Need a balm for these troubled times? I recommend the works of P.G. Wodehouse
I always know when I'm feeling blue, because I feel the gravitational pull of my long shelf of P.G. Wodehouse books.
If you've never read Wodehouse, I envy you the pleasure of discovering him for the first time. I'm well past that point; some of his stories and novels I've read dozens, even hundreds of times, and they can still make me convulse in laughter. More so when the outside world provides little to laugh about.
Evelyn Waugh, who admitted to learning a hell of a lot from Wodehouse, may have put it best: 'Mr. Wodehouse's idyllic world can never stale,' he wrote in a 1961 essay designed in part to defend Wodehouse over the one blot on his life story (more on that in a bit). 'He will continue to release future generations from captivity that may be more irksome than our own. He has made a world for us to live in and delight in.'
And what is that world? It's timeless, and yet dated. Orwell narrowed it down to the Edwardian era — 1901 to 1919 — long before the irruptions of two world wars and the Great Depression. Its inhabitants are those of 'there will always be an England' England: stern vicars, timid curates, lords and earls, penniless titled wastrels living on allowances from their uncles, imperious aunts, upper-crust twits.
They're all presented on the page by an inspired farceur whose exquisitely penned prose seems effortless, but belies the painstaking craftsmanship needed to make his split-second timing come off.
Some Wodehouse lines are like time bombs, detonating with a momentary delay. My favorite comes in an exchange with the soupy Madeline Bassett in 'The Code of the Woosters,' when Bertie comes up with a quote he heard from Jeeves, actually the title of a poem by Percy Bysshe Shelley, to describe his friend Gussie Fink-Nottle as 'a sensitive plant.'
'Exactly,' Madeline replies. 'You know your Shelley, Bertie.'
'Oh, am I?'
Where to start with Wodehouse? He used several framing devices for his novels and short stories. The golf stories are narrated by the 'oldest member' of an upper-class golf club who buttonholes unwary younger members to regale them with his memories of golfers he has known.
The peak of this series, to me, is 'Farewell to Legs,' featuring a playboy who takes a house in a placid golfing community and discomposes its dour Scottish golfers with his high jinks: 'Angus became aware with a sinking heart that here, as he had already begun to suspect, was a life-and-soul-of-the-party man, a perfect scream, and an absolutely priceless fellow who simply makes you die with the things he says.'
Then there are the fish stories told by Mr. Mulliner at his local pub the Angler's Rest, involving his inexhaustible circle of relatives. To me, the glory of the Mulliner stories are a sequence of three stories — 'Mulliner's Buck-U-Uppo,' 'The Bishop's Move' and 'Gala Night,' all related to his brother Wilfred's invention of a tonic meant to 'provide Indian Rajahs with a specific which would encourage their elephants to face a tiger of the jungle with a jaunty sang-froid,' and what happens when unsuspecting users swallow a tumblerful of something that should be taken by the teaspoon.
Some are set in New York and Hollywood, where Wodehouse spent some time writing lyrics for musicals with Jerome Kern and others. (His best-known song is probably 'Bill,' from 'Show Boat.')
But at the summit of Wodehouse's genius are the stories of Bertie Wooster and his 'gentleman's personal gentleman,' or valet, Jeeves. Of the short stories, all narrated by Bertie, to my mind the greatest are a trilogy beginning with 'The Great Sermon Handicap,' continuing with 'The Purity of the Turf,' and concluding with what may be the single funniest short story ever penned in English, 'The Metropolitan Touch.'
Bertie and Jeeves, as the British essayist Alexander Cockburn once asserted, are a pairing as momentous in literary history as Don Quixote and Sancho Panza, or Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson. Wodehouse never exhausted the counterpoint between Bertie's slangy gibbering and half-remembered literary allusions with Jeeves' carefully modulated responses: 'Very well, Jeeves, you agree with me that the situation is a lulu?' 'Certainly a somewhat sharp crisis in your affairs would appear to have been precipitated, sir.'
