Tariff hike puts pressure on LA's Kip's Toyland
Kip's Toyland, the oldest toy shop in Los Angeles, may be forced to raise prices or reduce stock as it faces tariffs of up to 145% on Chinese imports — a major blow for the nearly 80-year-old family-run store.
Around 80% of toys sold in the United States are manufactured in China.
Owner Don Kipper says the store has been receiving letters from suppliers warning of sharp price hikes due to upcoming trade penalties.
'We've been getting letters and other communication from our suppliers that say, 'Fasten your seat belts, this is on the way,'' Kipper told.
Some suppliers urged bulk orders before tariff pricing begins, while others warned of halted production ahead of the holiday season.
The development highlights renewed pressure on the US toy industry amid President Donald Trump's ongoing trade dispute with China.
In 2023, the US imported \$13.4 billion worth of toys from China, according to Commerce Department data.
Kip's Toyland sources most of its inventory from China. Kipper said he cannot afford to buy in bulk or store large quantities, unlike bigger retailers.
'It's a hostage situation. If we have to, we have to,' Kipper said of potentially paying higher prices.
Founded in 1945 by Irvin 'Kip' Kipper, a former World War II pilot and prisoner of war, Kip's Toyland began as a small shop selling flags and dolls. Today, it remains a nostalgic haven of unplugged, classic toys.
While most items on its shelves are now made in China, a few — like the American-made Slinky — are still sourced domestically.
Toy analyst Chris Byrne said rebuilding US-based toy manufacturing would take at least five years and still lead to higher consumer prices due to domestic labour and regulatory costs.
Parents visiting the shop said higher prices may force them to cut back. 'It's a real treasure,' said Aeri Schwartz, who visits with her toddler. 'Not being able to come here and buy something would be pretty unfortunate.'
Chelsea Kwoka, another parent, said she would likely shift spending to local experiences or buy second-hand toys if prices soar.
Kipper said he hopes loyal customers will still come in for birthdays or special gifts — but said he would have to 'buy smart' to keep the shop going.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
CCP's Appellate Tribunal upholds penalty against telecom operators for non-competitive practices
Upholding the Competition Commission of Pakistan's (CCP) decision of penalty against the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) and other Long Distance International (LDI) operators, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has directed the companies to deposit the fine within 30 days. The commission noted that while incoming call volumes fell by 70% after anti-competitive International Clearing House (ICH) agreement of telecom operators — from 1.9 billion minutes in September 2012 to 579 million in February 2013 — LDI revenues jumped 308%, from $8.37 million to $59 million. The tribunal upheld the CCP's findings but reduced the penalty to 2% of turnover generated from the ICH arrangement. It ruled that if the operators fail to pay within 30 days, the original 7.5% penalty will be reinstated. The CAT, however, has conditionally cut the fine to more than half of what the CCP had imposed. The CCP had imposed penalties of 7.5% of annual turnover on each LDI operator including the PTCL for entering into an anti-competitive ICH agreement. In 2012, the LDI operators including PTCL entered into an agreement wherein all incoming international calls were routed through a single gateway operated by PTCL as head of an LDI consortium. The arrangement fixed a uniform termination rate of around 8.8 US cents per minute — up from about 2 cents previously — and allocated revenue shares and traffic quotas among LDI operators. Competing networks were closed, and prices for overseas callers increased. The CCP declared the ICH a cartel arrangement involving price-fixing and market-sharing. In April 2013, it imposed penalties of 7.5% of annual turnover on each LDI operator and directed the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) to restore pre-ICH competition. The order rejected claims of 'state compulsion' or Ministry of Information Technology directives, stating that records showed LDI operators themselves sought and secured the policy directive for ICH. The tribunal affirmed that the Competition Act, 2010, applies to government bodies and regulators, noting that even PTA could be held liable for restricting competition. It dismissed arguments that the CCP lacked jurisdiction because the calls were incoming and free to local consumers, stressing that the agreement restricted market entry and competition.
