Officials Vow Strict Action Against Sex Determination: PCPNDT Act Reviewed in Jogulamba Gadwal
Addressing the gathering, Dr. Siddappa emphasized the urgent need to spread awareness at the field level about the ban on sex determination tests and the legal consequences of female foeticide. He urged officials from various line departments to engage with communities regularly to educate people about the Act, especially in rural and remote areas.
Highlighting the seriousness of the issue, the DMHO stated that any person or medical professional found violating the PCPNDT Act would face up to 3 years of imprisonment, a fine of ₹50,000, and non-bailable charges. Repeat offenders could face 5 years in prison and fines up to ₹1 lakh. In addition, the licenses of medical practitioners and the registration of clinics involved could be suspended or permanently cancelled.
Dr. Siddappa also called for widespread awareness of related laws, such as the POCSO Act and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, which are crucial for protecting women and children's rights. He further advised that pregnant women experiencing mental health issues should be made aware of the 14416 toll-free helpline, which offers free mental health support.
The meeting was attended by key health and welfare officials, including Dr. B. Damayanthi, Professor and HOD, Dr. G. Prasoona Rani, Maternal and Child Health Officer, Tanveer Rizwana, District Immunization Officer, Dr. G. Raju, Program Officer, NCVBDCP, K. Madhusudan Reddy, Deputy DEMO, P. Narendra Babu, DVLM, G. Narasayya, Health Assistant, and B. Narsinglu, District Child Protection Officer. Representatives from the Women and Child Welfare Department, the SAHKI One Stop Centre, and NGOs such as Parashuramudu also participated.
The meeting concluded with a unanimous resolution to intensify interdepartmental cooperation, enhance monitoring mechanisms, and ensure that all diagnostic centers strictly adhere to the PCPNDT Act. Officials reiterated their commitment to protecting the rights of the girl child and improving the gender ratio in the district.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Should HIV/AIDS testing be made mandatory before marriage?
In July, Meghalaya Health and Family Welfare Minister Mazel Ampareen Lyngdoh announced that the State may follow Goa in making HIV/AIDS test mandatory for all before marriage. The problem is multi-disciplinary; it is not merely a question of health, but also involves considerations of human rights, stigma, and free will. Should HIV/AIDS testing be made mandatory? N. Kumarasamy and Jahnabi Goswami discuss the question in a conversation moderated by Ramya Kannan. Edited excerpts: Is it possible to implement mandatory testing for HIV before marriage? What are the advantages of such a move? N. Kumarasamy: Regarding HIV, making anything mandatory is not acceptable. The HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017, clearly mandates counselling before testing, and testing only with the consent of a patient. As per the law of the land, once you do the testing, everything must be kept confidential. If they test positive, patients should be linked to the appropriate antiretroviral treatment centres. The next question will be whether they can get married — that has also been dealt with by the 2017 law. Today, based on science, we know that if a HIV-positive person is put on antiretroviral treatment, the viral load goes to an undetectable level within 2-3 months. Studies have shown that a person who has an undetectable level of viral load will not transmit infections sexually to their partners. The person will also not develop any HIV-related complications such as opportunistic infections, tuberculosis (TB), and various other comorbid conditions, and maintain a normal immunity level. Mandatory HIV testing without the consent of such a person will be a human rights violation. And doing so will also increase stigma. For all these reasons, mandatory testing cannot take place. HIV testing should be offered to as many people as possible — mainly to those who are at risk and also people who believe that they may be at risk. It should be offered. Consent is important. And testing, if done, should be done while maintaining appropriate confidentiality. Jahnabi Goswami: Yes, the viral load can be managed with drugs. But I still think HIV testing should be made mandatory before marriage. There are a number of cases we know where people who have been infected, but are not taking antiretrovirals regularly, get married because of family and societal pressure. The spouse finds out only later, or perhaps when she or he tests positive for HIV. The children are likely to be affected too. In India we believe in matching horoscopes before the wedding. Why not a HIV test, to see if the couple are compatible at all? Such a test will also ensure the health of the family. Will this move actually empower women? Jahnabi Goswami: My agenda is not women or male empowerment per se. In the north-east, specifically, there have been a number of cases where the (HIV positive) status was concealed. Injecting drug use is responsible for nearly 64% of HIV infections in the north-east. Men (injecting drug users) clean up for three months, get married and don't inform their wives. A few months later, they bring their wives too to test. Even today, we had such a case. This happens regularly. In fact, I believe that to safeguard women and girls, it is essential to go in for mandatory testing, with counselling. About confidentiality and consent, I want to point out that in practice, doctors are forcefully testing for HIV. Even if you go for a small dental procedure — sometimes they counsel, sometimes they don't, and force you to do HIV test. Sometimes it is good counselling and sometimes it is of bad quality. Will the HIV test, if it comes negative, provide a false sense of security? N. Kumarasamy: While you are doing appropriate testing, you are also counselling a patient to find out the duration of exposure. That also helps you determine the window period when testing should be offered. That is the reason you counsel someone. If you force someone to do a test, they may go to a lab and get it done. The