Hamas exploits humanitarian aid
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is not simply a byproduct of war. It is, in many ways, a strategy. Hamas deliberately engineers civilian suffering to preserve its rule, gain international sympathy, and pressure Israel diplomatically. The UN, by continuing to operate through Hamas-controlled channels, not only fails to stop this abuse -- it legitimises it.
Instead of being freely distributed, large portions of aid, mostly funded by Western nations, are diverted by Hamas. The group seizes shipments, hoards essential supplies, and resells them at inflated prices to desperate civilians. The profits fund Hamas' terrorist infrastructure, including salaries for fighters and weapons used not only against Israel but also to suppress dissent within Gaza.
There is credible evidence, including reports from within Gaza, of Hamas enforcing its control through brutal means, beating or shooting civilians who try to access food or medical supplies outside the terror group's channels. Meanwhile, the UN continues to rely on the same compromised delivery networks.
On Sunday, Israel implemented a humanitarian pause in designated civilian areas and corridors to ensure safe aid delivery. In the preceding weeks, hundreds of aid trucks were allowed into Gaza, positioned in coordination with the UN for collection and distribution. Yet many of these trucks remain idle, their contents untouched. The UN must act without further delay or excuse. Food is rotting. Medicine is expiring. People are waiting.
Israel categorically rejects the "starvation" propaganda promoted by Hamas. No policy of starvation exists. The humanitarian pauses and aid corridors are part of Israel's own initiative, not the result of international pressure, but a decision made to prevent Hamas from turning humanitarian issues into political weapons.
At the same time, while Israel opens humanitarian channels, Hamas continues to block or attack them. On July 23, Hamas fired a rocket at an aid distribution centre in southern Gaza. Civilians seeking help through independent aid groups like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have been met with violence. In just two months, the GHF, operating with Israeli facilitation, has delivered over 90 million meals directly to civilians, bypassing Hamas' grip. Unsurprisingly, this initiative has been met with hostility from the terror group.
Unfortunately, the UN ignores alternative distribution models like GHF and insists on working through existing Hamas-influenced systems. The result? Continued shortages, misused resources, and a population caught between terror and neglect.
Hamas applies the same manipulative tactics in ceasefire negotiations and hostage talks. It prolongs the conflict while blaming Israel for the consequences, holding both Gazan and Israeli hostages hostage to its political goals.
Let us be clear: the suffering in Gaza today is not just a humanitarian tragedy -- it is a manufactured crisis. Hamas wants civilians to suffer. It is a deliberate strategy to maintain power and erode Israel's legitimacy on the world stage.
This is not just Israel's problem. It is a moral test for the international community.
As long as the UN continues to enable Hamas' exploitation of aid, it becomes an accomplice in prolonging conflict and human suffering.
It is time to break this cycle. The international community must hold Hamas accountable and demand that the UN stop serving as a conduit for terror. Humanitarian aid must serve its true purpose: saving lives, not funding those who destroy them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
2 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
PHNOM PENH - Cambodia will nominate US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, its deputy prime minister said on Friday, following his direct intervention in halting the recent border conflict with Thailand. Asked via text message to confirm Cambodia's plan to nominate Trump for the prize, Sun Chanthol responded, 'Yes.' Speaking to reporters earlier in Phnom Penh, Sun Chanthol thanked Trump for bringing peace and said he deserved to be nominated for the prize, the highest-profile international award given to an individual or organisation deemed to have done the most to 'advance fellowship between nations'. Pakistan said in June that it would recommend Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve a conflict with India, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last month he had nominated Trump for the award. It was a phone call by Trump last week — and a threat to scrap trade talks if the two countries kept fighting — that broke a deadlock in efforts to end the heaviest fighting between Thailand and Cambodia in over a decade, leading to a ceasefire negotiated in Malaysia on Monday. Following the truce announcement, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X that Trump made it happen. 'Give him the Nobel Peace Prize!' she wrote. At least 43 people have been killed in the intense clashes, which lasted five days and displaced more than 300,000 people on both sides of the border. 'We acknowledge his great efforts for peace,' said Sun Chanthol, also Cambodia's top trade negotiator, adding that his country was also grateful for a reduced tariff rate of 19%. Washington had initially threatened a tariff of 49%, later reducing it to 36%, a level that would have decimated Cambodia's vital garment and footwear sector, the deputy premier told Reuters earlier.
