
The World Of Sebastião Salgado At Peter Fetterman Gallery In Santa Monica
"The World of Sebastião Salgado' at Peter Fetterman Gallery at Bergamot Station in Santa Monica (on view through September 1), is a large-scale Memorial exhibition of prints by the master photographer Sebastião Salgado who died May 23, 2025. The gallery also has many of Salgado's amazing books, some of them signed, which are available for sale.
Sebastião Salgado, 2019
Salgado is a master, an incomparable artist whose work took him to some 122 countries over the course of his career. Born in Brazil, Salgado first career was as an economist. In the 1980s, he began his career as a freelance photographer capturing news events. By chance, he was present at the assassination attempt on the life of President Ronald Reagan in Washington DC, and Salgado's images earned him the front page in newspapers all over the world. But that was just his start.
It was his photographs of forgotten people, the tribes of the Amazon, the workers on the oil fields of Kuwait, and his photographs of disappearing nature in the Amazon and Antarctica that remain his unforgettable legacy.
'Through the lens of his camera, Sebastião tirelessly fought for a more just, humane and ecological world,' Mr. Salgado's family said in a statement to the New York Times. 'Rich in humanistic content, this work offers a sensitive perspective on the most disadvantaged populations and addresses the environmental issues threatening our planet.'
Sebastião Salgado 1944-2025 Korubo, Amazonas, Brazil, 2017
Salgado's photos are primarily in Black and White. The exhibition at Peter Fetterman Gallery gives a sense of the amazing range of his work as well as his many talents. Salgado had an uncanny ability to put his subjects at ease and to photograph them in ways that seem completely authentic to who they are. His photos do not glorify, fetishize, or make his subjects seem other than who they are. Yet he renders them with great humanity and dignity.
Sebastião Salgado 1944-2025 Gold Mine, Serra Pelada, Brazil. (Figure Eight)
Salgado's landscapes are artworks of immaculate detail and composition. Even when he photographed the workers of a gold mine, the photos had their own beauty and power. That was Salgado's gift.
In a quote shared by Peter Fetterman, Salgado explained how the work he did, in particular his photo project, GENESIS, transformed him. 'I did 8 years of trips, 8 months a year. I went to 32 countries. But the big trip that I did was inside myself. I discovered that I am part of all this, that I am part of the animals. That we are part of everything alive in the planet. We are part of this huge equilibrium. You know for me this was the most important thing. We come out of the planet. We must go back to the planet."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Ask Sahaj: Divorced desi woman worries about talking about her dating life
Dear Sahaj: As a divorced woman dating in my late 40s, how do I show up authentically when desi family and friends ask about it? This is a no-brainer when I speak to my non-desi friends here. … However, the thought, 'What will people say' hounds me at other times.


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Strands hints today: Clues and answers on Thursday, August 14 2025
WARNING: THERE ARE STRANDS CLUES, SPOILERS AND ANSWERS AHEAD! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT THE AUGUST 14, 2025 STRANDS ANSWER SPOILED FOR YOU. Ready? OK! Have you been playing Strands, the super fun game from the New York Times, the makers of Connections and other brain-teasers like Wordle in which you have to do a search in a jumble of letters and find words based on a theme? It's pretty fun and sometimes very challenging, so we're here to help you out with some clues and the answers, including the "Spangram" that connects all the words. NYT Strands clue for today's puzzle: Honest-to-goodness If you want our help? Think about reality! As for the answers, scroll below the photo below: Kosher, True, Legitimate, Genuine, Authentic, Real The Spangram is ... BONAFIDE. Play more word games Looking for more word games?


