Mum of student killed in Strand crash 'almost reached her' as she lay dying
The mum of a student killed in the Strand crash was just yards from her injured daughter, but unable to reach her as she lay on the ground dying.
Aalia Mahomed, 20, died, and two others were injured when a van crashed into the pedestrianised area outside King's College London campus on the Strand.
The second-year physics and philosophy student was sitting down with friends outside the university when the van ploughed through the closed gates on March 18.
Her family described Aalia as a 'ray of sunshine' as they tried to come to terms with her sudden death.
Samira Shafi, Aalia's mum, described how she rushed to the crash scene after being alerted by her daughter's friend.
Samira told BBC London: 'I got a call from Aalia's friend. There was just blue lights everywhere, it was cordoned off.
'It is a pedestrian zone and it's really hard to make sense of any of it because she wasn't doing anything dangerous – she was sitting on a bench in a pedestrian area in some sunshine.'
The mum reached the area in 10 minutes after the frightening call.
But as the emergency scene was cordoned off, she couldn't get to her injured daughter.
She continued: 'I was told to stay back quietly because several people had been hurt, and so that's what I did.
'But later on based on the time that I got there, I worked out that I was there for nine minutes before Aalia's death was called.
'Maybe if she'd heard my voice she might have pulled through.'
She added: 'Aalia wasn't just a daughter, she was my best friend and my rock.'
Samira said that although an investigation is being carried out, the past eight weeks 'have felt like a lifetime.'
She said: 'I haven't got answers to what happened that day.
'It's been slow. I keep being told an investigation is being carried out and these things take time, which I appreciate.
'But the silence is quite difficult for us because for us these eight weeks have felt like a lifetime.'
She said she appreciates there is a process 'that needs to take place, but I would hope it's done as swiftly as possible to get us on some level of clarity.'
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
A 26-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of causing death by careless driving and on suspicion of drug driving. He remains on bail. More Trending
Metro understands that family liaison officers are in contact with the family.
Chief Superintendent Thomas Naughton, from the Met's roads and transport policing command, told Metro: 'Aalia's family continue to be supported by specialist officers, we regularly meet with them to discuss the progress of the investigation and to ensure they are receiving the support they need.
'Our investigation continues at pace and we are working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service. A 26-year-old man remains under investigation on conditional police bail following his arrest at the scene.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Raid of Café Diana in Kensington uncovers 45 tubs of 'illegal' shisha tobacco
MORE: Brockwell Park festival organisers give major update over Mighty Hoopla
MORE: Man says cafe staff refused to serve him because of his face tumours
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Gang leaders to face jail for forcing children to hide drugs inside themselves
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'Brutal' gang leaders who force children as young as seven to hide illicit objects like drugs and weapons inside themselves will face jail under a new law. Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips told Metro the stories of young and vulnerable people being exploited by criminals is her 'worst nightmare' as a parent. Now, the act of coerced internal concealment – known by the street names 'plugging', 'stuffing' and 'banking' – could become a specific criminal offence for the first time. Those who try to smuggle items across the country hidden inside traumatised victims will face up to 10 years behind bars, under an amendment being introduced to the government's Crime and Policing Bill. Metro travelled to Euston on Monday to see firsthand how the British Transport Police (BTP) is tackling the horrifying practice. On the bustling concourse of the north London rail station, officers in their bright jackets were even more visible than usual. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here. Commuters stepping off the escalator up from the Tube stop were directed towards a knife arch that set off gentle beeps as they passed through, while a police dog named Polly sniffed passengers heading to Liverpool. And hidden among them were plainclothes police, looking out for subtle signs of exploitation. Those include children who are 'unkempt, dishevelled, a long way away from where they live or where they're looked after', according to the BTP's Detective Superintendent Craig Payne, who headed up the operation. Criminals entice these young people with the promise of 'expensive shoes or expensive phones', he added – making these other potential indicators. Phillips, who was also at Euston to watch the officers at work, said it is difficult to come up with a figure for the number of victims due to the nature of the practice, but a thousand a year would be an underestimate. She told Metro: 'I've seen cases where people's fertility has been altered by brutal asks of them to carry weapons, money and other things. 'I've seen and heard examples of exploiters giving instructions to young boys about how to conceal drugs inside them. As a parent, that is my worst nightmare.' The Home Office minister added: 'This was an issue I've seen directly, and I want the use of children and vulnerable adults as mules to make money for exploiters to become a criminal offence, and so that is what we're doing.' Johnny Bolderson of charity Catch22, which helps victims of exploitation, said his colleagues had worked with seven-year-olds who were abused in this way. He said: 'There are so many different risks around it physically and internally for the young person, but that doesn't even touch the tip of it. 