A Hindu-Muslim Story of Betrayal, Healing, and Hope
In a world shaken by fear and fractured by hate, quiet acts of care endure. I find proof that humanity's heart beats stronger than its wounds.
On May 22, 2025, terror tore through the Baisaran meadow in Pahalgam, Kashmir, where attackers killed 26 civilian after allegedly demanding their religions. Among the fallen was one Muslim – a grim reminder that hatred, though perpetrated in the name of religion, spares no one.
In Srinagar, the spring air grew heavy with grief, the valley's famed beauty dulled by the weight of mourning. For the first time in 35 years of conflict, Muslim voices rose from beneath the iconic Clock Tower in Lal Chowk, crying out: ' Kashmir se awaaz aayi… Hindu Muslim bhai bhai (A voice rises from Kashmir… Hindus and Muslims are brothers)."
Yet, tragically, that voice echoed only within the bounds of the valley, unable to reach places where it was needed most.
Amid this sorrow, my phone buzzed. It was Monika, a Hindu friend from Jammu I'd known for years.
Her words pierced deeper than I expected: 'All you Muslims are terrorists who harbour and feed them.'
Moments later, she blocked me, cutting off all contact. What I thought was an enduring friendship dissolved into silence. It felt like betrayal.
But life has its way of stitching together what pain rips apart. As I wrestled with her words, a call came from Sushanta Bishal, a Hindu from West Bengal I had never met.
" Bhaya, come to London. Stay with us," he urged.
His brother Prashanta lives near IIT Kharagpur, where my son, Mehran, studies.
Over time, Prashanta and his wife, Sunita, had embraced Mehran like their own – inviting him to birthdays, Durga Puja celebrations, and dinners. Their six-year-old daughter, Aavya – affectionately called 'Mother India' – refuses to eat if Mehran doesn't show up at least once a week.
Two winters ago, Prashanta visited our Srinagar home bringing with him two more families we had never seen before. They skipped hotels, choosing instead to sleep on bedding spread across our drawing room – trusting us without hesitation.
Sushanta's call rekindled my shelved dream of visiting London, delayed since December. Encouraged, I booked a roundtrip ticket and informed him of my arrival.
Busy with work, he sent his brother-in-law, Surojit, to receive me at Heathrow. We visited a pilot friend, before taking the tube to Woodford Green, where Sushanta lives with his wife, Moumita, and mother-in-law, Smita.
At the station, Sushanta greeted me with a warm embrace. Moumita bent to touch my feet, a gesture of respect that soothed the ache of Monika's rejection.
Their home became a quiet refuge. But on my second night, news broke of India's military strike in response to the Pahalgam attack. The air grew tense.
Still, Sushanta's family didn't waver. Smita, barely older than me, cared for me with maternal grace, undeterred by my Muslim identity.
Back home, when missiles and drones were flying across the India-Pakistan border, Sushanta drove me around London – from the iconic bridge to the quiet English countryside.
He read my articles and discussed them thoughtfully. Despite political differences, our disagreements only deepened our bond.
Craving familiarity, I reached out to some Muslim friends in London, including a few Pakistanis I'd known since my first visit to the United Kingdom in 1998. But the conflict had hardened even them.
One snapped, 'Don't compare me to Hindus,' after I jokingly said, 'The Hindus here are taking such good care of me – and I haven't even heard from you yet.'
His words echoed Monika's prejudice, revealing how division poisons even the gentlest hearts.
Weeks later, healing found its way back.
Monika, after seeing my photos with Sushanta's family on social media, messaged me with regret: 'I was overwhelmed by disturbing WhatsApp messages and videos portraying Muslims as terrorists. I got caught up momentarily.'
I realised instantly how 'WhatsApp University' – with its barrage of forwarded videos, memes, and half-truths – can poison even soft hearts like Monika's.
In a gesture of reconciliation, she spoke with Sushanta and even invited him to visit Mata Vaishno Devi, the sacred Hindu shrine in Jammu.
Her transformation mirrored my own journey from betrayal to renewed trust.
After a month, Sushanta's family drove me to Heathrow. Moumita touched my feet once more, a quiet promise of enduring connection.
Back in Kashmir, my phone rang. ' Bhaya, when will you visit again?' Sushanta asked, his voice carrying the warmth of Woodford Green.
The tragedy of Baisaran had shaken my faith in humanity, but London's kindness restored it.
In a world shaken by fear and fractured by hate, it was quiet acts of care that endured. In those moments, I found proof that humanity's heart beats stronger than its wounds.
