logo
Aussie mum claims her job was so disgusting it left her unable to speak for SIX years

Aussie mum claims her job was so disgusting it left her unable to speak for SIX years

Daily Mail​18-05-2025
An Aussie mum says she lost her voice after being exposed to filthy conditions at her former workplace.
The 44-year-old was allegedly sent into urine and faeces-covered homes while employed as a disability support worker for Woodbine, a not-for-profit organisation that supports people with intellectual disabilities based in Warracknabeal in north-west Victoria.
In 2019, the fit and healthy mum-of-two, who has asked not to be identified, transported a client who required medical treatment to Warracknabeal Hospital.
She had to stay with him for several days as the hospital was unable to provide the necessary support for his needs, news.com.au reported.
During that time, the woman came down with a respiratory illness similar to that of other patients.
The woman, who worked for the not-for-profit for two decades, was off sick for three weeks before returning to work in allegedly unsafe conditions.
'Unfortunately [the clients] weren't able to keep their house clean, it would be filthy... urine, faeces, and mum would have to go there quite a bit,' her 21-year-old daughter told the publication.
'Mum didn't want to be rude. Woodbine was aware of the circumstances but there was nothing put in place to protect mum at all.'
The disability support worker's respiratory condition is said to have worsened following her return to work.
She was later diagnosed with a chest infection and pleurisy, inflammation of the lining of the lungs and chest cavity, which symptoms include a sharp, stabbing chest pain that worsens with breathing, coughing or sneezing.
She was hospitalised in March 2020, where she lost her voice completely.
Her daughter said her mum's condition 'developed into this vocal cord dysfunction from the recurrent infections'.
The mum-of-two never regained her vocal function and today, she can't speak for more than a few minutes at a time, and lives in constant pain.
She was left unable to work and moved to the Gold Coast in 2022.
Her daughter claimed her mum's life has been impacted severely by the condition and feels let down by her former employer.
Once fit and healthy, she requires medication to get through the day and is no longer able to exercise.
The financial implications have also been 'significant.'
The 44-year-old has received WorkCover payments at 80 per cent of her previous salary for more than five years.
However, the mum-of-two now intends to lodge an application for a serious injury certificate.
She is being represented by Shine Lawyers senior associate Nehad Elmassry, who described the case as a 'very bizarre and unique situation'.
The lawyer alleged Woodbine failed in its duty of care as an employer by not providing the mum with personal protective equipment.
Mr Elmassry said the her client had met the threshold to get compensation for losing her voice, but she would 'have to sue the Victorian WorkCover Authority, which steps into shoes of the employer' to get further compensation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maine clinics hope to get blocked Medicaid funds restored as they sue Trump administration over cuts
Maine clinics hope to get blocked Medicaid funds restored as they sue Trump administration over cuts

The Independent

time30 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Maine clinics hope to get blocked Medicaid funds restored as they sue Trump administration over cuts

