logo
Police Scotland's warning to people viewing illegal sexual images of children

Police Scotland's warning to people viewing illegal sexual images of children

The warning comes as Police Scotland's Online Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation unit reveals that from April 2024 to July 2025, it has carried out 863 investigations, resulting in 604 arrests, with steps taken to protect 815 children.
Ahead of new laws coming in to force from Friday, 25 July, aimed at keeping children safe online, the service is re-launching its Get Help or Get Caught online child sexual abuse prevention campaign.
The Online Safety Act's new measures mean that tech companies must take proactive steps to protect children from illegal content and activity, including:
Child sexual abuse
Controlling or coercive behaviour
Extreme pornography
Intimate image abuse
Detective Superintendent Nicola McGovern said: 'Children are increasingly using games, apps, sites and streaming services and living more of their lives online.
'That means it's never been easier for strangers to connect with children and on some platforms, it can take just 30 seconds for a predatory adult to contact a child.
'Online child sexual abuse and exploitation through technology is an increasing problem in Scotland and officers from our National Child Abuse Investigation Unit work tirelessly to prevent children becoming victims and we will use all means at our disposal to search for and identify offenders.
'Any measures that protect children online should be welcomed and our deterrence campaign work with partners gives us the chance to prevent abuse before it happens, by diverting potential perpetrators from committing offences.'
The Get Help or Get Caught campaign is in partnership with the Lucy Faithfull Foundation Scotland's Stop It Now service, which offers anonymous advice and support to prevent offending.
The child protection charity has worked with Police Scotland since 2018 to deliver a series of campaigns aimed at those who present the greatest risk of harm to children.
Stuart Allardyce, Director Lucy Faithfull Foundation Scotland said: 'The reasons for viewing sexual images of children or engaging in online grooming are complex, and many people recognise that what they are doing is wrong. Often, they feel trapped in a cycle of compulsive behaviour.
'Seeking individualised, anonymous, and non-judgmental support is absolutely the right step to take.
'We work with hundreds of people who are worried about their sexual thoughts or behaviour online or who have been arrested for offences involving children.
'We can help you stop and move on from offending or potential criminal behaviour, helping to protect and keep children safe.'
The Get Help or Get Caught campaign will be promoted on social media channels from Wednesday, 23 July, for six weeks.
Anonymous and confidential support is available on the Lucy Faithfull Foundation Scotland website.
Like this:
Like
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man's body found in Scots cemetery as cops probe ‘unexplained' death
Man's body found in Scots cemetery as cops probe ‘unexplained' death

Scottish Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Man's body found in Scots cemetery as cops probe ‘unexplained' death

The area around the graveyard was closed off as a probe was launched. TRAGIC FIND Man's body found in Scots cemetery as cops probe 'unexplained' death Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAN has been found dead inside a cemetery in a Scots town. The tragic discovery was made earlier today around 4.10pm. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 A man's body was found in Greenock Cemetery Credit: Google Maps A man's body was discovered inside Greenock Cemetery. Cops were called to the scene in the Inverclyde town. Police probing the death say the tragedy is currently being treated as "unexplained". The area around the graveyard was closed off as a probe was launched. A scene inside Greenock Cemetery has also been closed off as the investigation continues. Cops are still standing guard over the area. All entrances to the graveyard have been closed A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Around 4.10pm on Friday, August 1, 2025, the body of a man was found in a cemetery in Greenock. 'The death is being treated as unexplained. "Enquiries are ongoing.' Moment teens hunt boy, 15, before knifing him to death to 'teach him a lesson'

Cops lock down cemetery in Scots town after body found
Cops lock down cemetery in Scots town after body found

Daily Record

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Cops lock down cemetery in Scots town after body found

Police say the death is being treated as 'unexplained' at the moment. Cops have locked down a cemetery in a Scots town after a body was found. ‌ Emergency crews were alerted to the discovery this afternoon, Friday, August 1, at around 4:10pm. ‌ Police are treating the death as 'unexplained' and said their enquiries are ongoing into the incident. ‌ Locals reported that officers have blocked all the entry points to the cemetery as they investigate the death. An area within the cemetery is said to have been taped off and a heavy police presence remains in the area tonight. Speaking to STV, a Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Around 4.10pm on Friday, August 1, 2025, the body of a man was found in a cemetery in Greenock. 'The death is being treated as unexplained and enquiries are ongoing.'

Online Safety Act threatens free speech, says Elon Musk's X
Online Safety Act threatens free speech, says Elon Musk's X

Times

time10 hours ago

  • Times

Online Safety Act threatens free speech, says Elon Musk's X

Elon Musk's X platform has claimed the Online Safety Act, the 'heavy-handed' regulator Ofcom, and a planned police monitoring unit are harming free speech in the UK. The company published a post on X titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach' criticising what it saw was a triple-pronged attack on free expression. The post said the 'act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer.' Ofcom was taking an 'aggressive approach' to enforcement, X said, at the same time as publishing plans to force companies to take down hate speech proactively, which it called a 'double compliance' burden. A national police unit proposed by the Home Office to monitor social media for signs of unrest 'has set off alarm bells for free speech advocates who characterise it as excessive and potentially restrictive', the company claimed. A political row has broken out over the act, which introduced measures to protect children last week. A video of a speech in parliament by the shadow Home Office minister, Katie Lam, about sexual crimes committed by grooming gangs was restricted on X after being flagged as 'harmful content'. Nigel Farage and his Reform UK party have painted it as 'dystopian' legislation and vowed to repeal the laws. Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, said that Farage was siding with predators like Jimmy Savile. Kyle and Ofcom have also come under pressure from US Republicans this week, who have been in the UK to express their concerns about the act's impact on free speech. Jim Jordan, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has called the act 'the UK online censorship law'. He also published communications from the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology to social media platforms during the Southport riots last year that expressed concerns about the use of the expression 'two-tier policing'. X said that the act 'is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression' and parliament 'made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of online safety'. It claimed the act's measures 'prevent adults from encountering illegal content and steps to ensure age verification that limit adults' anonymity online'. Ofcom denies this. In the wake of the Southport riots, Ofcom proposed measures that would require social media platforms to remove hate speech from feeds. Platforms that are at high or medium risk of carrying hate speech would take it out of algorithmic feeds if it is potentially illegal. X called this a 'double compliance' burden on top of the act. Ofcom admitted the proposal 'has the potential to interfere with users' rights to freedom of expression and association.' Diana Johnson, the Home Office minister, last week proposed a national police unit that would monitor social media for signs of anti-migrant disorder. PATRICK PLEUL/REUTERS X said: 'While positioned as a safety measure, it clearly goes far beyond that intent.' The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. While the X post was not attributed to Musk, he retweeted an answer from his Grok chatbot that said: 'Evidence shows Labour has suppressed aspects of free speech via the Online Safety Act's content monitoring.' Ofcom said: 'The new rules require tech firms to tackle criminal content and prevent children from seeing defined types of material that's harmful to them. There is no requirement on them to restrict legal content for adult users. In fact, they must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping people safe.' Imran Ahmed, the CEO and founder of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, said: 'The Online Safety Act is a necessary step toward protecting our children in the digital world. Years of work have gone into crafting a law that addresses the real dangers kids face in online spaces, including exploitation, suicide promotion and self-harm. Those who propose to scrap this vital law must explain why they think these heinous online activities are tolerable.' A government spokesman said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store