Bangkok Post
3 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Hamas exploits humanitarian aid
Across Gaza, humanitarian aid is urgently needed. Yet much of it fails to reach the people for whom it is intended. Instead, international assistance is routinely hijacked by Hamas -- a reality enabled by the troubling complicity of the United Nations. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is not simply a byproduct of war. It is, in many ways, a strategy. Hamas deliberately engineers civilian suffering to preserve its rule, gain international sympathy, and pressure Israel diplomatically. The UN, by continuing to operate through Hamas-controlled channels, not only fails to stop this abuse -- it legitimises it. Instead of being freely distributed, large portions of aid, mostly funded by Western nations, are diverted by Hamas. The group seizes shipments, hoards essential supplies, and resells them at inflated prices to desperate civilians. The profits fund Hamas' terrorist infrastructure, including salaries for fighters and weapons used not only against Israel but also to suppress dissent within Gaza. There is credible evidence, including reports from within Gaza, of Hamas enforcing its control through brutal means, beating or shooting civilians who try to access food or medical supplies outside the terror group's channels. Meanwhile, the UN continues to rely on the same compromised delivery networks. On Sunday, Israel implemented a humanitarian pause in designated civilian areas and corridors to ensure safe aid delivery. In the preceding weeks, hundreds of aid trucks were allowed into Gaza, positioned in coordination with the UN for collection and distribution. Yet many of these trucks remain idle, their contents untouched. The UN must act without further delay or excuse. Food is rotting. Medicine is expiring. People are waiting. Israel categorically rejects the "starvation" propaganda promoted by Hamas. No policy of starvation exists. The humanitarian pauses and aid corridors are part of Israel's own initiative, not the result of international pressure, but a decision made to prevent Hamas from turning humanitarian issues into political weapons. At the same time, while Israel opens humanitarian channels, Hamas continues to block or attack them. On July 23, Hamas fired a rocket at an aid distribution centre in southern Gaza. Civilians seeking help through independent aid groups like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation have been met with violence. In just two months, the GHF, operating with Israeli facilitation, has delivered over 90 million meals directly to civilians, bypassing Hamas' grip. Unsurprisingly, this initiative has been met with hostility from the terror group. Unfortunately, the UN ignores alternative distribution models like GHF and insists on working through existing Hamas-influenced systems. The result? Continued shortages, misused resources, and a population caught between terror and neglect. Hamas applies the same manipulative tactics in ceasefire negotiations and hostage talks. It prolongs the conflict while blaming Israel for the consequences, holding both Gazan and Israeli hostages hostage to its political goals. Let us be clear: the suffering in Gaza today is not just a humanitarian tragedy -- it is a manufactured crisis. Hamas wants civilians to suffer. It is a deliberate strategy to maintain power and erode Israel's legitimacy on the world stage. This is not just Israel's problem. It is a moral test for the international community. As long as the UN continues to enable Hamas' exploitation of aid, it becomes an accomplice in prolonging conflict and human suffering. It is time to break this cycle. The international community must hold Hamas accountable and demand that the UN stop serving as a conduit for terror. Humanitarian aid must serve its true purpose: saving lives, not funding those who destroy them.