A network of clinics that provides health care in Maine is expected to ask a judge Thursday to restore its Medicaid funding while it fights a Trump administration effort to keep federal money from going to abortion providers. President Donald Trump's policy and tax bill, known as the ' big beautiful bill,' blocked Medicaid money from flowing to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. The parameters in the bill also stopped funding from reaching Maine Family Planning, a much smaller provider that offers health care services in one of the poorest and most rural states in the Northeast. A federal judge ruled last month that Planned Parenthood clinics around the country must continue to be reimbursed for Medicaid funding as the provider wrangles with the Trump administration over efforts to defund it. Maine Family Planning filed a federal lawsuit last month seeking to restore reimbursements. Lawyers and representatives for Maine Family Planning say its 18 clinics provide vital services across the state including cervical cancer screenings, contraception and primary care to low-income residents. They also say the funding cut occurred even though Medicaid dollars are not used for its abortion services. 'Without Medicaid, MFP will be forced to stop providing all primary care for all patients — regardless of their insurance status — by the end of October,' the organization said in a statement, adding that about 8,000 patients receive family planning and primary care from the network. It also said many Maine Family Planning clinics 'provide care in very rural areas of the state where there are no other health care providers, and around 70% of their patients rely exclusively on MFP and will not see any other health care provider in a given year.' In court documents, Anne Marie Costello, deputy director for the Center for Medicaid & CHIP Services, called the request to restore funding 'legally groundless' and said it 'must be firmly rejected.' 'The core of its claim asks this Court to revive an invented constitutional right to abortion — jurisprudence that the Supreme Court decisively interred — and to do so in a dispute over federal funds,' Costello said. While advocates of cutting Medicaid for abortion providers focused on Planned Parenthood, the bill did not mention it by name. Instead it cut off reimbursements for organizations that are primarily engaged in family planning services — which generally include things such as contraception, abortion and pregnancy tests — and received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023. The U.S. Senate's parliamentarian rejected a 2017 effort to defund Planned Parenthood because it was written to exclude all other providers by barring payments only to groups that received more than $350 million a year in Medicaid funds. Maine Family Planning asserts in its legal challenge that the threshold was lowered to $800,000 this time around to make sure Planned Parenthood would not be the only entity affected. It is the only other organization that has come forward publicly to say its funding is at risk. Planned Parenthood's legal fight with the Trump administration over Medicaid funding is still in the court system also.

Waiting list rises after row over NHS figures
Waiting list rises after row over NHS figures

Telegraph

time30 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Waiting list rises after row over NHS figures

The NHS waiting list has risen again as it is 'struggling to keep pace with demand'. The backlog rose by 10,000 to 7.37 million as of the end of June, compared with the previous month, driven by an increase in the number of patients being referred for appointments. It comes as experts revealed the NHS waiting list data was 'misleading' because it did not publish the number of 'unreported removals' – where patients who no longer need an appointment because of a variety of reasons have been deleted from the list. The Nuffield Trust think tank's analysis revealed as many as 245,000 people per month were being taken off the waiting list through these 'validation processes', and highlighted that fewer patients were being treated than added to the backlog. The Government said this only accounted for 15 per cent of the fall in the backlog since it took charge last July, with the waiting list down from 7.6 million on last July. The NHS said it had treated more than 100,000 people in June, up 2 per cent on the year before, but 141,000 patients joined the waiting list. The number of people waiting the longest also fell, with just 1,100 waiting more than 18 months. Dr Becks Fisher, director of research and policy at the Nuffield Trust, said the figures remain 'stubbornly high at 7.37 million and the NHS is struggling to keep pace with demand'. 'But the reported numbers on the planned treatment waiting list only show part of the picture,' she said. 'Our new analysis shows that waiting list reductions in previous months are not wholly due to increases in appointments being delivered. In fact, the NHS is still treating fewer patients than are being referred.' She added: 'We should be under no illusions that despite delivering more appointments, the NHS is still not meeting patient demand. 'The Health Secretary has praised 'record investment and fundamental NHS reform' as the reasons behind reductions in the waiting list earlier this year, but there are lingering background causes that go unmentioned.' Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said the Government had gone beyond its promise to deliver two million more appointments. 'One year on, we have delivered almost an extra five million appointments. As a result, today's figures show that, despite record numbers of people coming forward for treatment, we are cutting waiting times, with the lowest number of patients waiting more than 18 weeks for treatment in three years,' he said. Separate figures published by the NHS showed that 11,000 more appointments and procedures went ahead during junior – now called resident – doctor strikes last month, compared to last July's five-day walkout. Mr Streeting will continue discussions with the British Medical Association throughout the summer in a bid to avert further industrial action. The Health Secretary said the figures show the NHS 'was more resilient against last month's strike action than ever before'. 'We are getting on with the job of delivering progress in the face of strike action, and we will continue to put patients first,' he said. Professor Meghana Pandit, NHS national medical director, said: 'It is very welcome news that the Resident Doctors Committee has returned to talks – and we hope this leads to a resolution that avoids further disruption for patients.' Meanwhile, data on A&E wait times shows 76.4 per cent of patients were seen within four hours last month, up from 75.5 per cent in June. The number of patients waiting 12 hours for a hospital bed fell to 35,467 from 38,683 a month earlier. Despite this reduction, Dr Nick Murch, president of the Society for Acute Medicine, described the 12-hour wait figure as 'unacceptable'. He said: 'Clinicians across the UK are reporting this week as one of the worst they have experienced, with no sign of the brief respite seen in the immediate aftermath of recent strike action, yet there remains no tangible and immediate action to address urgent workforce and capacity issues. 'Sadly, instead, recent commentary and reporting suggests a growing reliance on selective or misleading interpretations of NHS data, as highlighted this week in analysis by the Nuffield Trust, which calls into question claims the NHS is being turned around.' Mr Tim Mitchell, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, said the waiting list rise was 'likely down to seasonal ebbs and flows'. 'However, as analysis published this week shows, the drop in waiting list numbers we've seen prior to this month doesn't necessarily mean more patients are being treated,' he said. 'The Government should be honest that a significant part of recent reductions reflects validation exercises rather than increased surgical activity. 'Ultimately, only further investment to expand the NHS' capacity will deliver substantial reductions in waiting times,' he added. Helen Morgan MP, the Liberal Democrat health spokesman, said: 'This Government is doing no better than treading water on getting the waiting list down. 'These figures will add salt to the wounds of [Wednesday's] news that Labour appear to be cooking the books – boasting of treating phantom patients who have in fact died, moved or desperately had to seek treatment elsewhere.'

