Media Matters sues to block FTC probe over Musk's X boycott claims
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Media Matters asked a court on Monday to block the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's probe into whether media watchdogs coordinated advertising boycotts, calling it retaliation for the group's criticism of Elon Musk , a major donor to Donald Trump's presidential campaign.The FTC demanded Media Matters hand over communications with other groups that evaluate misinformation and hate speech and documents related to lawsuits where Musk 's social media platform, X, has accused some groups of orchestrating advertiser boycotts.Media Matters, a Washington, DC-based liberal advocacy group, said there is no basis to accuse it of coordinating a boycott, and that the FTC's demands have chilled its ability to publish articles on the agency and Musk."The Court should put an end to the latest effort by the Trump Administration and Elon Musk's government allies to punish, intimidate, and harass Media Matters for publishing reporting they do not like," the group said.The FTC probe, first reported by Reuters on May 22, marked an escalation in U.S. government scrutiny into whether groups like Media Matters helped advertisers coordinate to pull ad dollars from X after Musk bought the social media site formerly known as Twitter in 2022.Media Matters said in its lawsuit on Monday that the court should block the request, as it did similar investigations by Republican attorneys general in Texas and Missouri.X sued Media Matters in 2023, accusing the organization of defaming it in an article that said ads for major brands had appeared next to posts on X that touted far-right extremist content.Media Matters has denied the allegations, and sued X earlier this year, accusing it of abusive, costly and meritless lawsuits to punish the group for its reporting on advertising on X after Musk purchased the site.The Media Matters said it found advertisements by IBM, Apple, Oracle and Comcast's Xfinity placed alongside posts touting Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party."X initiated a vendetta-driven campaign of libel tourism, spanning three jurisdictions in three countries, all arising from the same conduct: Media Matters' use of X's platform in accordance with X's Terms of Service and its truthful reporting on the results," the complaint said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared with last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the US could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the US — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that US employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the US economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro confirmed as top Washington prosecutor
Synopsis Jeanine Pirro, ex television personality, is now US Attorney for District of Columbia. Senate confirmed her in a 50-45 vote. Donald Trump nominated her. Pirro previously hosted 'Justice with Judge Jeanine' on Fox News. Democrats criticized her promotion of election conspiracy theories. Dominion Voting Systems sued Fox News, settling for nearly $800 million. AP FILE - Interim U.S. Attorney General for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro listens to President Donald Trump speak during her swearing in ceremony, May 28, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) The US Senate on Saturday confirmed former television personality and judge Jeanine Pirro to a key US judiciary post, making her the latest Donald Trump-nominated Fox News host to join the government. Pirro was confirmed to become the US Attorney for the District of Columbia in a 50-45 vote, as Trump urged the Republican-led Senate to work through the weekend to approve his nominations over six months after he returned to the White House. Pirro was named to the position in an interim capacity by Trump -- who has made a habit of filling powerful government posts with right-wing television network hosts and hardline loyalists -- in brash 74-year-old former district attorney of New York's Westchester County was previously described by Trump as being "in a class by herself."She made a name for herself hosting weekend television show "Judge Jeanine Pirro" (2008-2011) and then Fox News Channel's "Justice with Judge Jeanine," which ran for 11 years. She was a co-host of Fox News's show "The Five" until she assumed her interim post, considered one of the most powerful US attorney will join the ranks of other cable news hires like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who co-hosted "Fox & Friends Weekend," and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, a former reality TV show competitor and Fox Business Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate's Judiciary Committee, said Pirro "should never be a permanent US Attorney," calling her pick a "rubber stamp for Donald Trump."Durbin cited Pirro's promotion of conspiracy theories in relation to the 2020 election, which Trump lost to Joe touting unfounded allegations of election fraud in 2020, Pirro was named a defendant in a defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, which said Fox broadcast false statements about the News settled the case for nearly $800 has also authored several books, including "Liars, Leakers, and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy," from 2018. The Washington Post described the book as "sycophantic" in its support for ex-husband Albert Pirro was convicted of tax evasion when she was a district attorney in New York. He was pardoned by Trump during his first presidential part of the spate of expedited confirmation votes, Trump's former lawyer Emil Bove became a federal appellate judge last week.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is Sydney Sweeney a Republican? Fact-checking the viral claim amid the 'controversial' Euphoria actor's American Eagle backlash
