
Shocking revelation about Army Green Beret who exploded Cybertruck outside Vegas Trump hotel
The Army Green Beret behind the Cybertruck explosion outside Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas was under the influence of marijuana and alcohol at the time of the attack, a toxicology report confirmed.
Matthew Livelsberger, 37, an active-duty Special Operations soldier, detonated fireworks and other explosive materials from inside the rented vehicle while parked outside the Trump-owned building on January 1.
According to official documents, Livelsberger died from a single gunshot wound to the head, with the coroner's office ruling his death a suicide in May.
However, recently released toxicology reports revealed the presence of alcohol and THC, the psychoactive component of marijuana, in his bloodstream at the time of death, according to documents the 8 News Now Investigators obtained.
Livelsberger also had benzene detected in his stomach fluid, though officials noted this may have resulted from the fire and explosion - benzene is a chemical commonly found in gasoline and paint removers, according to the coroner's office.
The Army confirmed that Livelsberger was stationed in Germany at the time of his death, KDVR reported.
His wife told investigators he returned to his Colorado home on December 21, 2024, with plans to resume his assignment in Germany in early January.
While in Colorado, Livelsberger intended to meet with a Navy SEAL who was selling him drones, according to documents. However, after an argument with his wife, he canceled the trip, 8 News Now reported.
On December 29, Livelsberger left his home after sending a 'Goodbye' email to his wife, which included the message, 'things like their daughter will find another daddy,' according to documents.
Surveillance footage first showed the rented Cybertruck in Las Vegas on New Year's Day around 7.30 am.
It was later recorded driving through the hotel's valet area before leaving the scene.
The vehicle was tracked along the Las Vegas Strip, stopping briefly in a business parking lot at Flamingo Road and Las Vegas Boulevard, then returning to the hotel at about 8.40 am - just seconds before the explosion.
FBI and ATF officials reported that the explosion likely occurred at the same time as Livelsberger's fatal gunshot.
In their search of the remains of the charred car, investigators found a handgun and rifle burned on the truck's floorboard, according to documents.
Following this, Las Vegas Metro police shared some of Livelsberger's writings, also recovered after the blast, describing them as containing a mix of 'grievances and issues, some political, some personal.'
In January, police released excerpts from Livelsberger's letters, including calls to 'wake up' against weak leadership and to 'rally' behind Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
Despite this, the FBI found no clear motive for targeting the Trump hotel or using a Tesla Cybertruck.
Documents show Livelsberger had post-traumatic stress disorder and was on fluoxetine (Prozac) at his death.
His military service included deployments to Georgia in 2021 and five tours in Afghanistan.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
R Kelly rushed to hospital after prison 'overdose' plot, his lawyers say
R Kelly was hospitalised after prison officials gave him an overdose of medication, his lawyers have claimed – as part of what they say is an ongoing assassination plot. Kelly, whose full name is Robert Sylvester Kelly, is currently serving time at the Federal Correctional Institute in Butner, North Carolina, after being convicted of sex trafficking and racketeering in 2021. A year later, he was found guilty on three charges of producing child sexual abuse images and three charges of enticement of minors for sex. The 58-year-old was taken to hospital on Friday after prison staff "administered an overdose of his medication", according to a court document filed by his lawyer. The document, filed on Tuesday, reads: "Mr. Kelly's life is in danger, and that danger is coming from Bureau of Prisons officials and their actions. "Mr. Kelly needs this Court's intervention. His life actually depends on it." Nicole Blank Becker, one of Kelly's lawyers, said he is in solitary confinement and that she spoke with him on Monday. "What is happening right now with him is insane," she said. "I hope that this really results in someone, somewhere, somehow getting ahold of him today and getting him back in the hospital." A spokesperson for the Bureau of Prisons said in a statement that "for privacy, safety, and security reasons, we do not discuss the conditions of confinement for any incarcerated individual, including medical and health-related issues". "Additionally, the Bureau of Prisons does not comment on pending litigation or matters that are the subject of legal proceedings," they added. The allegation is the latest in a line of similar claims from the singer's legal team, who last week filed a motion accusing the Bureau of Prisons of instructing another inmate to kill Kelly. A motion filed by Kelly's legal team claimed Mikeal Glenn Stine, who is alleged to be a member of the Aryan Brotherhood gang and has a terminal cancer diagnosis, was given a chance to "to live out the last of those months as a free man" in exchange for killing the singer. The next day, his legal team filed additional material saying he had been moved to solitary confinement and denied access to his lawyer. Prosecutors rejected the claims as "repugnant". Their written response said: "Kelly has never taken responsibility for his years of sexually abusing children, and he probably never will. "Undeterred, Kelly now asks this Court to release him from incarceration indefinitely under the guise of a fanciful conspiracy."


