logo
Azalea's next challenge: Private equity investing for the mass affluent

Azalea's next challenge: Private equity investing for the mass affluent

Business Times25-04-2025
[SINGAPORE] Azalea Investment Management, which pioneered the Astrea series of Singapore Exchange-listed private equity (PE) backed bonds, has arguably fulfilled its mission of democratising retail investors' access to PE – or a structure close to it.
Over the past decade, it has raised a total of US$3.6 billion for Astrea bonds, including nearly S$1.3 billion in retail subscriptions. Three of the bond issuances have been fully redeemed.
But now Azalea, a Temasek Group company, has set its sights even broader. Its ambition is to extend direct co-investing in PE portfolios to an even wider audience than accredited or sophisticated investors. It hopes the mass affluent, widely defined as those with between US$100,000 and US$1 million in investable assets, will be allowed to invest.
It is also working on offering open-ended or semi-liquid funds, which typically have regular redemption windows, subject to limits.
Azalea's PE co-investment platform is called Altrium, which has raised a total of about US$2.3 billion in assets from accredited accredited investors and institutions to date. This includes the recent successful first closing for Altrium PE Fund III, which attracted commitments of US$262 million.
Altrium enables investments in the equity of private companies. This offers higher growth potential but at a higher risk. Investors generally have to remain invested over the funds' life. In contrast, Astrea comprises bonds collateralised by portfolios of PE funds. Distributions from the underlying funds are paid out as coupons to bondholders, who receive their principal at maturity. Bondholders do not participate in the underlying companies' growth.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The Monetary Authority of Singapore is currently seeking public feedback on a framework to enable retail investors to access private markets investments. Interest in private markets has intensified as investors seek sources of return uncorrelated with stocks and bonds.
Traditional asset managers, who grapple with fee compression, are also muscling in. Private market fund fees are more lucrative than unit trusts' fees. Apollo and State Street recently listed an exchange-traded fund in the US with an allocation to private assets. Bond giant Pimco is set to launch a European private credit fund.
Azalea itself recently completed a leadership transition. Margaret Lui, who has been chief executive since the firm was set up in 2015, has retired. She remains on the investment committees of existing Altrium funds. Chue En Yaw, who joined in 2018, is now chief executive officer, and retains his role as chief investment officer.
Lui, a Temasek veteran, led the development of the Astrea bond programme, which took pains to mitigate the risk of PE investments for the man in the street. Safeguards typically include the prioritisation of coupon payments for the retail tranche, a reserve account to set aside cash to redeem the bonds, and a liquidity facility to fund expenses.
The firm is confident about the resilience of the PE asset class and the Astrea bonds, despite the market upheaval over US President Donald Trump's tariffs. Chue said: 'We are still in early days, and the situation remains highly fluid. We're monitoring the situation closely and actively engaging our fund managers to assess the potential impact of the latest tariff changes on the underlying portfolio companies.
'While tariffs could impact PE investments and exit activity in the short term, it is worth noting that PE has historically demonstrated resilience across market cycles, including the dotcom crisis, global financial crisis and Covid-19.'
The firm is convinced that PE can help enhance returns for retirement portfolios as well as provide diversification benefits. Lui said: 'I'm very fortunate to have this mandate to do good, and make it work in a commercial sense. The entire team is passionate about financial inclusivity and enabling people to have access to this asset class to invest for their future… The holy grail is to bring equity investing to retail investors. The regulator is quite understanding in that respect; the world is moving towards that.
'We'll still provide Astrea bonds and Altrium PE funds so investors can have the whole array of risk-reward options to give them a chance to build for their future.'
Lui and Chue believe some retail investors are ready to co-invest in PE. Lui said: 'Over the past seven years investors in Astrea have graduated to a level where they're very curious about equity. We want to make sure people understand… After many iterations of Astrea PE bonds, perhaps it's time that investors can, within a certain framework, get access or invest in the equity. I do believe in time they will be allowed to.'
Chue said: 'Our philosophy has been to reach the mass affluent. One of the ways we measure success is to focus on the smaller accounts. We want more people to benefit from PE.'
The firm, he said, has sought to address some of the pain points of investing in PE. One is the 'J curve', where returns in the early years of a fund are poor or negative due to investment costs and the time needed for underlying investments to mature.
To mitigate this, Azalea commits an amount to seed the portfolio, in what is termed a 'warehoused portfolio', which reduces the 'blind pool' risks. The warehoused portfolio allows investors to enter at a later stage and potentially enjoy a markup in value, which reduces the negative effects of the initial years of the J curve.
Altrium funds also comprise a diversified mix of primary and secondary investments. Secondaries refer to existing PE assets put on the market by primary investors. Altrium also has relatively lower minimum commitments and shorter holding periods. Capital calls are made on an annual basis which enables investors to better manage their own capital and cash flows.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia has won war in Ukraine, Hungary's Orban says
Russia has won war in Ukraine, Hungary's Orban says

