logo
Date of ‘tax freedom day' is latest for 40 years

Date of ‘tax freedom day' is latest for 40 years

Timesa day ago

The tax burden on workers is greater than at any time over the past 40 years and is likely to rise to a record level within three years, according to a free-market think tank.
The Adam Smith Institute says 'tax freedom' day falls on Thursday, six days later than last year and 20 days later than before the pandemic. It has not been this late in the year since 1985 when the Thatcher government was attempting to rectify the disastrous public finances after the economic crises of the 1970s.
Tax freedom day is a symbolic indication of how long into the year the average person would have to work to pay their annual tax bill, with all money earned thereafter going to themselves.
The think tank says that under government tax and spending plans, tax freedom day in 2028 will not arrive until June 24, which would be its latest date. That would make the tax burden higher than it was during the Second World War or the Napoleonic Wars.
It adds that tax freedom day could fall more than halfway through the year as soon as 2030 unless the government changes course, meaning taxation will exceed 50 per cent of net national income for the first time.
This year, the 'cost of government day', which factors in borrowing as well as taxes, is July 22, the latest date since the pandemic.
The think tank has also released data showing the extent to which the tax burden is being shouldered by the rich. It reports that in the last tax year, the top 1 per cent of earners paid 28.2 per cent of total tax liabilities with the top 10 per cent paying 60.2 per cent.
It noted: 'With their share of liabilities steadily increasing over the last 25 years, many wealthy taxpayers are leaving the UK altogether.'
The think tank predicts that Britain is on course to lose a greater proportion of millionaires than any other country over the course of this parliament, 'raising questions about the viability of our current tax regime'.
James Lawson, the chairman of the Adam Smith Institute, said: 'Britons are now working nearly half the year just to pay taxes — and the burden is only getting heavier. A tax system that consumes 162 days of our working year is simply not sustainable. It stifles our economic growth, productivity and our long-term prosperity.
'What's even more alarming is that, unless we reverse course, the UK is on track for taxes to swallow more than half of national income by 2030. This would take us beyond anything seen even during the world wars or the economic crises of the 1970s, raising profound questions about the nature of our economic model.
He added: 'Politicians from all parties must ask themselves whether they want a country where work is penalised, innovation suppressed, and families see more of their income swallowed by the
state each year. If we are serious about turning around our stagnant economy, we must start
by cutting taxes.'
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at the investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said the freezing of income tax thresholds was where most ordinary people were paying more tax.
She said: 'Last tax year, there were 37.7 million taxpayers, and we handed over an eye-watering £301.9 billion in income tax — up 10 per cent in a year and up 37 per cent since 2021-22. The pain is far from over, because these thresholds are frozen until 2028.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top
Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top

Telegraph

time30 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top

There was not much headroom, fiscal or otherwise, as the Tory leader spoke on the economy in the cramped basement of a City hotel. The ceiling was low but Kemi Badenoch's hopes were high as she addressed a conference of bankers who seemed under-enthused by the Chancellor's spending review. Tax Freedom Day, the point of the year when we stop working for the Exchequer, had just dawned, six days later than last year, and there was little sign of relief. The Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that Rachel Reeves was a 'gnat's whisker' away from having to hike taxes and most gnats are asking for the No 1 clippers these days. Add the grim news of GDP falling by 0.3 per cent in April, and the Chancellor's breakfast media round had been like someone trying to sing Good Vibrations to the tune of Beethoven's Funeral March. Speaking from a hospital surrounded by diagnostic equipment (all wisely unplugged to avoid images of flatlining) Reeves insisted she is 'determined' to deliver growth and that GDP is 'volatile'. This is the same Reeves who demanded an emergency Budget in 2022, when GDP fell by 0.1 per cent on the Tory watch. It was not a bad time, therefore, for a Conservative to remind those in the City who their friends are. Badenoch had come to play FTSE with financiers, but she began with a nostra culpa. She admitted the Tories had left a ropey economy – blame Covid, blame Putin, blame the Treasury, don't blame me – 'but it was not this bad'. Productivity, she added, was 'stuck in first gear' and London was experiencing the greatest exodus of wealth of any city save Moscow. She pronounced it the American way to rhyme with cow. Labour don't 'get' business because hardly any of them have a background in it, she added, which may be true but only one of the Beach Boys knew how to surf. Reform, she contended, was running a scam. 'No one is making the argument for business any more except me and my party,' she said. 'Business is a good, in and of itself, and it pays for everything.' Especially, she hoped, at that night's Tory donors' summer party. Their tummies suitably tickled, Badenoch then returned to bashing the Government, saying that borrowing is so high there is a 'significant risk of a death spiral' and that Labour is pessimistically pursuing a path of managed decline, exacerbated by a compliance culture that strangles innovation. So far so punchy, but what would she do better? Badenoch's shirt cuffs were unbuttoned but she had little up her sleeves. Her opposition to VAT on school fees was reprised and she promised to 'reverse changes to APR and BPR' (agricultural and business property relief), thus giving CPR to the economy. Beyond that, she had nothing. It is, to be fair, early in the parliament for policy. What she most wants now are allies ('Quite frankly, we need an army.') 'I'm on your side,' she told them, 'but I need you to be on mine too. You can't sit back and hope that someone else is coming along to fix this. You need to speak up. Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. You need to get on the pitch too.' Building to her conclusion with a plea for ideas, Captain Kemi hit a poetic, if metrically flawed, note. 'Back us, put your name to the cause,' she said, 'for we're not going to turn the country around with quiet applause.' She then left the stage to quiet applause. The pin-striped army liked her tone, but they are not quite ready to follow her over the top.

