Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner's hopes of early prison release could be dashed after mystery woman's plea to German cops
The convicted rapist, 48, owed €1,446 (£1,246) for a fine from a previous set of convictions, keeping him behind bars until at least the end of January 2026.
He was fined in 2016 for drunkenness in traffic and forgery of documents, and in 2017 for assault.
Prosecutors have been desperate to keep him behind bars, fearing he will immediately flee Germany and prevent them from further investigating Madeleine's 207 disappearance.
But after an anonymous woman paid these outstanding fines, he was set to be released from prison on September 17.
The woman, identified as a former cop with Germany's FBI who claims to have been involved in wiretapping his cell, is now asking for her money bank, throwing Brueckner's early release into disarray.
The former police officer said she made a mistake, which officials are reportedly taking seriously.
Local media has reported that she claims to have been unaware of his former convictions, including forgery charges.
She reportedly told officials: 'I therefore wish to contest my declaration of intent to repay the payment and invalidate the legal transaction accordingly.'
Brueckner's lawyer, Dr. Friedrich Fülscher, previously told Bild that they believed upon his release the convicted paedophile plans to live on the island of Sylt in northern Germany, where he previously received a 21 month sentence for drug dealing.
Brueckner, who has been under investigation by German police in connection with Madeleine's disappearance since 2020, has vehemently denied the allegations.
Last October, he was also cleared of a series of unrelated sex attacks that took place in the Algarve between 2000 and 2017.
Brueckner's lawyer Philipp Marquort previously told MailOnline that he believed the sexual offender 'will leave Germany' when released, but that he would likely remain in jail until early 2026.
He added: 'I haven't had a chance to speak with him yet about the searches and I am not going to comment on what has been happening in Portugal.
'What I will say is that I don't think he will be coming out in September as he doesn't have any money to pay the fines because it went on his legal fees, so I can't see him leaving prison until early next year.
'He will probably see the news on the TV in his cell and he will talk about it when he calls me next time but I still do think when he is freed he will leave Germany.'
It comes just weeks after two buried guns were discovered during an intensive three-day search operation near Brueckner's former ramshackle cottage home close to where Madeleine vanished.
Last month, German authorities launched fresh searches through Atalaia - a stretch of scrubland littered with rubbish and graffiti-covered buildings linked by a network of dusty tracks known in Portuguese as the Fisherman's Trail.
Connecting Praia da Luz with the nearby town of Lagos, the track is a popular hiking route for tourists, but for four days last week it was cordoned off for members of the BKA - Germany's equivalent of the FBI - to conduct searches.
The search marked the first in Portugal for more than two years, following a near-week-long operation involving Portugese, German and police officers at a remote dam a 40-minute drive from Praia da Luz.
In a newly unearthed letter seen in June, German paedophile Brueckner boasted that police don't have evidence to pin allegations against him in relation to the toddler's case, gloating how the dropping of the probe 'will hit the world like a bomb'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tragic biker tourist mauled to death by brown bear moments after taking smiling selfie and vid with ferocious wild beast
A MOTORCYCLIST was mauled to death by a bear moments after taking a smiling selfie with the deadly wild beast. Omar Farang Zin, 48, was on holiday in Romania when he initiated the unwise encounter. 5 5 5 The Italian was riding along the spectacular Transfagarasan road - famously crowned the "most beautiful in the world" by Jeremy Clarkson on Top Gear. He encountered a bear on the route, uploading a video of a shaggy beast peering onto the road, and returned the next day in hope of spotting another. Omar got what he was looking for when he met a bear with cubs wandering around a car park, and stopped to feed it. That turned out to be a terrible mistake. A photo found his mobile shows Omar, kitted out in sunnies a helmet for his pleasure ride, grinning and pointing to a brown bear who is standing just metres away. He also took a video of the predator as it prowled around the area, flicking menacing glares at the camera. The biker can be heard saying: "Here is the bear! How beautiful! It's coming towards me," in his native Italian. Omar uploaded the video to Facebook - but that would be the last thing he ever did. Just moments later, the bear charged him and unleashed a ferocious attack. The beast dragged Omar out of the car park and about 60 metres into a ravine, where it mauled him to death. Bloodthirsty bear leaves only woman's severed head behind in vicious attack as victim's last moments captured on CCTV Passing motorists witnessed the harrowing scene and immediately called the emergency services. Police officers, firefighters and forest rangers all rushed to the scene - but Omar could not be saved. The rescue teams managed to recover his body, which was covered in bite wounds, and took it away for a post-mortem. Armand Chiriloiu, director of the forest authority, told Romanian newspaper Cancan: 'He got off his motorbike and offered some food to the bear. 5 5 'The Italian tourist's phone was also found, which contained some photos taken before the attack. "As the bear approached, he approached. With photos, close-ups.' The area was cleared following the fatal encounter and the bear was later shot dead. He also took a video of the bear as he passed it on his bike. The clip shows a shaggy bear peering onto the road over a barrier as Zin trundles past on his bike.