Straits Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Russia has won war in Ukraine, Hungary's Orban says

FILE PHOTO: Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban looks on at Balvanyos Summer University, on the day he delivers a speech to ethnic Hungarians, in Baile Tusnad, Romania, July 26, 2025. Inquam Photos/Tudor Pana via REUTERS/File Photo BUDAPEST - Russia has won the war in Ukraine, right-wing Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Tuesday ahead of a summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Friday. In power since 2010, Orban has been criticised by some European leaders for his government's ties with Russia and opposition to military aid for Ukraine, while his cabinet is struggling to revive the economy from an inflation shock. Orban, who has maintained close ties with Putin even after Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, became the only European Union leader on Monday not to endorse a joint statement saying Ukraine should have the freedom to decide its future. "We are talking now as if this were an open-ended war situation, but it is not. The Ukrainians have lost the war. Russia has won this war," Orban told the 'Patriot' YouTube channel in an interview. "The only question is when and under what circumstances will the West, who are behind the Ukrainians, admit that this has happened and what will result from all this." Hungary, which gets most of its energy from Russia, has refused to send weapons to Ukraine, with Orban also strongly opposing Ukraine's EU membership, saying it would wreak havoc on Hungarian farmers and the wider economy. Orban said Europe had missed an opportunity to negotiate with Putin under former U.S. President Joe Biden's administration and now was at risk of its future being decided without its involvement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation Singapore MyRepublic customers air concerns over broadband speed after sale to StarHub Singapore Power switchboard failure led to disruption in NEL, Sengkang-Punggol LRT services: SBS Transit Singapore NEL and Sengkang-Punggol LRT resume service after hours-long power fault Business Ninja Van cuts 12% of Singapore workforce after 2 rounds of layoffs in 2024 Singapore Hyflux investigator 'took advantage' of Olivia Lum's inability to recall events: Davinder Singh Singapore Man who stabbed son-in-law to death in Boon Tat Street in 2017 dies of heart attack, says daughter Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court "If you are not at the negotiating table, you are on the menu," Orban said, adding that he partly opposed the EU's joint statement on Ukraine as it made Europe look "ridiculous and pathetic." "When two leaders sit down to negotiate with each other, the Americans and the Russians ... and you're not invited there, you don't rush for the phone, you don't run around, you don't shout in from the outside." REUTERS

What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?
What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Russian traditional nesting dolls, known as Matryoshkas, with images of Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump are placed on a shelf during a demonstration at a gift shop in central Moscow, Russia, August 12, 2025. REUTERS/Yulia Morozova U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump on Wednesday amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. WHAT KIND OF DEAL COULD EMERGE FROM SUMMIT? Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation Singapore MyRepublic customers air concerns over broadband speed after sale to StarHub Singapore Power switchboard failure led to disruption in NEL, Sengkang-Punggol LRT services: SBS Transit Singapore NEL and Sengkang-Punggol LRT resume service after hours-long power fault Business Ninja Van cuts 12% of Singapore workforce after 2 rounds of layoffs in 2024 Singapore Hyflux investigator 'took advantage' of Olivia Lum's inability to recall events: Davinder Singh Singapore Man who stabbed son-in-law to death in Boon Tat Street in 2017 dies of heart attack, says daughter Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Putin. WHAT IF UKRAINE OBJECTS TO ANY TRUMP-PUTIN DEAL? Trump would face strong resistance from Zelenskiy and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Zelenskiy says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy U.S. weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of U.S. intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. HOW MIGHT A DEAL AFFECT TRUMP'S SUPPORT AT HOME? There would be big political risks in the U.S. for Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice in Putin's rape of Ukraine ... I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure", he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. HOW MIGHT UKRAINE'S EUROPEAN ALLIES RESPOND? EU member states said on Tuesday that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form." REUTERS

Companies plan stablecoins under new law, but experts say hurdles remain
Companies plan stablecoins under new law, but experts say hurdles remain

