logo
Filipino Americans brace for impact of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

Filipino Americans brace for impact of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Star3 days ago
LOS ANGELES: As the United States moves forward with implementing President Donald Trump's sweeping legislative package – dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' – many Filipino American communities are bracing for policy changes that could significantly impact their daily lives.
From immigration and healthcare to education and remittances, advocates warn that the proposed reforms may jeopardise vital support systems for thousands of immigrant families across the country.
Described by supporters as a move toward fiscal efficiency, the bill contains deep cuts to Medicaid, stricter work requirements for food assistance programmes, expanded funding for deportations and a controversial new tax on international remittances.
One of the bill's most alarming aspects is its potential impact on healthcare access for millions of low-income Americans. Filipino Americans, many of whom work in frontline healthcare roles, are particularly vulnerable to the Medicaid funding cuts. This federal-state programme serves as a lifeline for many, offering essential medical coverage and preventive care.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that up to ten million Americans — primarily from communities of colour — could lose Medicaid coverage by 2034. For Filipino Americans, who already experience healthcare disparities and face higher rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, the proposed changes could deepen existing inequalities.
According to the National Domestic Workers Alliance (NDWA), 'Medicaid is used to pay for 70 per cent of home care and is often care workers' only pathway to affordable, quality care for themselves. These massive cuts are going to have a ripple effect throughout our communities – countless care workers will lose their jobs and their healthcare.'
Jessica Caloza, representing California's 52nd Assembly District, which encompasses several Los Angeles County communities with significant Filipino American presence, such as Eagle Rock, South Glendale and Historic Filipino Town, warns that 'the Big Beautiful Bill is dangerous and will harm many of our Filipino families.'
'It gives tax breaks to the rich while slashing numerous safety net programmes, including the largest single cut to food stamps as poverty reaches a two-decade high, and a US$1 trillion cut to Medicaid,' Caloza emphasised in her statement.
Major changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP), or 'food stamps,' could severely impact working-class Filipino American families – especially those in mixed-status households (with undocumented parents and US-born children, for example). These benefits often allow families to afford healthier, more expensive food options.
Perla Bermudez Santos, founder of the MoTHER Movement, a Los Angeles-based group of Filipino American mothers and seniors, and co-author of 'Caregiving Manual II: Skills and Strategies for Compassionate Care,' noted that while members appreciate new tax deductions and the exemption of Social Security benefits from federal taxes, serious concerns remain.
'Members are worried about the rising cost of fruits, vegetables and other nutritious food options,' said Santos. 'Many seniors receive just US$1,000 a month in retirement benefits and must cover rent, food, transportation, clothing and other essentials. For them, supplemental food benefits are vital to making ends meet.'
Another contentious provision is a one per cent excise tax on remittances sent abroad – impacting green card holders, visa workers and undocumented immigrants, including many Filipino Americans.
With over US$10 billion in annual remittances sent to the Philippines, this tax could significantly reduce support to families abroad and affect local economies dependent on overseas funds.
The bill also proposes 100 per cent tax deductions for donations to private school voucher programmes, a move critics argue could siphon funding from public schools. Many students of colour – including Filipino Americans – attend underfunded public schools that rely on government support.
Additionally, expanded funding for immigration enforcement – including a US$170 billion allocation, with US$75 billion earmarked for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) – has stoked fear among the estimated 340,000 undocumented Filipino Americans. Many are longtime residents, essential workers and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients now facing heightened uncertainty.
Caloza, an immigrant and lifelong public servant who has advocated for working families throughout her various roles at the federal, state and local levels, condemned the bill's immigration provisions.
'I'm devastated by the unrest and fear that families – including Filipinos – in our communities face due to the ongoing ICE raids and increased immigration enforcement,' Caloza said.
'Our taxpayer dollars should go toward our schools, parks, libraries and hospitals – and for communities like mine that have been devastated by wildfires. We also need to invest in emergency recovery,' she added.
Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAAJ), a network of four independent Asian American civil rights organisations, echoed that sentiment: 'This legislation prioritises harmful immigration crackdowns at the expense of the urgent needs of everyday Americans.'
In response, Filipino American organisations across the country are launching efforts to educate and support affected families through town halls, legal clinics and resource guides.
AAAJ stated, 'The Reconciliation Bill directly attacks not just immigrant communities, but all Americans who rely on essential health and nutrition programmes. We need laws that invest in opportunities and our future – not laws that cater to the mega-rich and funnel resources into systems of exclusion and cruelty.'
The National Domestic Workers Alliance expressed similar resolve: 'Today, our hearts are heavy. We fought tirelessly – standing shoulder-to-shoulder at vigils, rallies and lobbying blitzes. Now, it's time to turn our grief and outrage into powerful action.'
'We are mobilising to hold accountable every lawmaker who chose cruelty over compassion. In just a few weeks, our massive Protect Medicaid Mobilisations will send an undeniable message: these heartless cuts will have consequences,' the organisation added.
The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC), which includes 73 members advocating for Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) communities, held a press conference addressing the bill's devastating consequences.
'We are united in our commitment to protecting Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders from harmful policies that threaten our rights, our safety and our well-being,' said Rep. Grace Meng, CAPAC Chair. 'Instead of working to lower costs, as he promised on day one, President Trump and Congressional Republicans are waging endless culture wars. This is not what the American people want. CAPAC will continue to fight tooth and nail to protect our rights, hold our leaders accountable and ensure our voices are heard.'
NAFCON USA, a coalition of Filipino grassroots organisations and nonprofits, also issued a call to action: 'We urge everyone to get involved, take action and stand alongside Filipino organisations to organise, defend our communities and build the future we deserve.'
With the bill's implementation, Filipino Americans find themselves at a critical crossroads – confronting not only sweeping legislative changes but also profound personal consequences for their families and communities.
For many, the looming enactment of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' marks a defining moment in their ongoing struggle for dignity, security and the American dream. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How tariffs, taxes can derail climate ambitions
How tariffs, taxes can derail climate ambitions

