GIC leads bidding for stake in Spanish broadband joint venture, sources say
GIC and the joint venture owners are negotiating details of a potential agreement for a 20 per cent to 30 per cent stake, according to sources.
LONDON – Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC has emerged as the leading bidder for a significant minority stake in a fiber-optic broadband network venture owned by MasOrange SL and Zegona Communications, people familiar with the matter said.
GIC and the joint venture owners are negotiating details of a potential agreement for a 20 per cent to 30 per cent stake, according to the people. A deal could value the business, which comprises over 12 million premises, at about €6 billion to €7 billion (S$9 billion to S$10.5 billion) including debt, they said.
While talks are advanced, they could still be delayed or even fall apart, the people said, asking not to be identified as the information is private.
Zegona-owned Vodafone Spain and MasOrange announced the creation of the venture in January, with an estimated enterprise value of €8 billion to €10 billion. They have said they would look for an investor to buy 40 per cent. Orange chief financial officer Laurent Martinez said on a media call this week that they are confident the deal could be closed by the end of 2025.
Spain has one of Europe's largest fiber optic broadband networks, but widespread overlap between operators has led to fierce competition. Investors, such as pension funds and private equity firms, have been attracted to fiber in recent years given stable returns and low expenses once networks are deployed.
MasOrange is the result of the merger between Masmovil Ibercom and the Spanish operations of Orange. Orange has a 50 per cent stake with the remainder controlled by three investment funds–Cinven, KKR & Co. and Providence Equity Partners– and MasOrange's chief executive officer, as well as others.
Spokespeople for Orange, GIC, Cinven, Zegona, MasOrange and KKR declined to comment, while a representative for Providence didn't respond to requests for comment. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Ireit Global DPU drops to 0.71 euro cent for H1 due to Berlin vacancy
[SINGAPORE] Ireit Global posted a 26 per cent fall year on year in distribution per unit (DPU) to 0.71 euro cent for the half-year of FY2025 ended June because of the full vacancy at the Berlin campus. Revenue decreased by 27.5 per cent to 26.6 million euros (S$39.8 million) while net property income slid 33.3 per cent to 18 million euros, the regulatory filing by the manager of the Europe-focused real estate investment trust (Reit) on Thursday (Aug 7) showed. The drop was mainly due to the full vacancy at Berlin Campus from Jan 1, 2025, and the absence of other income from the dilapidation cost paid by the main tenant at the property in the corresponding period of FY2024. Consequently, income to be distributed to unitholders at 9.5 million euros was 26 per cent lower, and this was after the retention of 10 per cent of income for working capital and capital expenditure. However, earnings per unit was higher at 0.05 euro cent, compared with 0.02 euro cent for the year-ago period, as total return attributable to unitholders was impacted by net change in fair values of financial derivatives and investment properties. Net asset value per unit was unchanged at 0.39 euro cent as at end June, against end-December 2024. Ireit Global Group, the Reit manager, said it has initiated discussions with the incumbent banks regarding the refinancing of the German and Spanish properties, and expects to finalise the agreements by the third quarter of 2025, thereby pushing the next earliest debt maturity to July 2027. Ireit Global units were unchanged at S$0.295 on Thursday, before the Reit manager published the financial results.