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
It is time to release prisoners trapped by inhuman endless jail terms
The Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence, introduced in 2005 under the Labour government, was intended to protect the public from serious offenders deemed too dangerous for a fixed-term release. But nearly two decades on, this law stands as one of the most egregious stains on Britain's criminal justice system. Abolished in 2012 for its inherent flaws, it nonetheless continues to trap thousands of people in a cruel legal limbo, as a debate in the House of Lords today will no doubt highlight. It is long past time that every person still serving an IPP sentence be resentenced. The continued use of this now-defunct punishment is both unjust and, arguably, inhumane. At its core, the IPP sentence allowed judges to hand out indeterminate prison terms for offences that did not justify life imprisonment but were deemed serious enough to warrant extended supervision. Offenders were given a 'tariff' – the minimum time they must serve before being considered for release. Many of these tariffs were shockingly short, some as low as two years. Yet thousands remain in prison long after these tariffs have expired. Why? Because release is dependent not on time served, but on proving to the Parole Board that they are no longer a danger to the public – a nebulous, subjective, and often unreachable standard. This flips the basic presumption of justice on its head. In a fair system, the state must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt to imprison a person. Under IPP, once the tariff is served, the burden of proof shifts unfairly to the prisoner. It is no longer the state's job to justify incarceration; it is the prisoner's burden to earn freedom. This is particularly problematic when access to rehabilitative programmes, often required for parole, is limited or unavailable – especially in overcrowded prisons. The system sets people up to fail and then blames them for not succeeding. Moreover, the psychological toll of such indefinite punishment is catastrophic. Suicide and self-harm rates among IPP prisoners are significantly higher than average. Many live in a state of constant uncertainty and despair, unsure if they will ever be released, even decades after their offence. It is not unusual to find individuals still imprisoned for minor crimes – such as theft or assault – that would today warrant only a few years behind bars, yet they languish without a release date. The punishment no longer fits the crime, if it ever did. The injustice of the IPP system has been widely recognised. The House of Commons justice committee labelled it "irredeemably flawed" and called for all remaining IPP prisoners to be resentenced. The European Court of Human Rights has also condemned aspects of the sentence as incompatible with human rights obligations. Yet the government has so far refused to act decisively, citing public safety and political sensitivity. This is a failure of courage and leadership. Protecting public safety does not require trampling basic rights or holding people indefinitely for crimes long past. Dangerous individuals can be managed through proper risk assessment and robust parole conditions – not through perpetual punishment without end. Resentencing every IPP prisoner is not only fair, it is necessary. It would give judges the opportunity to reconsider the nature and severity of each offence and impose a proportionate, fixed sentence with clear guidance for release. For many, this would mean immediate or imminent freedom; for others, it would offer clarity, rehabilitation goals, and hope – something the current system wholly lacks. Justice demands consistency, proportionality, and transparency. The IPP sentence undermines all three. Some argue that resentencing might release dangerous individuals back into society. But the risk can be responsibly managed without recourse to indeterminate detention. Modern sentencing tools, community supervision, mental health support, and parole frameworks are all capable of mitigating risk. Perpetual incarceration without due process is not a solution – it is a violation. Britain prides itself on the rule of law, but this chapter of penal policy betrays that principle. IPP sentences should not only be consigned to history – they must be actively undone. Every person still caught in this Kafkaesque trap deserves a proper sentence, a path to rehabilitation, and a chance at freedom. Anything less is a continuation of a deep and unforgivable wrong.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Post Office Horizon scandal: Why hundreds were wrongly prosecuted
