The US-China trade truce doesn't solve the Fed's headache
The agreement between the US and China to roll back their respective tariffs for 90 days has led to renewed optimism that the worst of America's trade wars is over. I'm not seeing the 'breakthrough": There's still plenty of scope for economic damage that the Federal Reserve will struggle to contain.
First, the rollback might not last and doesn't change the broad contours of the story. Tariffs will still be high, fueling inflation and stunting growth. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that the average effective tariff rate will be 17.8%, up from about 2.5% when President Trump started his second term. That's enough to increase the price level and the unemployment rate by about 1.7 and 0.35 percentage points, respectively.
Also Read: Tariff whiplash: The US truce with China offers hollow relief
Second, the 90-day pause merely extends the corrosive uncertainty surrounding the US administration's policies. This will lead businesses to delay purchase, investment and hiring decisions.
Third, the Fed will still face the difficult choice between fighting inflation and supporting economic growth. In the near term, it'll have to be patient, holding interest rates steady and watching inflation expectations—even as this raises the president's ire. As a result, it will probably be slow in responding to weakening in the economy.
The Fed has little choice. When it doesn't know which way the risks skew, it must wait for more information. Right now any major move would have only a 50/50 chance of a positive outcome.
The central bank's predicament is particularly difficult given that inflation has overshot its 2% target since 2021. This makes any attempt to prioritize growth fraught, because it increases the probability that inflation expectations will become unanchored, triggering an upward price spiral that would be hard to contain.
That's an asymmetric risk the Fed can't afford to take. When inflation expectations rose in the 1970s, it took punishingly high interest rates and a deep economic downturn to get them back under control.
Also Read: Will a US-China trade agreement work? Don't count on it
Being patient, though, also entails risks. As the economist Claudia Sahm has noted, weakness in the US labour market can also be self-reinforcing, as layoffs hit spending and engender more layoffs. Historically, the unemployment rate has tended to rise sharply after crossing the threshold of a 0.5 percentage point increase, leading to recession. Last year proved to be an exception, because the rise in unemployment resulted from labor force growth outpacing strong hiring. This time will be different: Hiring will slow, while deportations and a border crackdown have depressed labour force growth.
What, then, will the Fed do? It probably won't get much clarity on inflation, growth and trade policy until September. If at that point it needs to reduce rates, it'll have to move aggressively to arrest the deterioration in the labor market—especially given that the tariff-induced supply shock will undermine the effectiveness of monetary policy.
Also Read: Powell versus Trump: Why Fed independence matters in times of turmoil
If the US enters a recession, I'd expect rate cuts of 200 to 300 basis points.
The Fed shouldn't be faulted here. In contrast to the pandemic, when it was too slow in responding to inflationary pressures (thanks in part to a flawed monetary policy framework), this time around it's grappling with the fallout of trade policies that are beyond its control.
One can only sympathize and hope that clarity about the proper course emerges soon enough that the Fed can keep the economy afloat. ©Bloomberg
The author is a Bloomberg Opinion writer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Boeing's share price tanks over 4% after Air India flight crash in Ahmedabad
US aircraft maker Boeing's share price was down over 4.32 per cent on Thursday to $204.77 apiece at 7:17 pm IST, hours after an Air India operated 787 Dreamliner flying the Ahmedabad to London Gatwick Airport flight crashed within minutes of take off in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Boeing's share price was down nearly 8 per cent in pre-market activity on Thursday. The latest crash compounds the US-based jetmaker's woes as it battles scrutiny into its work practices on account of multiple plane crashes as well as whistleblower complaints in the recent past. To be sure, this is reportedly the first ever Dreamliner crash reported across the world. The flight carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members crashed minutes after take off at 1:30 pm. Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun had stepped down in 2024, making way for Kelly Ortberg, amid calls from airlines and regulators to overhaul the aerospace manufacturing giant which was best with a host of issues related to quality and safety. In January 2024, the door of an Alaska Airlines operated Boeing 737 Max jet flew out 9 minutes into a flight, prompting widespread scrutiny into the jetmaker. Taking accountability for the incident, Calhoun told CNBC in an interview he had decided to step down from the helm, adding ' Let's not avoid the call for action. Let's not avoid the need to slow down a bit and let the supply chain catch up.' Interestingly, Calhoun took the helm at Boeing after the ouster of his predecessor Dennis Muilenburg in 2020. Muilenburg struggled to handle the crisis that cropped up following two 737 Max crashes. Following the Alaska Airlines flight incident, America's Federal Aviation Administration halted Boeing's planned expansion of 737 Max jet production. The FAA refused to entertain any requests for a reversal of this order pending the regulator's satisfaction 'that the quality control issues uncovered during this process are resolved.' The Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash in Ahmedabad is likely to