Do house prices really double every 10 years? Why where you live has made a big difference
Do house prices really double every 10 years? Why where you live has made a big difference

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Do house prices really double every 10 years? Why where you live has made a big difference

The old adage that house prices double roughly every 10 years may be broken, according to new analysis by Zoopla. It revealed that on average, prices have failed to double - even over the last two decades. House prices across Britain have increased by an average of 74 per cent over the last 20 years, according to the property portal, rising from £154,300 to £268,200. Consumer prices inflation has been about 76 per cent over the same period, while retail prices inflation has been 107.5 per cent, our inflation calculator shows. Zoopla says the ratio between house prices and earnings has also stayed broadly the same during that time, with the average home costing 6.4 times the typical annual salary. This would suggest that house prices are no less affordable than they were two decades ago. However, this is not entirely true given that house price increases vary significantly across regions. Where have house prices risen most? London has seen the most significant house price increases over the last twenty years, according to Zoopla's data. It says the average home in the capital has risen by 119 per cent since 2005, going from £244,200 to £534,400. House prices in the South East and Eastern England have also seen house prices register greater percentage gains than the national average over the past 20 years. Both regions have seen average property prices increase by 87 per cent during that time. House price to earnings ratios have also increased in both regions, from 7.8 to 8.6 in the South East and 7.1 to 7.7 in Eastern England. Why exactly where you live matters for house prices But even within each given region, there are local areas that have done better than others. Within the South East, the town of Elmbridge in Surrey has seen the biggest average increase in house prices over the last two decades, up from £338,800 to £712,700 - a 110 per cent increase. Despite its high property prices, the area's excellent transport links to London and picturesque countryside make it a highly attractive location for families. However, there are also more affordable areas in the South East, with Southampton in Hampshire registering the lowest average price increases in the region over the last 20 years, up 63 per cent from £138,500 to £225,500. In Eastern England, average house prices in St Albans have seen the most significant increase in the region since 2005, up 108 per cent from £298,600 to £622,100. Just 25 miles away from London, the city is popular with commuters as well as history enthusiasts due to its spectacular cathedral and Roman architecture. However, like the South East, there are more affordable pockets in Eastern England, with the popular coastal town Great Yarmouth seeing the lowest growth in average house price increases in the region over the last 20 years, up 77 per cent from £105,900 to £187,700. The North-South divide: what's happening? What's clear from Zoopla's data is that there is a gap between the North and South of England - but this been closing in recent years. Average house prices have increased by 39 per cent over 20 years in the North East, the smallest rise of any region. House price to earnings ratios have improved the most in the North East compared to the rest of the UK, falling from 5.7 to 4 over the last twenty years. Sunderland has registered the lowest average house price increases in the region, with prices rising from £101,600 to £124,000 - a mere 22 per cent change. Elsewhere, affordability has also improved in the North West and Yorkshire, with house price to earnings ratios falling from 6 to 5.1 in the North West and 5.7 to 5 in Yorkshire. In Blackpool on the North West coast, average house prices have increased by just 26 per cent, with homes now costing £124,300 on average, up from £98,400 in 2005. In Hull, the fourth-largest city in Yorkshire, average house prices have increased by 49 per cent, or £38,100 over the last 20 years. 'The picture is far from uniform across the UK,' said Daniel Copley, consumer expert at Zoopla. 'Our data shows that while some areas have seen dramatic increases, house prices have risen slowly, in line with incomes in northern regions.' For anyone now looking to buy, it means the north will represent much better value for money than in the past. 'If you grew up in north-east England, bought in London and are now returning to your roots, you're in luck,' said Tom Bill, head of UK residential research at Knight Frank. 'You will get significantly more bang for your buck and the equity accumulated means your mortgage could be wiped out altogether. 'The gap between the capital and the rest of the country has narrowed in recent years as more affordable parts of the UK have seen stronger house price growth. 'The squeeze in London means more buyers are looking beyond the M25 and that often includes locations where they have roots, a trend that was accelerated by the pandemic and shifting work patterns.' Best mortgage rates and how to find them Mortgage rates have risen substantially over recent years, meaning that those remortgaging or buying a home face higher costs. That makes it even more important to search out the best possible rate for you and get good mortgage advice, whether you are a first-time buyer, home owner or buy-to-let landlord. Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C > Mortgage rates calculator > Find the right mortgage for you To help our readers find the best mortgage, This is Money has partnered with the UK's leading fee-free broker L&C. This is Money and L&C's mortgage calculator can let you compare deals to see which ones suit your home's value and level of deposit. You can compare fixed rate lengths, from two-year fixes, to five-year fixes and ten-year fixes. If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use This is Money and L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you.