test report can be negative but the person might really be positive (for HIV) leading to transmission of infection. If testing is done with appropriate consent, counselling, and confidentiality, I'm sure people are not going to refuse it. Goa also proposed mandatory testing some years ago, but it is still not a reality... N. Kumarasamy: Yes, it is not implemented in Goa. But there is wide testing happening in the State. There is no mandatory testing before a wedding. The thing is they cannot implement this because this will cause human rights violations. The same thing is happening in Meghalaya. If you look at the reports on rising infections, perhaps the State is ranked 5th or 6th where a significant number of infections is through injecting drug use and also through sexual contact. But I think it is possible to learn from other States, especially from southern India — Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Andhra Pradesh — as well as Maharashtra. The ideal way to contain this infection is to do appropriate HIV testing as much as possible in a variety of settings with proper consent and then link those tested people to the treatment. That will reduce infectiousness in the country and also lead to a reduction in new infections in Meghalaya. Jahnabi Goswami: I think it will definitely happen because the situation is quite different in Meghalaya. To understand it, you should understand the circumstances and people of the State. In Meghalaya, certain groups in the Christian community still think it is taboo to use a condom even if it is recommended by law. (The HIV Act promotes safe sex practices.) In fact, implementing the HIV/AIDS Act in Meghalaya is really difficult. Also, culturally and socially, they have provisions for extramarital affairs and living together. These are quite common among the youth. Simultaneously, HIV is a big discriminator in Meghalaya and no one has actually accepts HIV-positive men or women. How do we address the stigma that is still associated with HIV? N. Kumarasamy: Stigma started in India because it (HIV) was first detected in a commercial sex worker, so it was attributed to multi-partner sex. But this is not true, as we have seen. HIV is still an incurable disease. The way to address stigma today is to make sure that common people are aware that we now have treatment available. Even if it is not curable, it is permanently controllable. In our research studies in Chennai, we showed that treating one partner will prevent transmission if the viral load goes down. The message U=U (undetectable is untransmittable) does work. Such scientific messages can remove stigma from the community, so that as many people as possible will test and be linked to treatment. Someone who is already on treatment will do well, and not transmit infection to the others. Addressing stigma is not an easy thing. Over 30 years of taking care of people with HIV and their families at our centre here, we realise that each one is different. Much is based on their education, how they were raised, and whether they live in the village or city. All this will have to be wrapped up in several rounds of counselling. Jahnabi Goswami: As Dr. Kumarasamy has said, stigma is associated not with the disease, but with where the infection arises from. The impression is that people who are in sex work will get HIV; people who do drugs will get HIV. That is where the stigma comes from. We should constantly try to reduce stigma. The government, people who are infected, like me, and those working in the field should work hard to erode the stigma. If someone has cancer, they say without any hesitation that their family members died of cancer. If they are diabetic, they say they don't use sugar. And if they have hypertension, they don't mind asking you not to put salt in their food. But people who have HIV or people who have TB do not talk openly about it because these are seen as behavioral issues. We must remove the stigma and make it comfortable for HIV-positive people to talk about their status. I do believe we have to involve counsellors to tell people that they will not transmit because they are on treatment, that U=U; and involve more people with HIV as role models to reduce stigma and discrimination. The quality of counselling should be improved for sure. Listen to the conversation
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Bring out a booklet on surrogacy in a month: HC
Chennai: has directed Tamil Nadu govt to create a booklet outlining a step-by-step process to comply with the mandate under the Surrogacy Act. This booklet must be uploaded on the website to ensure that hospitals involved in this process are aware of their responsibilities, the court said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This directive must be completed within four weeks, Justice N Anand Venkatesh said while passing orders on a plea moved by GG hospital, Chennai, a surrogate mother, and an intending couple to condone the procedural lapse in not obtaining the 'parental order' mandated under the surrogacy law before initiating the surrogacy procedure. By the time the hospital and the intending parents recognized that the procedure they adopted was illegal, the surrogate mother was 11 weeks pregnant. Additionally, the surrogate mother faced a predicament as she was pregnant with twins, and if the process was not approved, she would have to give birth to the children and also take care of them. Considering the interests of the intending couple, the surrogate mother, and the rights of the unborn children, the court exercised its 'Parens Patriae' (parent of any child) jurisdiction and decided to issue the 'parental order' itself. On Aug 8, the court, after considering statements recorded from the respective parties and the documents that were marked, passed the parentage order declaring the intending couple as the lawful parents of the children to be born. This parentage order will be treated as a birth certificate after the children are born, the judge said. Regarding the procedural lapse and considering the complexity of the procedures involved under the Act and the potential lack of awareness, the court directed the department to create a booklet.
