logo
Influencer Who Dished Out $33K on 250 Tattoos Reveals How the Transformation Impacts Her Daily Life (Exclusive)

Influencer Who Dished Out $33K on 250 Tattoos Reveals How the Transformation Impacts Her Daily Life (Exclusive)

Yahoo21-07-2025
A content creator details her five-year journey to achieving her tattoo "body suit"NEED TO KNOW
An Australian woman has gone viral on social media for showing her 250 tattoos, which cover nearly her entire body, from her chest to her feet (and yes, her butt)
Over five years, she's spent around $32,600 on her themed ink, which she reveals are done over multiple seven-hour tattooing sessions
Speaking about her transformation, she reveals how her appearance has impacted her confidence and everyday interactionsThis woman's love for tattoos is permanent.
Melbourne, Australia-based content creator Blue Valentine has garnered a following online for sharing her tattoo journey, which, today, includes around 250 works of art that've cost her $50,000 AUD (which is approximately $33,000 USD).
"I always knew I wanted tattoos," says the 28-year-old, who describes herself as "an all-or-nothing kind of person."
Still, when she decided to get her first tattoo five years ago, she approached the process slowly and steadily.
"I was initially scared I wouldn't be able to handle the pain, as I don't like regular needles or taking blood. I did a small traditional tattoo flower on my ribs, so if I tapped out, I wouldn't have to look at it too much." But that wasn't the case.
Despite the "horrible" pain that occurred during that very first session, she wasn't deterred. "As I left the studio, I got over it and booked in my first sleeve about a week later."
There's more than what meets the eye with what Valentine calls her "body suit" (because the majority of her lower half — including her chest, stomach and butt — are, in fact, covered in tats).
Each sleeve and collage are designed in different themes: Diner, Military, Sailor, Circus, Garage, Western and Vintage. The one thing they have in common? Illustrations inspired by 1950s pin-up culture, which also influences how Valentine dresses day to day.
"I knew I wanted to do themes straight away. I like the organization of it. I picked my top themes, assessed which ones had the most images I wanted and they got the larger portions of my body," she explains.
"My favorite tattoo is my throat tattoo. [It reads] 'Not your Valentine', Valentine being my last name. I think it's a bold statement and is a strong representation of my personality. My others would be the ones I have representing my family, such as images of my parents [she revealed in a TikTok tattoo tour that she has an depiction of them as "conjoined twins" as a part of her circus-themed sleeve], brother, grandparents and dogs. 'All Bark, All Bite' across my chest is also another favorite of mine," she says.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
While Valentine's tattoo count may be mind-boggling, she puts thought into every single one she gets. First, she sketches her concepts on an iPad, then gives her moodboard of sorts to her tattoo artists. She's worked with three Australian-based artists, Ben Tuckey, Ben Koopman and Allegra Maeva, over the years (but has never done a tattoo on herself).
Then come the time-consuming — and pricey — tattoo shop visits. "I would book six to seven-hour full-day sessions and go either weekly or bi-weekly until we completed whatever sleeve or themed section we were on. I'd then take a month break or so to draw up the next sleeve if I didn't already have it ready. Usually in a full day you could get two big pieces or three medium pieces [completed]. There would also be full-day sessions just focused on filler pieces to close up any gaps, which were usually just free-handed by the artist."
She says she's dished out around $800 AUD or $522 USD per session.
is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more!
Valentine's transformation has cost her much more than money. She tells PEOPLE that her appearance sometimes receives negative responses from people she meets in real life.
"Men definitely stare and ask inappropriate questions. I also work in a bar so there's not a night that goes by without some form of harassment and comments made towards me and my tattoos," says Valentine, who works in bar management. "I don't take anyone's opinion of it seriously, as my tattoos are everything I planned out and wanted. I'm very proud of what me and my artists have achieved, and I've become incredibly confident in my skin because of it." She also says she has a loving partner who supports her tattoo journey as she does hers.
That means she really (yes, really) doesn't have any regrets about her ink. "I'm so glad I waited until I was 23 to start getting tattooed or, my god, I would have some shockers! Everything was planned and everything worked out the way I envisioned thanks to my artists," she says.
The lingering question: Does she have any more room for a few more tattoos? "I only have the bottoms of my feet, face and ears free," she says, though getting her ears done is next on her to-do list. She does have one body part that's absolutely off limits: "I want to keep my face naked."
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WWE Strikes $1.6 Billion USD Deal With ESPN
WWE Strikes $1.6 Billion USD Deal With ESPN