The Post Office Horizon scandal has been called the UK's most widespread miscarriage of justice, after hundreds of people were prosecuted on the basis of data from faulty scandal led to widespread public anger, partly as a result of a hit TV drama, and has been the subject of a lengthy first part of the inquiry's report is due to be published on Tuesday 8 July. What happened and how many people were affected? More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted because of incorrect information from the Horizon computer sub-postmasters went to prison for false accounting and theft, and others were financially Post Office itself took many cases to court, prosecuting 700 people between 1999 and 2015. Another 283 cases were brought by other bodies, including the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).In 2017, a group of 555 sub-postmasters - led by campaigner Alan Bates, who has since been knighted - took legal action in a landmark court case against the Post Office. In 2019, the Post Office agreed to pay the group £58m in compensation, but much of the money went on legal episode came to wider public attention last year after it was depicted in an ITV drama, Mr Bates vs The Post outcry triggered by the drama led to legislation being rushed through Parliament to bring in a law quashing convictions from the Horizon are now a number of compensation schemes under way, and as of 2 June 2025, more than £1bn has been awarded to thousands of sub-postmasters across all schemes. What was the effect on Post Office staff? Many former sub-postmasters and sub-postmistresses say the scandal ruined their used their own money to cover non-existent shortfalls because their contracts said they were responsible for unexplained losses. Many faced bankruptcy or lost their broke down, and some families believe the stress led to serious health conditions, addiction and even premature death. 'I'm terrified' - Post Office victim still fears seeing old customers'I thought mum left me, she'd been sent to prison' What compensation schemes are in place? There isn't a single compensation scheme for sub-postmasters to apply to, and individual eligibility depends on the particular circumstances of each four main schemes are aimed at groups of victims who had different experiences of the scandal. As of 2 June 2025, about £1.039bn has been awarded to just over 7,300 sub-postmasters across all four redress schemes. That total breaks down as:Horizon Shortfall Scheme - £559mGroup Litigation Order Scheme - £167mOverturned Convictions Scheme -£68mHorizon Convictions Redress Scheme - £245mProf Chris Hodges, chair of the the independent Horizon Compensation Advisory Board, told the BBC that some individual compensation claims were "well over £1m".How do the Post Office compensation schemes work? What is Fujitsu's Horizon system? Horizon was developed by the Japanese company Fujitsu, for tasks such as accounting and was introduced by the Post Office in quickly complained about bugs in the system after it falsely reported shortfalls, often for many thousands of pounds, but their concerns were Horizon system is still used by the Post Office. It says it has continued to make improvements to the system while it plans "to move to a new system that is being developed". What is the Post Office Horizon public inquiry? A public inquiry began in 2022 and heard evidence from Post Office and Fujitsu year, Sir Alan Bates appeared at the inquiry, telling it that the Post Office had spent 23 years trying to "discredit and silence" Vennells, who was Post Office chief executive between 2012 and 2019, gave evidence in May 2024. She was quizzed for three days and at times broke down in tears. She apologised to the sub-postmasters and their families "who have suffered as a result of all that the inquiry has been looking into for so long".The first part of the inquiry's report is due to be published on inquiry became almost box office viewing - racking up more than 20 million views on with no connection to the Post Office told the BBC how they became engrossed is Paula Vennells?Alan Bates says Post Office run by 'thugs in suits' Who has been criticised for the Horizon scandal? Ms Vennells resigned from her role at the Post Office in 2019. In January 2024, she said she would hand back her August 2023, the then-Post Office chief executive Nick Read said he would return bonus money awarded for his work on the Horizon Europe director Paul Patterson said the firm had a "moral obligation" to help fund compensation Dem leader Sir Ed Davey has been criticised for refusing to meet Sir Alan when he was postal affairs minister, in May 2010. He says he was "deeply misled by Post Office executives".The BBC discovered that former Prime Minister David Cameron's government knew the Post Office had dropped a secret investigation that might have helped postmasters prove their innocence.
