Black Hawk pilot Rebecca Lobach failed to heed flight instructor in moments before plane collision over Washington DC: report
The pilot of the military Black Hawk helicopter that collided with a passenger airplane over Washington, D.C., in January ignored instructions to change course seconds before the crash, according to a new report.
The report, published by the New York Times on Sunday, detailed the Black Hawk's exchanges with air traffic controllers in the lead-up to the disaster, which left 67 people dead.
According to the report, the Black Hawk pilot, Capt. Rebecca Lobach, was conducting her annual flight evaluation and her co-pilot, Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, was serving as her flight instructor.
When air traffic controllers informed the Black Hawk that there was an airliner nearby, Lobach and Eaves acknowledged the message and requested to fly by "visual separation," a common practice that allows aircraft to avoid collisions based on their own observations rather than following instructions from air traffic control.
"The Black Hawk was 15 seconds away from crossing paths with the jet. Warrant Officer Eaves then turned his attention to Captain Lobach. He told her he believed that air traffic control wanted them to turn left, toward the east river bank," the Times wrote.
"Turning left would have opened up more space between the helicopter and Flight 5342, which was heading for Runway 33 at an altitude of roughly 300 feet. She did not turn left," the report said.
A photo of Capt. Rebecca Lobach, posted by USA Today reporter Davis Winkie. Picture: Davis Winkie via X
The Coast Guard investigates aircraft wreckage on the Potomac River on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Brandon Giles/ U.S. Coast Guard via Getty Images
Lobach, of Durham, North Carolina, served as an aviation officer in the Army beginning in July 2019, and had around 500 hours of flying time in the Black Hawk, the Army said in a release.
Lobach was assigned to the 12th Aviation Battalion in Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Her awards included the Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal and Army Service Ribbon, according to the Army.
She was also a White House military social aide in the Biden administration.
Capt. Rebecca M. Lobach (right), of Durham, North Carolina, was assigned to the 12th Aviation Battalion in Fort Belvoir, Virginia, and has served since July 2019, the Army have said in a statement. Picture: Supplied
A crane lifts a piece of American Airlines flight 5342 from the Potomac River during recovery efforts after a midair collision with a military Black Hawk helicopter last January. Picture:/AFP
The third member of the flight crew, along with Lobach and Eaves, was Staff Sgt. Ryan O'Hara.
The crash instantly caused national scrutiny on air traffic control policies, with Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy opening an investigation.
Duffy announced plans in March to bolster airport air traffic control systems with the latest technology over the next four years, while also using artificial intelligence (AI) to identify "hot spots" where close encounters between aircraft occur frequently.
There have been 85 near-misses or close calls at Reagan National, according to a report from the National Travel Safety Board (NTSB). Close calls were identified as incidents when there are less than 200 feet of vertical separation and 1,500 feet of lateral separation between aircraft.
"We're having near-misses, and if we don't change our way, we're going to lose lives," Duffy told reporters at the time. "That wasn't done. Maybe there was a focus on something other than safety, but in this administration, we are focusing on safety."
Originally published as Black Hawk pilot Rebecca Lobach failed to heed flight instructor in moments before plane collision over Washington DC: report
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
03-06-2025
- Perth Now
Miley Cyrus reveals if she will ever launch a makeup line
Miley Cyrus doesn't think she will ever launch a makeup line. The 32-year-old pop superstar is unlikely to ever follow in the footsteps of A-Listers such as Selena Gomez and Kylie Jenner by creating a cosmetics brand simply because she is not "passionate" about it in the way she is about music. She told the New York Times: "I was talking to my stepdad and he was like 'Why are you the only celebrity without a makeup line?' and I said 'Because I'm not passionate about it'. And he 'That's the right answer.'" In fact, when the 'Easy Lover' hitmaker - who has just released her ninth studio album 'Something Beautiful' - doesn't even wear make-up when she is at home and insisted that her own "persona" is very different to how the public sees her. She said: "I don't think it's so much of a conscious choice. My persona or the public's idea of me is on in some way but in my own time, I am very off. "I like no makeup, my hair up messy. I don't even look in the mirror in my own time. " Miley found global fame as a teenager when she was cast in the title role of 'Hannah Montana' - which followed the adventures of a schoolgirl who led a double life as a world-famous pop star - and thinks that she was "programmed" by the concept of the hit Disney Channel sitcom to always think of herself as two different people in and out of the spotlight. She said: "I like doing my two worlds. Maybe it's something subconsciously from the show. From 'Hannah Montana', where I think my famous person has one life, and then as a regular person, I have another life. "I think subconsciously it programmed me - not even joking - to think that who I am at home and who I am as a performer are two separate identities, and actually they are. "It's definitely a superhero cape, but it's drag!"
