logo
Should I vaccinate my child against COVID-19 this winter? Here's the current advice for parents

Should I vaccinate my child against COVID-19 this winter? Here's the current advice for parents

As winter approaches and respiratory viruses spike, changing advice on childhood vaccines and knowing when to get each one can be confusing.
This week, the US announced it will no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for children and healthy pregnant women, with Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr calling it a "commonsense" decision grounded in sound science.
The change follows last week's announcement by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials that they would limit approval of COVID-19 shots, a critical tool in ending the pandemic, to adults aged 65 and older, as well as younger individuals with underlying health conditions.
It comes as experts are urging people to get their COVID booster jab as a new, more infectious variant emerges in Australia.
So what do the Australian government and medical experts recommend for children?
Here's your questions answered by ATAGI advice and experts.
In Australia, the COVID-19 vaccine is not recommended for healthy infants, children, or adolescents who do not have medical conditions that increase their risk of severe illness.
However, children under 5 years who are immunocompromised are eligible for the vaccination.
Children aged 5-17 are also eligible and it is recommended for all Australians aged over 18.
The Immunisation handbook says this is because during the pandemic the risk of severe illness was extremely low in this cohort.
"The rationale for the ATAGI recommendation is looking at the risk benefit analysis of preventing severe disease because that's what the COVID vaccine benefit analysis is decided on," Dr Kristy Short, a virologist at the University of Queensland says.
"Children are unlikely to get severe COVID-19 and so the bar for having a vaccine in children is much higher than it is say in adults or the elderly who are at higher risk of severe disease."
Dr Short says the advice around paediatric vaccination can be confusing.
"It does become really complicated and I as a parent get that it is confusing advice and it's partly because the situation with children is not as black and white as it is in adults," she said.
"When we talk about the elderly we know absolutely there is a high risk of disease, their immune response is impaired.
"In children it is not as black and white."
Dr Norman Swan says it is important to follow advice from ATAGI and discuss it with your GP.
"High priority areas are pregnant women who need to have flu vaccines, RSV and really seriously consider COVID as well," he says.
"Because COVID affects pregnant women more than otherwise healthy people and it can cause miscarriage and high blood pressure in pregnancy so they need ot talk about this with their doctor."
He says risks of COVID-19 in children are low.
"The main thing with kids is there is still a chance of long COVID in children which is reduced by immunisation and that's something to talk over with your GP."
Dr Short agrees.
"ATAGI made its initial recommendations on COVID vaccinations back in 2021 and we've now become aware of long COVID and the issue of long COVID and that doesn't factor into the risk benefit analysis that ATAGI has done," she says.
"On top of that, long COVID in children is still poorly understood.
"So this is a very long winded way of saying that the change in the US guidelines for paediatric vaccinations is probably not too shocking and it is in line with Australia's evaluation."
What does concern Dr Short however, is the changing US advice to pregnant women.
"What is really shocking is that they're no longer recommending COVID vaccination for pregnant women," she says.
"This is in contrast with scientific evidence.
"We know COVID-19 has implications for the fetus and where it becomes particular concerning is those early six months of the child's life when they are relying on maternal immunity.
"There is no question in my mind that it should be available to pregnant women."
ATAGI says pregnant women who have previously been vaccinated are not routinely recommended to have a further dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
However, they can consider a further dose of COVID-19 vaccine based on presence of underlying risk conditions and/or personal preference.
The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) recommends a COVID-19 vaccination for children aged 6 months to less than 5 years with severe immunocompromised, disability, complex/multiple health conditions which increase the risk of severe COVID-19.
This includes children with the following conditions:
Dr Norman Swan says you can receive the COVID-19 vaccine at the same time as the flu vaccine.
"The easy thing to do is if you're getting your child a flu vaccine you could get them that too if they're in the group recommended by ATAGI."
Both are available at GP clinics and pharmacies.
Children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years old that are severe immunocompromised are eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine every 12 months, according to the latest advice by ATAGI.
However, it is not recommended.
Dr Swan says patients who are eligible for the vaccine should base it off when they last were vaccinated, not when they last were infected with COVID-19.
The Australian Immunisation Handbook COVID-19 chapter has further details, including recommendations for people who have never received a COVID-19 vaccine.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds
Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Bigger properties occupied by smaller households in major housing mismatch, Cotality finds