makes a splash every time she appears on a commercial (with her sexy commercial scratchy voice, as coined by Stephen Colbert), whether by choice or by sheer coincidence. The ' ' actress has been under scrutiny for the past few days, thanks to her latest and heavily criticized American Eagle campaign, where she claims that she has great 'jeans', a pun on 'genes' that sparked heated debate over racial undertones and alleged ties to eugenics. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Yes, it's attracted more ridicule than her bathwater soap (?!), and what followed was an intense backlash and a whole lot of digging to find dirt on her. Amid mounting criticism over her 'controversial' commercials, now, questions have swirled about whether the 'Anyone But You' star is a Republican or not. More pressingly, did she vote for Donald Trump? Is Sydney Sweeney a Republican ? Multiple sources, including Florida's Department of State voter records (as reported by Newsweek), confirm that a Sydney Bernice Sweeney was registered as a Republican voter in Monroe County, Florida, on June 14, 2024, with an active voter status. A viral post on X by user @time222smoke first claimed that she was a registered member of the Republican Party. BuzzFeed subsequently reported on Sweeney's voter registration after reviewing publicly available records. However, there is no official confirmation that this registration belongs to the Hollywood actress born in Spokane and based in Los Angeles. While she owns a $13.5 million home in Florida's Summerland Key, aligning with the state of registration, none of the public reports confirm directly that the voter record refers to her. Furthermore, there's no official statement from Sweeney's side accepting or denying the claim. In short, yes, there's publicly accessible data pointing to Republican registration, but no definitive confirmation that it refers to the actor herself. Political image so far This isn't the first time Sweeney has faced heat. In 2022, images from her mother's 60th birthday party went viral, with guests wearing MAGA‑style hats and 'Blue Lives Matter' shirts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sweeney later clarified that those individuals were family friends, not her family, and she 'didn't intend a political statement.' In fact, on-screen and in public forums, Sweeney is as 'woke' as it gets. She has openly supported liberal-leaning causes such as LGBTQ+ rights, transgender rights, Black Lives Matter, and remained pro‑choice. However, her broader political alignment remains unclear, as she generally maintains a low public profile on explicit partisan issues. Although that hasn't stopped her from attending billionaire Jeff Bezos' ludicrous (to say the least) wedding in Venice and doing another ridiculous commercial selling her bathwater soap! Did Sweeney vote for Donald Trump ? Although multiple outlets have claimed that Sweeney is a registered Republican, there is no credible confirmation of her exact political alignment and affiliation. Which brings us to answer the obvious next question: no credible source confirms that she voted for or endorsed the US President Donald Trump. In essence, she has largely stayed out of electoral politics in public life. Great jeans or poor campaign: The American Eagle controversy Launched in late July, the campaign's centerpiece, 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans,' triggered intense debate in the public forum. One video even featured her saying, 'Genes are passed down… My jeans are blue.' The campaign generated a wave of controversy, being accused of invoking racialized beauty standards and eugenics-era rhetoric, noting Sweeney's blonde hair and blue eyes as visual cues in the messaging. Some even labeled the campaign 'fascist‑coded,' 'Nazi propaganda,' or an explicit nod to white supremacist tropes. While many argued that the pun on 'genes' combined with visuals of a blonde, blue‑eyed actress evoked white‑beauty norms and eugenics imagery, American Eagle came out with a rather 'safe' comment, responding to the backlash, stating: 'It is and always was about the jeans… great jeans look good on everyone.' However, despite the controversy, the brand's stock rose by around 10-11% following the campaign rollout, and Sydney Sweeney hasn't yet stopped trending on various social media platforms; evidence that controversy can translate into commercial traction. The final word… Sydney Sweeney's political identity remains ambiguous. The fact that the actress has yet to issue an official statement despite the intense heat speaks for her potential preference to keep her political stance that way. Will this ambiguity play out in her favor? Or she will come out, picking a side, justifying the same? Moreover, will that affect her career in the public eye? That remains to be seen. Sydney Sweeney Ad Row: JD Vance Unbuckles On 'Nazi' Noise, American Eagle Keeps It Casual