Bertie is both a classic unreliable narrator and a stock comic character given life. Having inherited a fortune from parents who are almost never mentioned, he's rich enough for financial difficulties to never be a plot obstruction, though he's always willing to tide over a pal brought low by 'unfortunate speculations' at the racecourse. Jeeves is a deus ex machina; we learn almost nothing about him, except for imperturbability and skill at solving the crises that Bertie falls into through his pure cloth-headedness.
Bertie's romantic relations are entirely sexless, 20th-century echoes of courtly love, though throughout the oeuvre he gets engaged to at least six women by my count. Among them towers the frighteningly domineering Honoria Glossop. ('Honoria, you see, is one of those robust, dynamic girls with the muscles of a welter-weight and a laugh like a squadron of cavalry charging over a tin bridge.')
Jeeves extricates Bertie from every one of these entanglements, and thankfully so, because every fiancée begins their relationship with the determination to toss Jeeves out on his ear.
Wodehouse aficionados wage a never-ending debate over which Jeeves and Wooster book is his masterpiece, with 'The Code of the Woosters' (1938) and 'Joy in the Morning' (1946) typically trading the top two spots.
I'm partial to the former, in part because it features the only overtly political character Wodehouse ever devised. He's Roderick Spode, a would-be British dictator plainly based on the real-life British fascist and Hitler partisan Oswald Mosley.
Spode is the leader of a gang of fascist toughs known as the Black Shorts. 'You mean 'shorts,' don't you?' Bertie says when he first hears about Spode. 'No,' he's told, 'by the time Spode formed his association, there were no shirts left. He and his adherents wear black shorts.' 'Footer bags, you mean?' Bertie asks, a Britishism for football shorts. 'How perfectly foul.'
Spode throws his weight around Brinkley Court, the country estate where the story takes place, harrying Bertie endlessly for reasons we don't need to go into, until Jeeves provides Bertie with a magic word guaranteed to turn dictator Spode into a shrinking mouse. At the climax, Bertie presses his advantage, informing his nemesis:
'The trouble with you, Spode, is that just because you have succeeded in inducing a handful of half-wits to disfigure the London scene by going about in black shorts, you think you're someone. You hear them shouting 'Heil, Spode,' and you imagine it is the Voice of the People. That is where you make your bloomer. What the Voice of the People is saying is: 'Look at that frightful ass Spode swanking about in footer bags. Did you ever in your puff see such a perfect perisher?''
It's no spoiler to tell you that the magic word Jeeves provides to Bertie is 'Eulalie.' As for who or what Eulalie is, and why it reduces Spode to jelly, you'll have to read the book.
That brings us to that one blot on Wodehouse's life. When World War II broke out, he was living peaceably in the French resort of Le Touquet. When the Nazis came through in 1940 they interned Wodehouse and transported him to Berlin, from which the Germans persuaded him to make a handful of 'nonpolitical' radio broadcasts for his British compatriots.
There was an uproar at home. Newspaper columnists condemned Wodehouse as a 'Quisling,' libraries took his books off their shelves, there were condemnatory speeches in Parliament.
The truth is that the broadcasts were indeed nonpolitical; if the Germans thought they had scored a propaganda victory it was instantly evident that they were wrong, and they halted the broadcasts after only five. Wodehouse had displayed nothing worse than the stupidity of the innocent. He knew nothing of the political context, much less that his broadcasts came at a moment when the very future of Britain was in question.
But that fit precisely with Wodehouse's literary landscape. Farce, of course, depends on its characters' failure to recognize what is near at hand; Wodehouse in his splendid isolation in France and in a bygone fictional Eden was incapable of recognizing the crisis in Britain was so near at hand that his broadcasts would strike hard at his countrymen's diminishing morale.
Orwell's opinion of Wodehouse's attackers was withering. 'It was excusable to be angry at what Wodehouse did,' he wrote in 1946, 'but to go on denouncing him three or four years later — and more, to let an impression remain that he acted with conscious treachery — is not excusable. Few things in this war have been more morally disgusting than the present hunt after traitors and Quislings. At best it is largely the punishment of the guilty by the guilty. ... In England the fiercest tirades against Quislings are uttered by Conservatives who were practicing appeasement in 1938 and Communists who were advocating it in 1940.'
