logo
How India can win Trump's trade game

How India can win Trump's trade game

India desperately needs a trade deal with President Donald Trump — for both economic and strategic reasons. When rival Pakistan, with its far smaller economy, finalized an agreement first, it underscored just how badly India has misplayed its hand.
India was among the first countries to enter trade negotiations with the Trump administration. Yet despite nearing an interim deal several times, there has been no breakthrough. And prospects for one have dimmed in recent weeks, with the president first slapping a 25 percent tariff on the country, then threatening further unspecified measures and 'substantially' higher tariffs if India does not stop buying Russian oil.
The key to breaking out of this spiral? Recognizing that the holdup is political and personal, not economic.
With those higher tariffs set to take effect as soon as Wednesday, some of India's most export-dependent industries — including gems, textiles, apparel and crude oil refining — are braced for pain. The pharmaceutical sector, a pillar of India's export economy, is also at risk. The tariffs could shave as much as 0.3 percentage points off India's GDP growth. Worse, they will make India less attractive as a manufacturing hub in a region where competitors such as Bangladesh, Pakistan and Vietnam have already secured more favorable trade terms with Trump.
The mercurial Trump has made no secret of his frustration with the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The original sin stems from the end of fighting between India and Pakistan in May, a welcome development that Trump claimed full credit for. Modi has repeatedly said that India's ceasefire decision was made without foreign influence — without mentioning Trump. That omission, along with India's refusal to halt Russian oil purchases despite U.S. pressure, has hardened Trump's stance. Contrast that with Pakistan's brazen diplomatic flattery, which included nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize.
'The fact that India has been unwilling to publicly acknowledge … the president's role in bringing the India-Pakistan ceasefire to pass has really stuck in Trump's head,' Milan Vaishnav of the Carnegie Endowment told me.
If it hopes to close the deal, India will have to provide Trump with some kind of symbolic 'win.' But Modi needs to tread carefully at home. He could probably close India's refineries to Russian oil without putting India's economy at risk, but acknowledging Trump's role in the ceasefire would be politically disastrous. Modi's carefully cultivated strongman image leaves little room for displays of deference. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi jibed that Trump said 'Narendra surrender,' and Modi rolled over. A gifted politician, Modi will have to find a way to square that circle.
There are other sweeteners India could offer Trump. Both countries have agreed in principle to increase bilateral trade to $500 billion annually, from the current $190 billion, by 2030. India had promised to slash duties on most U.S. imports, in exchange for a 15 percent tariff on its exports into the United States — a competitive rate compared with Vietnam's 20 percent and Pakistan's 19 percent. India also agreed to increase imports of American natural gas to close its $45.7 billion trade surplus with the U.S.
But Trump is said to have pushed hardest for opening India's agriculture sector, and that's where the domestic politics become truly daunting. Nearly 44 percent of India's workforce depends on agriculture, and Modi is haunted by a year-long farmers' protest in 2020 and 2021 that forced his government to repeal key farm reforms. The Hudson Institute's Aparna Pande told me that Modi may be hoping to push any agriculture concessions past the October elections in the state of Bihar. Expect him to try to hold the line on agriculture while offering concessions elsewhere.
Some possibilities: India could sweeten the deal on pharmaceutical imports, the backbone of the U.S.-India trade relationship, by offering to lower or even eliminate its 10 percent tariff on American pharmaceutical products. It could also pledge to increase purchases of American energy and defense equipment.
On energy, India might eliminate the existing 2.5 percent import duty on American liquefied natural gas — just as it has already done in deals with the United Arab Emirates and Australia. Such a move would not only boost U.S. energy exports but also provide a stark contrast with China, which continues to impose a 15 percent tariff on U.S. gas imports. Opportunities abound on defense as well. Despite long-standing security cooperation with the United States, India has not yet made procurement pledges in this round of negotiations. But during Modi's U.S. visit in February, he announced plans to buy Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stryker combat vehicles, as well as finalize the purchase of P-8I maritime patrol aircraft. Advancing these plans and committing to new defense acquisitions would undoubtedly help to placate Trump.
Navigating Trump's shifting trade demands has proven challenging for Modi. It will be difficult, but not impossible, for him to concede enough without alienating his domestic base. Modi has long made the case to voters that only he could successfully manage India's relationships with great powers. Time for him to prove it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariffs and the tax bill are splitting the stock market. Here's the playbook for investors, according to Morgan Stanley.
Trump's tariffs and the tax bill are splitting the stock market. Here's the playbook for investors, according to Morgan Stanley.

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's tariffs and the tax bill are splitting the stock market. Here's the playbook for investors, according to Morgan Stanley.

