Watch Kendrick Lamar's superb full Super Bowl 2025 halftime show
In case you missed it, K. Dot came with the heat for sports' biggest stage. It had everything you could possibly want out of the Compton rapper, including a guest appearance by Samuel L. Jackson. Of course, he wouldn't let his excellent setlist not include one of his biggest hits.
Yep. That one. He used the stage and 'Not Like Us' to troll Drake several times. There was a lawsuit joke, and even his ex, Serena Williams, metaphorically danced on his grave. WHEW. Naturally, that kind of get back spawned a ridiculously funny meme.
But that wasn't all that Kendrick put into his show. Here's the full 13-minute video so you can catch all the elements over and over.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
7 hours ago
- Engadget
The White House now has a TikTok account
The White House has joined TikTok, the social media app that President Trump wanted to ban during his first term. Its first post shows clips of Trump in various events with Kendrick Lamar's track playing in the background. The New York Times notes that it references a popular video edit of Creed, a boxing movie starring Michael B. Jordan, on the app. In the TikTok post, Trump could be heard saying "I am your voice," while the caption reads "America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" Trump's administration believes TikTok helped him win over young voters in the 2024 Presidential election, with the account he used to campaign having over 15 million followers. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. The president wasn't always fond of the platform. He once vowed to ban the app in the US and signed an executive order to outlaw any transaction between the app and its China-based parent company ByteDance for national security reasons. TikTok's "data collection threatens to allow the Chinese Communist Party access to Americans' personal and proprietary information — potentially allowing China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, build dossiers of personal information for blackmail, and conduct corporate espionage," the executive order read. After taking office earlier this year, however, Trump quickly put a pause on the law that was supposed to ban TikTok in the US. He even delayed the ban a couple more times to give ByteDance more time to sell its US business. Trump previously claimed that a "very wealthy" group is poised to buy TikTok, but the administration has yet to reveal the identities of the people in it.
USA Today
12 hours ago
- USA Today
Xavier Worthy reacts to Taylor Swift's viral NFL draft reaction: 'That's crazy'
Taylor Swift, NFL draft scout? While most of the attention surrounding Swift's appearance on the "New Heights" podcast was focused on her relationship with Travis Kelce, the pop star also pointed out her excitement during the 2024 NFL Draft. Specifically, Swift detailed her elation about the Kansas City Chiefs' selection of Xavier Worthy with the 28th overall pick. On Tuesday, Worthy responded to the viral clip. "That's crazy," Worthy said. "I ain't gonna lie, she's the biggest pop star in this generation so it's crazy to have somebody running around the house screaming, 'We drafted you!'" The pick was only made possible after the Chiefs traded up with the Buffalo Bills, which became cause for celebration in the Swift residence. "I became like a person who was running through the halls of my house screaming, 'We drafted Xavier Worthy,'" Swift said. Kelce was a non-believer at first, saying that he wasn't sure if Swift had the right information. "I forget where I was, but you were the first person to tell me that we drafted the fastest man in the draft," Kelce said. Chiefs fans were given many reasons to be happy about the selection and their newest superfan wasted no time joining the crowd. "I was freaking out," Swift added. Worthy certainly proved to be a solid addition to the Kansas City offense in his rookie year, totaling 742 scrimmage yards and nine touchdowns on 79 touches – also proving to be someone that rose to the occasion in the postseason. Heading into his second season, the former Texas star will look to build off an impressive rookie year. Turns out, he'll be doing it with one of the world's biggest celebrities in his corner.