One could go on. The pleasures of Wodehouse are inexhaustible, so I'll stop here. With some news about Trump's tariffs threatening to disturb my peace today, and having just finished a rereading of 'The Code of the Woosters,' I will share the next few hours with G. Darcy ('Stilton') Cheesewright, Zenobia Hopwood, Edwin the Boy Scout, Boko Fittleworth and Percy, Lord Worplesdon, and their horseplay in and around Steeple Bumpleigh, Hampshire.
Looking back on the affair and its satisfying resolution, Bertie tells Jeeves, 'There's an expression on the tip of my tongue which seems to me to sum the whole thing up. ... Something about Joy doing something.'
'Joy cometh in the morning, sir?'
'That's the baby. Not one of your things, is it?'
'No, sir.'
'Well, it's dashed good.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
13 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Combine Pedro Almodóvar with stop-motion and you get Adult Swim's most unexpected yet perfect show
In the annals of things I could not have seen coming, none has been more unexpected than 'Women Wearing Shoulder Pads,' a queer Spanish-language stop-motion comedy melodrama, set in the aesthetic world of a 1980s Pedro Almodóvar film. (It arrives Sunday at midnight on Adult Swim, the home of things one doesn't see coming, and premieres the next day on HBO Max.) Though it takes place in Ecuador, its central character, Marioneta Negocios (Pepa Pallarés), is Spanish, and it's easy enough to imagine Almodóvar muse Carmen Maura in the role — though it is also impossible to imagine the story told as well, or at all, in any other way. When I call this series perfect, notwithstanding the happy imperfections of its puppets and sets, it's not because everything works as its meant to, but because there's nothing you can measure it against — it occupies its own self-created space. Every element is necessary. Even presenting it in English would be to lose romantic, dramatic, telenovelistic force. At the center of the story is the cuy, a guinea pig eaten in Andean South America, though in this telling they're also used in a version of bullfighting. (Some cuys are large enough to ride on.) The primary action is a power struggle between Marioneta, a socialite running a campaign promoting cuy as pets, not food, and Doña Quispe (Laura Torres), who has risen from life as a humble butcher to the anything-but-humble CEO of the country's most famous restaurant, El Cuchillo (the knife). Mixed up in their lives are Coquita Buenasuerte (Gabriela Cartol), Marioneta's seemingly happy-go-lucky assistant; Espada Muleta (Kerygma Flores), a matadora in love with Marioneta; Nina (Nicole Vazquez), Doña Quispe's vegetarian daughter, serving a pro-cuy group as its Minister of Refreshments and Head of Recruitment for Rebellious Teens — 'I have looked upon the caged cuy through the prison of capitalist enterprise, through the hubristic iron bars of a homocentric world view' — who will become a pawn in the older women's game. Not everything will be as it seems. Created by Gonzalo Cordova (a veteran of 'Tuca & Bertie' and 'Adam Ruins Everything') and produced by the Mexican animation studio Cinema Fantasma, the series comes packaged as eight 11-minute episodes — that is cartoon length — which neatly constitute a short feature film. On the bill are mystery, suspense, terror, revenge, hot romance (including some puppet sex), masked stalkers, performance art, love notes posted with knives, parodies of television shows and commercials, old secrets coming to light and nuns singing karaoke. From 'Gumby' to 'Rudolph' to 'Wallace and Gromit' to 'The Fantastic Mr. Fox,' stop motion is of all forms of animation most magical and in its real-space, three dimensional, handcrafted way the most like life, if not necessarily the most lifelike. (It can look ungainly, which is also part of its charm.) It's a magnification of childhood playtime, a puppet show in which the puppets have broken loose from the puppeteers. The cleverness of the execution is as or more important than how seamless it is. 'Women Wearing Shoulder Pads' does all sorts of neat tricks, some you notice and more you simply accept — and when deemed necessary, or just amusing, it will insert a live-action hand or mouth. It's an exaggerated world — appropriately to the heavy-breathing material — but emotionally expressive, even moving, and lots of fun.


