Russia's gas production plummets following Ukraine's transit halt, media reports
The sharp decline is primarily attributed to Ukraine halting Russian gas transit through its territory on Jan. 1 after the expiration of a 2019 transit agreement. The move has severely impacted Gazprom, Russia's state-owned gas giant, whose production fell 13.2% year-on-year to 38.2 bcm in February.
With the loss of Ukrainian transit routes, Kommersant reports that Gazprom now relies almost entirely on the TurkStream pipeline, which has an annual capacity of just under 16 bcm—significantly restricting Russia's ability to export gas to Europe.
Beyond Gazprom, other major Russian energy companies also reported declines in production. Novatek reduced its output by 1.5%, producing 6.4 bcm in February. Lukoil's gas production fell by 13.3% to 1.3 bcm, while Rosneft recorded a 14% drop, bringing its total production to 5.5 bcm. Gazprom Neft also reported a decline of 8.3%, producing 2.2 bcm during the month.
The downturn extended beyond Russia's borders. Kommersant reported that Gazprom Neft's gas production in the NIS (Serbian oil and gas company), Badra (Badra oil field located in eastern Iraq), and Kurdistan (Iraq) fell by 20.5%, while Rosneft's output at Egypt's Zohr field declined by 21.3% compared to the previous year.
The only projects that maintained their 2024 levels were Sakhalin-1 and Sakhalin-2, which produced 0.7 bcm and 1.4 bcm in February, respectively.
Despite the slump, Russian price agencies told Kommersant that gas production in 2025 is expected to remain at 2024 levels as Moscow shifts its focus toward expanding pipeline exports to China and increasing LNG shipments.
Read also: Ukraine's list of energy facilities banned from attacks differs from Russian version, Energy Ministry says
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
What to know about Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula coveted by both Russia and Ukraine
Russia's illegal seizure of the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine in March 2014 was quick and bloodless, and it sent Moscow's relations with the West into a downward spiral unseen since the Cold War. It also paved the way for Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, during which Moscow illegally annexed more land from its neighbor. A look at the diamond-shaped peninsula in the Black Sea, coveted by both Russia and Ukraine for its naval bases and beaches: How did Russia seize Crimea? In 2013-14, a massive popular uprising gripped Ukraine for weeks, eventually forcing pro-Moscow President Victor Yanukovych from office. Amid the turmoil, Russian President Vladimir Putin pounced, sending armed troops without insignia to overrun Crimea. Putin later called a referendum in Crimea to join Russia that Ukraine and the West dismissed as illegal. Russia's relations with the West plummeted to new lows. The United States, the European Union and other countries imposed sanctions on Moscow and its officials. Moscow's illegal annexation of Crimea on March 18, 2014, was recognized only by countries such as North Korea and Sudan. In Russia, it touched off a wave of patriotism, and 'Krym nash!' — 'Crimea is ours!' — became a rallying cry. The move sent Putin's popularity soaring. His approval rating, which had declined to 65% in January 2014, shot to 86% in June, according to the Levada Center, an independent Russian pollster. Putin has called the peninsula 'a sacred place' and has prosecuted those who publicly argue it is part of Ukraine — particularly the Crimean Tatars, who strongly opposed the annexation. What happened after the annexation? After the annexation, fighting broke out in eastern Ukraine between pro-Kremlin militias and Kyiv's forces. Moscow threw its weight behind the insurgents, even though it denied supporting them with troops and weapons. There was abundant evidence to the contrary, including a Dutch court's finding that a Russia-supplied air defense system shot down a Malaysia Airlines passenger jet over eastern Ukraine in July 2014, killing all 298 people aboard. Russian hard-liners later criticized Putin for failing to capture all of Ukraine that year, arguing it was easily possible at a time when the government in Kyiv was in disarray and its military in shambles. The fighting in eastern Ukraine continued, on and off, until February 2022, when Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Why is Crimea important? Crimea's unique location makes it a strategically important asset, and Russia has spent centuries fighting for it. The peninsula was home to Turkic-speaking Tatars when the Russian empire first annexed it in the 18th century. It briefly regained independence two centuries later before being swallowed by the Soviet Union. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea from Russia to Ukraine in 1954, when both were part of the USSR, to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the unification of Moscow and Kyiv. In 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed, the peninsula became part of newly independent Ukraine. Russia kept a foot in the door, however: Its Black Sea Fleet had a base in the city of Sevastopol, and Crimea — as part of Ukraine — continued to host it. By the time Russia annexed it in 2014, it had been within Ukraine for 60 years and was part of the country's identity. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has vowed to retake it and said Russia 'won't be able to steal' the peninsula. For either side, possession of Crimea is key to control over activities in the Black Sea — a critical corridor for the world's grain, among other goods. What role does Crimea play in Russia's war in Ukraine? Ahead of its full-scale invasion, Moscow deployed troops and weapons to Crimea, allowing Russian forces to quickly seize large parts of southern Ukraine early in the war. A top Russian military official later said that securing a land corridor from Russia to Crimea by holding the occupied parts of Ukraine's Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions was among the key goals of what the Kremlin called its 'special military operation' in Ukraine. Before the invasion, Zelenskyy focused on diplomatic efforts to get Crimea back, but after Russian troops poured across the border, Kyiv began publicly contemplating retaking the peninsula by force. The peninsula soon became a battleground, with Ukraine launching drone attacks and bombing it to try to dislodge Moscow's hold on the territory. The attacks targeted the Russian Black Sea Fleet there, as well as ammunition depots, air fields and Putin's prized asset — the Kerch Bridge linking Crimea to Russia, which was struck in October 2022, in July 2023 and in June 2025. How does Crimea factor into peace efforts? Putin listed Ukraine's recognition of Crimea as part of Russia among Moscow's demands for peace in 2024. Those also include Ukraine ceding the four regions illegally annexed by Russia in 2022, dropping its bid to join NATO, keeping the country's nonnuclear status, restricting its military force and protecting the interests of the Russian-speaking population. Kyiv has rejected ceding any territory.


