Meta's $100 Million AI Bait Faces Resistance as Anthropic, Others Hold Ground
Meta is stepping up its AI recruitment game with enormous compensation packages, reportedly offering up to $100 million to top talent in a bid to power its new "Superintelligence Team." However, not all researchers are biting.
According to Anthropic's top brass, many within their AI-focused teams are choosing purpose over pay.
Anthropic co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei recently confirmed Meta's lucrative outreach attempts, and Jared Kaplan, a key executive at the company, opened up about the intensity of the current hiring war in a podcast interview. While not naming companies directly, Kaplan referenced outsized offers that some of his colleagues have turned down. "My best-case scenario at Meta is we make money. My best case at Anthropic is that we affect the future of humanity," he said.
Despite the eye-popping numbers, Meta has allegedly offered $100 million over four years per researcher, Kaplan noted that these deals may actually be "cheap" for the business given the value AI breakthroughs can generate. Still, he emphasized that many at Anthropic are mission-driven, prioritizing long-term impact over short-term financial gain.
Meta has already made high-profile moves in this space. In June, the company appointed Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang to lead its Superintelligence efforts and successfully recruited six researchers from OpenAI. These moves show Meta's aggressive play to dominate next-generation AI.
Meanwhile, others in the industry are weighing in. Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity AI, said retaining talent requires more than money. While acknowledging the size of Meta's offers as "surprising," he also noted, "Failure is not an option" at that level of investment.
As the AI talent race intensifies, it's becoming clear that for many researchers, the choice isn't just about money—it's about meaning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Meta names ChatGPT co-creator as chief scientist of Superintelligence Lab
[NEW YORK] Meta Platforms has appointed Zhao Shengjia, co-creator of ChatGPT, as chief scientist of its Superintelligence Lab, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said on Friday (Jul 25), as the company accelerates its push into advanced artificial intelligence (AI). 'In this role, Shengjia will set the research agenda and scientific direction for our new lab, working directly with me and Alex,' Zuckerberg wrote in a Threads post, referring to Meta's chief AI officer Alexandr Wang, who Zuckerberg hired from startup Scale AI when Meta took a big stake in it. Zhao, a former research scientist at OpenAI, co-created ChatGPT, GPT-4 and several of OpenAI's mini models, including 4.1 and o3. He is among several researchers who have moved from OpenAI to Meta in recent weeks, part of a broader talent arms race as Zuckerberg aggressively hires from rivals to close the gap in advanced AI. Meta has been offering some of Silicon Valley's most lucrative pay packages and striking startup deals to attract top researchers, a strategy that follows the underwhelming performance of its Llama 4 model. Meta launched the Superintelligence Lab recently to consolidate work on its Llama models and long-term artificial general intelligence ambitions. Zhao is a co-founder of the lab, according to the Threads post, which operates separately from Fair, Meta's established AI research division led by deep learning pioneer Yann LeCun. Zuckerberg has said Meta aims to build 'full general intelligence' and release its work as open source, a strategy that has drawn both praise and concern within the AI community. REUTERS
International Business Times
2 days ago
- International Business Times
Who Is Shengjia Zhao? META Appoints ChatGPT co-creator as Head of Superintelligence AI Team
Meta is making a big push into advanced artificial intelligence with its Super Intelligence Lab. Now the Mark Zuckerberg-led tech giant has appointed Shengjia Zhao to head up its Superintelligence AI team. Zhao, one of the developers that helped create ChatGPT at OpenAI, will now be its chief scientist for the latest AI division of Meta. X Zhao joined Meta in June 2025. On Friday (July 25), Meta announced that Zhao will officially serve as its Chief Scientist. The announcement was made on Threads by CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who referred to Zhao as the team's 'lead scientist from day one.' At OpenAI, Zhao was involved with some of the company's most significant early efforts. He was a co-author of the first ChatGPT paper and helped to produce the initial reasoning model, titled "o1." It's the model that effectively ushered in the concept of "chain-of-thought" AI, in which the AI works its way through problems step by step, an idea they've gone on to license and which has been adopted by many other companies, including