Elle
a day ago
- Elle
What That Episode 3 Twist in ‘Outlander: Blood of My Blood' Really Means
Spoilers below. When Ellen's not busy having steamy dreams about Brian, she's got a serious case of eldest daughter syndrome to contend with. In episode 3, 'School of the Moon,' Mrs. Fitz wakes Ellen from the subconscious reverie of sex with Brian, instead catapulting the MacKenzie firstborn back into the harsh light of reality. Her little brothers are making a mess of both clan politics and her love life. All of Leoch is abuzz with the news that she'll soon marry Malcolm Grant, whom Ellen has absolutely no desire to wed. (Not when there's a hunky Fraser just down the road.) Much of the resulting episode concerns Ellen's efforts not only to prevent her marriage but to stop her brothers from, however inadvertently, handing the lairdship to an outsider. First, she confronts Colum, the more rational of her male siblings. When it's clear that he won't respond to her anger, she tries to appeal to his common sense. She insists she's more valuable to him within Leoch's walls than in a Grant's bed, and it's ridiculous for her to have to atone for Dougal's brash stupidity in episode 2. ( Ellen also makes it clear she's heartbroken to watch Colum betray her, given that she nursed him back to health after the leg injury that almost killed him several years ago. He's thankful for her tenderness, sure, but no amount of love between them can change what he feels he 'must' do on behalf of the clan. Unfortunately, her other brother is an equal source of consternation. Although Dougal claims he attacked the Grants to defend Ellen's honor, she knows he 'would have used any excuse to pick a fight with them.' Dougal tries to convince her it's Colum who should receive the bulk of her ire—Colum made the betrothal arrangement! Colum broke their father's promise!—and, initially, Ellen has little reason to disagree. At least until Dougal tries to marry her off, too. When Dougal notices a certain visitor at the Gathering, Marcus MacRannoch, eyeing his sister from afar, he forgets all thought of Ellen's honor. Instead, he brokers his own deal: If Dougal is to be made laird, he'd align himself with the Stuarts—and therefore with the broader Jacobite cause, of which MacRannoch is a part—by promising Ellen's hand to MacRannoch himself. In response, McRannoch promises to make it known that 'any clansman who desires a Stuart king [should] champion you as the laird.' If all this talk of Jacobites and Stuarts reads like gibberish to you, here's a quick primer for those less educated in 18th-century Scottish politics: Jacobitism was an ideology popular in the Highlands amongst those who wished for the royal House of Stuart to re-secure their seat on the British throne. This is relevant information for Outlander fans, given that the flagship series begins in 1743 and concerns the doomed Jacobite rebellion of that period. Both Dougal and young Jamie—Brian and Ellen's future son—are Jacobite rebels when the show first begins. But as Blood of My Blood makes clear, their cause spread its roots long before Jamie was even born. At the Gathering, nothing stays a secret for long, especially when Colum and Dougal are about as subtle with their intentions as Brian is with his affections. (Alas, more on that later.) When Ellen meets with her younger sisters, Janet and Jocasta, the latter informs her that Dougal's plans have already gotten back to her. Her husband, John Cameron, is 'intimate with the Jacobites and their leaders,' and he overheard whispers of Dougal's offer to MacRannoch. Furious but hardly surprised, Ellen recognizes she's become no more than 'a piece on a chessboard' to the MacKenzie men. But it's not only her fate at stake. Talking to Ned, she recognizes that if her idiot brothers continue to divide support amongst their clansmen, a third party (i.e. McKinney) will win the lairdship, and Clan MacKenzie as they know it might disappear. All this sibling squabbling prompts Ellen to reflect on their collective childhood trauma. Years ago, during a midnight cattle raid, Colum and Dougal rode out together without Red Jacob to guide them. Initially intending to raid the Lowlands as their father had instructed, Dougal instead broke off to raid the MacDonalds' lands, and the men of Clan MacKenzie—trusting Dougal's prowess over Colum's—followed him. Unfortunately, the MacDonalds caught on to this scheme and sounded the alarm. After one of them shot a fusil that startled Colum's horse, the would-be laird fell, shattering his leg. As Ellen's flashback depicts, the brothers return home to a father who will