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Senior EU official says Gaza crisis ‘looks very much' like genocide
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Israel has repeatedly rejected accusations of carrying out genocide in its war in Gaza. BRUSSELS - A senior member of the European Union's executive said the displacement and killing in Gaza looked very much like genocide, the first commissioner to level that accusation and publicly break with the body's position on the conflict. "If it is not genocide, it looks very much like the definition used to express its meaning," Ms Teresa Ribera - the European Commission's second-highest ranking official - told Politico in an interview published on Aug 7. Israel has repeatedly rejected accusations of carrying out genocide in its war in Gaza. Israel's mission to the EU did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ms Ribera is the European Commission's Executive Vice-President, second only in seniority to President Ursula von der Leyen. The Spanish socialist, whose portfolio includes climate and anti-trust issues, is not responsible for EU foreign policy. "What we are seeing is a concrete population being targeted, killed and condemned to starve to death," Ms Ribera told Politico. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds Singapore Wastewater overflow in Bedok and Chai Chee due to choked sewer at BTO worksite: PUB Singapore Fine for man who damaged PAP campaign materials on GE2025 Polling Day Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Teen's love of dance powers her through cancer to perform at NDP 2025 Singapore Ex-Hyflux director fined over firm's failure to disclose Tuaspring info Business S'pore firm looks to buy SMEs lacking successors, launches CEO training programme to foster renewal Her statements went further than the European Commission, which has accused Israel of violating human rights in Gaza, but stopped short of accusing it of genocide. The Commission last week proposed curbing Israeli access to its flagship research funding programme after calls from EU countries to increase pressure on Israel to alleviate the humanitarian crisis in the enclave. In that proposal, the Commission said Israel had violated a human rights clause in an agreement that governs its relations with the EU. "With its intervention in the Gaza Strip and the ensuing humanitarian catastrophe, including thousands of civilian deaths and rapidly rising numbers of spreading extreme malnutrition, specifically of children, Israel is violating human rights and humanitarian law," it wrote. Israel has fended off accusations of genocide, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice in the Hague that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned as "outrageous". The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israeli communities and military bases near Gaza on Oct 7, 2023. About 1,200 people, including more than 700 civilians, were killed, and 251 hostages were taken to Gaza. Israel's military response has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people, mostly civilians, according to Palestinian health authorities. Israel has repeatedly said its actions in Gaza are justified as self-defence and accuses Hamas of using civilians as human shields, a charge the militant group denies. REUTERS
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Chinese drone maker DJI shut out of Washington with US market at risk
[WASHINGTON] Chinese-owned and operated DJI Technologies is up against an end-of-year deadline to keep its US business alive, and the drone maker is struggling to get anyone in Washington to listen. The company, which controls over 70 per cent of the domestic commercial market in the US, has hired a small army of lobbyists and recently dispatched an Australia-based executive to Washington to address a looming ban on their technology. But DJI says emails and calls are going unanswered and they're running out of time. 'We've been through the meat grinder on this issue, and we're happy to put ourselves through the meat grinder again,' Adam Welsh, DJI's head of global policy, said. 'We'd love to get to the point where we could actually have a conversation.' DJI, like Chinese-owned social media giant TikTok, makes a popular product but is facing existential threats in the lucrative US market amid rising concerns that the data it collects in the US could be shared with authorities in Beijing. Hardware in its supply chain also could have its security compromised before the product leaves China. The DJI drones, which are less expensive than those made by US competitors, count filmmakers, farmers, law enforcement agencies, and fire fighters among their customers. Congress last year inserted a provision in the annual Pentagon policy bill requiring drones made by the Shenzhen-headquartered company undergo national security audits to ascertain the risks around data collection, particularly whether the company adheres to Chinese laws mandating it share any data the government demands. The provision also affects competitor Autel Robotics, another Chinese manufacturer. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up If the reviews validate those concerns – or if no audit is conducted – the drones could be added to the Federal Communications Commission's Covered List, which bans any new models or technology from being sold or imported into the US. DJI says it is ready to submit to the required audit, but officials don't know who to talk to about it. The law stipulates that the audit should be conducted by the 'appropriate national security agency,' which could be the Departments of Defense or Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the National Security Agency or the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Welsh was in Washington for nearly two weeks in July, trying to contact intelligence agencies and asking lawmakers in both parties for meetings. Congressional China hawks with whom DJI tried to talk said those meetings were never going to happen. 'It's a despicable government and they're part of it,' Florida Republican Senator Rick Scott said. 'I would never do it. They want to spy on us.' Representative Elise Stefanik similarly refused to talk to DJI, with spokesman Wendell Husebo saying the New York Republican doesn't meet with 'Communist Chinese front groups.' The opposition to DJI appears to be largely bipartisan. Representative Frank Pallone Jr., the leading Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the company had been repeatedly flagged by the federal government as a national security concern. 'I simply won't stand by and accept that risk, which is why I'll continue to support DJI being added to the list of banned telecom technology that my Secure and Trusted Act created. This is exactly how I intended this law to work,' he said in an email to Bloomberg. Welsh said he's had to confront a 'very established group think' on China. 'They may be accurate on some points, but they're certainly not accurate about us, and we're trying to break through and be treated on our own merits,' he told Bloomberg in an interview. The parts that make up the drones mainly come from manufacturers working in and around Shenzhen, China's Silicon Valley, which lies across the border from Hong Kong. Influence game ByteDance, TikTok's Chinese parent, spent millions in 2024 lobbying Congress, paying influencers to file lawsuits, and mobilising its 170 million American users in a failed effort to kill legislation requiring it to sell the app's US operations or face a ban. The law took effect in January, but President Donald Trump has signed three extensions of the deadline for ByteDance to sell, allowing the video-sharing platform to continue operating in the US while the administration seeks to arrange a sale. DJI's efforts pale in comparison. So far this year, the manufacturer has spent about US$400,000 on lobbyists and law firms, according to Open Secrets. They include law firm Sidley Austin, which referred all inquiries about its work for the manufacturer to DJI. One lobbyist, Brian Darling at Liberty government Affairs, said DJI faced both an educational and ideological challenge on Capitol Hill. 'Some offices have little knowledge of the specifics of the company and others are ideologically opposed to any company that manufactures and is headquartered in China, even though they all use iPhones manufactured in China,' he told Bloomberg. Despite the growing security concerns, police departments in Asheville, North Carolina and Ross Township in Pennsylvania continue to use the drones, saying they have been invaluable for police work and public safety. During Hurricane Helene last year, the Asheville police force used drones, including those manufactured by DJI and Skydio, a California-based company, to identify and rescue victims, map damage to infrastructure and provide real-time aerial views for law enforcement and first responders, said Brandon Moore, Asheville police patrol commander. In Ross Township, the drones have been used to cover ground more quickly to find missing people, including children and elderly, and used to scout potentially dangerous scenarios where suspects have barricaded themselves against law enforcement. They've also provided real-time aerial assessments during SWAT-type operations, said Brian Kohlhepp, the deputy chief of police. Both officers said their departments follow safety guidelines for data collection and use and were extremely cognisant of people's privacy. 'We don't use them in any capacity where anything that we're reviewing isn't publicly available on Google Maps,' Kohlhepp told Bloomberg. 'I would argue that the use of the drones wouldn't reveal anything that compromises national security.' Other police departments, including Orange County Florida, ceased using DJI and Autel drones after a state legislature ban came into effect in 2023. DJI has a business partnership with Anzu Robotics, a company headquartered in Austin, Texas, that sells DJI drones. Critics claim the company is a pop up created by DJI in the event of the ban becoming law. The House Select Committee that focuses on China wrote DJI last year calling Anzu a 'passthrough' company created to avoid the government restrictions. DJI referred questions about the nature of the partnership to Anzu. Anzu declined to comment. It isn't clear which agency is responsible for the national security review DJI's future depends on. The National Security Agency referred questions to the Pentagon. The Pentagon, along with other intelligence agencies, did not respond to requests for comment. Late last month a US District Court judge lawsuit DJI had filed against the Pentagon over its designating the drone manufacturer as a Chinese Military Company remained unresolved. Some of the submissions the Pentagon made regarding the national security concerns were blacked out in documents. The judge asked for an order that would allow him to read the classified material and share it with DJI's representatives who had security clearance to also review it. BLOOMBERG