Time Magazine
14 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Tells Zelensky to Forgo Crimea or Joining NATO
President Donald Trump has told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to give up on the idea of Ukraine reclaiming Crimea or joining NATO. 'President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump said via Truth Social on Sunday night, stating there was 'no getting back' Crimea and 'no going into NATO by Ukraine.' Trump, who is now focused on securing a peace deal rather than a cease-fire to end the Russia-Ukraine war (which was triggered when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022), shared the advice ahead of his planned meeting with Zelensky and key European leaders at the White House on Monday. Ukraine's pursuit for NATO membership has long been documented and is a point of contention for Russia. At the annual NATO Summit earlier in June, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, said: 'NATO has no business in Ukraine. Ukraine is not a member of NATO, neither Russia, my job is to keep it as it is.' NATO has maintained its stance on the matter. 'Ukraine is not a NATO member. Ukraine is a NATO partner country, which means that it cooperates closely with NATO but it is not covered by the security guarantee in the Alliance's founding treaty,' the organisation's website reads, specifying that 'NATO condemns in the strongest possible terms Russia's brutal and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine.' Meanwhile, Crimea has been under Russian occupation since 2014, when Moscow-backed forces took control of the territory. Russia initially denied direct involvement in the occupation. Read More: Why Putin Must Be Thrilled With the Result of the Alaska Summit Trump's comments on Sunday night come after he travelled to Alaska on Friday to engage in, what he referred to as, a 'high-stakes' summit with Putin. The summit, which saw the first in-person encounter between Trump and Putin since 2019, was intended to foster discussions about a path toward a potential cease-fire, but it ended earlier than expected and without any deal being reached. Trump and Putin spoke only briefly to reporters afterwards, and neither took any questions. Despite the anti-climatic event, Trump referred to the meeting as 'extremely productive' and has since lashed out at what he calls 'fake news,' insisting he had a 'great meeting' with Putin. Mapping out his reasoning behind inviting Zelensky to a White House meeting, Trump said: 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere cease-fire agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Trump late-night comments on Sunday and his public direction to Zelensky re: his vision for how the war can be ended, fall in line with previous remarks he has made. In an interview with TIME in April, Trump suggested that Crimea (which he has repeatedly referred to as being 'given' by Barack Obama, who was President at the time of Russian annexation of Crimea), would remain under Russian control when asked about a path to peace in Ukraine. 'Will they [Ukraine] be able to get it back? They've had their Russians. They've had their submarines there for long before any period that we're talking about, for many years. The people speak largely Russian in Crimea,' said the U.S. President. In that same interview, Trump also said that he didn't see a future for Ukraine in NATO. 'I don't think they'll ever be able to join NATO. I think that's been—from day one, I think that's been, that's I think what caused the war to start was when they started talking about joining NATO,' he maintained. Elsewhere, Trump has also previously stated that a lasting cease-fire in the Russia-Ukraine war could likely only come through the exchange of territories 'for the betterment of both.' Zelensky and his European allies have staunchly denounced this idea, with Zelensky stating that Ukraine will not 'gift their land to the occupier.' Zelensky, who famously clashed with Trump during a disastrous Oval Office meeting in February, will this time be bolstered by the presence and support of key European leaders as he returns to the White House on Monday. Read More: The Secret White House Backchannel That Paved the Way For Trump's Summit With Putin Among those set to attend are U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Also set to be present in Washington, D.C., for the peace talks are NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission. Furthermore, Zelensky's European allies are firm in their notion that 'pressure' upon Russia can be increased moving forward. 'We do stand ready to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary,' U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said last week. 'It's important we all continue to work alongside Presidents Trump and Zelensky for a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.'


CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
U.S. Ambassador to NATO on Russia-Ukraine deal: We can't let perfect be the enemy of the good
U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss key takeaways from the Trump-Putin Alaska summit on Friday, what to expect from Trump's meeting with Ukrainian president Zelenskyy and European leaders today, whether a deal can be reached between Russia and Ukraine, whether he believes Ukraine should be a part of NATO, and more.