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Companies plan stablecoins under new law, but experts say hurdles remain

(Refiles to fix typo in paragraph 22) Financial companies from Bank of America to Fiserv are preparing to launch their own dollar-backed crypto tokens now that a new U.S. law has established the first-ever rules for stablecoins, but experts warn the path forward could be anything but simple. U.S. President Donald Trump on July 18 signed the GENIUS Act into law, setting federal rules and guidelines for cryptocurrency tokens pegged to the U.S. dollar known as stablecoins. This U.S. law, the first designed to facilitate crypto usage, could pave the way for the digital assets to become an everyday way to make payments and move money, experts said. The use of stablecoins, designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 U.S. dollar peg, has exploded in recent years, notably among crypto traders moving funds to and from other tokens, such as bitcoin and ether. Now, a slate of companies are entertaining their own stablecoin strategies to capitalize on the promise of instant payments and settlement that stablecoins offer. Payments on traditional banking rails can take several days to arrive, or take even longer across international borders. Among the companies considering stablecoins are Walmart and Amazon, the Wall Street Journal reported in June. Walmart and Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment. However, the new law will not immediately open the floodgates, experts said. The newfound opportunity to dabble in stablecoins can lead to numerous tricky considerations for firms, both strategic and technical. Companies have to embark on a lengthy process to deploy their own stablecoins, or decide whether it makes more sense to integrate existing stablecoins, like issuer Circle's USDC, into their business. Companies first have to decide the purpose of their stablecoins. For example, a retail platform could make a stablecoin available to customers to buy goods, which could appeal to crypto-savvy users. Some companies could use them internally for cross-border payments, given that stablecoins can enable near-instant payments, often with lower fees. How a company plans to use a stablecoin could affect whether it creates a stablecoin or works with a partner. "The intended use is going to matter a lot," said Stephen Aschettino, a partner at Steptoe. "Is this something really designed to drive customers to engage with the issuer, or is the issuer's primary motivation to have a stablecoin that is more ubiquitous?" For nonbanks, stablecoins will bring new compliance costs and oversight requirements, given that the GENIUS Act requires issuers to comply with anti-money laundering and "know your customer" (KYC) requirements. "Those that already have robust KYC risk management and regulatory change management programs or working towards implementing these program elements may have a competitive advantage," said Jill DeWitt, senior director of compliance and third-party risk management solutions at Moody's. One group likely to enjoy that advantage is banks, which are no strangers to screening for sanctions-related risks and verifying the identities of their customers. Bank of America and Citigroup are actively considering issuing their own stablecoins, the CEOs of both banks said in earnings calls last month. Others like Morgan Stanley are closely monitoring stablecoin developments. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said the bank will be involved in stablecoins, without giving details. Banks need to weigh several factors before going live with stablecoins, including how holding the tokens might affect liquidity requirements, said Julia Demidova, head of digital currencies product and strategy at FIS. Banks holding assets like stablecoins on their balance sheets might be required to hold more capital under current U.S. bank rules. "The GENIUS Act is great, but if the bank is treating their stablecoin on the balance sheet under prudential banking regulation, you still need to look at the risk weight of the asset," she said. Another crucial question is how to issue stablecoins. Like other cryptocurrencies, stablecoins are created on a blockchain, a digital ledger that records transactions. Hundreds of blockchain networks exist today, two of the most popular being ethereum and solana. Both are considered public or "permissionless" blockchains because all transactions on those networks are available for anyone to see. Still, it is unclear which attribute companies issuing stablecoins would prioritize. Banks, in particular, could opt for their own private, or "permissioned," blockchains instead, Demidova said. "The banks would desire and demand that very clear governance and structure," she said. "In that permissionless environment, you don't have the governance and controls in place." Others like Nassim Eddequiouaq, CEO of Bastion, a provider of infrastructure for companies to issue their own stablecoins, see merits to permissionless blockchains. "We've seen a tremendous amount of interest for existing blockchains that have seen user adoption, that have been battle tested at scale, including during activity spikes," he said. Although the GENIUS Act has been signed into law, its effective date is potentially several years off, with federal banking regulators expected to issue rules in the meantime to fill in certain gaps. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, for instance, is expected to issue rules to outline several risk management and compliance requirements. Under the new U.S. framework, the Treasury Department will have to issue a rule on foreign stablecoin regulatory regimes and their compatibility with the new U.S. framework.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store