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
PEN America ‘gravely concerned' by deportation of Australian writer critical of Trump administration
A major writers' advocacy group has condemned the detention and deportation of an Australian writer from the US as 'gravely concerning', while the US administration rejected the suggestion he was targeted because of his political beliefs as 'unequivocally false'. Alistair Kitchen, a former Columbia University postgraduate student, was last week detained at Los Angeles airport before being deported back to Melbourne. He said he was 'explicitly' told by US border officials he had been held because of his writing on pro-Palestinian campus protests. A spokesperson for the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said this week Kitchen was denied entry because he gave false information about drug use on his Electronic System for Travel Authorization (Esta), which allows eligible visitors to make a short trip to the US without a visa. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'Using the Esta is a privilege, not a right, and only those who respect our laws and follow the proper procedures will be welcomed,' the spokesperson said. Kitchen had ticked 'no' on his Esta application to a question asking travellers if they have ever consumed drugs, but later told border officials he had previously bought marijuana in New York state, where it is legal, and had consumed drugs in other countries. The 33-year-old believes he was 'clearly targeted for politically motivated reasons' and said officials spent more than 30 minutes questioning him about his views on Israel and Palestine including his 'thoughts on Hamas'. PEN America, a non-profit which raises awareness for the protection of free expression in the US, said that writers, artists and scholars must be free to express their views openly without compromising their free movement across borders. 'It is gravely concerning to read an account of someone being detained and turned away at the border due to their writings on student protests, Palestine, and the Trump administration,' the organisation said in a statement. 'Kitchen's account fits a disturbing pattern, in which border agents appear to be screening visitors to the U.S. for their viewpoints. That is anti-democratic, and it must be halted,' PEN America said. This year, Kitchen published a piece on his blog, Kitchen Counter, on the Department of Homeland Security's detention of Mahmoud Khalil, the lead negotiator of the Columbia Gaza Solidarity Encampment. In the article, Kitchen said Khalil had been arrested 'on utterly specious grounds by a neo-fascist state' with the goal of 'the deportation of dissent'. He referred to the Trump administration's executive order of 30 January in which the government promised to go on the 'offense to enforce law and order' and 'cancel the student visas of all Hamas sympathizers on college campuses'. When asked by reporters about Kitchen's case on Monday, Richard Marles, the acting prime minister, would not speculate as to what took place at the US border, but said that 'we have freedom of speech in this country and that's a very important part of our nation'. A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson confirmed that consular assistance had been provided to an Australian who was refused entry into the US. The universal human right of free speech is protected in the US by the first amendment and covers both US citizens and non-citizens. Western Sydney University professor of law Chris Michaelsen suggested there was 'a grey zone' at the US border – and that the Trump administration was 'pushing the boundaries until there's resistance'. Michaelsen said that under the first amendment, there is no legal basis on which border officials can deny an individual entry to the US because of what they have said or written. But what someone has said or written could prompt immigration officials to hold an individual while investigating their background. 'What's happening is that once you say something critical, you appear on somebody's radar,' Michaelsen said. 'It's used as a pretext to basically invoke the real powers that they have.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion He said arriving visitors were particularly vulnerable because they do not have standby access to a lawyer – and any later legal challenge would be both lengthy and expensive. It was not clear that there was a systematic attempt by the US administration to profile people's speech – but even a few cases of people with dissenting views being deported could have a 'chilling effect' on public speech, he said. The director of the University of New South Wales' Australian Human Rights Institute, Prof Justine Nolan, said the right to free speech seemed to be interpreted differently for US citizens and non-citizens. 'It is somewhat of a 'moving feast' in terms of its application at the moment with priority apparently being given to 'national security' caveats as a means of not only restricting free speech but also intersecting with immigration policies,' she said. The effect is that some visitors are taking precautions before entering the US – if they are choosing to travel there at all. Guardian Australia has spoken with an Australian journalist based in the US who spoke on the condition of anonymity. He said when he was visiting Australia recently his company told him to post his smartphone to his home in the US rather than risk taking it through US immigration control. The company also advised him to carry a temporary 'burner' phone with him when he returned to the US, he said. He chose not to heed the advice and re-entered the US without issue. Anthony Loewenstein, an Australian author, journalist and film-maker who is critical of the Israeli government, said he knows of several people, including authors, who have sought legal advice before travelling to the US for work. Some have chosen to give lectures and attend book tours by Zoom rather than in person while others have taken burner phones to the US. Some have removed their social media accounts from their phones before flying – but, he said, 'you can't stop immigration officials Googling you'. The result, he said, may be a 'kind of intellectual impoverishment within the US' as scientists, writers, academics and thinkers from around the world avoid travelling to the country. 'The American government seemingly doesn't want a plurality of views,' he said. 'I think the result will be that America and American intellectual life will become poorer.' Dfat's Smartraveller website states US officials may ask to inspect travellers' electronic devices, emails, text messages or social media accounts – and if a traveller refuses, officials can deny entry.


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Truck with Army tank kills DC pedestrian after Army's 250th birthday parade
The June 16 accident occurred on New York Avenue while a contract truck driver was hauling the tank from the West Potomac Park staging area to a railyard in Jessup, Maryland, according to an internal Army document obtained by USA TODAY. The truck was part of a larger convoy of vehicles. The woman, whose name was not included in the document, was alone and not wearing clothing at the time of her death. An initial investigation by DC's Metropolitan Police Department cleared the truck's driver of criminal intent or negligence, the document said. No military personnel were involved in the accident. The Army declined to respond to a query from USA TODAY and referred questions to the DC Metropolitan Police Department, who did not immediately respond to an inquiry. As many as 120 military vehicles participated in the parade, which also featured around 6,000 soldiers in uniforms representing different eras of conflict. The M1 Abrams tanks that took part traveled via rail from Fort Hood (formerly Fort Cavazos), Texas.