Forbes
16 hours ago
- Forbes
Drake/UMG Dispute: Transparency In The Streaming Age
Amid his highly publicized rap battle with Kendrick Lamar, Drake filed a series of lawsuits aimed at Universal Music Group, owner of his label Republic Records. Among other allegations, Drake accuses UMG of manipulating streams to favor Lamar's tracks over his own, causing him financial harm. These are just allegations for now, but they open the door to broader conversations about how major labels leverage their relationships with streaming platforms. These aren't niche issues: global paid streaming subscribers are projected to reach 827 million in 2025, according to research by Goldman Sachs. With that kind of scale, small shifts in visibility or recommendation algorithms can have enormous financial implications. Bots, Algorithms, and Playlist Visibility A significant issue at the heart of this lawsuit and the industry as a whole is the lack of regulation of 'bots,' software accounts that are programmed to repeatedly stream a song or album and, in the process, inflate streams. A Financial Times article found that as much as 10 percent of all music streams are derived from bots or streaming farms. According to allegations in Drake's lawsuit, 'Kendrick Lamar's 'label' (i.e., Interscope) paid him via third parties to use 'bots' to achieve 30,000,000 streams on Spotify in the initial days following the Recording's release with the goal of 'jumpstarting' its spread and turning it into 'a crazy hit' on the platform.' The lawsuit further stresses Spotify's failure to prevent the issue, as the platform itself acknowledged the presence of bots in response to Drake's pre-litigation filing in New York State court. The issue goes far beyond play counts, exposing systemic flaws in algorithms and playlist placements that serve as the industry's real digital gatekeepers for artist exposure. In 2020, the Federal Trade Commission scrutinized promotional practices in the streaming era, examining how labels influence playlist placement and algorithmic recommendations. Streaming was supposed to remove gatekeepers, but playlist algorithms have instead created new ones. It's hard enough for many of them to break into a platform's curated playlist, let alone reach the level of clout necessary to access customized licensing terms with that platform. Even well-established artists struggle to break through without curated playlist placement, let alone access to preferential licensing terms with DSPs. Streaming has reshaped music promotion, concentrating leverage around algorithms and data feeds. That shift affects everyone from bedroom producers to stadium headliners. Among Drake's other allegations, he claims UMG charged '...Spotify lower than usual licensing rates for the Recording in exchange for Spotify affirmatively recommending the Recording to users who are searching for other unrelated songs and artists,' and that UMG partnered with Apple's Siri to play Kendrick's track unprompted in response to unrelated voice requests. Tom Gray, founder of the #BrokenRecord campaign, echoed this sentiment in his testimony to the UK Parliament's Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, stating: 'The reality is that playlisting is the new payola. The gatekeepers have changed, but the game remains the same.' Without major label backing, independent artists face an uphill battle. Playlist inclusion can feel like a lottery, and without it, algorithmic momentum is hard to build. That cycle of fewer playlists, less visibility and lower per-stream rates makes it tough to break through, even for artists with strong followings or touring chops. This isn't just a visibility issue; it's an economic one. Goldman's reporting shows that recorded music revenue growth has slowed dramatically, missing 2024 projections by over 4 percentage points. When top-line growth slows, competition over playlist slots and per-stream payouts only intensifies. Metrics, Trust, and Power Royalties used to flow from physical CDs or iTunes downloads. Now, the industry runs on clicks, skips, and saves. And with that shift, power has moved to the platforms themselves, a setup that makes manipulation easier and oversight harder. Streaming payouts are complicated even in the best-case scenario. But when bots and backend deals enter the picture, things get murkier. It's not just a transparency problem. It's a trust problem. Even well-known artists say streaming numbers don't always mean financial sustainability. And for independent creators trying to make a living, inflated data hurts twice: they get buried in discovery algorithms and shortchanged in payout models. As Drake's legal team puts it, 'Streaming platforms, like Spotify, use streaming data to proportionally allocate and disperse payments, which means streaming fraud diverts funds from artists whose songs are legitimately streamed by real consumers to those who use automation to falsely create the appearance of legitimate streaming.' This isn't a new complaint. Artists, indie labels, and advocates have been calling for transparency for years. Groups across Europe and the U.S. have pushed for access to backend data and more clarity around algorithmic curation. Without it, the market remains tilted and opaque. Streaming data now functions as career currency. It shapes touring budgets, brand deals, sync placements and almost every downstream opportunity. And for the artists who don't have a label machine behind them, the opacity of that system makes it harder to compete on anything close to a level playing field. That imbalance also locks artists out of fast-growing income opportunities. Goldman estimates that if just 20% of paying subscribers worldwide are 'superfans' (meaning those willing to spend 2x the average fan) it could unlock over $4.2 billion in additional revenue. But if that growth depends on algorithmic exposure and playlist favor, it's not likely to benefit those who need it most. The stakes aren't limited to the U.S., as Goldman projects that 70% of all new streaming subscribers by 2030 will come from emerging markets. If algorithmic opacity remains the norm, these regions risk replicating the same inequities seen in the current system, just on a bigger scale. As the dust continues to settle from Drake's filings, the bigger question is whether the industry will start demanding real transparency – or whether we'll just keep optimizing for the algorithm. Legal Entertainment has reached out to representation for comment, and will update this story as necessary.
