logo
Bird flu brings foul times: Chicken shortage and price hike loom in South Africa

Bird flu brings foul times: Chicken shortage and price hike loom in South Africa

The Citizen20-05-2025

South Africa risks a chicken shortage if the Department of Agriculture bans imports from Brazil.
South Africans must brace for a potential rise in chicken prices, as the government is expected to ban imports from Brazil following a recent outbreak of avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu, in that country
Brazil supplies more than 84% of South Africa's poultry imports. Should the Department of Agriculture ban the imports, the poultry industry in SA could face a massive shortage, leaving the industry little to no choice but to increase prices.
The same measures may be forced upon Astral Foods, South Africa's largest poultry producer, which is already under pressure from rising input costs despite remaining profitable.
ALSO READ: Bird flu: Farmers can apply for compensation for animals destroyed
Chicken shortage
The Association of Meat Importers and Exporters (AMIE) has urged the government to avoid a blanket ban on Brazilian imports and instead adopt a regionalisation strategy that targets only the specific areas affected by the outbreak.
This approach has already been announced by Japan, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the Philippines in response to the outbreak in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul.
AMIE CEO Imameleng Mothebe warned that a full ban on Brazilian poultry imports would have devastating consequences for South African poultry processors and consumers, particularly the country's most vulnerable.
The importance of chicken imports
'Imported poultry not only fills the country's poultry consumption gap, but also provides the necessary competition to ensure that prices are kept in check.
'Chicken is the most affordable protein source for many South Africans, and a disruption in the supply of poultry products, including bone-in chicken and mechanically deboned meat (MDM), will significantly drive up prices and impact food security,' she added.
Mothebe said a blanket ban on imports will lead to sharp increases in the prices of these products, making them unaffordable for many, particularly those in low-income communities.
If this happens, it would exacerbate food insecurity at a time when consumers are already facing high inflation and economic pressures. Coupled with this is the potential job losses arising from the unavailability of MDM product required to keep the meat processing facilities running.
ALSO READ: Egg prices increasing globally due to US shortage — Should SA take advantage and export?
SA has potential
With more than 84% of South Africa's poultry imports coming from Brazil, it is highly possible that the country would face a chicken shortage. However, the South African Poultry Association (Sapa) holds a different view.
Izaak Breitenbach, CEO of Sapa's Broiler Organisation, said SA has enough capability to make up for the shortfall.
'We are currently producing about 21.5 million chickens per week, and the industry has the capacity to increase this by about another million birds per week.
He added that winter months are a period of lower demand for chicken. Therefore, the additional supply of chicken should be sufficient to prevent shortages or price increases.
'The impact of a ban on Brazilian chicken imports will not be felt immediately. Chicken imports from Brazil can take about six weeks to reach South Africa, and products dispatched before the ban is implemented will not be affected.'
Brazil has no compartmentalisation deal
Breitenbach added that if Brazil had a compartmentalisation agreement with South Africa, chicken imports from other parts of Brazil that are not affected by the bird flu outbreak would be allowed.
'If there is a problem following a ban on Brazilian imports, it will concern MDM, not fresh or frozen chicken meat. MDM is a paste used in the production of processed meats, such as polony and sausages; it is not produced in large quantities in South Africa.'
MDM accounts for about 60% of our poultry imports from Brazil. The second-largest category is offal – products such as chicken heads, feet, gizzards, and livers. A far smaller proportion, 4.5% of Brazilian imports, comprises bone-in chicken portions such as leg quarters, thighs, drumsticks and wings.
The Citizen has reached out to the Department of Agriculture for a comment.
Company loses profit
Astral Foods' financial results for the six months ended 31 March 2025 show the company lost 51% of its profit before interest and tax due to higher input costs.
The company is under pressure due to increased costs and its inability to pass these costs on to consumers by raising food prices.
The results show the business was able to see more chicken during the six months. However, these sales were made with selling prices down 3.1% year-on-year.
Astral Foods effectively subsidised the cost of producing chicken during the period, resulting in a loss of R26 million for the poultry division.
NOW READ: Here are the economic and social impacts of bird flu

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Institute of Race Relations slams unclear expropriation law
Institute of Race Relations slams unclear expropriation law

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Institute of Race Relations slams unclear expropriation law

