
Derailed: Looming funding cuts to Philadelphia's transit system offer a lesson for Chicago
But Chicago's public transit systems are set to get gut-punched early next year by a funding deficit in the hundreds of millions of dollars. If state lawmakers don't agree to allocate more money to public transit, branches on half of the CTA's 'L' lines could go silent. So many bus routes would get slashed that Chicago would have fewer of them than Kansas City. Metra trains could be spaced one or even two hours apart, depending on the day of the week.
Chicagoans don't yet know which train stations would close, which bus lines would stop running or how much longer, exactly, it would take them to get to work and school each morning.
That clarity isn't expected to come for months. The cuts themselves wouldn't start until January at the earliest.
But 700 miles to the east, in Philadelphia, one potential version of Chicago's future is coming into focus.
The city is facing up to its own massive transit deficit, caused in large part, like Chicago's, by the expiration of federal pandemic aid and exacerbated by ridership numbers that simply haven't recovered to 2019 levels.
There, catastrophic transit cuts are slated to start in just weeks unless lawmakers come to a last-minute agreement on funding.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, which runs subways, buses, trolleys, light rail and commuter rail lines throughout Philadelphia and its suburbs, is facing a more than $200 million deficit. The agency, the equivalent of the CTA, Metra and Pace all in one and the sixth-largest public transit system in the nation, expects to eliminate nearly half of its service if lawmakers don't avert the funding crisis.
Weeks from now, a first round of cuts will eliminate close to three dozen bus routes. Other bus lines would be truncated, cutting off service for those who need to travel to the end of a line. Trains, trolleys and buses will all come less often, and fare increases mean riders will pay 21.5% more for the diminished service.
Things will get even more dire in January. A second set of cuts would put all rail service to bed after 9 p.m. Some regional rail lines would be totally cut, including one of SEPTA's most popular lines.
'The cuts are everywhere, in every neighborhood, every mode,' said Leslie Richards, who served as SEPTA CEO until late last year.
'The public has just been universally distraught by this,' said Connor Descheemaker, a transit activist who lives in Philadelphia.
When she saw the announcement of the planned cuts in Philly, Senia Lopez went into 'panic mode.'
Lopez, 30, takes the bus to and from home to her work at a grocery delivery warehouse in North Philly. These days, Lopez has the option of taking a couple of bus lines for both portions of her route, meaning she typically waits only 10 or so minutes for a ride.
That's going to change when the first round of transit cuts hits just weeks from now. Two of the buses Lopez regularly uses to commute will be slashed entirely. The others will see reduced service.
'There's no viable way for me to get from my neighborhood to the neighborhood of my job without having to go farther away and come back,' she said. Lopez said she might have to alter her commute by taking a bus to a train toward Philly's downtown — traveling the opposite direction from her job — and then taking a bus from downtown to the warehouse where she works.
'It would double my commute,' said Lopez, who doesn't have a drivers' license. 'There's no way around it.'
That's not to mention the impact of the impending cuts to Lopez's commute to her second job as a photographer's assistant for weekend events. In January, rail service is slated to stop entirely after 9 p.m., which would leave Lopez stranded downtown after working events such as weddings.
'I'm never done earlier than 10,' she said, meaning she'd have to take a ride-share home to the tune of $30 to $60, eating into at least an hour or two of her earnings from the event in question.
Negotiations around transit funding in Pennsylvania have been fraught, intensely partisan and marked by a rural-urban divide. Unlike in deep blue Illinois, the Pennsylvania statehouse is divided, with Democrats holding onto a narrow one-seat majority in the House and Republicans controlling the Senate. The legislature is weeks past the deadline for its budget, in which transit funding is a major sticking point. 'There is still no deal in sight,' the Philadelphia Inquirer reported last week.
'Funding transit is something that we can live without in our caucus,' Joe Pittman, the state Senate majority leader, a Republican, said in June.
State Sen. Nikil Saval, a Democrat whose district includes Philadelphia's downtown and who has pushed for transit funding, told the Tribune he wouldn't vote for a budget that didn't include transit dollars. 'That can't be an option,' he said.
But the cuts are getting closer.
Last week, SEPTA started posting alert signs at bus stops, letting riders know their routes are on the chopping block.
'We're all systems go, planning for the cuts to be put into place. The hope is obviously that we would be able to roll those back, but there does come a certain point where you can't roll them back,' SEPTA's budget director, Erik Johanson, said in an interview two weeks ago.
Northern Illinois' transit agencies have issued similar warnings to state legislators, who failed to pass transit funding during their spring session.
Without a legislative solution soon, they warn, planned cuts could be hard to reverse. The CTA, Metra and Pace are in the midst of planning multiple budgets for different funding scenarios next year. Layoff notices for some of the 3,000 workers who could lose their jobs under the new paradigm could go out as soon as September or October.
Here, negotiations around transit funding are tied to the overhaul of the structure of the region's transit agencies. A mantra of 'no funding without reform' has come to dominate conversations around the topic in Springfield.
During the spring legislative session, lawmakers in both chambers introduced bills that would have replaced the Regional Transportation Authority, the governing body for CTA, Metra and Pace, with a new entity called the Northern Illinois Transit Authority that would be given broad planning responsibilities.
But after months of behind-the-scenes negotiations, lawmakers only started sharing ideas for revenue generation days before the end-of-session deadline.
Shortly before their legislative deadline, the Illinois Senate approved a version of the bill that would have funded the state's public transit systems with revenue streams that included a controversial $1.50 package delivery fee.
But the bill was never called in the House.
Lawmakers plan to return to the Capitol for a veto session in October, although they'll now need a three-fifths majority in each chamber to pass legislation that would take effect before Illinois runs out of federal funds. Transit advocates have said that meeting during veto session isn't soon enough to avert disaster. They've urged lawmakers to return for a special session this summer, though, as of the end of July, there was no indication they planned to do so.
Last week, Gov. JB Pritzker told reporters he didn't 'see any reason' to call a special session.
In an interview with the Tribune, state Sen. Ram Villivalam, a Chicago Democrat who sponsored the transit funding bill that passed the Senate, said legislators 'saw the sense of urgency.'
But when asked about whether he supported returning to Springfield before October, Villivalam said the decision was one for the governor and legislative leadership to make. 'That is above my pay grade,' he said.
Other mass transit systems across the country, including in Boston, Washington, D.C., and the Bay Area are also facing looming funding gaps exacerbated by the expiration of federal pandemic aid.
Local transit agencies have stretched their pandemic dollars further than most peer agencies, the RTA has said.
Chicago-area transit agencies receive a smaller share of their operating revenue from the state than their peer systems, according to 2019 data from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning.
However, other agencies, including SEPTA and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority in D.C., have seen infusions of short-term funding from state and local governments that have delayed severe service cuts.
That was the case in Pennsylvania last year, when the state's Democratic governor, Josh Shapiro, directed $153 million in federal highway funds to SEPTA.
SEPTA also increased fares by 7.5% at the time, delaying the additional and more significant increase it plans to make this year. The agency has said it is operating under an austerity program.
In Illinois, the CTA has faced some criticism for its finances, but has defended its efficiency, arguing that it has the lowest overhead expense ratio and lowest level of public funding per trip among its peer agencies.
Meanwhile, the transit timer is running out. The impending budget deficit, which has been previously estimated to be around $771 million in Illinois, could end up being roughly $150 million to $225 million lower than expected due to revenue from online e-commerce sales. But even in the best-case scenario, the deficit would still total more than $500 million without more funding.
Villivalam said he had not heard of a temporary funding measure being discussed in Illinois. Lawmakers, he said, were focused on passing legislation that would see transit fully funded here.
But as the deadline for cuts creeps closer in Illinois, regional transportation administrators are keeping a close eye on service cuts elsewhere.
At their monthly meeting Thursday, members of the RTA's board discussed the similarly precarious financial situations of peer transit agencies, including SEPTA.
The sheer scale of the potential service cuts in Pennsylvania hit home.
'45% service cuts in Philadelphia,' remarked RTA board Chairman Kirk Dillard at Thursday's meeting. 'It's unfathomable.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
16 hours ago
- USA Today
Deportations are taking a toll on California's economy - and have only just begun
ICE raids and mass deportations could cost California $275 billion in lost wages and other funds, a report finds. Lupe Lopez can't help but notice that business and foot traffic are painfully slow these days in the predominantly Hispanic neighborhood of East San Jose, California. "A lot more people are either staying closer to home or not coming out at all," said Lopez, 69, whose family owns nine Arteagas Food Center supermarkets, one of which is in East San Jose. Young people are buying in bulk, she said, because their parents are afraid of being outside, where they might be picked up by immigration agents. "We're seeing a change in shopping habits," said Lopez, co-founder of Avanzando, a nonprofit helping Latinos make advances through education. Even as the Trump administration prepares to ramp up its immigration enforcement nationwide, the focus so far in California has already hurt local economies, research and anecdotal reports suggest. One recent study estimated that the hit to California, the world's fourth-largest economy, could be as much as $275 billion. "It's a pretty massive amount that even took us by surprise," said Bay Area Council Economic Institute Research Director Abby Raisz, author of the nonprofit's June report. "We anticipated it would be big, but we didn't realize how expansive and significant a role undocumented workers play in sustaining California's economy. It's bigger than we thought." Immigration raids led to drop in California's workforce Since the report's release, the Trump administration has expanded immigration raids to include many more people without criminal records. The Department of Homeland Security said nearly 2,800 undocumented immigrants have been arrested in Greater Los Angeles. Local media reported that many were between June 6 and 22. The raids had a dramatic and immediate impact on the workforce. Almost 465,000 California workers fled from the labor ranks during the week of June 8, as immigration authorities raided worksites across the Los Angeles area, according to a July University of California, Merced study. As a result, people working in private-sector jobs in California dropped by 3.1%, a decline not seen since the COVID-19 pandemic, the study noted, though it's unclear whether they left permanently or just for a short time. California Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis said immigrants are the backbone of the state's economic workforce. "They are the workers who feed us, the caretakers who support us, the entrepreneurs who drive innovation, and the neighbors who strengthen our communities," Kounalakis said in a statement. "The ripple effects of mass deportation in California would be felt nationwide and beyond." "Carry your papers": The Trump administration is telling immigrants 'Carry your papers.' Here's what to know. Report: Undocumented workers' imprint cannot be underestimated Of California's 10.6 million immigrants, 2.3 million are undocumented, according to Pew Research Center. They account for 8% of all workers statewide. Undocumented immigrants are more likely to be in the workforce than Californians born in the United States, Bay Area Council's Raisz said, with 72% of undocumented immigrants participating in the workforce compared to about 67% of native-born. Immigrants are widespread, but concentrated in certain fields and geographic areas. More than 60% of California's agricultural workers are immigrants and almost 26% are undocumented; about 41% of the state's construction workers are immigrants and 14% are undocumented, Raisz' report found. Those workers are concentrated in coastal urban areas in the Bay Area and Greater Los Angeles, as well as in agricultural hubs in the Central Valley. "These regions are critical drivers of California's economy and understanding the potential impact of deportation on local, state, and national economies has never been more critical," the report said. And even these high figures are probably an undercount, said Darlene Tenes, the executive director of Farmworker Caravan, a San Jose-based nonprofit assisting area farmworkers with some basic needs. "It's very, very difficult to document the undocumented. They are very much a shadow community," Tenes told USA TODAY. "I think it's hard to put a number on it. You have to understand, almost every industry in California uses undocumented workers." Crossroads: Farmers are facing a fork on Trump's immigration highway. So what's next? Undocumented workers' impact on agriculture, construction Raisz said her report shows how entrenched undocumented immigrants are in California and how much they contribute to their communities. "About two-thirds of them have lived here for more than a decade, and about a third own their own homes, so they pay both income and property taxes," Raisz said. Without undocumented labor, GDP generated by California's agriculture would decline by 14%, Raisz said, and the state's construction industry would see a 16% decrease. Both sectors were already experiencing labor shortages, he said, which will only be compounded by immigration crackdowns. Tenes said Americans and some parts of the world won't have access to fresh fruits and vegetables without undocumented workers, as California's coastal counties and Central Valley are consistently among the largest agricultural producers in the nation. 'Cost burdened': America's housing is pulling further out of reach, report finds "Without (undocumented workers), we don't eat, period," Tenes said. "Everything that you eat from a grocery store, strawberries, grapes, lettuce, bread, cereal, all came from the ground at some point. Guess who picks them?" About half of the nation's 4.3 million construction workers are Hispanic and as many as 1 million of them are undocumented, according to George Carillo, CEO of the Hispanic Construction Council. Thousands of those workers are in California and will be needed as the nation faces a housing shortage of around 4.5 million homes and Los Angeles recovers from this year's deadly wildfires, Carillo said. "Who do you think is going to help rebuild those homes that were lost?" Carillo said.


Chicago Tribune
3 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Gov. Pritzker needs to veto this pension bill. Chicago can't afford it.
Memo to Springfield: Chicago is broke. Gov. JB Pritzker has a bill on his desk that would sweeten pension benefits for Chicago's police and firefighters hired in 2011 or later, to the tune of $60 million more out of the city budget in 2027 alone and more than $11 billion over the next three decades, according to the city's own projections. The measure passed unanimously in both chambers at the end of the spring session, allowing for next to no debate and, astoundingly, was supported by every Chicago House member and senator. At the time of the bill's passage, we wrote that the entire Chicago delegation had effectively had voted to increase property taxes on their constituents. Property taxes, of course, are the main means municipalities have of financing their pension obligations to their workers. Interestingly, the governor acknowledged the conundrum last week. Asked about the bill, he said, 'One thing to consider, of course, is the finances of the city of Chicago. How will they pay for it?' The other important consideration, he said, was ensuring Chicago's first responders are 'well taken care of.' We're glad to see Pritzker explicitly state why he's mulling whether to veto despite the strange prospect of rejecting legislation that passed without a single dissenting vote. By asking rhetorically if Chicago can 'pay for it,' the governor has answered his own question. Of course Chicago can't pay for it. The police and fire pension funds have a mere 25% of the assets needed to meet their current and future obligations as it stands. Since we wrote about this measure in June, the city has estimated what it would do for its woefully underfunded first-responder funds. That percentage would drop to an almost unfathomably low 18%. To those who say it's nonsensical to veto a bill with such overwhelming support, remember that GOP lawmakers mainly went along because of the Chicago delegation's unanimous backing and the fact that only Chicagoans' taxes would be affected. All the Chicago Democrats who voted yes could justify reversing their positions by saying (truthfully) they didn't have the city's projections on just how much these changes would cost taxpayers. Chicago taxpayers already are chewing their nails wondering how the city will plug a 2026 budget deficit exceeding $1 billion. The following year looks even worse. Pritzker already tossed an $80 million hot potato in Chicago's lap with his 2023 initiative to phase out the state's 1% tax on groceries, the proceeds of which had been distributed to municipalities. More than 200 municipalities have approved their own 1% grocery taxes, as the state allows them to do. Mayor Brandon Johnson wants the City Council to do the same for Chicago, which must happen by a state-set deadline of Oct. 1. There are no guarantees, given Johnson's fraught relationship with the council and Chicagoan's understandable resistance to tax hikes of any sort, that aldermen will do as he wishes. Meanwhile, this pension time bomb would cost the city nearly as much as repeal of the grocery tax and in the future will cost far more. Speaking of the mayor, while he has spoken tepidly against this bill, he ought to be forcefully urging Pritzker to veto it and Chicago lawmakers to vote to sustain that veto, despite their earlier support of the measure. The city essentially has been missing in action on this issue, and Johnson apparently is struggling to balance his political brand as an ardent union backer with his duty to Chicago taxpayers. This is no time for such timidity. At this stage, it's worth laying out the origins of this bill. In 2010, in a bid to reform Illinois' public-sector pensions, the state created a second tier of beneficiaries hired in 2011 and thereafter — so-called Tier 2 workers — whose retirement payouts were to be substantially less than the overly generous benefits of existing employees and retirees that had gotten Illinois so deeply in pension debt. Six years ago, Pritzker signed into law sweetened pension benefits for Tier 2 cops and firefighters in Illinois outside of Chicago as part of a consolidation of downstate police and fire pension funds. Ever since, Chicago police and fire unions have argued their Tier 2 workers ought to get the same treatment. In addition, proponents cite concerns that the benefits for Tier 2 workers don't rise to the level of Social Security benefits, which would violate federal law. This page has been consistent on the issue of Tier 2 pension benefits and Social Security. State policymakers should do no more than ensure they are compliant with the law and rebuff union efforts to use the Social Security argument in effect to do away with Tier 2 and pension reform altogether. As much as we appreciate and rely on Chicago's first responders, everyone who went to work for the Police or Fire departments after 2010 knew — or should have known — what their retirement benefits were. In a perfect world, their pensions would be equivalent to those earned by their counterparts outside the city. We don't live in that world. Far from it. Mayor Johnson, you should advocate for your city's beleaguered taxpayers and call on Gov. Pritzker and Chicago's Springfield delegation to do the right thing. And, Governor, adding to Chicago's fiscal crisis hurts the whole state. Whether the mayor asks or not, veto the bill.


Politico
4 days ago
- Politico
Tech exec Liam Stanton eyes mayoral run
Happy Monday, Illinois. Stay cool, cause it's gonna be hot again. TOP TALKER SCOOP: Liam Stanton, a 38-year-old tech entrepreneur from Rogers Park, is gearing up to run for mayor. He hasn't formally launched but is in the early kitchen-cabinet conversations and strategic reach-outs, he told Playbook. 'Chicago should be on the world stage. We need to do a better job promoting the city and just being open to business,' he said in an interview. Stanton joins a growing list of Chicagoans considering a challenge to Mayor Brandon Johnson. Others include state Comptroller Susana Mendoza, Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, state Rep. Kam Buckner, County Treasurer Maria Pappas, Chicago Alds. Bill Conway and Andre Vasquez, former Chicago Inspector General Joe Ferguson, government consultant John Kelly and businessman Willie Wilson. Worth noting: The mayoral election isn't until February of 2027 — two months after the 2026 General Election. Stanton isn't a household name — yet. But he says he's lining up some Democratic firepower behind his campaign, including operatives from former Mayor Rahm Emanuel's and former President Barack Obama's teams. Stanton also counts David Spielfogel, who worked in Emanuel's administration, as a friend. At 38, Stanton is part of a new breed of young Democrats looking to make change. 'I call myself a radical moderate,' Stanton said in the interview. Most Chicagoans are just tired of the extremes, he added. 'They want common sense.' Stanton speaks the city's cultural dialect having been raised in Rogers Park as the youngest of eight, the son of a Chicago Police officer and now living in Bowmanville with a young family of his own. But he also speaks with the fluency of someone who's helped run global strategy for large companies. The tech-exec-meets-neighborhood guy wants to boost tourism and create a better climate for small businesses. On public safety, Stanton says he supports community policing and also wants to attract new officers. 'We need a reset. Who would want to be a cop in this city right now?' And when it comes to the city's financial challenges, Stanton says, 'I firmly believe we're not going to tax our way out of this.' He pointed to Chicago's period of growth during the Oprah Winfrey and Michael Jordan days. Since then, he said, 'We've kind of gotten on the back foot. Now, we have to get on the front foot and start growing again.' THE BUZZ Judge throws out Trump's lawsuit against Illinois over sanctuary policies: 'The case is just one in a series of lawsuits that the DOJ has filed against blue states and cities,' report POLITICO's Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein. U.S. District Judge Lindsay Jenkins concluded the lawsuit — the first filed by the administration this year trying to upend so-called 'sanctuary policies' in states and cities — was an 'end-run around the Tenth Amendment,' which protects states from federal government overreach. The case challenged Illinois' TRUST Act, which was signed into law by Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner. It restricts law enforcement officials from helping U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in its work — though it doesn't prevent ICE from doing its job. The logic is that immigrant communities will trust local law enforcement if they know officers aren't working hand-in-hand with ICE. Gov. JB Pritzker's take: 'This court ruling shows what we already knew: Illinois' law has always been and still is compliant with federal law,' he said in a statement. 'Illinois ensures law enforcement time and energy is spent fighting crime — not carrying out the Trump Administration's unlawful policies or troubling tactics.' If you are Bruce Rauner, Playbook would like to hear from you! Email: skapos@ WHERE'S JB At 555 West Monroe Street at 11 a.m. to sign gun and safety legislation WHERE's BRANDON No official public events Where's Toni No official public events Have a tip, suggestion, birthday, new job or a (gasp!) complaint? Email skapos@ BUSINESS OF POLITICS — FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: Community leader Paul Kendrick is kicking off his campaign today for Illinois House District 12. It's the seat now held by state Rep. Margaret Croke, who's running for state comptroller. Croke is also endorsing Kendrick for the statehouse job as are Ald. Brian Hopkins and Water Reclamation District Commissioner Precious Brady-Davis, according to Kendrick's team. 