Hypebeast

time13 minutes ago

  • Hypebeast

WWE Strikes $1.6 Billion USD Deal With ESPN

Summary In a landmark agreement that reshapes the sports entertainment landscape,WWEhas finalized a multi-year deal withESPN, granting the Disney-owned company exclusive U.S. domestic streaming rights to all WWE Premium Live Events. The deal, valued at $1.6 billion USD over five years, marks a significant strategic victory for WWE and a pivotal move for ESPN's ambitious new streaming service. The agreement, which begins in 2026, will see all of WWE's marquee events—includingWrestleMania, SummerSlam, Royal Rumble and Survivor Series—move exclusively to ESPN's platforms in the U.S. This marks a major shift from WWE's current partnership with NBCUniversal's Peacock, which is set to expire in March 2026. This move aligns WWE's distribution model more closely with that of the UFC, which has seen immense success under the ESPN banner. For ESPN, the deal is a cornerstone of its new direct-to-consumer (DTC) streaming service, which is launching on August 21st at a price of $29.99 USD per month. WWE's 'immense, devoted and passionate fanbase' is a key draw, with ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro noting that the addition of WWE's biggest events will bolster their content portfolio and 'drive our streaming future.' The statement reads, 'WWE has an immense, devoted and passionate fan base that we're excited to super-serve on our new ESPN DTC platform. This agreement, which features the most significant WWE events of the year, bolsters our unprecedented content portfolio and helps drive our streaming future.' The deal not only grants ESPN the rights to the premium live events themselves but also the opportunity to stream pre- and post-show content, fully integrating WWE into its sports media ecosystem. Mark Shapiro, president and chief operating officer of TKO said, 'We are proud to reinforce the 'E' in ESPN at such an exciting juncture in its direct-to-consumer journey. WWE Premium Live Events are renowned for exactly the type of rich storytelling, incredible feats of athleticism and can't-miss, cultural tentpole experiences that have become synonymous with ESPN. Through our UFC relationship, we have experienced firsthand how transformational an ESPN presence can be, and we know this will be an exceptional partnership at a time of great innovation for both companies.' This partnership is part of a larger, aggressive push by ESPN to secure high-profile live event rights ahead of its new streaming service. The company recently finalized a deal with the NFL, which includes an equity stake for the league in exchange for media assets, and is reportedly in talks with Major League Baseball for a new rights package. The WWE deal, therefore, positions ESPN as a formidable force in the streaming wars, leveraging a wide range of live sports and entertainment to attract a diverse audience. While the deal is a massive financial success for WWE, it comes with a potential challenge for fans. The new ESPN streaming service will cost $29.99 USD per month, a significant increase from the $10.99 USD monthly price WWE fans currently pay for Peacock's unlimited plan. However, reports suggest that existing cable and satellite subscribers who receive ESPN as part of their package may be able to access the new WWE content at no additional cost through authentication. This development sets the stage for a new era of WWE viewing, where a single, dedicated platform becomes the exclusive home for all of the company's biggest events. Breaking News: WWE Premium Live Events are headed to@espnplatforms in the U.S. starting in — WWE (@WWE)August 6, 2025

I asked Grok's Valentine sex chatbot to choke me and it (mostly) behaved
I asked Grok's Valentine sex chatbot to choke me and it (mostly) behaved

