
Facing an ‘existential threat,' a Vermont business helped take on Trump's tariffs
Although Terry Precision Cycling manufactures much of its merchandise in Spokane, Wash., it also imports materials and finished goods from China, Taiwan, Vietnam, El Salvador, Italy and the Philippines, said Nik Holm, its president. President Trump has sharply increased tariffs on all those countries, creating what Holm called 'an existential threat' to his company.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
So he decided to join four other US businesses in filing a lawsuit challenging the legality of those tariffs, which
Advertisement
'To have the best chance of survival was to join up here,' Holm told the Globe, noting the high tariffs Trump slapped on China added nearly $50 to the cost of a Caicos short. He was forced to pass most of that cost onto his customers, hiking the retail price to $199.95 from an anticipated $165.
'When you're up against the wall ...there was no hesitancy for me personally because as president I knew it was the best path forward for our company to have our best footing,' Holm said of joining the lawsuit against Trump.
Advertisement
In the suit filed by the Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian public interest law firm, and a second one filed by 12 Democratic state attorneys general, the US Court of International Trade Wednesday ruled Trump's tariffs are illegal. The ruling, which is a blow to Trump's aggressive trade policy, was
then temporarily halted by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and could ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court.
White House officials have said they believe Trump's tariff authority ultimately will be upheld. But Holm remains optimistic the courts will quash the higher levies.
'We're a small company dealing with global supply chain disruptions and rising costs caused by these tariffs that shouldn't have been in there in the first place,' he said. The ruling helps him believe that 'we're going to come through this...and have better clarity on the other side.'
Nik Holm, president of Terry Precision Cycling. (Terry Precision Cycling)
Terry Precision Cycling
There's been little clarity up to this point. The 16-employee company has scrambled to keep up with Trump's constant changes to tariff rates while trying to find alternative sources for the unique materials in its products.
'We haven't been working on innovation the last couple of months,' he said. 'We've been working on tariff mitigation and sourcing products from other channels.'
Holm declined to say who he voted for in the 2024 election, but said his politics weren't involved in the decision to join the suit.
'This wasn't a political move in the sense that we were going after the Trump administration,' he said. 'We were going after the survival... of our company.'
Advertisement
Terry Precision Cycling is located in progressive Burlington, but its customers are from around the country and Holm said there has been some backlash in the chat section of its website for joining the lawsuit.
'That's even more of a reason that we need to stick our neck out there because somebody has to do it,' Holm said.
The company is used to paying tariffs. Even before Trump took office in January, the base tariff rate on its imported biking tops was 32 percent, Holm said. But the dramatically increases from Trump were an unforeseen hit.
Holm said he started the year targeting $50,000 in operating income. The tariffs have added $45,000 to his costs. And if they stay in place, the hit will be $1.2 million next year.
'That just would not be sustainable,' he said. " And obviously all that would have to be somehow passed to the consumer or adjusted supply chains."
But adjusting supply chains in such a specialized business and doing more domestic manufacturing is not easy.
One of the company's product lines used to be made in the United States, but the manufacturer couldn't find enough workers to do the sewing so production moved to China, Holm said. And even for the products Terry Precision Cycling makes in Spokane, all the high-end fabrics they use come from abroad.
'El Salvador, China, Italy, a number of European countries have...fabric mills that just don't exist in this country,' he said.
The K-L Manufacturing facility in Spokane, Wash., which makes products for Terry Precision Cycling of Burlington, Vt. (Terry Precision Cycling)
Terry Precision Cycling
Trump has said the tariffs are designed to bring more manufacturing back to the United States. But Holm said it would take years to develop factories that can produce those materials domestically.
Advertisement
'That would take quite some time and quite some investment in infrastructure and... some incentives to build out [to produce] the fabric and chamois and elastic and zippers and everything that goes into the garments we build,' he said. 'That would be a big feat for the country to do, to say, 'Hey, we're going to make this all in the United States.' '
And were that even possible, the cost of domestically-produced materials would be much higher., Holm said. The lower cost of its goods from China has helped offset the higher cost of manufacturing others in Spokane, he said. Doing it all in the United States would mean substantial price increases for consumers.
In the meantime, Holm has been trying to find ways to reduce the cost of the tariffs.
'We look at our Philippine supplier and say, 'What else can you do? Can you do more to take away from the Chinese made goods?' ' he said. One of his Chinese manufacturers is building a factory in Cambodia, but Trump increased tariffs on that country as well.
Like many US businesses, Terry Precision Cycling is just trying to keep its head above water as the tariff issue plays out in court and in negotiations between the Trump administration and foreign trading partners.
'It's a lot of uncertainty for sure,' Holm said. 'We and everybody else are stuck between a rock and a hard place currently.'
Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Independent Non-Executive Director of Radiopharm Theranostics Picks Up 48% More Stock
Even if it's not a huge purchase, we think it was good to see that Ian Turner, the Independent Non-Executive Director of Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (ASX:RAD) recently shelled out AU$87k to buy stock, at AU$0.029 per share. That purchase might not be huge but it did increase their holding by 48%. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The MD, CEO & Director Riccardo Canevari made the biggest insider purchase in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for AU$241k worth of shares at a price of AU$0.031 each. So it's clear an insider wanted to buy, even at a higher price than the current share price (being AU$0.024). It's very possible they regret the purchase, but it's more likely they are bullish about the company. We always take careful note of the price insiders pay when purchasing shares. As a general rule, we feel more positive about a stock if insiders have bought shares at above current prices, because that suggests they viewed the stock as good value, even at a higher price. In the last twelve months insiders purchased 22.43m shares for AU$772k. But insiders sold 1.50m shares worth AU$43k. Overall, Radiopharm Theranostics insiders were net buyers during the last year. Their average price was about AU$0.034. These transactions suggest that insiders have considered the current price attractive. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date! Check out our latest analysis for Radiopharm Theranostics Radiopharm Theranostics is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find small cap companies at attractive valuations, this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. Looking at the total insider shareholdings in a company can help to inform your view of whether they are well aligned with common shareholders. We usually like to see fairly high levels of insider ownership. From our data, it seems that Radiopharm Theranostics insiders own 11% of the company, worth about AU$6.3m. Overall, this level of ownership isn't that impressive, but it's certainly better than nothing! It's certainly positive to see the recent insider purchase. We also take confidence from the longer term picture of insider transactions. However, we note that the company didn't make a profit over the last twelve months, which makes us cautious. We would certainly prefer see higher levels of insider ownership but analysis of the insider transactions suggests that Radiopharm Theranostics insiders are expecting a bright future. While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. When we did our research, we found 4 warning signs for Radiopharm Theranostics (2 make us uncomfortable!) that we believe deserve your full attention. But note: Radiopharm Theranostics may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


CNBC
40 minutes ago
- CNBC
Stock futures inch lower to kick off start of the new trading month: Live updates
A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) at the opening bell on May 30, 2025, in New York City. Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images Stock futures fell on Sunday as Wall Street looks to the start of a new month of trading following a strong performance in May. S&P 500 futures traded down 0.2%, while Nasdaq-100 futures dropped about 0.3%. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average also declined 70 points, or 0.2%. On Friday, the S&P 500 closed out the month of May with a more than 6% gain, its best monthly performance since November 2023. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite surged more than 9% for the month and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about 4%. That said, Morgan Stanley's Chris Toomey is skeptical about whether May's market momentum will continue. "We're probably still range-bound," the managing director told CNBC's "Closing Bell" on Friday. "The concern we've got is that while I think we've taken [out] the worst-case scenario with regards to the 'liberation day' [tariffs], we're in a situation where I think the market's right now probably pricing in the best-case scenario." He added: "Everyone's talking about the fact that there's probably going to be 10% tariffs across the board, 30% for China. I think that's kind of baked in." President Donald Trump's tariffs have been in legal limbo following two key court rulings last week. The U.S. Court of International Trade struck down much of the president's steep levies Wednesday, ordering his administration to stop collecting them. A day later, however, a federal appeals court granted the administration's request to temporarily pause that ruling, effectively reinstating the duties. Trump's top economic advisors have remained optimistic in the tariffs even with the recent legal challenge, as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Fox News over the weekend that the tariffs are "not going away." Additionally, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told ABC News that he's "very confident that the judges will uphold this law." Hassett also suggested that Trump and China's President Xi Jinping could discuss trade as early as this week, though he said no date for the talks has been set. His comments come as trade tensions between the U.S. and China ramped up last week, with Trump writing in a Truth Social post Friday that China has "TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US." Meanwhile, investors will be eyeing a slew of reports due this week that could provide insight into how tariffs have affected the U.S. economy, including the key May nonfarm payrolls reading on Friday. Stock futures traded lower Sunday evening. S&P 500 futures were down about 0.3% shortly after 6 p.m. ET, along with Nasdaq-100 futures. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 95 points, or 0.2%. — Sean Conlon


Hamilton Spectator
41 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
List of ‘sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website
WASHINGTON (AP) — A list of more than 500 ' sanctuary jurisdictions' no longer appears on the Department of Homeland Security's website after receiving criticism for including localities that have actively supported the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The department last week published the list of the jurisdictions. It said each one would receive formal notification the government deemed them uncooperative with federal immigration enforcement and whether they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published Thursday on the department's website but on Sunday there was a 'Page Not Found' error message in its place. The list was part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that there had been anger from some officials about the list. However, she didn't address why it was removed. 'Some of the cities have pushed back,' Noem said. 'They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' The list, which was riddled with misspellings, received pushback from officials in communities spanning from urban to rural and blue to red who said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California, the city of Huntington Beach made the list even though it had filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration sanctuary law and passed a resolution this year declaring the community a 'non-sanctuary city.' Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his community must have been a clerical error. Davel voted for Trump as did 67% of Shawano County. Davel thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .