Apple Watch Ultra 3 tipped to launch this year alongside Series 11 and iPhone 17
Jeff Pu's latest report, which outlines Apple's product roadmap through to 2027, also indicates that a new HomePod model, reportedly dubbed the HomePod 6, could be launched at the same time. Notably, if the predictions hold, 2025 could mark one of Apple's most expansive autumn launches in recent years.
Though Apple introduced the Watch Ultra 2 in September 2023, the company has since remained quiet about the next iteration. The only update since has been a new colourway for the Ultra 2, leaving enthusiasts eagerly awaiting more substantial upgrades.
Rumours suggest the Watch Ultra 3 could feature improved battery life, an upgraded LTPO 3 OLED display, and possibly even satellite connectivity, a feature hinted at by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
Looking further ahead, Pu claims the Apple Watch Series 12 and the third-generation AirPods Pro are likely to be introduced in 2026. Meanwhile, 2027 could be a breakthrough year for Apple's wearable technology, with the first smartwatch expected to include blood pressure monitoring. The year could also see the launch of Apple's long-rumoured smart glasses and a more budget-friendly 'Vision Air' mixed-reality headset.
Jeff Pu's timeline appears to align with earlier projections by analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, who also suggested a 2025 release for the Watch Ultra 3. With multiple sources converging on similar timelines, anticipation is building for a major refresh across Apple's hardware ecosystem in the coming years.
To recall, Apple also recently announced watchOS 26 at its WWDC 2025, the latest version of its Apple Watch software. The update brings a new design and smarter features focused on fitness, messaging, and daily use.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'It's been coming soon for a full year,' Google mocks Apple for Siri AI delay in Pixel 10 teaser
Google Pixel 10 series launch is just a few days away, and the Mountain View giant has started to tease the launch. Not only has the company revealed the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro design, but it is also teasing some early launch benefits, creating curiosity among buyers. However, the Pixel 10 teaser is not limited only to the launch, as this time Google takes a shot at Apple, delaying Siri's AI features. In the latest teaser, the tech giant silently mocks Apple about delaying crucial features, saying, 'It's been coming soon for a full year.' While Google did not highlight Apple's name but the company is currently in the limelight for not delivering promised features. Here's everything you need to know about the teaser. Google Pixel 10 new teaser, encourages buyers to change their phones from iPhone to Pixel, here's how.(Google) Google mocks Apple delaying Siri's AI upgrade in Pixel 10 teaser Google has recently shared a 30-second teaser video of the upcoming Pixel 10 model, flaunting smartphone design in the new Moonstone shade. However, the video also consists of a voice-over, which cleverly mocks Apple for delaying Siri's AI upgrade, which was first introduced at WWDC24. Now, we have completed a year since the announcement, and Apple has failed to deliver the promised AI upgrade on time. Mocking Apple for the delay, Google, in the teaser video, said, 'If you buy a new phone because of a feature that's coming soon, but it's been coming soon for a full year. You could change your definition of soon. Or you could just change your phone.' As per Apple's promise, the Siri AI upgrade, which consisted of capabilities like personal context, onscreen awareness, and cross-app actions, was expected to ship with iOS 18.4 to the iPhone 16 models. Now, just in time for release, Apple announced that the feature is not ready, and left iPhone users with a vague commitment. Now, the company has also showcased the iOS 26 update, and it is expected to roll out next month, with Siri AI features expected to roll out in 2026. Despite the new generation OS update, Apple has not confirmed when iPhone users can expect the delayed AI upgrade. Therefore, Google is now taking a dig and is encouraging consumer to simply change their phone with the tagline 'Ask more of your phone.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
China's 996 workweek is knocking on America's door: Is Silicon Valley falling for the 70-hour grind?
(Representative image) There was a time when Silicon Valley served a dream on a platter, not just of a technology to revolutionise the world, but of lives built on flexibility, creativity, and a certain renegade freedom. Today, in the fluorescent-lit offices of AI startups from Palo Alto to SoMa, the dream is morphed and has become a subject of mockery. 12 hour shifts and six days a week are becoming the new norm of the American job market. The 21st century opened with the narratives of work-life balance, with beanbags, open offices, and kombucha on tap, it appears the next chapter may be authored in the image of a far more punishing model: China's 996 work culture, 9 AM to 9 PM, six days a week. Once vilified and outlawed in the country of origin, 996 is now knocking on America's doors, looking for a new traction in the heart of its tech frontier. The question isn't whether this trend exists. It does. The question is: What does its rise say about the future of ambition in America? Will Silicon Valley keep championing the employees who trade their sleep and sanity for the sake of so-called progress? A peek into the new reality At Rilla, a San Francisco-based AI startup, there's no pretence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Stylish New Mobility Scooters Available for Seniors (Prices May Surprise You) Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Search Now Undo The job listing doesn't mince words: 'Do not apply unless you're excited about working approximately 70 hours a week.' It's not just a warning, it's a filter. Meals are provided, Saturdays included. The message is etched in black and white: This is the place where work should be your optimum priority, and is for the ones who breathe hustle. And this story does not end with a single company, but is slowly redefining the very fabric of American work culture, where work is no longer a part of life, but a life itself. 