Meta to boost profits by rolling out advertisements on WhatsApp... less than two years after denying it
WhatsApp's users are threatening to delete the app following the announcement it is introducing advertising.
The free messaging app, owned by Mark Zuckerberg 's firm Meta, will roll out ads to all its users 'slowly over the next several months', regardless of what country they're in.
However, the plan has gone down badly with people on social media, being described as 'dumb' and the suggestion that it's time to buy an old-school Nokia cell.
Comments from furious users included 'dumbest idea ever'; 'time to switch to Telegram'; 'Bye bye Meta, may you loose every Whatsapp user you had in the past and get a very hard negative hit in your revenues.'
While another said: 'WhatsApp is bringing ads. Its time to get back to Nokia 3310.'
Meta revealed the controversial update in a blog post on its website, but said that advs will not 'interrupt your chats', nor will it be binning end-to-end encryption.
For now, the ads will only appear in WhatsApp Status - the feature released in 2017 that lets users share photos and videos that disappear after 24 hours.
But James Bore, tech expert at consultancy Bores Group, thinks it's a matter of time before ads come to the rest of WhatsApp.
'WhatsApp is owned by the same company as Facebook,' he told MailOnline.
'Their history shows that they will cram in ever more prevalent and ever more intrusive ads into every aspect of every platform they can, regardless of how it negatively impacts user experience.'
WhatsApp Status is found in 'Updates' tab at the bottom of the app, next to the three other tabs - 'Chats', 'Communities' and 'Calls'.
Meta says: 'The growing popularity of the Updates tab makes this the right place for these experiences, in a way that doesn't interrupt your chats.
'If you only use WhatsApp to chat with friends and loved ones, there will be no change to your experience at all.'
WhatsApp admitted it will take user information such as their country, city and language, plus how they interact with the ads, to show certain ads that they 'might care about'.
But it stressed that it will still not able to read your messages - so it will not be sending you targeted ads based on what you send to friends and family.
It will also 'never sell or share your phone number to advertisers'.
The company added: 'Nothing changes about people's personal chats, which remain end-to-end encrypted and are not used for ads.
'Your personal messages, calls and groups you are in will not be used to determine the ads you may see.'
He jokingly added 'Also it looks like you misspelled Brian's name,' referring to Brian Acton, co-founder of Whatsapp'
Meta purchased WhatsApp in 2014 , but it has so far resisted using advertising to tap into new revenue steams.
As recently as 2023, WhatsApp denied reports it was even considering the idea.
'False. We aren't doing this,' WhatsApp boss Will Cathcart posted not even two years ago on X in response to a report from the Financial Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Iran asks its people to delete WhatsApp from their devices
Iranian state television on Tuesday afternoon urged the country's public to remove the messaging platform WhatsApp from their smartphones, alleging the app — without offering specific evidence — gathered user information to send to Israel. In a statement, WhatsApp said it was 'concerned these false reports will be an excuse for our services to be blocked at a time when people need them the most.' WhatsApp uses end-to-end encryption, meaning a service provider in the middle can't read a message. 'We do not track your precise location, we don't keep logs of who everyone is messaging and we do not track the personal messages people are sending one another," it added. 'We do not provide bulk information to any government.' End-to-end encryption means that messages are scrambled so that only the sender and recipient can see them. If anyone else intercepts the message, all they will see is a garble that can't be unscrambled without the key. WhatsApp is owned by Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. Iran has blocked access to various social media platforms over the years but many people in the country use proxies and virtual private networks, or VPNs, to access them. It banned WhatsApp and Google Play in 2022 during mass protests against the government over the death of a woman held by the country's morality police. That ban was lifted late last year. WhatsApp had been one of Iran's most popular messaging apps besides Instagram and Telegram.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Amazon's workforce to reduce on rollout of generative AI, agents
June 17 (Reuters) - Rollout of generative AI and agents will reduce Amazon's (AMZN.O), opens new tab total corporate workforce in the next few years, Andy Jassy, CEO of the online retailer wrote in a note to employees on Tuesday. Artificial intelligence is reshaping the global workforce by automating routine and repetitive tasks, and industry leaders expect this to prompt a reduction or transformation of certain roles across industries. "As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs," Jassy said.