increase the scrutiny on Boeing, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Kristine Liwag. While the best case scenario for Boeing's stock is that the crash may have occurred due to a pilot error, the worst-case scenario could be a system issue, the analyst said, giving a share price target of $200 apiece. RBC Capital analyst Ken Herbert maintained an 'outperform' rating on Boeing's stock with a share price target of $230 apiece. While the implications of the Air India flight crash are yet to be known, they are likely to overshadow Boeing's prospects ahead of the Paris air show. Under current CEO Ortberg, Boeing has embarked on a cost-cutting drive. However, he would not hesitate to add personnel at its defense and commercial aircraft unit, Ortberg said during Boeing's annual general meeting in April. Boeing was engulfed in a controversy brought by a former employee turned whistleblower John Barnett, who was found dead in 2024. The former quality manager at Boeing's North Charleston plant, which built the 787 Dreamliner, retired in 2017 citing health grounds. He alleged later that the workers at the facility were under pressure to fit sub-standard parts to the jets on the production line, the BBC reported. This was done to prevent production delays, he said. He flagged problems with the jet's oxygen systems indicating that one in four breathing masks may fail during an emergency. Since then, several whistleblower's have come forward to flag safety concerns on Boeing jets. In a June 2024 US Senate hearing, Senator's said Boeing under Calhoun faced a 'moment of reckoning' besides being accused of strip mining the company. 'You're cutting corners, you're eliminating safety procedures, you're sticking it to your employees,' Republican senator Josh Hawley said to Calhoun during the hearing.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Boeing shares drop 5% after Air India flight crashes in Ahmedabad
Synopsis Boeing shares tumbled 5.0 percent in early trading Thursday after a London-bound Boeing 787 operated by Air India crashed in western India, likely killing all 242 people on board. boeinglondonair indiaunited statesfatal crashes Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains The rise of Crypto Futures in India: Leverage, tax efficiency, and market maturity, Avinash Shekhar of Pi42 explains NEXT STORY
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The six best films about financial turmoil
Finance is not an obvious subject for dramatists. Interest rates, term sheets, mark-to-market accounting: these are phrases to make the average viewer's eyes glaze over. But when markets plunge—dragging down Main Street along with Wall Street—screenwriters' interest surges. Perhaps viewers can expect some terrific films about the tariff-induced chaos in years to come. Until then, here are the best films made about financial turmoil. The financial crisis of 2007-09 was decidedly serious, but this film—about a group of outsiders and hustlers who bet on the housing bubble bursting, and hence foresaw the crisis—is very funny. (It is adapted from a book of the same name by Michael Lewis.) Various celebrities make cameos to explain financial concepts directly to viewers, while Steve Carell, Christian Bale (pictured below) and a frighteningly tanned and venal Ryan Gosling play three of the men who profit from the crisis. This film is morally complex and gripping; it informs and outrages. This documentary is about financiers who ended up in prison because they thought they were cleverer than everyone else. Greedy and hubristic, Enron's executives used dodgy accounting and aggressive PR tactics to make their energy-trading firm seem more profitable than it was. Investors lost billions and the top executives were convicted of fraud, though the boss, Kenneth Lay, died shortly before his sentencing. Based on an equally enjoyable book by Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind. The Joad family, kicked off their land in Oklahoma during the Great Depression, head west to California to make a better life. The story could easily have been leaden, but Henry Fonda's spiky lead performance as Tom Joad, and the extraordinary cinematography of Gregg Toland (who also filmed 'Citizen Kane'), make it a work of art. John Steinbeck's novel is an American masterpiece; this film is better. A young analyst at an investment bank finds out that the firm is overexposed to risky mortgage-backed securities. This film (pictured below), set in 2008, focuses on the next 24 hours, as the firm sells everything and panic spreads across Wall Street. The ensemble cast is terrific, in particular Paul Bettany as a shark with a well-hidden heart of gold. But watch it for its portrayal of the rituals and culture of high finance: how people dress and defer to superiors, what they talk about outside the office and how they cut each other's throats. Another film about the crisis of 2007-09, this time about the headliners. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Hank Paulson, America's treasury secretary (William Hurt), Ben Bernanke, the chair of the Federal Reserve (Paul Giamatti), and the leaders of the biggest banks gather. They negotiate the Troubled Asset Relief Programme, the government's purchase of bad assets from banks to unfreeze credit. The script is instructive—characters explain things to each other for the viewer's benefit—so you'll finish the film having learned something as well as having been entertained. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Jordan Belfort, a smooth-talking huckster who, in real life, made millions in penny-stock scams before going to prison. Martin Scorsese may have intended to make a morality tale about the dangers of filthy lucre, but Belfort and his buddies are clearly having more fun than the honest lawmen who eventually do them in. Jonah Hill offers a grotesque supporting performance aided by a gargantuan set of false teeth.