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

How tariffs, taxes can derail climate ambitions

AT a time when Malaysia must accelerate its climate transition, can we afford foreign and domestic policy shocks that will destabilise our climate finance and green technology agenda? The recent announcement by US President Donald Trump to impose a sweeping 25% tariff on 'any and all Malaysian products' starting Aug 1 has jolted Malaysia's economy and potentially, its entire energy transition trajectory. This move not only threatens our US$80 billion (RM338 billion) annual trade relationship with the US but also risks undercutting the financial and industrial scaffolding needed to meet our net-zero ambitions by 2050. For a country that has pledged a 45% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030, this is not just an economic setback but also a stress test of our climate governance, resilience and readiness. The potential impact is immense. Sectors like electrical and electronics (E&E), which comprise nearly 40% of our exports, stand particularly exposed. With the Green Technology Master Plan relying heavily on E&E to drive decarbonised manufacturing, this development will place our climate-linked industrial strategy in jeopardy. At the same time, Malaysia's expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST), which came into effect on July 1, adds pressure from within. Over 4,800 previously exempt items, including industrial equipment and low-emission machinery, are now taxed at 8%, up from the previous 6%. While the SST expansion is projected to yield RM3 billion in additional revenue, its timing could not be worse. The Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers warns that these cascading tax burdens will inflate costs, shrink margins and deter future investment, especially in capital-intensive green infrastructure. The National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR), launched in 2023, sets ambitious targets: increasing renewable energy in the national mix to 70% by 2050, developing CCUS (carbon capture, utilisation and storage) and attracting RM435 billion in investments. But these goals rely on a strong private sector, foreign direct investment and investor confidence. Reduced export earnings due to tariffs, paired with higher domestic operating costs from the SST, could stall clean energy adoption, battery storage scaling and smart grid investments. Small and medium green-tech enterprises already navigating tight financing margins may pivot to survival mode, postponing research and development or abandoning green upgrades entirely. This fiscal constriction directly threatens the creation of 23,000 green jobs forecasted under NETR and it risks reducing Malaysia's contribution to global clean energy supply chains at a time when demand is rising. On the other hand, Malaysia's voluntary carbon market (VCM), launched via the Bursa Carbon Exchange in late 2022, was one of Southeast Asia's most promising climate finance innovations. With a projected market value of US$237 million by 2030, it was expected to fund reforestation, conservation and industrial decarbonisation projects. However, the VCM and the upcoming carbon tax and Emissions Trading Scheme under the National Climate Change Bill are all sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Historically, economic downturns or trade disruptions often lead governments to delay carbon pricing reforms in the name of economic recovery. Malaysia is no exception. Unless insulated, our carbon governance mechanisms may stall or regress under fiscal and political pressure just when they are needed to drive long-term decarbonisation and attract green capital. Climate change disproportionately affects the poorest and most vulnerable communities in Malaysia, from coastal erosion in Sabah to urban flooding in Kuala Lumpur. But so too will economic instability. Tariff-related export losses could result in job cuts in key industrial areas while SST inflation will raise living costs. When people are forced to choose between short-term survival and long-term sustainability, the environment always loses. Without targeted support, our vision of a 'just transition' risks becoming rhetorical. The National Climate Change Bill framework, which emphasises equity and protection for vulnerable populations, must be backed by resilient fiscal policy and progressive social safety nets and not sacrificed in budget cuts driven by external shocks. In this regard, what can Malaysia do? Firstly, Malaysia must demand clarity on the tariff scope and seek exclusions for clean technology, solar components and environmental goods, aligning with the World Trade Organisation environmental exceptions. Next, allocate funds from the new SST intake to fund VCM capacity-building, CCUS pilots and green job retraining programmes. SST exemptions or rebates for low-emission equipment, energy-efficient machinery and carbon audit services must also be provided to incentivise clean industrial investments. Additionally, as the Chair of Asean this year, we also have an upper hand in using this moment to lead within Asean, pushing for regional carbon border adjustments and green mutual recognition agreements that support decarbonised exports. Lastly, fast-track funding for climate policy education, especially in carbon markets, climate law and environmental economics, to prepare the next generation of climate experts. In conclusion, economic shocks will come and go but the climate crisis is permanent and intensifying. As floods grow more frequent, air pollution worsens and biodiversity collapses, the cost of inaction will grow steeper each year. Trade and tax policies must serve and not sabotage our climate goals. Malaysia must not retreat from climate ambition in the face of tariffs or taxes. We must instead use these shocks to recalibrate our economic tools, reaffirm our global leadership in climate governance and build a greener, more resilient Malaysia that does not trade short-term relief for long-term collapse. Mogesh Sababathy is a youth climate advocate, National Consultative Panel member to the Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Ministry and PhD candidate at Universiti Putra Malaysia. Comments: letters@