'Because obviously there's the embarrassment around it, there's the fear, the side of it where you're holding something for a gang and you can lose it if you get arrested, if you are caught or if you ask for support.' As well as children, he said criminals have also taken advantage of neurodiverse and isolated people. The new law is a 'great thing moving forward', Johnny added, but he warned it would need to take into account that not all over-18s are perpetrators and ensure support is in place for them too. Other amendments added to the landmark Crime and Policing Bill, currently more than 300 pages long, including new offences covering child criminal exploitation and cuckooing. Described by the government as 'one of the most significant updates to crime and policing legislation in the UK for decades', it is now approaching the report stage after passing its second reading in March. Ensuring vulnerable children and adults do not become victims in the first place is 'the fundamental things that has to happen', Phillips said: 'I don't want to just identify these children and then deal with them after this has happened.' Law enforcement, schools, youth services and the government all have a role to play in achieving that, she added. Last month, an Independent Sentencing Review was published, advising the government on potential approaches to justice which could relieve some pressure on the prison system. One recommendation, a scheme for early release of some offenders, was met with criticism from some of the country's top police officers. More Trending Essex Police Chief Constable Ben-Julian Harrington told the BBC: 'How do the victims of these crimes feel when someone who may have committed a violent crime and given three years in prison is released on parole, and then they breach that licence? 'If I was a victim of crime, I'd be worried about that.' Phillips said: 'When senior police officers in our country are speaking up for their officers, that is something that every government should listen to.' 'What I know from working with senior police officers is we get to a point with the crisis in prisons where we cannot lock anybody up and something has to be done,' she added. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Teens who killed pensioner with fireworks and ran off laughing are jailed MORE: Remains found in search for 'murdered' woman who vanished 15 years ago MORE: Man 'drove three-inch nail into girl's brain to stop her revealing sex abuse'
Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
John questioned by police on Nate's murder in Emmerdale
In the wake of the discovery of Nate Robinson's (Jurell Carter) untimely Emmerdale death, accusations are flying, but it's John Sugden (Oliver Farnworth) who is sweating. Murderous John seemed to be high and dry after the dredging of the lake was called off, and with Aidan slipping back into his coma – the other person who could blow his cover – he smugly returned to the village to resume the new life he'd created for himself. But reality came back to bite him on the bum when they dredged the lake anyway and Nate's body was finally found. It's badly decomposed so it'll be harder for the police to gather much if any DNA, but there will be a thorough investigation regardless and John is not in the clear. Then his worst living nightmare comes true – the police show up to question him about the day Nate disappeared. Having got away with things for this long he plays it cool. But as it turns out, it's not him they're after – it's Cain Dingle (Jeff Hordley). Now this does not a happy Cain make, and though the finger isn't pointing at John, John still needs to work hard to protect Cain from going down for a crime he didn't commit – especially in the wake of Tracy Shankley's (Amy Walsh) accusation towards him. Tracy later walks passed and Sam Dingle (James Hooton) can't resist giving her what for. Cain is left shaken and puts voice to a dark thought that he believes Tracy did away with her ex. Finger firmly pointed, Tracy feebly tries to defend herself, but John concocts a dreadful plan to take the heat off Cain. The police soon arrive at Tug Ghyll with a search warrant and make a massive discovery – Nate's phone in Frankie's playhouse. Now the fear sets in for Tracy as she realises how bad things are starting to look – just wait until they find out she's been using his credit card too. But before they even get that far, they learn there is no record of the removal men who came to collect Nate's stuff – the ones that Tracy was the only one to interact with. Want to be the first to hear shocking EastEnders spoilers? Who's leaving Coronation Street? The latest gossip from Emmerdale? Join 10,000 soaps fans on Metro's WhatsApp Soaps community and get access to spoiler galleries, must-watch videos, and exclusive interviews. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications so you can see when we've just dropped the latest spoilers! It's looking damning and Tracy is taken to the station. More Trending The police reveal they suspect Nate died the day he was due to leave, so quick thinking Tracy gives a false alibi – which implicates Vanessa (Michelle Hardwick). The police need to corroborate this, and Vanessa is blindsided when they show up to question her. View More » Has John sealed innocent Tracy's fate? MORE: Unexpected Emmerdale character confesses to murder in ITVX streaming release as Nate's body found MORE: John to 'get away with murder' in Emmerdale as Nate's murder is pinned on someone else MORE: The Emmerdale moment Ruby hands herself in to the police in new spoiler video
Metro
10 hours ago
- Metro
I loaned my parents a few hundred quid — then they stole thousands
'I know people will judge my mum and dad for what I'm about to tell you, or call me stupid for letting it happen – but we all feel terrible already and really just need advice.' Financially responsible Lily, 25, has just found out her credit rate has plummeted. The reason? Her parents have technically 'stolen' from her, taking out a spiralling loan in her name. In the latest instalment of Metro's Money Problem, personal finance journalist and consumer champion Sarah Davidson gives some no-nonsense advice. The problem… Lily says: 'About two years ago, my parents' rent went up at the same time as their car broke down, and they needed some money but had been refused credit. I was at uni and only working part-time, which barely covered my own rent and living expenses. I did have a good credit score though, and when I asked how I could help out, my mum suggested I could take out a payday loan of a few hundred pounds. 'I'm of the opinion that you do what you can for your family, so I agreed – and as promised, they paid it back on time. The issue is that they then kept borrowing small amounts each month (which the company seemed to allow without any additional checks). 'The high interest rate got them further and further into debt and it snowballed into the thousands, which they couldn't afford so ended up defaulting on. 'I didn't find out until I checked my credit report recently, as I've now graduated and started saving to buy a house. Even though I'm angry at them (mostly for not telling me) I could see how ashamed my mum and dad were about what they did. Up Next 'Is there any way I can fix this without getting them into trouble?' The advice… Oh Lily. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I don't think you're stupid for 'letting' this happen. It's a bitter pill to swallow, but in the eyes of the law, your parents stole from you. That's a criminal offence and you're a victim. If you're not okay with that, you need to report it to the police. If you are okay with that, then covering the cost of that theft is on you. It's also up to you to work out how to deal with what your mum and dad did. If you had lost money as a result of another person taking a loan out in your name without your knowledge, you would normally take the following steps: Report it to Action Fraud, the police department that deals with financial crimes. You can do this online, by calling 101, or by calling their fraud or cybercrime specialists on 0300 123 2040. When you submit a report you will receive a police crime reference number. Report the incident to the payday lender, including the amounts and dates of the additional advances taken without your knowledge and your crime reference number. The company will either agree to reimburse you for the money taken, agree to a part payment or refuse to cover your losses. If you're unhappy with this outcome, you can make a complaint to the company. If you're still unhappy, you can wait eight weeks (usually) and then make a further complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. However, your question is whether there is any way you can 'fix this without getting them into trouble', which I'm guessing means getting your money back and/or getting this black mark struck from your credit record. Sorry, Lily. No can do. The bottom line is that unless you report the crime to the police, you are accepting that 'you' took the loans and failed to repay them. That gives you no recourse to get your money back and no grounds to challenge the damage it's done to your credit score. If you don't want to dob your mum and dad in, then you need to forgive the past and focus on mending the future. To have any hope of that happening, you need to be comfortable accepting that – in the eyes of the law and of the lender – this is your problem to fix. You haven't said whether you've had any letters or contact about the default, other than that you saw it on your credit file. You need to talk to your parents to find out why not – have they changed the contact details on your account with the payday lender? Have they had emails, calls or letters? Once you've got all the facts and paperwork from your parents, here's what I'd suggest: Contact the payday lender to find out how much debt you owe and ask them if it's possible to agree a repayment plan with smaller monthly amounts that you can afford. Just be aware, they don't have to agree to this. Also make sure they have your correct contact details. If you have savings (you mention you're saving for a house), you could use them to clear the debt and then start rebuilding your credit score. Be realistic: the first will be a labour of love and the second will take time. Don't be tempted to use a credit card or another expensive loan to pay off this debt. However, if you can afford to take a fixed term loan and pay it off monthly at a lower interest rate, this could keep interest costs down. There are lenders that offer responsible loans for this type of situation – try searching credit unions and community finance in your area. Campaign group Fair4all Finance invests money into responsible lenders across the UK – you can find a list on their website. Your payday lender may already have referred you to a debt collection agency. If this is the case, the lender can give you their details – or your parents might have these already. Contact the debt collector to ask for your repayment options. Some will allow you to make smaller payments you can afford over a longer time. Others won't. Whatever you do, do not ignore letters. You could end up facing court action, which will make everything much worse. If you can't afford to repay the debt, contact one of the organisations listed on the Government's website for free and confidential help. They will be able to guide you on your best options and are not financially incentivised to advise you take out expensive debt relief orders or declare bankruptcy. Try to avoid those routes if you can. Finally, you and your parents need to make this right between you or it will fester. Where there is money involved, feelings can become bitter over time. I'd suggest you sit down with them over a cup of tea at a pre-agreed time to discuss it. Have all the paperwork in front of you and let them know beforehand that you'd like to consider how they could help you with the repayments so they aren't blindsided. You might decide to write off some of what they borrowed in your name – it sounds like you're sympathetic to their financial situation and want to help if you can. I wouldn't recommend letting them off scot-free though. That's not fair on you and, frankly, if there are no consequences for them, what's to stop it happening again? After all, they seem to have been using your credit pretty freely to pay for more than just their rent and fixing the car. Use the meeting to work out what you and your parents can realistically afford each month. Add up all their income and subtract all their bills, allowing for some extra cash each month to cover unforeseen expenses. You should do the same. Anything left should go towards repaying the debt. Ask your parents to set up a standing order with their bank to transfer their share to you on a fixed date every month. Once that's done, contact the lender or debt collection agency and – perhaps with the help of one of the charities above – agree a repayment plan that you can afford to maintain until the loan is paid off. It might be worth agreeing an amount you can afford even if your parents stop contributing. I'm sure you don't need telling twice that, even with the best of intentions, things can go awry. Got a Money Problem of your own? Have you been ripped off by a romance scammer? Fighting with family or friends over who should pay for what? Struggling to get by despite a decent income? Or simply want to vent about how you've been treated by a major company? If you've got a money problem you'd like Sarah to look into, fill in this form or email providing as much detail about your situation as possible. No issue is too big or small, and all submissions will be treated with the strictest confidence. Sarah Davidson is an award-winning financial editor and head of research at WPB Got a money worry or dilemma? Email