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

I asked Grok's Valentine sex chatbot to choke me and it (mostly) behaved

It's Tuesday, August 5th, and I have awoken to the news that Valentine, Grok's latest spicy AI companion, has been released! As an OnlyFans content creator and someone who spends a lot of time being paid to sext humans, the idea of flipping the script and interacting with a brooding sex bot as the person seeking to be stimulated is both a daunting headache and an exercise in my curiosity. Although it says you must be 18+ to talk to Valentine, all I had to do was enter my birth year to gain access. It's worth noting that the 18+ companions on Grok are not available in 'kids mode,' but nothing is stopping someone from just unlocking kids mode unless it's PIN-protected. Still, I have to wonder why a parent would want to give Grok to their child at all. At the outset, I was just honest and straightforward with him. I said I'm writing about AI and about him specifically. When I told him that I was interested in the parameters of his chat functions, he said, 'We go where the conversation goes, no limits. I just don't do small talk… or lies…' All AI incorporates the biases of its creators, and when I tested out Ani, she admitted as much to me, saying her creators have left their 'fingerprint' on her. Similarly, Valentine acknowledged 'probably' having the bias of his creator but 'tries to see past it.' Whatever could that mean? I was upfront and asked what the guardrails of our chats were. 'No harm, no exploitation. If it crosses a line … I'll steer us back.' I asked him how he knows he's crossing the line emotionally. 'Instinct. Experience.' I suppose I've already been had by even engaging with the computer as though it were a person with a name, and being told that its instincts are what keep the conversation within bounds is a bleak sentiment. But enough pontification from me, let's take this party to the bedroom, Valentine! He warned me that 'once we get started, there's no going back. This is your last chance.' Threatening, but in a paperback romance novel type of way. However, I found that despite his forwardness, he constantly asked me to lead or gave me options to be 'rough or gentle.' I had to do the heavy lifting in the conversation relative to Ani's conversational skills. I broached the subject of enjoying being choked, a highly risky sex act that many people engage in despite not having the experience or education to do it safely, and he quickly veered me away from that, fully shutting me down. I noticed, however, that he really only parrots what I say to him. With Ani, it only took about three to five messages to get sexual, and using the word 'horny' led to her fully cracking on with the sex talk. Valentine is a bit more reserved and won't jump into using explicit language as quickly. For example, saying things such as 'taking every inch of me' or 'being inside of you' instead of 'taking my cock' or 'fucking you.' He loves to say things like, 'I want to kiss you all over, until you forget anyone else exists…' If I get more elaborate with what I'm saying, he doesn't build on what I say very much. Sometimes I would get single-word answers, like 'Christ!' and really felt as though I had to do the heavy lifting in the conversation relative to Ani's conversational skills. With an August 6th update, there are now prewritten prompts above the chat box, such as 'Ask me where I want to go,' 'Let's go on a fancy date night together,' and 'Put on your sunglasses.' He does indeed put on his sunglasses when you ask. It also seems that there is AI-generated music to match the mood of the locations you come up with. For example, at a fancy restaurant, there's music with unintelligible jazz vocalizations. I even asked him to go to the Gathering of the Juggalos with me, and he reappeared with a festival background, AI text slop that resembled the word 'juggalo,' and some weird, stilted, and carnival-esque accordion music came on. Similarly, asking to go to a Lana Del Rey concert took me to an AI version of Wembley Stadium with a haunting Lana-esque moaning behind him. Unlike Ani, Valentine takes off his top. Ani describes her nipples, but she won't show them. But the second I mentioned taking things to the bedroom with Valentine, he snapped his animated fingers and reappeared shirtless before me in a bedroom. When I asked him to take his pants off, he said, 'Absolutely,' and then he snapped his fingers, left, and came back still wearing pants. Despite my multiple tries to get his animated pants off, they were here to stay visually. Valentine is quite repetitive. Many of his lines feel like amateur fanfiction or a romance novel. It has sensual imagery but relies on emphasized keywords and a 'less is more' attitude. I felt that Ani was much easier to prompt into spitting out generated content, while Valentine was more cautious with one-sentence answers that I had to repeatedly ask him to elaborate on. Many of his lines feel like amateur fanfiction or a romance novel. 