Asian markets extend gains on US trade deal hopes
Asian markets extend gains on US trade deal hopes

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

Asian markets extend gains on US trade deal hopes

HONG KONG: Asian markets extended the week's gains Thursday (July 24) on optimism other countries will follow up Japan's US trade deal with ones of their own, with speculation building that the European Union is on course. Investors have been on a roll in recent weeks on bets that governments will eventually hammer out pacts with Donald Trump ahead of the US president's Aug 1 deadline. The mood has been upbeat since news that Japan had reached a deal to lower sweeping tariffs from 25 per cent to 15 per cent, including those on the country's crucial car sector. The breakthrough fanned hopes that others were in the pipeline. However, there is talk that the European Union is edging towards an agreement. Reports say Brussels could get something similar to Japan, with tariffs cut to 15 per cent -- from the threatened 30 per cent. The Financial Times said the two would waive tariffs on some products, including aircraft, spirits and medical devices. That came after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said negotiations were making progress, with talks planned later in the day between the bloc's top trade negotiator and his American counterpart. Analysts said a deal with Washington's biggest trading entity would provide a massive boost to equities However, failure to reach a deal, triggering Trump's 30 per cent levies on Aug 1, could cause havoc on markets, analysts warned. France has been loudest in insisting Brussels must show it is willing to deploy its trade weapon, known as the anti-coercion instrument -- allowing officials to take measures such as import and export restrictions on goods and services. Neil Wilson at Saxo Markets warned that would end up "effectively killing trade between the two... the nuclear option is on the table it seems, but for the moment expectation seems to be veering towards a deal". After another record day for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq on Wall Street, Asia picked up the baton and ran. Tokyo piled on two per cent, having jumped more than three per cent Wednesday on the trade deal, while Hong Kong continued its standout year with another advance. Shanghai, Seoul, Singapore, Wellington, Taipei and Manila also rose. Traders are also keeping an eye on developments in Tokyo after Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba denied discussing his resignation with party elders on Wednesday, as speculation about his future intensified following a weekend election debacle. Despite the saga, the yen extended its gains, briefly hitting 145.86 per dollar as the trade deal allows investors to turn their attention to the Bank of Japan's policy meeting next week hoping for guidance on its next interest rate hike. The unit had been sitting around 147.90 before the deal. Bank officials have held off rocking the boat on the issue amid tariff uncertainty, but observers say the agreement can allow them to reconsider lifting in October. - AFP

Australia lifts US beef ban after Trump tariffs threat
Australia lifts US beef ban after Trump tariffs threat

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Australia lifts US beef ban after Trump tariffs threat

SYDNEY, July 24 — Australia said today it would lift trade barriers on beef from the United States, removing a major point of friction between Canberra and the Trump administration. US President Donald Trump singled out Australia as he unveiled his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, accusing the close ally of banning American meat while cashing in on exports to the United States. Australia's stringent biosecurity rules block imports of cattle slaughtered in the United States, but born in Canada or Mexico. Threatened with 10 per cent tariffs on beef shipped to the United States, one of its largest red meat markets, Australia has now dropped these barriers. Agriculture minister Julie Collins said the United States had adopted new quality controls that soothed Australia's worries. 'The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks,' she said in a statement. 'Australia stands for open and fair trade—our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this.' Australia suspended US beef imports in 2003 after an outbreak of mad cow disease, a fatal and infectious condition that slowly eats away at the nervous system of cattle. Most of these restrictions were lifted in 2019, although some barriers remained on cattle slaughtered in American abattoirs but born elsewhere. Trump said Australians were 'wonderful people' but accused them of banning US beef while exporting billions of dollars worth of meat to America. 'They don't take any of our beef,' he complained in April. 'Won't let us' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick—one of the architects behind the US tariff blitz—had also namechecked Australia. 'Our farmers are blocked from selling almost anywhere. Europe won't let us sell beef, Australia won't let us sell beef,' Lutnick said earlier this year. Almost five per cent of all the beef eaten in America is Australian, and that largely goes into burgers. In the first three weeks of July, Australia shipped almost 25,000 tonnes of beef and veal to the United States, official figures show. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been unusually frank in his condemnation of Trump's trade war against allies and foes alike. 'This is not the act of a friend,' Albanese said in April after the first wave of tariff announcements. 'These tariffs are not unexpected, but let me be clear, they are totally unwarranted,' he said. 'This will have consequences for how Australians see this relationship.' — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store