Google. At Meta, Zhao will answer to Alexandr Wang, Meta's new Chief AI Officer. Wang had joined Meta in June, after leading Scale AI. He now leads Meta's quest to create synthetic general intelligence (AGI), or AI, that can think and reason like humans. Meta's Superintelligence Lab, which was launched in June 2025, is distinct from Meta's older AI research group FAIR (Facebook AI Research). FAIR will retain its work under AI pioneer Yann LeCun, who now reports to Wang. The hiring of Zhao is an indication of Meta's aggressive talent acquisition approach. In recent months, Meta has hired more than a dozen AI researchers from top companies, including Apple, Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. The list features industry veterans such as two of Apple's most famous scientists, Tom Gunter and Mark Lee. Some reports have said Meta is making huge pay packages to attract talent, including, in one case, up to $300 million. Meta has disputed those numbers but says it is also pouring significant resources into top AI talent. Presently, Meta's top open-source AI model, LLaMA 4, is still behind rivals such as GPT-4 and Gemini. But the company is due to put out a beefier model, codenamed Behemoth, later this year. Zuckerberg said, "We are piloting a team that can build learnings with the tools and pass on the baton to the future of superintelligence AI."
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Meta clashes with Apple, Google over age check legislation
The Supreme Court this summer ruled age verification laws are constitutional in some instances. The biggest tech companies are warring over who's responsible for children's safety online , with billions of dollars in fines on the line as states rapidly pass conflicting laws requiring companies to verify users' ages. The struggle has pitted Meta Platforms Inc. and other app developers against Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc.'s Google, the world's largest app stores. Lobbyists for both sides are moving from state to state, working to water down or redirect the legislation to minimise their clients' risks. This year alone, at least three states – Utah, Texas and Louisiana – passed legislation requiring tech companies to authenticate users' ages, secure parental consent for anyone under 18 and ensure minors are protected from potentially harmful digital experiences. Now, lobbyists for all three companies are flooding into South Carolina and Ohio, the next possible states to consider such legislation. The debate has taken on new importance after the Supreme Court this summer ruled age verification laws are constitutional in some instances. A tech group on Wednesday petitioned the Supreme Court to block a social media age verification law in Mississippi, teeing up a highly consequential decision in the next few weeks. Child advocates say holding tech companies responsible for verifying the ages of their users is key to creating a safer online experience for minors. Parents and advocates have alleged the social media platforms funnel children into unsafe and toxic online spaces, exposing young people to harmful content about self harm, eating disorders, drug abuse and more. Meta supporters argue the app stores should be responsible for figuring out whether minors are accessing inappropriate content, comparing the app store to a liquor store that checks patrons' IDs. Apple and Google, meanwhile, argue age verification laws violate children's privacy and argue the individual apps are better-positioned to do age checks. Apple said it's more accurate to describe the app store as a mall and Meta as the liquor store. The three new state laws put the responsibility on app stores, signaling Meta's arguments are gaining traction. The company lobbied in support of the Utah and Louisiana laws putting the onus on Apple and Google for tracking their users' ages. Similar Meta-backed proposals have been introduced in 20 states. Federal legislation proposed by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah would hold the app stores accountable for verifying users' ages. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Cambodia calls for ceasefire with Thailand after deadly clashes Asia 'Nothing like this has happened before': At least 16 dead as Thai-Cambodian conflict continues Multimedia Lights dim at South-east Asia's scam hub but 'pig butchering' continues Business Banking and finance jobs will change but won't disappear as AI becomes the new normal: Accenture Singapore SMRT to pay lower fine of $2.4m for EWL disruption; must invest at least $600k to boost reliability Singapore Tipsy Collective sues former directors, HR head; alleges $14m lost from misconduct, poor decisions Asia Hottest 'ticket' in Jakarta? Young Indonesians compete for a slot at singing club Singapore Kopi, care and conversation: How this 20-year-old helps improve the well-being of the elderly Still, Meta's track record in its state campaigns is mixed. At least eight states have passed laws since 2024 forcing social media platforms to verify users' ages and protect minors online. Apple and Google have mobilised dozens of lobbyists across those states to argue that Meta is shirking responsibility for protecting children. 