'I'm running because I love our community and I want to keep it safe and vibrant for my daughters and generations to come,' Kendrick said in announcing his campaign. His launch video is here. — FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: Progressive Congressman Ro Khanna is set to endorse Kat Abughazaleh in her bid for the IL-09 seat now held by retiring U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky. Khanna is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and co-chair of Sen. Bernie Sander's 2020 campaign for president. — Pritzker in North Carolina: 'I am contemptuous of MAGA Republicans. And you should be, too,' Gov. JB Pritzker told North Carolina Democrats at a fundraiser Saturday. Watch his speech here, starting at 1:17 — Krishnamoorthi is running one of the best-funded U.S. Senate: 'He put together nearly $12.7 million between the time he entered the Senate race in early May and the end of the year's second quarter on June 30. That's enough to rank him sixth out of more than 260 candidates,' by the Daily Herald's Russell Lissau. — State Rep. Paul Jacobs, a Republican from Pomona, has announced that he's running for the 59th Senate District seat now held by Sen. Dale Fowler, who isn't seeking re-election. Jacobs describes himself as 'a tough-on-crime conservative Republican' and says he's running to ensure southern Illinois 'continues to have strong, principled leadership in Springfield.' — Radiance Ward, a Cook County assistant public defender, launched her campaign for Cook County judge in the 1st Judicial Subcircuit on Thursday — her 43rd birthday. — Catholic priests are deeply divided politically, based on their campaign contributions, by the Sun-Times' Robert Herguth THE STATEWIDES — There's one tax change in Trump's big bill that even Gov. JB Pritzker supports: 'The measure temporarily raises the limit on how much of their state and local tax bills taxpayers can deduct when filing their federal income tax returns. Boosting the cap on the so-called SALT deduction to $40,000, from the previous $10,000, and extending its expiration date for five years will largely benefit those at the upper end of the income scale. But it's also seen as especially beneficial in states such as Illinois that have high property taxes,' by the Tribune's Dan Petrella. — PPP fraud in Illinois sees nearly 375 government workers implicated, state watchdog finds, by the Sun-Times' Frank Main. CHICAGO — Ald. Stephanie Coleman is proposing a measure to require anyone on a boat to wear a life jacket or face fines: That would include people on large tourist vessels, too, by Bob Chiarito for the Sun-Times — This iconic Marshall Field's salad has been a Chicago tradition for more than a century, by Alex Fulton for Allrecipe COOK COUNTY AND COLLARS — Landlord imprisoned for decades in hate-crime attack on Palestinian American family has died: 'Three months ago, Joseph Czuba was sentenced to 53 years behind bars,' by The Associated Press. TAKING NAMES — Penny Pritzker, Harvard's powerful leader, faces intense scrutiny in Trump fight: 'As Harvard and the government negotiate to end a conflict with billions of dollars on the line, some ask whether Penny Pritzker, the head of the school's governing board, should step down,' by The New York Times' Anemona Hartocollis. — Tumia Romero, chief of staff to Congressman Danny Davis, has earned her Ph.D. in leadership and change from Antioch University. Graduation ceremonies were Saturday. Romero wrote her dissertation on the Second Chance Act to try to understand its potential impact on the re-entry of African American women into society after serving their time. Davis, who has advocated on this issue, served on Romero's dissertation committee. State Rep. La Shawn Ford, who's running for Davis' seat, attended Romero's graduation. — Annette Guzman, budget director for the City of Chicago, has been selected as a fellow in the latest class of Leadership