Ebit has been hit by a combination of structural and market-specific factors that have reshaped the Australian telco landscape over the past few years. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'That said, Optus is now on a recovery path,' it added, noting that in FY 2025, Optus delivered that 55 per cent rise in Ebit. Singtel expects Optus to be a key driver of the group's Ebit. This will be supported by ongoing cost-reduction efforts, rational pricing in mobile and broadband sectors, and further streamlining of the product portfolio, it added in its written response. However, some shareholders were still unconvinced, with one raising his concern about Optus being left behind by its competitors. Singtel's group chief executive officer Yuen Kuan Moon, noted that Optus' Ebitda margin was around 27 per cent – lower than the industry's average Ebitda margins of 30 to 33 per cent. He added that the Singtel management was looking at the capital expenditure needs for Optus to lift its performance, and that this would include exploring network and IT investments. 'We want to ensure that Optus is able to grow progressively and sustainably over time,' he added. Controversy surrounding Optus While the financial performance has improved, shareholders wanted to know what steps Singtel would take to restore customer trust following the outage in Australia. Singtel replied that doing this was an ongoing priority for the management, and that 'some improvements' in Optus' reputation metrics have already been noted. Shareholders also homed in on the more recent Jun 18 A$100 million penalty incurred over Optus' alleged sales misconduct, specifically the selling of mobile phones and plans to vulnerable customers. Asked about the fallout from the incident, Yuen said Optus is making ongoing efforts to reach out and support affected customers. One shareholder, referring to the latest group-wide sustainability report, asked the board to clarify the 'disproportionately high volume' of grievances reports involving Optus. The report indicated that Optus accounted for more than half of all reported staff grievances and whistleblower reports. In a written response, Singtel said that since Optus contributes to approximately half the group's revenues, the proportion is reflected in related metrics, including whistleblower cases. Looking ahead Singtel's group chief financial officer Arthur Lang, responding to the questions raised, said: 'We are not happy about where Optus is today.' Whether it is revenue, Ebitda, Ebit, returns on capital, cash flow – Singtel is working on improving these areas, he said 'We are confident, and we are very focused on making sure that Optus will continue to perform,' he added. Ten resolutions tabled on Singtel matters for the AGM were resoundingly passed, each garnering at least 94 per cent support. Among them, two concerned the rise in directors' remuneration by S$0.3 million to S$4.9 million, and the re-election of three directors. Shares of Singtel closed down 1 per cent, or S$0.04, at S$4.03 on Tuesday.