In a reminder of how broken housing affordability and access is, new analysis highlights a major mismatch between the size of Australian homes and the number of people living in them. While the vast bulk of Australian housing is built for larger families, property research firm Cotality has found more than 60 per cent of households are made up of just one or two people. It reveals a misalignment between "who lives in our homes and the kinds of homes we're building", Cotality's head of head of Australian research Eliza Owen said in the report. "Of the lone-person households in Australia, the data suggests around 40 per cent are aged 65 and over," Ms Owen said. "The highest share of households is two people, but the highest share of housing has three bedrooms. "While there's nothing wrong with more bedrooms than people in a dwelling, there could be some inefficiencies in the way housing is being allocated," Ms Owen said. "After all, a 'traditional' family of four may have more need for a three-bedroom dwelling than a household of two people." The report cited data from the 2021 Census, which showed there were more two-person family households in three-bedroom dwellings (about 1.3 million), than three or four-person family households (about 1.1 million). Ms Owen has suggested a way to fix the "efficiency question", which she knows is not politically appealing — send a price signal. "Governments could make it more expensive to have more housing than you need, and cheaper to live in smaller housing," she wrote in her research note. She said that logic often leads to calls for tax reform including abolishing stamp duty to cheaper to move between housing, replacing it with a broad-based land tax (which raises costs the more land you own). "These options are both politically difficult as it would involve moving from a tax that applies to a small amount of voters each year who purchase property to one that will tax two thirds of voters (property owners)," she noted. Independent housing researcher Cameron Kusher, speaking to The Business in July, argued high transaction costs, namely stamp duty, discourage moving to a "better sized property" and can lead to people purchasing larger homes than they need to begin with. "People just feel like if I can get a better and bigger home sooner, that's a better outcome," he said. "If we look at what is being built, it's usually very large houses, four or five bedrooms, taking up most of the land on these new housing sites," Mr Kusher said. "A lot of it comes down to how much a piece of a property, [and] how much the land and the house, costs. "I think a lot of people are building bigger homes, thinking 'I'll spend a little bit more up-front and my family will grow into this home'. "It might just be a couple grandkids, or they're planning to have a couple of kids." He noted the effects of rapidly increasing property prices, which can leave people priced out of re-entering the market, and the fact that larger properties can be more likely to appreciate in value at a faster pace. Cotality's Ms Owen said other policy options to encourage people to move into appropriately sized homes could include reforming pension asset tests to include the value of the family home. "Strides are already being taken on the supply side to establish well-located apartments in our larger cities, that can accommodate smaller households. "But shifting demand through tax reform could help the take-up of these new homes." The government has accepted it is not on track to meet the target to build 1.2 million homes in five years, but Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the ambition, despite Treasury advice it would not be met. In another recent note, Ms Owen questioned the focus of state and federal governments on speeding up building approvals to boost housing supply, warning that the construction industry simply cannot keep pace. "With completion times already above average and construction costs elevated, it seems an odd time to be incentivising more dwelling approvals and commencements," she said. Cameron Kusher argued past experience could be a guide on how to approach today's housing problems and ease the construction crunch. "Maybe we need to go back to how things were 30 or 40 years ago, where you have smaller homes and you make them easy to renovate," he told The Business. "Over time, people can actually add bedrooms, bathrooms, car parks, verandahs and all these sorts of things to add value to the home.

John Menadue critiques Australia's media and our relationship with the United States
John Menadue critiques Australia's media and our relationship with the United States

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

John Menadue critiques Australia's media and our relationship with the United States

John Menadue has been at the heart of Australian public life for over fifty years, working for the Whitlam, Fraser and Hawke governments. He oversaw the effective end to Australia's White Australia Policy, was CEO of Qantas and set up the Centre for Policy Development. In the media he ran The Australian for Rupert Murdoch, launched the online weekly New Matilda and founded the influential public policy platform, Pearls and Irritations. Now aged ninety, John reflects on Australia's media, in particular its coverage of the war in Gaza, our attitudes to race relations, AUKUS, our relationship with the United States and how Australia is navigating its place in the world during a global power shift. Guest: John Menadue, Founder and Editor in Chief of Pearls and Irritations John Menadue, Founder and Editor in Chief of Pearls and Irritations Producer: Catherine Zengerer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store