'We see the legislation being pushed by Meta as an effort to offload their own responsibilities to keep kids safe,' said Google spokesperson Danielle Cohen. 'These proposals introduce new risks to the privacy of minors, without actually addressing the harms that are inspiring lawmakers to act.' Meta spokesperson Rachel Holland countered that the company is supporting the approach favored by parents who want to keep their children safe online. 'Parents want a one-stop-shop to oversee their teen's online lives and 80 per cent of American parents and bipartisan lawmakers across 20 states and the federal government agree that app stores are best positioned to provide this,' Ms Holland said. As the regulation patchwork continues to take shape, the companies have each taken voluntary steps to protect children online. Meta has implemented new protections to restrict teens from accessing 'sensitive' content, like posts related to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders. Apple created 'child accounts,' which give parents more control over their children's' online activity. At Apple, spokesperson Peter Ajemian said it 'soon will release our new age assurance feature that empowers parents to share their child's age range with apps without disclosing sensitive information.' As the lobbying battle over age verification heats up, influential big tech groups are splintering and new ones emerging. Meta last year left Chamber of Progress, a liberal-leaning tech group that counts Apple and Google as members. Since then, the chamber, which is led by a former Google lobbyist and brands itself as the Democratic-aligned voice for the tech industry, has grown more aggressive in its advocacy against all age verification bills. 'I understand the temptation within a company to try to redirect policymakers towards the company's rivals, but ultimately most legislators don't want to intervene in a squabble between big tech giants,' said Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich. Meta tried unsuccessfully to convince another major tech trade group, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), to stop working against bills Meta supports, two people familiar with the dynamics said. Meta, a CCIA member, acknowledged it doesn't always agree with the association. Meta is also still a member of NetChoice, which opposes all age verification laws no matter who's responsible. The group currently has 10 active lawsuits on the matter, including battling some of Meta's preferred laws. The disagreements have prompted some of the companies to form entirely new lobbying outfits. Meta in April teamed up with Spotify Technology SA and Match Group Inc. to launch a coalition aimed at taking on Apple and Google, including over the issue of age verification. Meta is also helping to fund the Digital Childhood Alliance, a coalition of conservative groups leading efforts to pass app-store age verification, according to three people familiar with the funding. Neither the Digital Childhood Alliance nor Meta responded directly to questions about whether Meta is funding the group. But Meta said it has collaborated with Digital Childhood Alliance. The group's executive director Casey Stefanski said it includes more than 100 organisations and child safety advocates who are pushing for more legislation that puts responsibility on the app stores. Ms Stefanski said the Digital Childhood Alliance has met with Google 'several times' to share their concerns about the app store in recent months. The App Association, a group backed by Apple, has been running ads in Texas, Alabama, Louisiana and Ohio arguing that the app store age verification bills are backed by porn websites and companies. The adult entertainment industry's main lobby said it is not pushing for the bills; pornography is mostly banned from app stores. 'This one-size fits all approach is built to solve problems social media platforms have with their systems while making our members, small tech companies and app developers, collateral damage,' said App Association spokesperson Jack Fleming. In South Carolina and Ohio, there are competing proposals placing different levels of responsibility on the app stores and developers. That could end with more stringent legislation that makes neither side happy. 'When big tech acts as a monolith, that's when things die,' said Joel Thayer, a supporter of the app store age verification bills. 'But when they start breaking up that concentration of influence, all the sudden good things start happening because the reality is, these guys are just a hair's breath away from eating each other alive.' BLOOMBERG
