Business rescue practitioners tells Parliament task to save struggling Post Office a success
They told Parliament on Wednesday that the South African Post Office has seen the first positive balance sheet with a net asset value of R1 billion - the first since 2012.
But the turnaround has come at a huge cost, with more than 4,000 employees retrenched and hundreds of branches closed, affecting poor and rural communities.
The Post Office was placed under provisional liquidation in February 2023, and a few months later, Anoosh Rooplal and Juanito Damons were appointed as the joint business rescue practitioners.
They told the communications and digital technologies committee that they've reached a point where they can start planning their exit.
Rooplal said the process has yielded a lot of positive results.
"This certainly has been a complex business rescue process; it hasn't been easy, but nonetheless, much progress has been made since our appointment."
He said the entity has also resolved its debt problem, which amounted to billions.
"Effectively, we're handing back an entity, a Post Office… that's virtually debt free."
The rescue team told the committee that the Post Office still needs a cash boost after being denied a R3.8 billion bailout by Treasury in 2024.
ALSO READ: Mashatile says govt not ready to let go of cash-strapped Post Office yet
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
These are the MOST popular fast foods in South Africa
Fast foods in South Africa are a multi-billion-Rand business annually. However, following the introduction of 30% Trump tariffs this month, a major shake-up is on the cards. While this spells trouble for US-based brands, it does represent great strategic opportunities for other fast foods in South Africa. Interestingly, according to a report by Mordor Intelligence, fast foods in South Africa are a R177-billion industry annually. As of May 2025, there were an estimated 5 982 fast-food restaurants in the country. This accounts for nearly 80% of all food services, reports Daily Investor . Instead of sales, the report analysed the most visible and talked-about fast foods in South Africa. These included McDonald's, KFC, Chicken Licken, Nando's, Roman's Pizza, Debonairs, and Steers. Noteworthy is the fact that full-service, sit-down restaurants like Spur, Wimpy and Mugg & Bean were not included. As such, the most popular fast foods in South Africa are McDonald's and KFC, leading online share of search (SoS) rankings with more than 10% each. Interestingly, Data from Standard Bank customers also revealed how South Africans spend their money on fast foods every month. Pizza, burgers or chicken, which is South Africa's most popular? Image: File Research found that your average customer (earning R25 000 per month) spends roughly R775 monthly on fast foods in South Africa. This is over and above groceries and other food shopping. Interestingly, the higher the earnings, the higher the spending. Earners in excess of R50 000 spend R1 000 per month, and spending can peak at R1 300 per month over the holiday period. Moreover, Mordor says negative sentiment towards brands comes from late deliveries, poor service and/or small portion sizes. More than 70% of consumers say taste consistency and credibility was their strongest driver for fast foods in South Africa. The best-selling combo deals don't exceed the R100 mark. And the 80% of fast-food purchases take place on Fridays and Saturdays, in and around paydays and holidays. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town's Dial-a-Ride service faces budget cuts, limiting transport for disabled users
Users have expressed concern over changes to Cape Town's Dial-a-Ride service amid budget constraints. Image: Supplied The City of Cape Town said its Dial-a-Ride service is oversubscribed as they experience capacity challenges, with the R28.2 million annual budget being insufficient for the current R40 million operating costs. This has been met with concern by users. The City announced that effective September 8, the service will exclusively transport eligible wheelchair users and those with severe walking impairments, strictly between work and home. "Over the past two decades, the service has expanded to include commuter trips to educational, medical, recreational facilities, shopping centres, and private home visits and the user base grew to include users with other special needs. "Unfortunately, due to budget constraints, the DaR (Dial-a-Ride) service needs to be realigned with its core mandate: namely to transport eligible wheelchair users and those with severe walking impairments, and to limit these trips between the users' homes and places of work,' the City said. It added that due to a current budget deficit amounting to nearly R1 million a month and the operational costs, which is set to continue to increase, they are unable to sustain the service over the longer term without implementing changes. 'The DaR service is over-subscribed due to the expansion of the service beyond its core mandate and the service is experiencing severe capacity challenges where the demand exceeds the available resources,' they City said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Abram Lintnaar from Atlantis is among the commuters affected by changes to the Dial-a-Ride service. Image: Supplied 'The annual budget for the service is R28.2 million, while the annual operating costs amount to R40 million currently.' They also said as of September 8, the service will transport eligible wheelchair users and those with severe walking impairments during peak periods, from Monday to Friday, with minimal services on Saturdays, Sundays, and public holidays for those who need to go to work 'The City is busy engaging users, user groups, and stakeholders to inform them of the amended eligibility criteria, requirements to qualify, and amended service offering." A year ago, the City announced its decision to discontinue the services to Altantis and the issue was raised with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) by a commuter. Abram Lintnaar, 51, from Atlantis, used the service daily to get to his workplace at the Cape Town Society for the Blind and told the Cape Argus that its changes has added financial strain.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Court ruling lifts R660,000 reserve price on property auction in Durban
Durban High Court has ordered removal of R660,000 reserve price after two failed auction attempts Image: File The Durban High Court has ordered the removal of a R660,000 reserve price for the sale in execution of a property following two failed auction attempts. The court heard that previous sales in execution held in July 2022 and February 2024 had failed to attract bidders, despite attempts to lower or lift the reserve price during the auctions. The property, with an estimated market value of more than R1 million and forced sale value of R1,050,000, remained unsold due to the R660,000 reserve price barrier. The property owners' financial situation had deteriorated significantly since the court ordered that the reserve price be R660,000 nearly four years ago. Their arrears to the Changing Tides 17 (Pty) Ltd had grown to more than R824,270.16, with R375,773.67 representing arrear instalments. Additionally, the couple owed the eThekwini Municipality R412,842.61 as of March 2024. Judge Robin Mossop SC presided over the reconsideration application brought by Changing Tides, which sought to remove the fixed reserve price that had prevented the successful sale of the couple's immovable property. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Changing Tides asked to be permitted to put up the property at a third sale in execution without a reserve price being fixed. In an affidavit, one of the owner's asked the court to dismiss the application with costs, on the basis that it is procedurally redundant, an abuse of process, and improperly motivated. The court said it would not consider the unsigned affidavit. Judge Mossop said the owners did not say what must be done about the reserve price. 'This is perhaps understandable given the fact that (they) are not represented,' he said. Moreover, Judge Mossop emphasized the procedural nature of the reconsideration process under Uniform Rule 46A(9)(c). "It seems to me that this sub-rule is simply a procedural tool to enable the establishment of a way forward where the fixed reserve price of a property declared specially executable has not been achieved," he stated. The judge clarified that the reconsideration was not an adversarial process. "The reconsideration prescribed by rule 46A(9)(c) is a procedural requirement; it is not a process that can be opposed. It is a process in which the court must consider any relevant evidence put before it, but the process is not an adversarial one," Judge Mossop explained. Considering the mounting financial pressures faced by the owners, Judge Mossop stressed the urgency of disposing of the property. He considered the lapse of time since the order of R660,000 and the worsening indebtedness of the couple. 'It appears to me to be imperative that the property be disposed of as quickly as possible," Judge Mossop ruled. No costs order was made in the matter, meaning each party will bear their legal expenses related to the reconsideration application.