Farooq Shah is a veteran journalist from Kashmir.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Engineered exclusions': RJD moves SC against EC's electoral roll revision in poll-bound Bihar
NEW DELHI: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Manoj Jha on Sunday moved the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, which heads to elections later this year. In his writ petition, Jha contended that the process is 'not only hasty and ill-timed, but has the effect of disenfranchising crores of voters, thereby robbing them of their constitutional right to vote.' Jha's petition claimed that the decision, taken without consultation with political parties, 'is being used to justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities. As such, they are not random patterns but are engineered exclusions.' Jha, a Rajya Sabha member from the RJD, told the court that the short deadlines render the entire process unreasonable and unworkable. The petition challenges the process as a violation of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Lal Babu Hussein v. Electoral Registration Officer, (1995) 3 SCC 100, which held that deletions from electoral rolls must follow a fair and reasonable procedure. 'The impugned order (ECI's) is discriminatory, unreasonable and manifestly arbitrary and violates Articles 14, 21, 325, and 326. The impugned order dated 24-06-2025 is a tool of institutionalised disenfranchisement,' the petitioner stated. Questioning the rationale of initiating such an exercise in a state with a high number of migrant workers and illiterate citizens affected by poverty, Jha argued that conducting the process just months before the assembly elections is both illegal and arbitrary. 'The 11 documents which are specified by the ECI to establish citizenship are not the kind of documents which poor and illiterate persons might possess,' Jha said, urging the court to quash the ECI's SIR order.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
RJD MP Manoj Jha joins force in Supreme Court to challenge special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar
Petitions challenging the decision of the Election Commission of India (ECI) to conduct the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar are mounting with RJD MP Manoj Jha moving the Supreme Court. Mr. Jha termed the SIR process in the State 'ill-timed and hasty'. Also Read | Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra moves Supreme Court against EC's revision of electoral rolls in Bihar He agreed with Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, who has separately challenged the SIR in the apex court, that the SIR process would disenfranchise crores of voters. Mr. Jha said the decision was taken by the poll body without consultation with political parties and would be employed to 'justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities'. Also Read | Questions swirl around poll officers' powers to flag citizenship issues NGO, Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, activist Yogendra Yadav had also approached the apex court against SIR as a violation of the rights to adult suffrage, non-discrimination, dignity and equality of the ordinary and marginalised people of the State. The petition filed by the NGO has sought the quashing of the June 24 communication from the EC declaring the SIR. The plea said the process violated the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. EDITORIAL | Careful curation: On Bihar's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls 'The SIR order, if not set aside, can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country, which are part of the basic structure of the Constitution,' the petition has submitted. The petitioners have variously argued that the SIR shifted the onus of being on the voters' list from the State to the citizens.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Lathi Charge, Case Against 16 After Attempt To Divert Muharram Procession Route In Ujjain
Bhopal: Tensions flared during a Muharram procession in Ujjain's Begumbagh area when a group of men allegedly broke police barricades and attempted to divert the religious procession from its pre-approved route. The incident led to a mild lathi charge by police, injuries to two officers, and legal action against 16 people, including the procession organiser Irfan Khan alias Lalla. According to the police, the incident occurred during the traditional 9th Muharram horse procession. While the route had been decided and mutually agreed upon by the administration and community leaders in meetings held over the past ten days, Mr Khan and his associates allegedly attempted to divert the procession from the designated Khajurwali Masjid-Nikas Chauraha path towards Abdalpura. When stopped, they reportedly broke through police barricades, leading to chaos. "In the past ten days, multiple meetings were held with the Muslim community to finalise the procession route. Everyone signed an agreement. Despite this, the barricades were broken. Two policemen were injured, and mild force was used to disperse the crowd," said Ujjain SP Pradeep Sharma. The police registered a First Information Report (FIR) under sections 191, 192, and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including charges related to obstruction of public servants and disobedience of lawful orders. CCTV footage from the area is being analysed to identify and arrest the other accused. The Seerat Committee - a group formed within Muslim communities dedicated to promoting the understanding of the Seerat (also known as Sirah), which refers to the life, character, and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad - acknowledged the fault. Maqsood Ali, Joint Secretary of the Committee, said, "The police had clearly decided the route during prior meetings, and even a bond was signed. If any changes were required, they should have been communicated in those meetings. Violating the decided path was wrong, and those responsible must face action." The injured policemen are reported to be stable. Meanwhile, the Ujjain police have said they are conducting a thorough review to avoid such confrontations in the future.