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
How developing brain in teens plays key role in consent for sex
When the government recently argued in the Supreme Court against lowering the age of consent for sex from 18 to 16, it relied on legal precedent and the need to protect minors from exploitation. But this old debate gains more nuance when seen through the lens of neuroscience: the teenage brain isn't just a smaller version of an adult's, it is also developing. What's interesting is that the brain doesn't develop as a composite whole. The reward centres focusing on risk-taking behaviours develop faster than the parts that focus on also has an answer to the big question: teenagers might be physically capable of sex, but are they neurologically ready to make an informed decision, and say yes or no?This is as adolescence is a period of intense brain development. The body often reaches physical maturity well before 18, but the brain's decision-making systems take a little TEENAGE BRAINS, ACCELERATORS OUTPACE THE BRAKESThe prefrontal cortex is of central importance here as it is the part of the brain which weighs consequences, controls impulses, and plans ahead. Research shows it continues maturing well into the why the question of teenage consent for sex is complicated. While it is a reality, the law must weigh this reality against protection from isn't just saying "yes" or "no."It's understanding it to its full extent. While the teenage brain is capable of creativity and learning, it is not yet consistently wired for sound judgement in high-stakes, emotionally charged situations like intimacy and sexual the prefrontal cortex control is lagging, the limbic system, which drives reward-seeking and emotional reactions, is in overdrive during Laurence Steinberg calls this the brain's "accelerator", outpacing its "brakes".The result: teenagers are more prone to risk-taking, dopamine-seeking, and acting on impulse, especially in "hot" situations charged with emotion or peer impulsiveness is accounted for in many laws across the OF CONSENT: WHY IT'S 18 IN INDIA BUT 14 IN GERMANYGlobally, the age of consent ranges from 14 in Germany to 16 in the UK and 18 in several countries. Many nations balance lower ages with "close-in-age" or "Romeo and Juliet" clauses that prevent criminalising consensual sex between peers while still punishing coercion, exploitation, or large age Pocso Act has no such clause, meaning even consensual sex between a 17-year-old and an 18-year-old can lead to serious criminal the law doesn't operate in a India, sex education is patchy, and taboos mean many adolescents navigate relationships without accurate information or supportive adults. Gender norms often tilt power toward older men, making younger girls particularly is why the conversation cannot be only about where to set the legal if the age of consent remains at 18, young people need comprehensive, age-appropriate sex education that goes beyond anatomy to teach consent, communication, and recognising unhealthy dynamics. Without that, any legal age becomes a blunt instrument in a much more complicated decision-making often takes place in this high-risk zone, with strong emotions, peer pressure, and an incomplete grasp of long-term stakes are Sundargarh, Odisha, a 24-year-old allegedly lured a 16-year-old into a sexual relationship with the promise of marriage. She became pregnant; the newborn died. He was arrested under Ludhiana, Punjab, a 17-year-old met two people, who she had befriended on social media, at a hotel. She was allegedly drugged, intimate moments recorded, and blackmailed. Her mother's intervention led to an FIR under Pocso and charges of criminal BRAINS WIRED FOR SHORT-TERM GRATIFICATIONScience doesn't say teenagers can't make any decisions. But it does show that some decisions, especially those with lasting consequences, are often made when the brain is biased toward short-term sexual situations, that bias affects not only the decision to have sex but also the ability to handle consent, resist pressure, and anticipate consequences of emotional harm, pregnancy, or legal for lowering the age say the current law is too punitive for close-to-age argue the higher age limit is a protective barrier against coercion and grooming, risks that rise as the decision-making parts of the brain are still shows that in risky situations, the brains of adolescents light up in reward areas but lag in control regions, making resistance often overestimate how much they understand and underestimate the risks, a pattern intensified in emotional or socially pressured contexts. In sex, where power imbalances can be subtle, this age of consent at 18 offers a margin of safety, closer to when most people have better neurological maturity. Lowering it to 16 assumes readiness comes earlier. Science shows that while some teenagers are mature at 16, most are still in transition. Though science shows us how a developing brain plays a key role in risky behaviour and consent, sex education is of the utmost importance. Also, important is to remember that adolescents undergo a hormonal rush, and their romance doesn't get criminalised.- EndsTrending Reel advertisement