Finextra
3 hours ago
- Finextra
To ESG or not to ESG? Britain's ‘Big Four' banks buck the trend of DEI retreat
0 This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. A counterbalance to claims of trans-Atlantic ESG de-prioritisation, Finextra's investigation into the UK's top financial institutions prove that some industries are keeping ESG front of mind. On Sunday 6 June 2025, The Observer published an article in its business and economics section which revealed how leading British firms had 're-written' their yearly surveys, 'in the wake of Donald Trump's corporate crusade against diversity, equity, and sustainability.' The investigation – which compared the 2023 and 2024 annual reports of 85 FTSE 100 companies for instances of terms related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as well as environment, social, and governance (ESG) – found that 'total mentions of DEI, along with the number of pages containing the phrase and variations on it, both declined by more than 16% on average.' The mentions of ESG, it added, declined by 22%. The reporters – Barney Macintyre and Joe White – pointed to the 'large orange cloud' that has blown across the Atlantic, as the reason for this rather bleak regression in Britain's boardroom policies. Indeed, Amazon, Bank of America, Blackrock, Citigroup, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, JPMorgan Chase, Meta, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo have all been flagged by Forbes as having rolled back their DEI policies, in various ways. According to Macintyre and White, the US administration's hostile position on DEI and ESG – having sought to purge official documents of hundreds of 'woke' terms, and touted the 'drill baby, drill' agenda – may be legitimising similar moves in the UK. The ESG pulse of UK banks While the revelations of The Observer report are a concerning development for our FTSE 100, the outlook becomes quite different if we focus our sights on specific industries – especially the UK's financial services industry. Indeed, it appears that recent developments are a (far from insignificant) glitch in a broader upward trend. To gain an insight into the health of DEI policy in our top institutions, Finextra conducted its own investigation, limiting the methodology to the 'Big Four' banks: HSBC, Lloyds, Barclays, and NatWest. These institutions collectively hold a sizable share of the retail banking market – with estimates ranging from 68% to 85%, depending on the source consulted. Owed to their stature, these banks act as a bellwether for how the industry's position on DEI and ESG is moving. For a contextualised view of this issue, Finextra's investigation looked at differences between the 2020 and 2024 annual reports of the Big Four. The year 2020 marked the commencement of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests, as triggered by the murder of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis police department. This was the cultural tipping point, when businesses all over the world rushed to champion diversity initiatives. In the Big Four's annual reports of 2020 and 2024, Finextra tallied the mentions of 'ESG', as well as several terms related to DEI, including 'DE&I,' 'DEI,' 'diversity,' 'equality,' 'inclusion,' and 'fairness'. The results suggest a brighter picture than that painted by The Observer, of the FTSE 100. The Big Four averaged a 361% increase in mentions of 'ESG' between 2020 and 2024. This average was brought up in large part by Barclays, which mentioned 'ESG' 17 times in 2020 and 187 times in 2024 (an increase of 1,000%). NatWest's increase was the second highest, at 275%, though it mentioned 'ESG' the least number of times in both years. HSBC's increase came in at 181%, though it mentioned 'ESG' more times in both years than any of the other Big Four. Our research shows Lloyds may have mentioned ESG the least, with a reduction of 11%. However, this could fall within the margin of error. On the DEI side, average mentions of related terms rose by 82% between 2020 and 2024, leaving some room for improvement – though still a significantly better outlook than other FTSE firms. Bringing the average up significantly was NatWest, having mentioned DEI-related terms around 28 times in 2020, and 118 times in 2024 (a 321% increase). The second highest increase was by Lloyds, at 24% – though it mentioned DEI-related terms more times than NatWest in both years. Barclays and HSBC reduced their mentions by 7% and 11%, respectively. Once again, these figures could fall within the margin of error. Each of the Big Four were contacted for comment. The link between a mention and an action Of course, mere mentions of DEI and ESG do not always result in concrete policy – and sometimes even amount to greenwashing or ESG-washing. Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, and NatWest have each been accused of some form of greenwashing in the last several years – some cases were more substantial than others. On 17 June 2025 HSBC was accused by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) of breaching its own coal phase-out policy by helping to raise $2.4bn in 2024 for companies expanding their coal operations. As Pavita Cooper, UK chair of the 30% club (a global campaign to increase gender diversity at board and senior management levels), put it in The Observer: 'Many organisations made declarations of public support in the days following the murder of George Floyd – very few made meaningful change.' While use of the terms 'DEI' and 'ESG' are not (quite) legally binding, there may be a correlation between their acceptance into the public consciousness and the rollout of progressive policy in the long-term. This is the very reason Trump 2.0 aims to curtail the use of these phases. In their 2024 annual reports, Barclays dedicates over 50 pages to describing its specific, target-bound climate strategy, and NatWest highlights ongoing initiatives around recruitment and attraction; leadership and retention; employee-led networks; as well as ethnic, gender, socio-economic, and neuro-diversity. In many of these cases, mentions of 'ESG' and 'DEI' are correlated with action – seeking to improve the institutional relationship with the environment, and make offices in the city more equitable. In some areas, positive change has already filtered through. The World Economic Forum (WEF)'s recent report on the global gender pay gap, for example, reveals it is closing at its fastest rate since the pandemic – currently sitting at 68.8%. The WEF puts this down to 'economic and political advances', with women outpacing men in higher education. As ever, there is still work to do, and the hope is that these trends continue in the long-term, rather than recede as a result of the US administration's policies. Securing tomorrow's talent It would seem that, at least within the banking community, the UK is carrying forward the torch of environmental and societal responsibility – as are only a clutch of storied US institutions of academia. But the DEI and ESG mission is not just music to consumers' and investors' ears; it helps firms mitigate transitional risk, keeps assets secure, and helps to engage the pipeline of future talent. Cooper rounded off The Observer piece by pointing out that by 2034, Gen Z will overtake millennials in number within the workforce. This makes it even more important that institutions don't simply name-drop DEI and ESG-related terms in their annual reports. According to a recent survey, 43% of employees said they would quit their jobs if their employer rolled back on DEI policy. Clearly, the crusade against DEI is not entirely welcomed in the UK – particularly among specific subgroups, such as women, Gen Z, and millennials. To counter the 'orange cloud', firms must offer more transparency around their ESG projects; stand as an example for smaller businesses; and show how progressive policies will serve the incoming wave of employees – none of whom have forgotten the lessons learned from the tragic case of George Floyd and the protests his death inspired.
