Trump asks Supreme Court to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission
Trump has the power to fire independent agency board members, the Justice Department argued in its filing to the high court, pointing to a May ruling by the Supreme Court that endorsed a robust view of presidential power.
The administration asked the court for an immediate order to allow the firings to go forward, over the objections of lawyers for the commissioners.
The commission helps protect consumers from dangerous products by issuing recalls, suing errant companies and more. Trump fired the three Democrats on the five-member commission in May. They were serving seven-year terms after being nominated by President Joe Biden.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox in Baltimore ruled in June that the dismissals were unlawful. Maddox sought to distinguish the commission's role from those of other agencies where the Supreme Court has allowed firings to go forward.
A month earlier, the high court's conservative majority declined to reinstate members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board finding that the Constitution appears to give the president the authority to fire the board members 'without cause.' The three liberal justices dissented.
The administration has argued that all the agencies are under Trump's control as the head of the executive branch.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
Maddox, a Biden nominee, noted that it can be difficult to characterize the product safety commission's functions as purely executive.
The fight over the president's power to fire could prompt the court to consider overturning a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor. In that case from 1935, the court unanimously held that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause.
The decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination, the airwaves and much else. But it has long rankled conservative legal theorists who argue the modern administrative state gets the Constitution all wrong because such agencies should answer to the president.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission was created in 1972. Its five members must maintain a partisan split, with no more than three representing the president's party. They serve staggered terms.
That structure ensures that each president has 'the opportunity to influence, but not control,' the commission, attorneys for the fired commissioners wrote in court filings. They argued the recent terminations could jeopardize the commission's independence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Trump's Big Beautiful Bill nears approval
The U.S. Congress inched towards approving President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, despite attempts by Democrats to stop it. The bill is Trump's signature legislation which includes massive spending increases on the military and immigration enforcement while slashing social programs including health insurance and food assistance.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Wisconsin Senate passes state budget in rush to help hospitals
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Senate passed a compromise state budget on a bipartisan vote Wednesday in a race to approve a deal reached between Gov. Tony Evers and majority Republicans. Lawmakers were rushing to pass the plan and get it signed into law before federal law changes take effect that could cost Wisconsin hospitals $1.5 billion. The Assembly, also controlled by Republicans, was expected to pass it late Wednesday night and send the $111 billion budget to Evers for his quick signature.
Calgary Herald
2 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Trump announces Vietnam trade deal with 20% import tariff
Article content The S&P 500 rose after Trump's post, with shares in furniture stocks and apparel makers recording gains. ON Holding, Nike and Lululemon all jumped to hit session highs. Article content Some U.S. officials wanted to calibrate tariffs for Vietnam and others in Southeast Asia to ensure they're sufficiently lower than what's imposed on China, to encourage production to leave that country. Article content The higher 40 per cent rate announced Wednesday would be imposed on goods deemed to be 'transshipping' — where components from China and possibly other nations are routed through Vietnam or subject to only minimal final assembly before being exported to the U.S. Article content That's been a major concern for Trump's top trade advisers, including Peter Navarro, who described Vietnam as 'essentially a colony of communist China' during an April interview with Fox News. Article content Full details of what goods would be subject to that higher rate were not immediately available. Article content Article content U.S. exports to Vietnam were worth just US$15 billion last year. Trump touted the prospect of a boost in auto sales as a result of the deal. Article content 'It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam,' he wrote on Truth Social. Article content Although Trump shared the broad contours of the agreement, the White House has not yet released a term sheet or published any kind of proclamation codifying the arrangement. And some of the details could still be in development. The U.S. and U.K. first announced their own trade deal in early May, but it wasn't until mid-June that Trump signed an executive order implementing the accord. And even then, key details have been set aside to be addressed later. Article content While Trump and his team initially envisioned holding concurrent negotiations with dozens of trading partners, the president and his advisers have suggested in recent weeks that they will just focus talks with major economies and unilaterally issue levies on smaller countries or those that don't reach agreements. Article content Article content The deal with Vietnam was struck after weeks of discussions during which the U.S. pressured the country to get tougher on trade fraud, ensure stricter enforcement against the transshipment of Chinese products, and also pushed for the removal of non-tariff barriers. Article content Vietnam offered to remove all tariffs and repeatedly promised to purchase more American goods. Senior Vietnamese officials flew to the U.S. to rally support and sign deals, including for US$3 billion of agricultural goods. The trade minister also wooed executives from Nike, Gap and others to encourage them to get behind negotiation efforts. Article content Officials in the country also touted the Trump Organization's plans to develop a $1.5 billion luxury resort complex, a project that will feature five-star hotels, golf courses and residential estates spanning more than 990 hectares.