Bangkok Post
5 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Trump is trying to build a far-right international
Until recently, the spectre of an international far-right alliance of populist parties in democracies around the world has been just that: any appearance of cooperation was a form of self-promotion, rather than an expression of true solidarity. Few far-right figures have made any sacrifices for one another or seriously interfered in other countries' internal affairs to prop up allies. And efforts to unite the far right in the European Parliament have fallen dismally short. But that may be changing. US President Donald Trump's threat to impose punitive tariffs on Brazil, with the explicit goal of protecting its far-right former president, Jair Bolsonaro, from a "witch hunt", marks a significant shift in tactics. What's more, Mr Trump's meddling in other democracies in the name of "free speech" serves powerful interests in the United States: tech companies that do not want to be regulated by foreign governments. The international far right is often said to be a contradiction in terms. After all, every far-right leader is a nationalist, which would seem to preclude, by definition, an international alliance. But this view shows little philosophical sophistication or, for that matter, historical awareness. In nineteenth-century Europe, liberals like Giuseppe Mazzini helped one another in their various struggles for freedom and independence from imperial powers. At the time, no one complained that there was a deep contradiction embedded in a liberal international alliance devoted to national self-determination. By the same token, today's far-right populists can claim that they form a united front against "globalists" and supposedly illegitimate "liberal elites". This rhetoric -- and the attendant conspiracy theories, often tinged with anti-Semitism -- has easily crossed borders. Far-right politicians have also copied from one another what scholars have called "worst practices" for undermining democracies. Just think of the proliferation of laws that force civil society organisations to register as "foreign agents", or other thinly veiled repressive tactics. The far right also has a transnational ideological infrastructure. To be sure, there is no populist Comintern issuing binding interpretations of doctrine. But collaboration is real: for instance, Hungarian institutes lavishly endowed by Viktor Orbán's government are now allied with the Heritage Foundation in the US. So far, though, there has been a lack of concrete solidarity among populist leaders. When Mr Trump fraudulently claimed to have won the 2020 US presidential election, his international allies, from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, could have refused to recognise Joe Biden as president. Instead, they congratulated Mr Biden on his victory, choosing pragmatism over ideological affinity. But Mr Trump is changing that in his second term, embracing an ideologically driven approach to confronting other countries that obviously undermines long-standing international norms. In the case of Brazil, he is using the threat of a 50% tariff to pressure the government into ending the federal criminal trial against Mr Bolsonaro for seeking to engineer a coup after losing the 2022 presidential election. Unlike Mr Trump, who was never held accountable for his role in the Jan 6, 2021, insurrection at the US Capitol, Mr Bolsonaro -- often called the "Trump of the Tropics" -- has already been banned from running for office until 2030. In his letter to the Brazilian government announcing the levy, Mr Trump also accused it of "insidious attacks on … the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans", including the censorship of "US Social Media platforms". This highlights another dimension of Mr Trump's economic bullying: his administration's crusade against efforts to prohibit hate speech and regulate the digital sphere. In February, Vice President J D Vance berated Europeans for their supposed lack of respect for "free speech". Meanwhile, the State Department has reportedly targeted the prominent Brazilian judge Alexandre de Moraes, who at one point blocked Elon Musk's X in Brazil and is taking the lead in holding Mr Bolsonaro criminally accountable for his conduct. Big Tech is clearly displeased with the extensive regulations that the European Union and Brazil have placed on its industry. As in other areas -- notably its attacks on higher education -- the Trumpists are weaponising free speech to exert power over supposed political adversaries. The hypocrisy is apparent: while advocating for deregulation of platforms ostensibly to protect free speech, the US government is snooping around in foreigners' social-media accounts for speech it dislikes (and then refusing a visa or entry on this basis). Pious talk of defending democracy as a shared Western value sits uneasily with the abject disrespect for other countries' right to determine their own approach to platform regulation. Whereas far-right leaders of smaller countries are limited by realpolitik, Mr Trump can use America's might to advance his punitive-cum-populist agenda at will. After all, a pliant Republican Party will not question his abuse of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. True, the courts may ultimately decide that his desire for political revenge hardly constitutes an "emergency", but the damage will have been done. As in other areas where his administration has taken plainly illegal actions, many of those being targeted will seek a deal rather than a fight. Solidarity is costly, but not for Mr Trump. ©2025 Project Syndicate Jan-Werner Mueller, Professor of Politics at Princeton University, is the author, most recently, of 'Democracy Rules' (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021).