ABC News
28-05-2025
- ABC News
The ethics of commemorating the dead of the Third Reich
From an Australian perspective the commemoration of war has long been wrapped up with our national identity. Both 20th C world wars have loomed large for many Australians, and we continue to commemorate our war dead - note the Federal Government has just dropped over half a billion taxpayer dollars on a refurb of the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. Everyone deserves a proper and decent burial. Even those who have lived a life of crime or scandal can surely expect some dignity in death. But what if the deceased is a war criminal -- specifically a Nazi? In Germany, an organisation established after World War 1 to help locate and re-bury the remains of some of the millions who died, has found itself in an ethical dilemma. A fascinating story called Unburying the Remains of the Third Reich by Nicholas Casey , a journalist and staff writer at The New York Times based in Madrid.
The Advertiser
23-05-2025
- The Advertiser
Disasters are worsening and volunteer numbers are dwindling
As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe. Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia. Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years. They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021. We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions. Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce. The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally. This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services. Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond. Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention: 1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures. 2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers. 3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times. 4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans. 5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters. Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities. Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need. READ MORE: These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief. Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services. Ultimately, we will all pay. Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities. As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe. Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia. Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years. They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021. We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions. Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce. The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally. This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services. Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond. Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention: 1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures. 2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers. 3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times. 4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans. 5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters. Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities. Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need. READ MORE: These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief. Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services. Ultimately, we will all pay. Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities. As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe. Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia. Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years. They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021. We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions. Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce. The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally. This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services. Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond. Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention: 1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures. 2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers. 3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times. 4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans. 5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters. Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities. Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need. READ MORE: These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief. Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services. Ultimately, we will all pay. Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities. As NSW communities are again experiencing a record-breaking disaster event unfold, it's the committed emergency service volunteers who consistently show up during times of disaster that keeps impacted residents safe. Recently, it was National Volunteer Week, a time to acknowledge and value the efforts of the 400,000 emergency service volunteers across Australia. Volunteers who are out in force in NSW where the Manning River at Taree exceeded its previous almost 100-year-old record, reaching a height expected on average only once every 500 years. They evacuated, sandbagged, rescued people and provided comfort across the Mid North Coast where hundreds of properties were flooded, and thousands of people were impacted. Some of these communities experienced major flooding as recently as 2021. We live in a time of worsening natural hazard risk. Major disasters once considered rare are becoming more frequent as we warm our climate and choose to live in areas prone to flood and bushfire. Disasters are not natural. They are the consequence of our decisions. Increasingly frequent disasters place a enormous strain on volunteers when broader demographic, technology and work trends are influencing the current and future disaster management workforce. The recent Senate select committee on Australia's disaster resilience highlighted challenges in recruiting and retaining emergency service volunteers, with one estimate that volunteer numbers have decreased by more than 20,000 in the last decade nationally. This is occurring at a time of increasing geopolitical stress, meaning we can't just call in the Army to support response and recovery efforts. Our troops now considered a last resort to support state and territory-based emergency services. Ensuring adequate resources to meet the demands of future disasters requires urgent attention and action. After previous disasters, calls were made for federally funded emergency response initiatives such as a national firefighting force, but these duplicate existing structures and are expensive. While no one strategy will be a panacea, action is needed now to ensure a volunteer disaster workforce is prepared for tomorrow and beyond. Five evidence-informed strategies merit attention: 1. Make it easier for people to volunteer through streamlined recruitment and onboarding of volunteers, recognising existing skills. Ensuring the required infrastructure is provided, including facilities, vehicles, equipment and volunteer support staff. Opportunities exist to be more inclusive and engage with a more diverse range of volunteers by providing more flexible volunteering models that are tailored to personal preferences and time pressures. 2. Address volunteer workloads, with volunteers often burdened by mounting administrative demands. Cost of living pressures also impacts volunteering and could be mitigated through legislated employment and financial incentives for volunteers. 3. Ensure emergency service agencies' disaster plans incorporate engagement and coordination with new volunteer groups emerging during disasters, such as the "tinny army" during the 2022 Lismore floods. Accelerated learning techniques could rapidly skill individuals to perform critical tasks and support traditional emergency response and recovery volunteers during critical times. 4. Mobilise often underutilised business, not-for-profits and First Nations ranger groups skills and resources. There is significant benefit in exploring deeper partnerships between government agencies and these groups in the development of disaster plans. 5. Trialling, investing and adapting new technologies to reduce workforce demands and augment the existing workforce, while also considering how future technologies will reshape the skill sets required to manage future disasters. Autonomous robots and vehicles, equipped with advanced sensors, AI and communication technologies, represent a potential leap forward in disaster response capabilities. Combined with predictive analytics, autonomous assets could be deployed with minimal human intervention to areas of greatest need. READ MORE: These assets could be co-ordinated to perform a variety of tasks, from firefighting and search and rescue operations to rapid impact assessment and the delivery of emergency relief. Ultimately, we must focus on reducing disaster risks and avoiding future development in at-risk areas. Without addressing the fundamentals that reduce disaster risks our communities will only experience further suffering, increasing demands on volunteers and other government services. Ultimately, we will all pay. Let's recognise and celebrate our volunteers but not wait until the next disaster to invest in actions to strengthen critical capabilities.