Greater Chicago, a group of accomplished government, corporate and nonprofit leaders. The full list is here. SPOTTED Journalism-palooza: More than 150 people poured into the Billy Goat on Saturday for Tribune reporter Ray Long's retirement party. In the bar were Mayor Brandon Johnson, former Mayor Lori Lightfoot, Atty. Gen. Kwame Raoul, state Rep. Theresa Mah, Appellate Court Justice Joe Birkett and former Illinois appellate justices Kent Slater and Tom Homer. Also spotted: Legislative Inspector General Mike McCuskey and top lawyers Cardelle Spangler, who was a federal mediator in Shakman anti-patronage cases, and Patrick Cotter, who prosecuted John Gotti. Among the journalists: Christi Parsons, Long's longtime Tribune bureaumate and former president of the White House Correspondents Association, who flew in from Washington; former Peoria Journal Star political reporter Loren Wassell; former State Journal-Register political reporter Bernie Schoenburg, and numerous reporters and editors from the Tribune and across the state. Reader Digest We asked what you accomplished in your student government role. Former Mayor Lori Lightfoot: 'During my third year of law school, I was president of the student government and I led a successful fight to ban a large international law firm from interviewing on campus after a fellow student was subjected to demeaning sexist and racist comments from the firm's interviewer — who had a history of asking such questions. The ban at my law school caught fire and led to that firm being banned from interviewing at other campuses across the country.' James Cappleman, the former alderman: 'I started attending Robert E. Lee High School in Baytown, Texas, just after integration had begun. In 1970, during my senior year, some of my fellow students and I organized to stop the display of the Confederate flag on our school campus. After that success, we started a new school club called The Human Race Club, which had the purpose of uniting people of all different races.' Kent Gray: 'In the mid-1990s at Loyola, we implemented a new student activity fee and, as the College Republicans, brought Jack Kemp, Dan Quayle, Fred Barnes, Dave Thomas, Lynn Nofziger and many others to speak on campus.' Ashvin Lad: 'As student body president at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, we led the initiative to have a formal co-op and internship program and an on-campus career fair.' Gail Schnitzer Eisenberg: 'A crosswalk at 4th and Chalmers in Champaign and the reinstatement of study abroad offerings in Israel.' Alex Sutton: 'As college student body president, I rewrote our constitution and bylaws and executed projects to expand the gymnasium, law student lounge and 3D printer makerspace.' NEXT QUESTION: If you could choose a political party mascot besides an elephant or donkey, what would it be? THE NATIONAL TAKE — Trump has Hegseth's back. Some of Hegseth's allies worry it won't last, by POLITICO's Rachael Bade — Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland, by POLITICO's Liz Crampton, Jeremy B. White and Nick Reisman — 'Donaldddddd': Foreign leaders schmooze Trump on his personal cell, by POLITICO's Eli Stokols and Dan Bloom — Researchers quietly planned a test to dim sunlight. They wanted to 'avoid scaring' the public, by POLITICO's Corbin Hiar TRIVIA FRIDAY's ANSWER: Congrats to Joseph Morris and Michael Penicnak for correctly answering that Wabash Avenue and Calumet Avenue share their names with the Wabash River and Little Wabash River and the Calumet River and Little Calumet River, respectively. TODAY's QUESTION: Which future U.S. senator wrote for the Chicago Defender during the 1940s? Email your answer to: skapos@ HAPPY BIRTHDAY State Treasurer Mike Frerichs, governor's chief of staff Anne Caprara, former state Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, former state Rep. Darlene Senger, former Urbana Mayor Diane Marlin, political and media consultant Delmarie Cobb, tech entrepreneur and former mayoral candidate Neal Sales-Griffin, education advocate and comms expert Peter Cunningham, Blue Raven Campaigns partner Joshua Kaufman, retired BMO senior bank exec Susan Payne, former White Sox exec Sam Mondry-Cohen and broadcast legend Walter Jacobson -30-