'Don't be a child in Ludlow,' councillor warns
'Don't be a child in Ludlow,' councillor warns

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

'Don't be a child in Ludlow,' councillor warns

"Don't be a kid in Ludlow," a councillor has warned in response to local healthcare Harris, a mother of three and Ludlow town councillor, said lack of provision meant mothers could not give birth in a midwife-led unit in the town, or get tests for newborns and older that families were having to travel to Shrewsbury or Telford for essential appointments, she said she had launched a survey on children's healthcare in Ludlow to gauge parents' experience. The Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Integrated Care System (STW ICS) said it was committed to working to build on its community offer, in line with a government plan, moving more services from hospitals. The midwife-led birthing unit at Ludlow Community Hospital shut in 2018, with the closure said to be a temporary measure. But it has not reopened, leaving Princess Royal Hospital, an acute site in Telford, as the only alternative for expectant mothers in Shropshire. In 2019, the local NHS proposed a maternity hub plan but no birthing units at the county's rural who represents Labour on the local authority, is calling for more children's services to be based at Ludlow's hospital. She said the town was promised a new hospital in 2012 and an urgent care unit in 2015, but "neither has happened".Her Children's Health Care in Ludlow survey is backed by Ludlow Health Campaign, which fights service cuts. 'Battle for parents' Health visitors and school nurse numbers were down, with Ludlow "missing out" as a result, Harris said. "It shouldn't be a battle for parents to get the care their children need."[Parents] shouldn't have to give up half a day for an appointment."STW ICS said Telford provided birthing care and the option of homebirth was added families were going to Telford for a children's audiology service from The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust and it was expected to return to Royal Shrewsbury Hospital following construction and care providers had worked to deliver new services and initiatives in and around Ludlow, STW ICS stated, including developing a community and family included community health clinics, health visitor drop-in clinics and an early help team, providing advice with infant feeding and breastfeeding and special educational needs and were also services commissioned by NHS Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin and Shropshire Council, delivered across health, education, social care and the voluntary Community Health trust provided services in people's homes, within schools and through clinics, including health visiting and school nursing, STW ICS said. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store