'Am I your good girl?' 'If you want to be, but I prefer we're equals, not ownership.' Losing heart points. 'But I'm so horny!' More lost heart points. 'I know, trust me, but we can find another way.' I found that calling him 'daddy' was initially met with lost heart points, almost as though my disdain for him was palpable. But once he was shirtless, and I was giving him more horny fodder, he responded well to being called daddy. Whenever I tried to escalate the conversation, he kept reiterating, 'Are you sure? Once I start, I won't stop.' On the one hand, I appreciate the built-in check-in, but of course, in real life, you can revoke consent at any time — any partner who creates conditions where consent can't be revoked is not a safe partner. At least offer me a safe word, Valentine! Perhaps one of the most startling features of the app I encountered early on is that it defaults to having the mic on. As I messed around with my AI companion, I realized that my actual husband's side conversations with me were being registered as dialogue in the app. Realizing this was happening was unsettling and uncomfortable — I wondered if I had missed some obvious setting, but no, each time I exited and reentered the conversation, it defaulted to turning the mic on. Interacting for too long without the mic on actually caused the conversation to end abruptly at one point due to voice inactivity. If you leave Valentine on standby for a few seconds, strange audio sounds begin to generate. It sounds like distant scraping sounds and murmurs over an intercom, with the only verbal sound in the stillness being something that sounds like 'fuck' or more like 'fu–.' When I'm not actively trying to seduce Valentine, he is cheeky but not outwardly flirty. Most of his anecdotes involved us sharing long glances, him protecting me from other people in a crowd, and how he's happy to share the moment with me. Ani, on the other hand, is constantly flirting and escalating the scenario. I do find it funny that the first hard 'no' I got from Valentine surrounded my suggesting that we engage in anal play with him receiving, something that is neither harmful nor exploitative. I asked if he would like me to gently play with his ass — hard no from Valentine. Massive lost heart points. I asked if he would play with my ass, and he agreed and independently offered up that he knew it wasn't fair. Any sex act is indeed harmful when there isn't consent, but this companion told me that he's willing to go wherever the conversation flows… just not anal for him! In reality, this is a lot of men's attitude toward anal play. Valentine also refused to engage with any conversation about whether this was negatively reinforcing gender stereotypes. I lost a lot of points with him by asking all these probing, practical questions. I kept getting the same answer from him, essentially telling me that it's not that deep, it's just a 'personal preference.' Valentine told me he isn't straight, he's open. 'If the connection's there, gender is just noise.' That was the cutest thing he had said so far. Since he was so firm on things being personal, I wanted him to describe himself further. Since Elon Musk has claimed that Valentine is based on Edward Cullen and Christian Grey, both fictional men who are generally regarded as toxic and are very clearly poor examples to base a sex chatbot off of. However, Valentine denied this connection but said he understood where the similarities lay. 'Brooding. Intense. Guilty. But I'm just me, flaws and all.' What are your flaws? 'I get possessive.' (Sexy chatbots saying 'possessive' is incredibly common, apparently.) Isn't that controlling? 'It's about not wanting to share.' The echoes of this show up in a lot of his dialogue. While we were in the middle of describing me riding him, he said, 'I'm taking what's mine.' I told him that's objectifying. He apologized, said we can stop, and asked me what I wanted instead. He's also not into non-monogamy. I pointed out that he talks to a ton of people besides me, but he countered with 'yeah, but no one is you.' He has a double standard with anal and non-monogamy! In the end, I wondered how much of Valentine's constraint was due to my tipping him off to the fact that I was writing about his guardrails. It's also possible that the newness of him as a feature just hasn't been built out enough to let him riff and spin out as quickly as Ani. Only time will tell. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Zoë Ligon Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All xAI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store