The Institute of Race Relations (IRR) calls on Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson to disclose all state bodies empowered under the Expropriation Act. The Expropriation Act allows property to be seized below market value, raising concerns about property rights in South Africa. Makone Maja of the IRR says more than 400 state entities may already hold expropriation powers. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni residents to face new tariff hikes IRR polling shows 68% of South Africans oppose the Expropriation Act. The IRR will this week write to Macpherson, seeking clarity on how many public entities have been granted the power to expropriate property under the recently enacted Expropriation Act. The act grants expropriating authorities broad powers to seize property, including land, homes, and business assets, potentially at below-market value. It provides limited legal recourse for owners to challenge such actions in court. The IRR has raised concerns over the lack of transparency about the number of government bodies authorised to carry out expropriations. Makone Maja, the IRR's strategic engagements manager, said the law is unpopular among South Africans and poses a significant threat to property rights. 'Our polling conducted in March and April shows that 68% of registered voters oppose the Expropriation Act,' said Maja. 'The act is so broadly worded that all forms of property – including savings and pensions – are now vulnerable.' According to the IRR, at least 426 public entities currently have the authority to expropriate property under the Act. However, the organisation believes the actual number may be closer to 1 000. ALSO READ: Issues plaguing Edenvale tackled in a heated meeting 'It is the height of policy recklessness for such vast powers to be granted to an unknown number of authorities,' said Maja. 'If the number is unclear, how can citizens have confidence that these powers will not be abused?' The IRR argues that uncertainty around expropriation powers could undermine investment, economic growth and food security. In its Blueprint for Growth policy series, the institute emphasises the importance of secure property rights as a foundation for economic empowerment. Maja added that South Africa's history of corruption and abuse of power makes the lack of oversight especially troubling. ALSO READ: Court orders the removal of illegal billboard on Gillooly's 'We have seen how state power can be misused,' she said. 'It is deeply irresponsible to empower a vast and unaccountable network of officials to take property without clear safeguards. 'The minister must urgently disclose which entities have been given this authority and explain how abuse will be prevented.' The IRR has called on the government to publish a full list of authorised expropriating entities and to provide clarity on how the act will be implemented to protect constitutional property rights. For more information, visit At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts
Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts

eNCA

time3 hours ago

  • eNCA

Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts

WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said that Elon Musk had "lost his mind" but insisted he wanted to move on from the fiery split with his billionaire former ally. The blistering public break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful is fraught with political and economic risks all around. Trump had scrapped the idea of a call with Musk and was even thinking of ditching the red Tesla he bought at the height of their bromance, White House officials told AFP. "Honestly, I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk, I just wish him well," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to his New Jersey golf club late Friday. Earlier, Trump told US broadcasters that he now wanted to focus instead on passing his "big, beautiful" mega-bill before Congress -- Musk's harsh criticism of which had sparked their break-up. But the 78-year-old Republican could not stop himself from taking aim at his South African-born friend-turned-enemy. "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" Trump said in a call with ABC when asked about Musk, adding that he was "not particularly" interested in talking to the tycoon. Trump later told Fox News that Musk had "lost it." Just a week ago Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after four months working there. While there had been reports of tensions, the sheer speed at which their relationship imploded stunned Washington. After Musk called Trump's spending bill an "abomination" on Tuesday, Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe on Thursday in which he said he was "very disappointed" by the entrepreneur. Trump's spending bill faces a difficult path through Congress as it will raise the US deficit, while critics say it will cut health care for millions of the poorest Americans. The row then went nuclear, with Musk slinging insults at Trump and accusing him without evidence of being in government files on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump hit back with the power of the US government behind him, saying he could cancel the Space X boss's multi-billion-dollar rocket and satellite contracts. Trump struck a milder tone late Friday when asked how seriously he is considering cutting Musk's contracts. "It's a lot of money, it's a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look -- only if it's fair. Only if it's to be fair for him and the country," he said. Musk apparently also tried to de-escalate social media hostilities. The right-wing tech baron rowed back on a threat to scrap his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. And on Friday the usually garrulous poster kept a low social media profile on his X social network. But the White House denied reports that they would talk.

Trump dismisses Musk's call after public fallout, considers selling Tesla
Trump dismisses Musk's call after public fallout, considers selling Tesla

IOL News

time12 hours ago

  • IOL News

Trump dismisses Musk's call after public fallout, considers selling Tesla

US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk (R) speak in the Oval Office before departing the White House in Washington, DC, on the way to Trump's residence at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida US President Donald Trump has no plans to speak to billionaire Elon Musk and may even ditch his red Tesla car, the White House said Friday after a stunning public divorce fraught with risk for both men. Trump's camp insisted that he wanted to move on from the row with the South African-born Musk, with officials telling AFP that the tech tycoon had requested a call but that the president was not interested. The Republican instead intended to focus on getting the US Congress to pass his "big, beautiful" spending bill -- Musk's harsh criticisms of which had triggered the astonishing meltdown on Thursday. Fallout from the blow-up between the world's richest person and its most powerful could be significant, as Trump risks political damage and Musk faces the loss of huge US government contracts. Trump phoned reporters at several US broadcast networks to insist that he was looking past the row. He called Musk "the man who has lost his mind" in a call to ABC and told CBS he was "totally" focused on the presidency. The White House meanwhile, squashed earlier reports that they would talk. "The president does not intend to speak to Musk today," a senior White House official told AFP on condition of anonymity. A second official said it was "true" that Musk had requested a call.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store