Trump's policies are splitting the stock market, Morgan Stanley says. The bank said it believes Trump's tariffs and tax bill are splitting parts of the market in half. It says there are a handful of things for investors to look for when deciding where to put their money. President Donald Trump's policies are splitting the market into distinct camps, Morgan Stanley says. Lisa Shalett, the chief investment officer of the bank's wealth management arm, pointed to the effects of Trump's tax bill and his sweeping tariffs in a recent podcast. "Now, as the impacts of the tax reform bill and global tariff implementation begin to roll through the economy, we sense that yet another series of great divides are opening up," Shalett said. Here are the splits that are emerging: 1. Consumer-facing businesses vs. B2B businesses Businesses that sell directly to consumers are more impacted by any potential weakening fo household balance sheets, a risk that business-to-business firms are less worried about. Market pros believe that tariffs could weaken consumers' spending power, as companie can pass along the cost of import duties by raising prices. Shalett added that those pressures are coming at an already critical time for consumers, pointing out that more Americans are falling behind on credit card and auto loan payments. The job market is also flashing signs of weakness, with payrolls in May and June seeing a large downward revision, while job growth for the month of July was below expectations. A weaker labor market often leads to a pullback in consumer spending. 2. Multinational exporters vs. importers Multinational exporters outside of the consumer space are facing "fewer external barriers" to sending products abroad, Shalett said, suggesting they were more shielded from the trade war. Those firms are also benefitting from a weaker US dollar, which is making their products more attractive to foreign customers, Shalett added. Multinational firms are also typically more capital- and research & development-intensive, she said. That also positions them to benefit more from the tax benefits outlined in the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which creates favorable tax treatment for domestic R&D costs. "So, with this new structural division emerging, global stock selection is more important now than ever," Shalett said. Here are some characteristics of the companies investors should be leaning toward, in Shalett's view: Multinational non-consumer exporters. Tailwinds for these companies should continue, Shalett said. Select tech, financials, industrials, energy, and healthcare stocks. Stocks in these areas could benefit from some of the policies included in Trump's tax bill, which could lead to upside surprises in earnings and cash flow. Stocks that aren't "overhyped." International stocks, commodities, and energy infrastructure. Companies in these areas could help an investor diversify their portfolio, she added. Sentiment has shifted slightly more bearish in the last week, with Trump doubling down on tariff threats and markets digesting weaker-than-expected economic data. Goldman Sachs, Evercore ISI, Stifel, Pimco, and HSBC are among the firms that have recently flagged the risk of a stock correction or advised investors to rethink their portfolio allocations. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

IFS Capital Insider Ups Holding By 105% During Year
IFS Capital Insider Ups Holding By 105% During Year

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

IFS Capital Insider Ups Holding By 105% During Year

Explore IFS Capital's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Insiders were net buyers of IFS Capital Limited's (SGX:I49 ) stock during the past year. That is, insiders bought more stock than they sold. While we would never suggest that investors should base their decisions solely on what the directors of a company have been doing, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. IFS Capital Insider Transactions Over The Last Year In the last twelve months, the biggest single purchase by an insider was when Group CEO & Executive Director Cheng Leong Sim bought S$123k worth of shares at a price of S$0.11 per share. Although we like to see insider buying, we note that this large purchase was at significantly below the recent price of S$0.13. Because the shares were purchased at a lower price, this particular buy doesn't tell us much about how insiders feel about the current share price. Cheng Leong Sim bought 3.88m shares over the last 12 months at an average price of S$0.12. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below! Check out our latest analysis for IFS Capital There are always plenty of stocks that insiders are buying. If investing in lesser known companies is your style, you could take a look at this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them). Insider Ownership Of IFS Capital Looking at the total insider shareholdings in a company can help to inform your view of whether they are well aligned with common shareholders. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. IFS Capital insiders own about S$32m worth of shares (which is 65% of the company). This kind of significant ownership by insiders does generally increase the chance that the company is run in the interest of all shareholders. What Might The Insider Transactions At IFS Capital Tell Us? Our data shows a little insider buying, but no selling, in the last three months. That said, the purchases were not large. But insiders have shown more of an appetite for the stock, over the last year. With high insider ownership and encouraging transactions, it seems like IFS Capital insiders think the business has merit. While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. At Simply Wall St, we've found that IFS Capital has 5 warning signs (3 don't sit too well with us!) that deserve your attention before going any further with your analysis. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

Rubio suggests Russia, Ukraine not ready for Trump meeting
Rubio suggests Russia, Ukraine not ready for Trump meeting

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Rubio suggests Russia, Ukraine not ready for Trump meeting

Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested Wednesday that Russia and Ukraine are not ready for a meeting with President Trump as the war between the two countries rages on. 'I think what we have is a better understanding of the conditions under which Russia would be prepared to end the war,' Rubio told Fox Business Network's Larry Kudlow on his show. 'We now have to compare that to what the Ukrainians and our European allies, but the Ukrainians primarily, of course, are willing to accept and what you try to see is, how far can you get these two positions closer? How can you get these two positions closer to each other?' 'If we can get what the Ukrainians will accept and what the Russians will accept close enough, then I think there's the opportunity for the president to have a meeting that includes both Putin and Zelensky to try to close this thing out,' he added. 'So, we've got to get closer in that regard.' Trump has recently weighed a meeting in upcoming weeks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky amid an effort to end the war between the two countries. The president brought up the idea of meeting with the two leaders in a Wednesday call with European leaders, a source confirmed to The Hill. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said Russia had shown interest in a Trump meeting. 'As President Trump said earlier today on TRUTH Social, great progress was made during Special Envoy Witkoff's meeting with President Putin,' Leavitt said in a statement. 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky. President Trump wants this brutal war to end,' she added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store