996 isn't creeping , it's charging in What was once the whispered domain of overworked founders is now becoming institutionalised. Google co-founder Sergey Brin recently described 60-hour weeks as the 'sweet spot' for his Gemini AI team. Elon Musk offered a more ruthless ultimatum at X: commit to 'extremely hardcore' work hours or take severance and go. Other startups are less subtle. San Francisco-based Fella & Delilah recently introduced a two-tier system, a 25% salary bump and double the equity for those opting into 996. Just under 10% of staff signed on. Meanwhile, recruiters are adjusting to the new expectations. Adrian Kinnersley, a long-time tech headhunter, reports a surge in companies asking for 996 commitments upfront. He's already registered the domain not as a gimmick, but in anticipation of a job market that no longer hides its demands behind euphemisms like "fast-paced" or "growth-minded." Why now? Why again? The answer to why there is a resurgence of extreme work culture, one has to look beyond office walls, to the geopolitical battle being waged in code and silicon. China's DeepSeek AI recently stunned Western researchers with models rivalling, even threatening, the dominance of OpenAI and Google DeepMind. Silicon Valley, long accustomed to leading from the front, suddenly feels the heat at its back. The reflex is primal: work harder. Work longer. Outbuild. Enter the 996 revival. It's no longer just about building great products; it's about defending America's place in a global AI arms race. British venture capitalist Harry Stebbings, never known for understatement, suggested that even 996 might now be passé. 'China's on 007,' he quipped. 'Midnight to midnight, seven days a week.' For Stebbings, working five days a week builds $100 million companies. Seven days? That's the $10 billion game. It's a mindset that both inspires and alarms, depending on where you stand. The fine print: Dreams vs. labour law The glorification of relentless toil does not come without repercussions. Labour law experts forewarn that numerous companies are operating far outside compliance, especially in California, which boasts some of the strictest protections for overtime, rest, and worker safety. But the law, as always, lags behind the culture. And culture is shifting fast. The truth is, there is less appetite, at least in the Valley, to run the ethos. Investors don't reward moderation. Founders don't get applause for leaving early. And in a climate where Gen Z founders equate sleep with mediocrity, the gravitational pull of extreme work is hard to resist. A warning from the East It's worth remembering: China tried this. It scaled the heights of innovation on the backs of millions of overworked engineers, only to be forced into a reckoning. Burnout, protests, suicides, and eventually, government intervention. In 2021, China made 996 illegal. The social cost had become too high. And now, in a twist almost too ironic to script, the United States is embracing the very culture China deemed untenable. The bigger question: What are we building , and at what cost? Work, at its best, is a vehicle for meaning, progress, and transformation. But when the engine is pushed too hard, too often, even the best machines break down. There is a huge fascination and allure to the narrative that genius only emerges through grind. Silicon Valley has long mythologised its titans, the Jobses, the Musks, the Zuckerbergs, as monks of obsession. But it is one thing to admire their intensity. It is another thing to institutionalise it. What happens when a whole generation mistakes exhaustion for excellence? When working through weekends isn't the exception but the expectation? The race for AI dominance is real. But the deeper race, the one that will shape our culture, our health, our future, is how we define the value of a human hour. If America is to lead the world in innovation, it must ask itself: Is it enough to work harder than China, or must we work smarter too? Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
New space race: Acting Nasa chief Duffy to announce plan for building nuclear reactor on moon this week- Here's what we know
US transportation secretary Sean Duffy is set to reveal accelerated plans for constructing a lunar nuclear reactor this week, marking his first significant initiative as Nasa 's interim administrator. According to documents reviewed by POLITICO, this announcement will establish a clearer timeline for the lunar reactor project, despite Nasa facing substantial budget reductions. This initiative demonstrates Duffy's intention to influence Nasa's policy direction, even as he faced criticism for managing dual roles. "It is about winning the second space race," said a Nasa senior official, granted anonymity to discuss the documents ahead of their wider release. Following a disagreement with Tesla CEO Elon Musk in July, President Donald Trump appointed Duffy after withdrawing billionaire Jared Isaacman's nomination. Duffy has also issued instructions to expedite the International Space Station's replacement. These decisions could enhance American progress towards lunar and Martian missions, objectives that China is also pursuing. These initiatives reflect the Trump administration's emphasis on human spaceflight. The White House's 2026 budget proposal increases funding for crewed missions whilst significantly reducing other programmes, including a nearly 50 per cent reduction in science mission funding. The reactor initiative requires Nasa to request industry proposals for a 100 kilowatt nuclear reactor, targeting a 2030 launch date, crucial for lunar astronaut missions. Previously, Nasa funded research for a 40 kilowatt lunar reactor, planning deployment in the early 2030s. The directive warns that the first nation to establish a reactor could "declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States," reflecting concerns about a China-Russia collaborative project. Nasa must appoint a project leader and gather industry feedback within 60 days. The 2030 launch target aligns with China's planned first lunar landing. Nasa maintains involvement in nuclear development despite the Pentagon's recent termination of a joint nuclear-powered rocket engine programme. "While the budget did not prioritise nuclear propulsion, that wasn't because nuclear propulsion is seen as a non-worthy technology," the Nasa official stated. The space station directive seeks to replace the current International Space Station with commercial alternatives through revised contract procedures. Nasa intends to award contracts to at least two companies within six months of the proposal request. The goal is to establish a new station by 2030, preventing China from being the sole operator of a crewed orbital station. Several companies, including Axiom Space, Vast, and Blue Origin, have shown interest. However, legislators have expressed worry about insufficient funding allocation speed.