Vox
3 hours ago
- Vox
What a 62-year-old maid explains about childhood
is a senior correspondent for Vox, where she covers American family life, work, and education. Previously, she was an editor and writer at the New York Times. She is also the author of four novels, including the forthcoming Bog Queen, which you can preorder here This story originally appeared in Kids Today, Vox's newsletter about kids, for everyone. Sign up here for future editions. I'm on vacation this week, so instead of a regular newsletter, I decided to examine a children's classic that has been taking up a lot of my brain space lately. Back next week! Raising children frequently offers one the opportunity to revisit the touchstones of one's youth with a more experienced, critical eye. Who among us has not wondered how Garfield knows that it is Monday, or why Mickey is a mouse who owns a dog? But perhaps no artifact of children's pop culture feels more bizarre, more confounding, or, on closer inspection, more fascinating, to me than the multivolume story of Amelia Bedelia. Written by Peggy Parish from 1963 to 1988, and continued by her nephew Herman for decades after, the Amelia Bedelia stories revolve around the eponymous Amelia, a rosy-cheeked woman with a starched apron and a perpetual smile who spends her days absolutely laying waste to her employers' home. Asked to 'change the towels,' she cuts them to pieces. Asked to check Mr. Rogers' shirts, she covers them with a checkerboard pattern. Asked to strip the sheets off a bed, she tears them to shreds. Part of the pleasure of revisiting the Parish oeuvre is just how strange even the supposedly normal requests made by Mr. and Mrs. Rogers seem today, some 40 to 60 years after they were first issued. At one point, Mrs. Rogers asks Amelia Bedelia to 'dress the chicken,' so she stuffs a raw chicken into some lederhosen. But what was she supposed to do with the chicken carcass she was given? Marinate it? What is this lost art of chicken dressing? My core question, though, revolves around Ms. Bedelia herself: What exactly is it that makes her not merely misinterpret her employers' instructions, but interpret them in the most floridly destructive way possible? The standard explanation is that Amelia Bedelia takes her bosses' commands too literally — failing to understand colloquialisms like 'draw the drapes,' for example, she produces a sketch of them instead. One popular interpretation is that Amelia is autistic, and some autistic commentators have described finding traits in common with Amelia Bedelia or even learning common idioms from the books. She's someone who's supposed to follow other people's commands, and who instead performs bizarre acts that make those commands look silly. Under this interpretation, Amelia wants to do what she's asked; she just has trouble figuring out what that is (understandable given some of her bosses' arcane assignments). There's another school of thought, however, that asks whether the chaos Amelia produces might be a little bit intentional. Given the way she frustrates and flummoxes her wealthy bosses, it's not surprising that some see Amelia as a class warrior. For the New Yorker's Sarah Blackwood, she's Bartleby in an apron, 'a figure of rebellion: against the work that women do in the home, against the work that lower-class women do for upper-class women.' It's instructive to see which tasks Mrs. Rogers delegates to Amelia. In particular, the maid is supposed to act as a kind of prep cook for the lady of the house, tasked with paring the vegetables (she puts them together in pairs, obvs), measuring cups of rice (she fills teacups with rice and then uses a tape measure), and, of course, dressing the chicken (again: what?). Amelia Bedelia draws the drapes. Images from 'Amelia Bedelia' by Margaret Parish, illustrated by Fritz Siebel. Used with permission of HarperCollins Children's Books. Mrs. Rogers, emerging from her limousine wearing a fur stole, intends to finish the process of making dinner, and presumably get credit from her husband for her wonderful cooking. But her plans are upended when Amelia not only royally screws up all the prep tasks, but also makes pies and other baked goods so delicious that no one is thinking about dinner anyway (and also no one can bear to fire her). Amelia Bedelia gets the upper hand, turning repetitive, invisible, literally thankless labor into highly visible performance art, destroying her bosses' property and getting paid to do it. I do not think Peggy Parish intentionally wrote Amelia Bedelia as a working-class revolutionary, but I do think there's a bit of the trickster in her, despite her innocent demeanor (when she 'changes' the towels, for example, she cuts a jack-o-lantern grin into one of them). I think my children, who are even further removed than I am from a world in which people drew drapes, like her because she is an adult who does silly things, a category of character that children tend to enjoy (see also Peppa Pig's father, Daddy Pig, who reads maps upside down and once accidentally fell out of an airplane). It's not just my kids who weirdly reach for a book about a mid-century maid doing chores they can't begin to understand. By the eve of her 50th anniversary in 2012, stories of Amelia Bedelia had sold over 35 million copies in the US alone. The character remains popular enough today that Herman Parish wrote an updated version in the 2010s and 2020s in which Amelia is no longer a servant, but a child whose misunderstandings take place on field trips and family house-hunting expeditions. My kids don't like this version as much, and I can see why. The core of Amelia Bedelia isn't just that she has trouble with figures of speech. It's that she's someone who's supposed to follow other people's commands, and who instead performs bizarre acts that make those commands look silly. For a child — someone constantly being told what to do in terms that are often less than clear, by people who seem to hold all the power — what could be more satisfying?