show them no pity or concern. He is enraged that his men had 'no faith' in Colum as a leader. Now, he sees his son only as 'a cripple,' and his disgust literally injures Colum further. (When Colum attempts to prove to Red Jacob that he can still stand and fight, he instead tumbles down a set of stairs, worsening his condition all the more.) In the meantime, their father beats Dougal into submission with a whip, declaring him 'a bloody fool.' Ellen understands that the events of the cattle raid marked a turning point in their family. That night, Red Jacob lost his faith in his sons: He believed that neither Colum nor Dougal would make a worthy MacKenzie laird. But Ellen also knows that the lairdship is as much about words as it is war, regardless of whether the clansmen care more about pissing contests or collecting rents. And so she devises a plan that she asks Ned to present to her brothers: At the oath-taking ceremony, Colum and Dougal will announce their intentions to lead Clan MacKenzie together. Colum will serve as laird, while Dougal will become war chieftain. When the brothers do indeed swear allegiance to each other at the oath-taking ceremony, Ellen could all but collapse in relief. The clansmen approve of the partnership—even MacKinney, once he realizes he can never stand against the MacKenzie boys as a unit. Watching from up on the balcony in Castle Leoch, Jocasta and Janet turn toward their older sister, knowing full well Ellen was the architect behind the arrangement. 'You've managed it artfully,' Janet says, 'as Da would've.' Wow, it's almost as if Ellen herself should be leading this clan! Afterward, in a brothel, Ned promises the Grants' new bladier—one Henry Beauchamp—that the MacKenzies will maintain their vow: Regardless of how Colum and Dougal exercise their power, Ellen will marry Malcolm. And with this business now complete, Ned takes the opportunity to reward his new ally: He introduces Henry to the mistress, Una Hay, whom he claims would know of any 'woman, alone, in Inverness.' Henry has little hope in this search, but he nevertheless describes his wife to Una, who promises she'll send word when she tracks down Julia. But, of course, Julia isn't alone in Inverness. She's hidden away at Castle Leathers, desperately trying to hide the growing swell of her stomach. Early in the episode, Davina walks in on Julia stowing her writing parchment in the ceiling boards. Surprised by the sudden intrusion, Julia's hands fly momentarily to her abdomen, and Davina—appropriately suspicious—strips back her new maidservant's sheets, inspecting them for blood. 'I ken [understsand] you have a bellyful,' she says with a pointed look. Julia stumbles in her repeated attempts to deny the pregnancy. But Davina is not so easily tricked, and she encourages Julia to pursue an abortion. She claims the lost Mrs. Beauchamp will be 'treated no better than dirt' as a lone woman with a child out in the Highlands, nor would Lord Simon Fraser of Lovat ever permit a bastard in his house. Julia is quick to point out Davina's hypocrisy: She had a bastard son, and he still lives under Simon's roof, doesn't he? But Davina outlines the key difference in their situations. Julia is carrying a fatherless child. Brian was and is the laird's son. And Lord Lovat knows it, she says, almost sadly. If Julia decides to keep her baby, Simon will 'get rid of the bairn [child] himself.' Soon, Brian and Murtagh return from the Gathering, both of them heartbroken after having learned of Ellen's pending betrothal. Somehow, Murtagh is clueless enough not to suspect his cousin's crush, perhaps because Murtagh's own undying love for Ellen has proven so enduring. But even with their sullen looks, they straighten their backs to present a report on the Gathering to Simon, initially focusing on which attendees supported the Jacobite cause. Brian, however, soon steers the conversation toward Colum's alliance with the Grants, and, in particular, the ensuing union between Ellen and Malcolm. Initially, Simon reacts exactly as Brian expected he would: He's angry, certain the MacKenzies now seek to turn the Grants—formerly a Fraser ally—against him. 'An engagement can be broken,' Simon plots, playing directly into Brian's hand. But the young Fraser is aghast when his father hatches a nasty plan in response. Lord Lovat decides to launch a rumor, claiming that the reason Ellen has yet to marry is on account of a stained reputation. Brian objects to this idea, hoping for a 'more honorable' way to halt Ellen and Malcolm's wedding. But, really, what other way is there? What did Brian expect from his abusive, cold-hearted, power-hungry father? At least Murtagh's happy with the turn of events! He thinks Brian's scheming is on his behalf. 'If Malcolm refuses Ellen, I may yet have a chance of winning her hand,' he says with glee. 'Suppose I should be thanking you.' Brian, hearing this, grimaces. But he doesn't take the opportunity to correct his best friend. For now, the love between him and Ellen must remain a secret. Elsewhere in Leathers, the secrets are proving impossible to conceal. Realizing she won't be able to deny her pregnancy for much longer—especially now that Davina already suspects it—Julia realizes she has a terrible decision to make. She devises a scheme: She will sleep with Simon Fraser in order to convince him that the baby she's carrying belongs to the laird himself. (Look, I probably should have seen this coming, but the plot twist got me. I gasped.) Maybe, if Julia gives birth to a child Simon believes is Brian's half-sibling, she can keep Henry's baby. But such a plan presents a bevy of problems. If and when Henry does reunite with Julia, Simon will never allow the Beauchamps to depart with a child he believes is his. And what about Brian? How long will he live under the impression he has a new sibling? Might the truth turn him against Julia somehow? Might the Frasers and Beauchamps become enemies? In a letter to her husband that she can't possibly send, Julia pleads for Henry's forgiveness. Like Ellen, mere miles away, Julia is acting for the sake of her family. Let's just hope the men don't find a way to destroy the women's carefully laid plans.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Lewis Capaldi Recalls Terrifying ‘Mental Episode' That Left Him ‘Convulsing' Backstage Mid-Concert
Lewis Capaldi has come a long way since he started working on his mental health a couple of years ago, with the Scottish singer-songwriter revealing that he once had a 'mental episode' that left him 'convulsing' backstage at a show. While guesting on the Tuesday (July 15) episode of Theo Von's This Past Weekend podcast, Capaldi reflected on the tough moments in his career that forced him to confront the fact that he needed help. The musician made headlines in 2023 when he struggled to get through his Glastonbury set that year, but shortly before that happened, he says he had an incident at a concert in Chicago that was 'even worse.' More from Billboard Lewis Capaldi Performs 'Survive,' Says Glastonbury Return Was 'Best Day of My Life' on 'Tonight Show' Djo Scores First Airplay Chart No. 1 With 'Basic Being Basic' Druski Announces Coulda Fest Tour Featuring BigXthaPlug, Young M.A & Soulja Boy: See the Dates 'I couldn't come back on stage and finish the song,' Capaldi told Von of performing in the Windy City. 'I was like, backstage, convulsing and having this crazy panic attack, mental episode. It was really, really bad. It was the first time people at my shows had seen it.' The musician has been open about dealing with mental health issues as well as Tourette's, a disorder that causes difficult-to-control movements and sounds known as tics. In April 2023, Capaldi revealed that his struggles with Tourette's were becoming so severe, he was considering stepping back from music. After his onstage breakdown at Glastonbury two months later, Capaldi did just that. Immediately after stepping off stage at the festival — where fans had helped him get through his set by loudly singing the words for him — the artist knew it would be his last show until he got some help, he told Von. 'When it happened and when it was happening, it was, like, the lowest moment of my life, and it was horrible,' he recalled on the podcast of Glastonbury 2023. 'I had this moment where I was on stage like two, three songs in. I was like, 'This is the last time I'm going to play a gig for a long time. I need to try and get through the rest of the show, but when I come off, I'm done.'' Capaldi is now back and better than ever before after spending the past two years reconnecting with himself, with the star telling Von that therapy and exercise have helped him immensely. This past June, he made a triumphant return to Glastonbury with a surprise set, shortly after which he announced that he'd be donating 734,000 hours of free virtual therapy with BetterHelp inspired by his own mental health journey. While speaking to Von, he gushed that this year's Glastonbury performance was a 'bit of a comeback moment.' 'It was lovely,' he added. 'It was a really special moment.' Watch Capaldi's full conversation with Von below. Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart Solve the daily Crossword