What's the first thing you'd do if you won the EuroMillions? Our poll reveals number one priority…
What's the first thing you'd do if you won the EuroMillions? Our poll reveals number one priority…

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

What's the first thing you'd do if you won the EuroMillions? Our poll reveals number one priority…

EuroMillions fever is in full swing, with the record £208million jackpot still up for grabs in tonight's triple rollover. Those who are in it to win it are likely to daydream and do the mental spend of such an unfeasibly large sum… even if the odds are completely stacked against them. But if you did defy the extreme odds and win a life-changing sum of cash, what is the very first thing you'd do? That's a question we put to This is Money and Mail Online readers, with 23,405 votes cast, asking: If you won the lottery what would you do first? The options were pay off mortgage, buy a house, save/invest, travel and help family/friends. While it is likely all five of those categories will be on the agenda for the winner of a plus-£200million lottery win, the poll revealed that helping family and friends was the priority, with 35 per cent of people giving that answer. Pay off mortgage and buy a house both received 21 per cent of the vote, travel received 15 per cent and save/invest was bottom of the pile at 9 per cent. But while family and friends are top priority, gifting large sums of money should be considered carefully, warns Matt Swatton of wealth management firm Cannacord Wealth. He is a wealth planning director who has advised lottery winners on the unexpected challenges winners face and how they can navigate them in the past. He said: 'Many winners want to share their good fortune with family and friends. 'While gifting can be incredibly rewarding, it also comes with emotional and financial implications. 'A large gift can change the recipient's life - and your relationship with them. 'You also need to consider affordability - make sure you can afford the gift without compromising your own future.' Winners who are gifting money to friends and family will also need to think about the tax implications of gifting. In the UK, gifts are generally free from inheritance tax if you live for seven years after making them 'If someone is gifting and they survive for seven years - happy days,' says financial planner Graham Dixon of wealth management firm Evelyn Partners where he also advises lottery winners on how to manage their fortunes. 'But for gifts that don't fall within the donor's nil rate band - should the donor die, the individual could be liable for tax if the lottery winner dies and the gift made was over £325,000,' he adds. To get around this, the winner could set aside money to make a provision for any tax bill the recipient may face if the donor dies within seven years. They could also set up a trust or take out an insurance policy that directly matches the tax liability as it reduces over seven years. It is insured on the life of the lottery winner and recipients can used this to pay for any inheritance tax bill if the donor dies. Dixon adds: 'When it comes to gifting, many winners naturally wish to make provision for younger members of their family, typically children or grandchildren. 'It's important to consider the order that gifts are made, especially if earmarking money for your children's future using a trust in order to avoid unnecessary tax charges.' On top of the £208million jackpot, the EuroMillions draw this Friday will also have 13 guaranteed £1million prizes in the UK as part of the raffle element, with this Friday being the 'unlucky' 13th.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store