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
CCP's Appellate Tribunal upholds penalty against telecom operators for non-competitive practice
Upholding the Competition Commission of Pakistan's (CCP) decision of penalty against the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) and other Long Distance International (LDI) operators, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has directed the companies to deposit the fine within 30 days. The commission noted that while incoming call volumes fell by 70% after anti-competitive International Clearing House (ICH) agreement of telecom operators — from 1.9 billion minutes in September 2012 to 579 million in February 2013 — LDI revenues jumped 308%, from $8.37 million to $59 million. The tribunal upheld the CCP's findings but reduced the penalty to 2% of turnover generated from the ICH arrangement. It ruled that if the operators fail to pay within 30 days, the original 7.5% penalty will be reinstated. The CAT, however, has conditionally cut the fine to more than half of what the CCP had imposed. The CCP had imposed penalties of 7.5% of annual turnover on each LDI operator including the PTCL for entering into an anti-competitive ICH agreement. In 2012, the LDI operators including PTCL entered into an agreement wherein all incoming international calls were routed through a single gateway operated by PTCL as head of an LDI consortium. The arrangement fixed a uniform termination rate of around 8.8 US cents per minute — up from about 2 cents previously — and allocated revenue shares and traffic quotas among LDI operators. Competing networks were closed, and prices for overseas callers increased. The CCP declared the ICH a cartel arrangement involving price-fixing and market-sharing. In April 2013, it imposed penalties of 7.5% of annual turnover on each LDI operator and directed the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) to restore pre-ICH competition. The order rejected claims of 'state compulsion' or Ministry of Information Technology directives, stating that records showed LDI operators themselves sought and secured the policy directive for ICH. The tribunal affirmed that the Competition Act, 2010, applies to government bodies and regulators, noting that even PTA could be held liable for restricting competition. It dismissed arguments that the CCP lacked jurisdiction because the calls were incoming and free to local consumers, stressing that the agreement restricted market entry and competition.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Tribunal upholds penalty against PTCL, other LDI operators
Upholding the Competition Commission of Pakistan's (CCP) decision of penalty against the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) and other Long Distance International (LDI) operators, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has directed the companies to deposit the fine within 30 days. The CAT, however, has conditionally cut the fine to more than half of what the CCP had imposed. The CCP had imposed penalties of 7.5% of annual turnover on each LDI operator including the PTCL for entering into an anti-competitive International Clearing House (ICH) agreement. In 2012, the LDI operators including PTCL entered into an agreement wherein all incoming international calls were routed through a single gateway operated by PTCL as head of an LDI consortium. The arrangement fixed a uniform termination rate of around 8.8 US cents per minute — up from about 2 cents previously — and allocated revenue shares and traffic quotas among LDI operators. Competing networks were closed, and prices for overseas callers increased. The CCP declared the ICH a cartel arrangement involving price-fixing and market-sharing. In April 2013, it imposed penalties of 7.5% of annual turnover on each LDI operator and directed the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) to restore pre-ICH competition. The commission noted that while incoming call volumes fell by 70% after ICH — from 1.9 billion minutes in September 2012 to 579 million in February 2013 — LDI revenues jumped 308%, from $8.37 million to $59 million. The tribunal upheld the CCP's findings but reduced the penalty to 2% of turnover generated from the ICH arrangement. It ruled that if the operators fail to pay within 30 days, the original 7.5% penalty will be reinstated. The order rejected claims of 'state compulsion' or Ministry of Information Technology directives, stating that records showed LDI operators themselves sought and secured the policy directive for ICH. The tribunal affirmed that the Competition Act, 2010, applies to government bodies and regulators, noting that even PTA could be held liable for restricting competition. It dismissed arguments that the CCP lacked jurisdiction because the calls were incoming and free to local consumers, stressing that the agreement restricted market entry and competition.
